Usually, viral videos aren't exactly hot on the production end. You have your wonky camera work, following a guy who's shouting just loud enough to be heard over the nearby freeway, gusts of wind and neighborhood lawn mowers. It's pretty impressive when they manage the cute cuts and fades. Our Whiteboard Friday videos put most YouTube uploads to shame, and most of the professional videos you see online were made for TV and put in the Internet as an afterthought. Wetpaint, however, has deliberately filmed TV-quality content for the Web.
I remember being shocked at the low-quality television commercials when I moved to the U.S. in 2002. For some reason, the New Zealand television commercial market got very competitive in the late 90s and watching the ads was often more entertaining than watching the shows. This stunner of a commercial brought an antiquated swear word to the mouths of every Aussie and Kiwi. Our anti-drunk driving commercials (and other road safety ads) would be rated strictly NC-17. Air New Zealand always made really neat 30-second mini-movies for our entertainment. I came over here and was devastated at the ad quality. In the wake of fast-forwarding commercials, American ads are improving remarkably, but I still miss the delight of Kiwi commercials!
The need to be competitive and different is especially important online. When was the last time you took notice of Adsense, let alone clicked on it? I clicked on an Adsense ad this morning, but it was only to find out what "BUI" meant, in relation to "DUI" (FYI, it means "boating under the influence"). Anomalies like this aside, we've become accustomed to tuning out boring ads in the same way we don't watch the very tame All State car accidents (in comparison to the Kiwi ones - don't make me link to these little horror films). Wetpaint's campaign, while not totally original, is a smart move in that their videos are accessible to people who are already online and who may want to check out their site, and they are not paying for an expensive television slot where totally dis-interested people will gaze at the ad and wonder, "what's a wiki?"
This is the first time I've written about viral video because I have very little experience with it and it interests me a lot. I find Wetpaint's approach interesting, and I'm sure there is more to be made from the medium, given the desensitisation we have to all forms of advertising.
If you managed to make it to the end of this post without getting lost in the joys of YouTube, thanks for your stoic attention span. On the Linkbait panel that I'm taking part in at SMX London, Ciarán Norris will be presenting on the subject of video bait. I'll probably sit there in front of the crowd and shamelessly take notes along with everyone else.
I thought a "wiki" was a dyslexic Kiwi. :P
Would that not be a wiKi?
Hahaha. If Kiwi-bashing was a sport (oh wait, it is), you'd be a professional.
Jane,
Despite your admitted lack of experience with viral video, you presented a concise and informative post. So, thank you for that.
Although I find SEO extremely interesting, VEO and IEO (Video and Image Engine Optimization), present a potentially compelling value proposition. Not to mention EIEIO. Ok, sorry for that one.
Inasmuch as many websites fail to fully implement best practices SEO; image optimization and viral video campaigns are a great way to improve traffic, branding etc., for very little cost.
I've read one article from a webmaster that suggested his image searches consistently represented over 35% of his traffic. That's compelling.
In terms of video however, there's a catch 22. Full motion video and voice can burn a brand image into our head for better ("What, what, what, what?"), or worse ("Leave Britney Alone" and "Don't Tase Me Bro"), come to mind. BTW - the latter two have found their way into the annals of Urban Dictionary.
At the end of the day, perhaps just like everything else, it comes down to delivering valuable content - (i.e. Whiteboard Friday's).
On two final notes:
First, I have a brother that creates and directs commercials here in the States (Budweiser frogs, VW, etc). The commercials in his portfolio are hysterical, however the stiff, conservative US execs that approve what gets aired are the ones that make our commercials so damn boring. Somehow they beleive that Super Bowl Sunday is the only day they can run really funny, edgy stuff. Like they got a hall pass for the day. Gee, Monday after Super Bowl is the only day we talk about commercials. Hello...McFly! Will they ever get it?! Ok, sorry for the mini rant.
Second, I loved your link to the down under commercial. It gave me a great idea of how to use my Tundra and a length of rope to quiet down the 4.5lb Maltese puppy that's been keeping me up all night!
PS - In the event any PETA folks read this blog - I was just kidding about the puppy. (sort of)
Cheers.
Very interesting about your brother and his experience with U.S. television executives. There have been some stellar U.S. commercials; it's too bad that great content isn't allowed to air every day! As I said above, the commercial breaks were as much fun as the shows themselves and I'd be willing to bed that fewer New Zealanders than Americans fast-forward their commercial breaks.
I hadn't thought of the concept of video "burn(ing) a brand image into our head", but that's a good point! My favourite example of this would have to be the unfortunate Caitlin Upton and her botched response to a question during the Miss Teen USA Pageant. At least for a short time, "The Iraq", "everywhere like such as" and "U.S. Americans" were pretty popular phrases!
Re: My brother
He became so frustrated that he spent the better part of the last four years in the UK for no other reason than the fact that they are much more liberal in their tv advertisements. As to your point about NZ commercials vs US - I'm sure you are quite correct in that statement.
On another note, your reference to Caitlin Upton is a perfect example. If you saw this young lady speak on any given day - she's intelligent and articulate. So, in front of national TV, in one moment, she has a brain lapse and the rest, as they say - is history.
The girl will never live it down. The incident also spawned spin-off content such as the Miss Teen South Carolina Tubes Map, which only perpetuate her (in)fame(y).
I'm glad to hear that your brother is finding a more willing audience over her; whilst I don't base my (mild) patriotism on it as much as I do on our history of great music, our excellent ads are (almost) something to be proud of.
I have to say though that in our recent 7 Best Ads of 2007, several were from the US. The Berries & Cream & Skittles Touch are, IMO, both excellent examples of creative advertising, which were made to go viral.
"If you saw this young lady speak on any given day - she's intelligent and articulate"...mate I can't believe I'm reading this. She had a chance to be "intelligent and articulate" on the Today Show interview and she came across as even thicker - if that's possible. Have a look - Foot in Mouth again.
And on the subject of Viral Video - I've had nearly 5 Million views of my videos on YouTube alone but it doesn't really bring me much traffic. If there were some way of putting a hyperlink on a video that you could click on it might work. Like a 2D barcode. But generally the video viewers don't even bother to read the description alongside the video. And a lot of them seem to be part of the 40 Million functionally illiterate Americans out there.
That's interesting; some of the examples I have show that it does drive direct traffic & even sales...
Is your video the Foot in Mouth one you mention? If not do you want to share it, to see if the Moz community has any advice on why it might not be driving the traffic?
Huh? I have 290+ videos on YouTube. The least viewed is 18 Views, the most viewed has been seen 850,000 times.
Well, you must be doing something right to get so many people to watch your videos.
Why these eye balls are not turning into hits for your Website?
If your Youtube user id or nick is so hot, how about monetarizing of it?
I was wondering if you wanted to put links to some of the videos you mention so that people could look at them and make suggestions as to why the views aren't turning into visitors.
Have a look at this one with 550,000+ views - A Modern-Day Da Vinci Genius
Ahhh Kiwi ads. How could you not mention L&P's Stubbies? I have no idea why I know this. I'm from Oregon. I guess I'm just cultured.
Jane, I find it useful to work videos as an extension of link baiting.
So even if your video is not up to par, but you put an interesting title on the link to your video, you will get some results.
So, I posted my video link on a travel forum with a title, Life in Japan.
But if I would have covinience store in Japan, or just the YouTube url, I would not get any hits to it, but in 3 or 4 days, I got 70 hits to the video.
So i think taking viral videos and integrating them as a tool with other SEO tools we have is the way to go.
Please update us on viral videos as you learn more about them and how to use them.
Legend says this land was hauled from the ocean like a giant fish...
And then it waited...
Kiwi and Aussie ads are awesome, because there is only one mainstream TV network to advertise on rather than fragmented regional networks like in the US. That means only companies with a decent sized budget can afford TV spots.
Aw, I wanna go home now :\
One mainstream TV network??? Last time I looked there were three main commercial stations - Seven, Nine and Ten plus two non-commercial - SBS and the ABC.
It amazes me that when I left New Zealand, we had only four mainstream TV stations. Channels One, Two, Three and Four. No kidding. I remember when TV 3 first aired. It was a big day.
There are more now, but as recently as 2002, these four gems were the only stations 90% of the population watched.
We recently did a simple testimonial for a cosmetic surgery client. I couldn't believe how many people linked to the channel just because of a little cleavage. It was fairly unintentional but I can imagine that if we got 9,572 views in two months without trying, a good solid effort is probably well worth the money of producing a video. You can do a really good job with a professional filming company for a few thousand dollars. But a lot of this stuff can be done in-house for next to nothing. Either way, it's worth the money compared to the cost of a TV spot.
Great post as usual Jane. Something to think about doing for the future and a relatively untapped opportunity at the moment.
So Jane, how much the whole campaign costed them ? How to measure success of such campaigns ?
An exact replica of Apple's commercial. Even the background music. I see it, I think Apple not WetWiki or PaintWiki or . . . j/k
I did check out WetPaint.com though and . . . I like it. I may use it to integrate some more usability into the LyricVault.com site I started a couple of years ago.
Great post! Bad commercial.
My post was less about the quality of the commercial's content and more about the idea to create television-style commercials purely for the web. There have been many instances of people copying Apple's commercials lately so, as I said in the post, that wasn't particularly original. However, their points about their system are valid.
Jane, nice topic...you going for exploretary stuff, and it is good to see the bravery on your side.
I do agree with viral video and the potency of it.
The Wetpaint video almost made me puke...but I guess they will get better it...
I tried one myself and I totally sucked at it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiuWo5C6zIY
This one is about IPhone and it was an excelent viral video
https://www.geekentertainment.tv/2007/07/18/dontcha-wish-your-cell-phone-was-hot-like-me/
I did not do this one, wish I did...:)
So, me think we have a lot to learn about how to make a viral video, but it is definetly something to go at, so I guess Wetpaint point is getting accross...
Viral video definitely has a ways to go until it's as strong as it could be: this is one of the reasons I'm excited about Ciaran's presentation in London - we need to learn more about the potential of video :)
Jane, check out this Russian music video. It is a bit weird, so hope you not shy.
But it is an excelent case study of a viral market video.
Keep an eye for MTV subliminal link bait as it flashes for a millisecond for the first time...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBe-AUAujYk
While on the topic of video.. How do you guys get the white board vidoes so good? I've tried everything and my videos when I upload them look terrible.
Scott's in charge of these... he has a collection of rather impressive studio lights that improve the quality of the film somewhat, although I'll let him give you the details about how he does the filming...
I use the following compression settings when rendering video for upload:
Audio: 64 Kbps, 44,100 Hz, 16 Bit, Stereo.Video: 30 fps, 320x240, WMV V9 Compression.
Decent lighting really helps, too. For editing, I use Sony Vegas Platinum.
Thanks! I'll give those a try!
Nice post Jane,
We are watching the effects of a youtube video at the moment. One of my oldest friends runs a quirky, independent record label called the leaf label and the video for Efterklang - one of his acts - got chosen as a featured video last week. You can take a look here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSKIl-NeZeE
As you can see, we're looking at half a million hits in about ten days - not bad for an independent, although the video of a rubix cube being solved next to it got about 2 million views in the same time period.
I'll see if I can track down some figures for visitors to the Efterclang website on the back of this.
Here's a great case study from a presentation done at MarketingSherpa, on creating a viral campaign.
Wetpaint is certainly interesting.
Jane - thanks for sharing this with us.
Jane, we been schooled about Viral Video