Marketers of all stripes are hearing more about providing unique content and value to their audiences, and how that's what Google wants to show searchers. Unique content is straightforward enough, but what exactly does everyone mean by "unique value?" What does that actually look like? In today's Whiteboard Friday, Rand illustrates the answer.
For reference, here's a still of this week's whiteboard!
Video transcription
Howdy, Moz fans, and welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. This week we're going to chat a little about providing unique value in your content. Now I've been known to talk a lot about what you need to do to get to the kind of uniqueness in content that Google wants to index, that searchers want to find, that is likely to earn you amplification and links and all the signals that you'll need to perform well in the rankings, and to perform well on social media and in content marketing of all kinds.
The challenge has been that I've seen a lot of people adopt this attitude around, yes, unique content, unique value, but merge those two and not view them as two different things and really not understand what I mean when I say unique value at all, and it's not just me. A lot of the content marketing and SEO industries are talking about the need for unique value, and they may say other words to describe that. But unfortunately, as an industry, we've not yet coalesced around what that idea means, and so this Whiteboard Friday is to try and explain exactly what a lot of these best practices and experts are talking about when they say "unique value."
Modern criteria for content
So let's start by talking about our modern criteria for content, and I have a slide that I like to show a lot that kind of displays this, and many other folks in the field have as well. So if I'm going to be producing content, I need to meet these five criteria.
One of a kind
One of a kind is basically what we meant when we said old unique content, meaning that the engines have never seen those words and phrases and numbers and visuals and whatever in that order on a page on the web previously. It's been written for the first time, produced and published for the first time. Therefore, it is one of a kind, doesn't appear elsewhere.
Relevant
Relevant meaning it contains content that both searchers and engines interpret as on topic to that searcher's query or their intent. Sometimes you can be on topic to the query, meaning you've used the words and the phrases that the searcher used, and not be on topic to their intent. What did they actually want to get out of the search? What question are they trying to answer? What information are you trying to get?
Helpful
This one's pretty obvious. You should resolve the searcher's query in a useful, efficient manner. That should be a page that does the job that they're hoping that that content is going to do.
Uniquely valuable
This is the one we're going to be talking about today, and what we mean here is provides information that's unavailable or hard to get elsewhere -- I'm going to dive into that a little bit more --
Great user experience
This means it's easy and pleasurable to consume anywhere on any device.
You meet these criteria with your content and you've really got something when it comes to a content marketing strategy or when it comes to content you're producing for SEO. This is a pretty solid checklist that I think you can rely on.
Unique value and you (and your website)
The challenge is this one. Uniquely valuable has been a really hard concept for people to wrap their heads around, and so let's dig in a little more on what we mean when we say "unique value."
So these are kind of the three common criteria that we mean when we say "unique value," and I'm actually going to show some examples as well.
1) Massive upgrade in aggregation, accessibility and design
The first one is a massive upgrade versus what's already available on the web in aggregation, accessibility, and/or design. Meaning you should have someone who views that content say, "Wow. You know, I've seen this material presented before, but never presented so well, never so understandable and accessible. I really like this resource because of how well aggregated, how accessible, how well designed this resource is."
Good examples, there's a blog post from the website Wait But Why on the Fermi Paradox, which is sort of a scientific astrophysics, "why are we alone in the universe" paradox concept, and they do a brilliant job of visualizing and explaining the paradox and all of the potential scenarios behind it. It's so much fun to read. It's so enjoyable. I've read about the Fermi Paradox many times and never been as entranced as I was as when I read this piece from Wait But Why. It really was that experience that says, "Wow, I've seen this before, but never like this."
Another great site that does pure aggregation, but they provide incredible value is actually a search engine, a visual search engine that I love called Niice.co. Not particularly easy to spell, but you do searches for things like letter press or for emotional ideas, like anger, and you just find phenomenal visual content. It's an aggregation of a bunch of different websites that show design and visual content in a search interface that's accessible, that shows all the images in there, and you can scroll through them and it's very nicely collected. It's aggregated in the best way I've ever seen that information aggregated, therefore, providing unique value. Unfortunately, since it's a search engine, it's not actually going to be indexed by Google, but still tremendously good content marketing.
2) Information that is available nowhere else
Number two is information that's available nowhere else. When I say "information," I don't mean content. I don't mean words and phrases. I don't mean it's one-of-a-kind in that if I were to go copy and paste a sentence fragment or a paragraph and plug it into Google, that I wouldn't find that sentence or that paragraph elsewhere. I mean unique information, information that, even if it were written about thousands of different ways, I couldn't find it anywhere else on the web. You want your visitor to have experience of, "Wow, without this site I never would have found the answers I sought." It's not that, "Oh, this sentence is unique to all the other sentences that have been written about this topic." It's, "Ah-ha this information was never available until now."
Some of my favorite examples of that -- Walk Score. Walk Score is a site that took data that was out there and they basically put it together into a scoring function. So they said, "Hey, in this ocean beach neighborhood in San Diego, there are this many bars and restaurants, grocery stores, banks, pharmacies. The walkability of that neighborhood, therefore, based on the businesses and on the sidewalks and on the traffic and all these other things, the Walk Score out of 100 is therefore 74." I don't know what it actually is. Then you can compare and contrast that to, say, the Hillcrest neighborhood in San Diego, where the Walk Score is 88 because it has a far greater density of all those things that people, who are looking for walkability of neighborhoods, are seeking. If you're moving somewhere or you're considering staying somewhere downtown, in area to visit for vacation, this is amazing. What an incredible resource, and because of that Walk Score has become hugely popular and is part of many, many real estate websites and visitor and tourism focused websites and all that kind of stuff.
Another good example, blog posts that provide information that was previously unavailable anywhere else. In our industry I actually really like this example from Conductor. Conductor, as you might know, is an enterprise SEO software company, and they put together a phenomenal blog post comparing which portions of direct traffic are almost certainly actually organic, and they collected a bunch of anonymized data from their platform and assembled that so that we could all see, "Oh, yeah, look at that. Sixty percent of what's getting counted as direct in a lot of these websites, at least on average, is probably coming from organic search or dark social and those kinds of things, and that credit should go to the marketers who acquire that traffic." Fascinating stuff. Unique information, couldn't find that elsewhere.
3) Content presented with a massively differentiated voice or style
The third and final one that I'll talk about is content that's presented with a massively differentiated voice or style. So this is not necessarily you've aggregated information that was previously unavailable or you've made it more accessible or you've designed it in a way to make it remarkable. It's not necessarily information available nowhere else. It's really more about the writer or the artist behind the content creation, and content creators, the great ones, have some artistry to their work. You're trying to create in your visitors this impression of like, "I've seen stuff about this before, but never in a way that emotionally resonated with me like this does." Think about the experience that you have of reading a phenomenal book about a topic versus just reading the Wikipedia entry. The information might be the same, but there are miles of difference in the artistry behind it and the emotional resonance it can create.
In the content marketing world, I really like a lot of stuff that Beardbrand does. Eric from Beardbrand just puts together these great videos. He has this gigantic beard. I feel like I've really captured him here actually. Eric, tell me what you think of this portrait? You're free to use it as your Twitter background, if you'd like. Eric's videos are not just useful. They do contain useful information and stuff that sometimes is hard to find elsewhere, but they have a style to them, a personality to them that I just love.
Likewise, for many of you, you're watching Whiteboard Friday or consuming content from us that you likely could find many other places. Unlike when Moz started, there are many, many great blogs and resources on SEO and inbound marketing and social media marketing, and all these things, but Moz often has a great voice, a great style, at least one that resonates with me, that I love.
Another example, one from my personal life, my wife's blog -- the Everywhereist. There are lots of places you can read, for example, a history of Ireland. But when Geraldine wrote about her not-so-brief history of Ireland, it had a very different kind of emotional resonance for many other people who read and consumed that and, as a result, earned lots of nice traffic and shares and links and all of these kinds of things.
This, one of these three, is what you're aiming for with uniquely valuable, and there are likely some others that fit into these or maybe that cross over between them. But if you're making content for the web and you're trying to figure out how can I be uniquely valuable, see what it is that you're fitting into, which of these themes, hopefully maybe even some combination of them, and is that defensible enough to make you differentiated from your competition, from what else is in the search results, and does it give you the potential to have truly remarkable content and SEO going forward. If not, I'm not sure that it's worth the investment. There's no prize in content for hitting Publish. No prize for hitting Publish. The only prize comes when you produce something that meets these criteria and thus achieves the reach and the marketing goals that you're seeking.
All right, everyone, we'll see you again next week for another edition of Whiteboard Friday. Take care.
Not that I disagree with the content of the blog at all (I am 100% on board for great content) - but if this is truly what Google wants how is Buzzfeed able to just grab content from around the web pop it into a list, with little to no editorial, and achieve such great rankings?
Buzzfeed has tapped into some powerful psychology about the consumers of content - they know what triggers engagement, links, social sharing, and those things all correlate with the kinds of signals that help them earn rankings. Their content is unique and the value it provides is, too, even if some of us don't like it (myself included, I rarely visit the site).
Do you think unique value content can compete with that? or does the value of knowing your customers outstrip anything you can produce?
I think you raised an interesting issue here, which is common to all "content" independently of the medium used to present it. In fact, what you just wrote about Buzzfeed could be told almost 1:1 for certain kind of TV Shows or literature or movie genres.
My thought - also based on 10+ years working in the TV industry, where this topic was discussed almost daily - we should try to not confuse "Value" with "Quality".
Obviously, quality and value usually go hand in hand, but what quality means for us maybe is not what it means for others.
So, IMHO, value should be unlinked from "quality", and thought somehow subjectively (aka: under the filter of the targeted audience).
In other words, a content is valuable as much as it perfectly answers to the needs (information, entertainment et al) the audience that content targets has.
That's why, when auditing or simply analyzing the "value" of some site's content, we should be able to "forget" our scale of values and concentrate on how the content is responsive to the audience needs. For instance, using Buzzfeed again, we can see that the purpose of Buzzfeed is offering easy and fastly readable/viewable content that appeals to most basic sentiments and curiosity of the average Internet user. In other terms, Buzzfeed is an hiper-sofistication of the free newpapers people read during commuting for work.
If you look at Buzzfeed's content under that "mission", you will be able to understand why Buzzfeed is Buzzfeed:
Is Buzzfeed content "quality content"? 99% of the time not.
Is Buzzfeed content valuable for its audience? 99% of the time yes, because it answer to the need to feed primary feelings and innate curiosity of the average people... and to spend time.
Your question, then, hides another deeper one:
Should we just "respond" to the audience tastes, psychology, needs in order to target it?
The answers usually enter in ethics:
Which one to use? Depends, as always, but - personally - I would always see if there is the opportunity to go following the second path, because it is what can give you a competitive advantage and a unique and very recognizible voice, but I can understand why others may choose the first path, even if I'd consider the risk, for instance, of being just another "Buzzfeed".
That is a fantastic post Gianluca, completely changed my perspective on content - thanks for taking the time to put together such a detailed post
wow - thanks for that Gianluca Fiorelli.
Never thought much deeper about the difference between "Value" and "Quality"...
comment from Gianluca Fiorelli is equally matched with the quality of the main article, great comment!
"extreme importance given to social media ... because Social Media is the place in the Internet where 'emotions' are dominant"
That revelation has genuinely never dawned on me before! Thank you :)
Just wanted to make a point about Buzzfeed -- as much as I've also hated their click-bait content, they seem to be getting better and are moving towards quality journalism. They've announced a fellowship for journalists of color. (Erica, I think you'll like that!)
Two examples: This award-winning report on U.S. foreign policy, and this nice feature on "Empire Records" that anyone who, like me, was a teenager in the 1990s will like.
I cannot back this up, but my hunch is that the flood of content in recent years is causing people to push back -- so, we'll hopefully start to see a focus on quality over quantity in terms of content.
Edit: I read just now that Upworthy also seems to be going into journalism. Maybe the Internet didn't really kill journalism -- it saved it!
Interesting how most sites that produce click-bait content now invest time and money in creating something entirely different too. Seen this trend a couple of times already. I guess they are trying to target other audiences as well.
Tin Foil Hat disclaimer.
Consider also how the very recent change in the Facebook algorithm is going to hit overly click-baity titles, therefore Buzzfeed and Upwhorty need to start differentiating the kind of content they produce and propose to their audience and... maybe, they should start thinking at starting earning more and better traffic through Google (especially News).
Richard, if you want to learn more about how Buzzfeed is successful, their founder and CEO -- who was also a co-founder of The Huffington Post -- gave the keynote at SMX East last year. I couldn't find any video or deck, but this coverage at Search Engine Land and Bruce Clay might interest you!
Hi Samuel
Thanks for the links always interesting to hear from the guys at the top what they are/were thinking or aiming for.
Don't get me wrong here Samuel I know that Buzzfeed targets a specific audience and does a very good job of providing relevant content for their users, what they are doing is a perfect example of knowing your audience and, as a result, they are successful
No worries, and my pleasure! Glad to help.
Helpful insights as always. I just thought I'd share this tool from Ross Hudgens' team at Siege Media - it can be very helpful for planning and thinking through these things in a systematic process.
Amazing checklist! Thanks for sharing it.
You bet - credit to Ross and the Siege team!
Long but it helpful. Thnaks for sharing
Hi Rand, your post is really eye-opening. as usual but I am still trying to determine if I got more value from the post itself or the comments on the post. There is such a wealth of information in both!
Great stuff once again Rand.
When we started building one of our brands back in 2007 many of the campsites we promoted did not have a website of their own. We gathered the information and promoted it for them and we combined campsites from different umbrella organizations and gathered all this information in one place.
Nowadays almost all of the campsites have their own website but our brand has become so known in the industry that we still provide good content only not as unique as it always has been but with our own voice to it. I think, as a supplement to your video, this is also very important. Without your own voice to a piece of content or information there is no need to publish it since it is likely to already be there.
For commerce websites to deliver unique value is even more important and yet maybe even more difficult since to available information is also used by your competitors. I know you did a video about this some time ago and that one also opened my eyes on the subject. Using the information available, combining this with your own content, images with different descriptions in a unique lay-out for that combination might just by the voice you can put to the content. Still I do believe that it is more difficult for commerce sites to provide unique value and content opposed to informational websites.
Love to read your view on this.
regards
Jarno
i totally agreed with the blog. its all about providing something new everyday to your audience. this blog will help all the writers to enhance their writing skills.
As some other commenters have mentioned, it's about understanding what your audience perceives as "value". Using the Buzzfeed example, to some- there isn't any value there but to others (obviously), it's exactly what they're looking for when they have a few quick minutes during the day to read something funny or entertaining.
Great wbf on having unique value. The popular Field of Dreams quote comes to mind. "If you build it they will come." One unique article won't keep people coming back but we have to build lots of unique content. As Rand states that Moz may have the same information that you have read somewhere else but they have a unique style and all businesses need to find that. Moz created the "Whiteboard Friday" and rank #1 for it. There are niches to be had.
While I agree with most of your comment, I would also suggest that people not forget the (I think it's called) 90/10 Rule -- 90% of the effort should be put into publicizing and promoting the content. The most unique and valuable piece of content will achieve nothing if it's just put on a website and nothing else is done with it.
Nice watch :) And Great, GREEEAT WBF!
Niice.co is very cool!
Their "404" result is also very clever with a nice animated pacepalm gif
I want to ask Rand one question, citing other resources from a blog is good, bad or okay? Refer another resources helps to put a point in complete while at the same time readers get annoyed if there are many. Some balancing needed but how? Can you tell us implications from ranking perceptive and readability also?
I think referring to other resources can be a great way to provide unique value. In some senses, that's what content curation is all about. So long as those links/references are of value to your audience, the search engines will perceive them positively.
Spot on Rand :-)
The best content curation, in fact, is not simply aggregation, but it should respond to an editorial guidelines and, ultimately, answering to the site's mission.
In other terms, curation is offering value of showing things under a new perspective thanks to aggregation, distillation and the other characteristics of content curation.
That's why sites that presents some others content with a very well done curation are not hit by Google (albeit they should also own an almost perfect technical SEO set up). One example is Techmeme.
Listened to Marshall Simmonds and Rand talking about the bow tie model in a whiteboard Friday 5 years ago...
"we want to be in the middle, where we are receiving links from other sites, but pointing out to other relevant places as well."
The New York Times used this strategy for creating topic pages back then. Lot of it should still be relevant even today. Makes sense- if you are a valuable resource on the topic, there is much logic in pointing out to other valuable places on the net. Or as Marshall said- you cannot be everything to everyone.
Lots of interesting stuff in the video- like for instance link journalism (useful when you are having a publishing powerhouse)... Here is the link
https://moz.com/blog/whiteboard-friday-optimizing-t...
Many thanks to all three!
Yes Slavko, it is not possible to get only, we need to give something also. That is the way how trade goes on.
Shame the best line comes right at the end of this wbf:
"There's no prize in content for hitting Publish"
This is exactly what I at least try to consider when drafting a new content strategy or post - it can save so much time that would have otherwise been wasted scribbling away.
Thanks - relevant and highly useful post as ever :-)
I completely agree with this and it is certainly a path to a richer online experience for us all. The major change (which has already happened) is that in order to create this type of content we have a requirement for various different skill bases (research, design, analysis, technical, copy etc etc) Finding one person with all that is not easy but it certainly promotes teamwork which I love. The slight drawback is that it can be expensive or at least seem expensive to the smaller businesses/organisations out there. It is certainly a difficult job to justify the costs when people don't understand the value and they have been used to people selling quick fix SEO (we all know what that is/was)
All in all this is the right way to do it but it moves the SEO game up a notch and I have seen smaller budgets suffer because to them it seems like we are asking them to take a leap of faith and they are less eager to commit. I do wonder if it will start to alienate certain groups.
Uniquely valuable is not easy but it is challenge with rewards all round (fun and gets results).
That's why the best brands are fastly becoming real publishers...
If by 'real' publishers you mean folks that publish content based around the data feedback and making considered, creative decisions polished off with great UX then yep I agree. There can still be the temptation to Publish, Publish, Publish hoping that you hit a home run but we shouldn't confuse activity with productivity.
No, I was meaning "real" publishers, with departments dedicated only in producing creative content, or investing in external providers.
I get ya....where do you think that leaves the smaller players in the market. The SERPs have always seemed to give them a chance but as, I think, we agree the investments needed these days can be significant. Is that prohibitive and should they start looking to alternative areas for their ROI?
Even the big players are going to get to the point where creating content doesn't give them the ROI. There's just so much of it out there! When I started out with this strategy content worked quickly, it brought rankings and results in weeks and months, because everyone is producing content I reckon a newbie has to be thinking in months and years before they see the real benefit of content - and many of them won't be able to wait that long.
I agree Simon. I read a post somewhere about SEO getting harder. I would hate to think that it ends up like other medium were it is only accessible to the big boys.
How we deal with content mush is the next challenge which you are identifying.
Good point
TL;DR - https://www.pinterest.com/pin/85709199134598242/
"Stop selling, start helping" Zig Ziglar
And this is one of greatest way to achieve success in business. Just like Moz TAGFEE.
I must say, you yourself have that great personality which entices the reader to stick to your posts, Rand. Along with providing unique content you also provide these great videos in your own unique style of presentation. I became your Fan.Love the way you bid "Bye". :-)
Thanks a ton for sharing your invaluable insights with us.
Best Regards
Anshul Sukhwal
Not only is there unique content, there's unique presentation. Great WBF!
Very interesting article. Comments are also instructive especially that of Gianluca.
The Best example of "Unique Value" is your video I think. :)
Your Presentation, Style and Information is really really unique and much Helpful. And I believe it also touch everyone's Feelings and Emotion like mine as well.
Thanks a lot for such a great tutorial.
Thanks Rand, Trying to explain this to my content writer was difficult but you made this nice and simple. Just got some great feedback from her :)
Haha you really love Niice.co Rand. It's not the first time you've plugged them. :)
>>is probably coming from organic search or dark social and those kinds of things, and that credit should go to the marketers who acquire that traffic.
What does it mean 'dark social' ? It's like black hat seo methods or something else? :)
Dark social is traffic/visits that come from social networks (Facebook, Twitter, Google+, etc), but don't contain a referrer string (many mobile/tablet apps and some web social referrals work this way), thus show in referrer sources in analytics as "direct/type-in."
wow, that was fast :)
Thanks a lot for explanation, Rand!
Hi Rand,
Nice post it is. You describe it very well. I read whole the post and got one conclusion that, if you have valuable content which produce some unique thoughts, then you can definitely win the race. For e.g If you write something new topic on SEO trend which has not been written elsewhere, then you can surely get highlight from the readers and there is 100% chance that, you will get more social signals and engagement.
Nice Post , it looks like search engines are trying to find a way to enter in to the human brain. When you say one of its kind means engines have never seen the words and phrases on page before. There are dictionaries and encyclopedia uploaded in text format, So how could not be an engine crawled that words or phrases before?
Motivated to create more content based on journalistic approaches.
Hi Rand.
I just came across your great blog and I wanted to ask you something. Is scrapebox a good tool for long tail keyword research in 2016?
Thanks,
Julio
Awesome WBF rand. I had a question as many says (you also) that it will be better to share information available nowhere else but what about involving many other surveys and examples of others in a post. Is this will also have any kind of SEO effect?
Really great stuff Rand! I'm speed-reading through your whiteboard-friday sessions at the moment.
Great insights!
Great Post, gives a lot of insights on creating quality content! Thanks Rand
I have a question i want to start content marketing for my website but there is a problem my website is similar to E-Commerce type. How do i do that? We provide hotel rooms to the customer.
Can any one help me on this?
Thanks
People often concentrate on uniqueness but this is clearly not enough on it's own. I find that allowing personality to come through can sometimes be good; it can help in this area as well as increasing appeal but you clearly have to pitch it just right otherwise it can come across as inappropriate. Humour can clearly add value but needs to be used very carefully so as not to be misleading, misunderstood or inadvertently offensive.
I have been using humour on my company Twitter feed and have been pushing the boundaries a bit with regards to acceptability but have had a wholly positive response, which pleasantly surprised me. The engagement has dramatically increased and I have had many people come up to me in person and comment on it positively, which is great as it can be very difficult to engage people with a functional product. I am still waiting for a complaint though!
I agree totally Toby, your personality coming through in your content is always good. I actually believe that this also helps you in creating content. And yes humour is always good, who wants to read boring long articles.
Rand.. i agree with 3 point and I wait for every friday whiteboard presented by You.
Thanks Again Rand.
Nice Topic Rand. Importance of good quality content has been increased these days. Points are helpful for making content marketing strategy.
Any tips for how the average blogger can hit the "massive upgrade in aggregation, accessibility and design" point? It seems like bloggers are forced into the "differentiated voice or style" way of creating unique value just because its easier to do without having a big budget. But are there unique ways to present information that an average blogger can take advantage of?
Rand you know, you really make these things look so easy. I just started following your videos and blog posts. But so far, these videos and posts have been nothing but Awesome and Insightful.
Thanks so much!
That's some bad hat, Rand.
And the grand prize is creating content that you can't get anywhere else that is easily understandable and in a unique, entertaining voice. As elusive as Bigfoot?
I don't often find myself writing content that is unavailable elsewhere on the web; it's good to hear that the other two criteria can also add great value to content. Thanks Rand!
Hi Rand, Great White Board Friday topic. This definitely changes my thinking of providing "Unique Value" through content. I learned a ton. I will definitely integrate some of these checklists to boost my content creation value going forward. Thanks for sharing!
Great White Board Friday as always Rand! I think that we sometimes get stuck in a rut of produce, produce, produce and forget why we should be slowing down and taking the time to make sure we really understand what we're trying to accomplish with the content we're creating. We're probably all guilty of forgetting "There's no prize in content for hitting Publish." I'm going to have to keep that in mind!
I like the example of Walk Score v/s Hillcrest neighborhood in San Diego for better understanding through marketing percentage.
Great WBF as usual, Rand, I'd love to see you do one sometime where you're sat at a computer and taking us through stuff - maybe not a WBF but similar.
I know I've been watching a lot of Rand Fishkin recently when I see familiar examples used in the presentation :)
Great WBF. Been wondering about one thing though- if content meets these criteria and still fails to attract attention, who is there to "blame"? Do these criteria suddenly become subjective then? What are the metrics used to define value? -engagement would be one I suppose.
Produced something I myself find very interesting and in line with these criteria. Tried to reach people, though nothing happened. How can I tag my content as one that provides value- wouldn't that be purely subjective now?
Great WBF I wanted to let you guys at Moz know you're having a display problem -
https://imgur.com/ovgPC34
I'm on FireFox.
Thanks Chris - I think that's just the post missing an intro! I'll fix it up.
Hi Rand,
I have a question i want to start content marketing for my website but there is a problem my website is similar to E-Commerce type. How do i do that? We provide hotel rooms to the customer.
Can you help me?
Thanks
Helps shore up the gaps as some of us wonder where to truly put our efforts in being unique, Rand. Being in real estate there are many ways to draw the consumer in but getting them to stay and come back because you are the trusted source with the right voice is always the challenge...this WBF does speak to me!
I think some of the unique value you are talking about are the values of some of the sites entirely which itself is somehow unique. Where it gets a little tough is when you are providing few generic services and what ever you think that add valuable for your customers is already generated somewhere.
I think a business also needs to think how unique they are what values they can provide. Produce and drive that content, which matches up for its own audience. It also gives people who like reading different be attracted not only the ones who are seeking that type of content.
Thanks for this I like the checklist.
Rand's WBF's are just one of the things I look forward to from Moz. This place is my #1 resource, and I love that it calways comes with some personality and humor. Inbound marketing is fun if you make it that way. Thanks for always keeping it light-hearted and entertaining!
Hi, nice discussion here, I am looking a way to display moz rank on my page content. Thanks for any infomation
I think this is exactly what the founders of Google want. To make the world a richer and better place by pushing unique and valuable content up the search results so people can be inspired or educated. I think this is the perfect approach. What do the Google founders want? What are their goals / ambitions? And how can I help them? How can I provide that?
"Great post with good comments = Boost up knowledge". Thanks for sharing this.
I agree with a lot of what's been said, however I'm wondering then how this applies to businesses that really don't have a lot that's unique about them. A plumber for example is a plumber and there are probably 20 - 30 of them in a 20km radius. How would you then create unique value for a business that's so common and rarely would have anything unique about them?
That's a nice article but restricted only to few themes of websites. Say the electronics website, all of those, sell the same kind of products, they cam just make a difference in the presentation and thus the third factor should be implied here only.
But again, there can be lots of scope if you are showing up the product with video presentations, tutorials, performance stats...
Mind boggling would be obviously needed to make a difference and the one that actually has a positive impact but most of times, you might be failed of over exciting strategies..
Lovely summary there sir. We always try and insert a healthy degree of emotional resonance into all of our content (although scaled depending on the industry and appropriateness), it really works well, it fosters engagement wonderfully. Write as a person not as an organisation has been our guideline for a while now (although it could be phrased in a more snappy manner). Which is not to detriment the other two points which are equally important but we have to accept that there are times when a client's topics or industry may lack the depth to put across truly one of a kind information.
Good post/video. I like the point "Information that is available nowhere else" most. But, if we are talking about SEO industry, I usually see people write on the same topics by just rewording other's ideas and repeats same content again and again.
Thanks Gianluca for provides me very helpful information.
Really its very helpful for me.
Thanks
Great video but "Simple is better" :)
I think there are concepts that could join.
Totally agree with the delivery of unique value in content, It is all about bringing in something new in your blog that can compete and beat others talking about the same stuff
Thanks for the post from Content Marketing World That`s is some thing very useful .... !!!