I've been connecting with a lot of site owners who are re-entering or ramping up their efforts in the blogosphere. I suspect this has something to do with the focus on content creation + linkbait in the SEO world's dialogue as well as the potential new traffic streams bloggers are feeling from the surge of linking via Twitter. Whatever the case, there's a few critical pieces that can help make for greater SEO value from blogging and feeds in general (and most of these haven't been covered in my previous posts on blog optimization).
#1 - Control Your Own Feed
It's hard to write something better than Danny Sullivan's terrific piece on Staying Master of Your Feed Domain. The concept is that you can utilize services like Feedburner, but you want those feed URLs to originate from your domain (so you keep the link juice you're earning):
To make this work, you need your hosting provider to create a CNAME entry for a new subdomain you’ll create. If they can’t do that easily for you, find a new hosting provider. I highly recommend ours, Tiger Technologies. Cheap, easy for you to do this yourself, plus Digg-tested.
For me, I simply make a subdomain called feeds for any domain I’m dealing with. Since searchengineland.com is our main domain, our feed domain is feeds.searchengineland.com.
Once I’ve created this, the MyBrand magic lets FeedBurner take control of where the domain points to. That let’s me turn the FeedBurner feed address for us into https://feeds.searchengineland.com/searchengineland.
But wait — I thought it was about keeping control? Relax. I’m giving them control because I want to. If they went all evil, I’d just change the CNAME record and point that subdomain to wherever I want. I own the domain. I control where it ultimately points to.
Sadly, SEOmoz doesn't do this, and it's a pain to switch (though at some point, it may be worth that trouble). If you're new to feed publishing or are early in the game, it makes a lot of sense to move now, before it becomes more painful.
#2 - Get Your Feed Listed Across the Web
There are some great directory lists like this one from TopRank Blog and this one from Ari Paparo. However, my advice here would be to go after not just the generic lists, but the more specific feed lists, aggregators, portals and yes, other blogs & news sites that can put your posts in front of an audience that's passionate about your topic.
In the technology field, for example, places like Alltop, Techmeme, PopURLs, even the NYTimes technology page list feeds from a variety of sources. Those are amazing links and incredible sources of traffic, too (Alltop recently entered SEOmoz's top 30 referring domains for traffic to the site). If you're committed to getting the most out of your feed, you need to identify the portals in your niche that command share, traffic and page views, make a feed worthy of being posted and get their attention. Emails are surprisingly effective, but nothing beats an in-person conversation.
#3 - Use Absolute URLs in Your Feed
Scrapers, both good and bad, are going to scoop up your feed and re-publish it, including the links. If you use absolute URLs in your markup (e.g. https://moz.com/blog/rand-loves-the-nfl) rather than relative URLs (e.g. /rand-loves-the-nfl) your chances of getting link equity and PageRank back from those who re-publish goes up significantly. Note that this is a general disagreement with JohnMu (who posted on this topic last year, though not specifically as it relates to feeds).
#4 - Record Feed CTR & Links You Earn as "Conversions"
Through feed tracking, you can determine the posts that received the greatest/fewest clickthroughs. You can also use your web analytics or tools like Linkscape, Yahoo!, Technorati or Blogscape's SMM Prototype to see how many links each post has earned (Backtweets is another good one if you want to record tweets). Treat those links andd clicks like a conversion - write more posts like the ones that have success and shy away from the posts that don't earn much love/attention. Great bloggers don't start out great (I certainly didn't). They learn over time what's successful and effective and get consistently on that track.
#5 - Full Text Feeds are Generally Better for SEO
The argument over partial text vs. full text tends to be about earning the clicks and interactions on your site (full text means people can read off-site and may never click through, while partial text really annoys some subscribers), but from a raw SEO perspective, full text has a few benefits.
- All things being equal, you tend to get more subscribers with full text than partial, which boosts your numbers, gives you wider distribution and increases the liklihood you'll earn a link from those readers.
- Full text feeds get re-published in full, and that means links further down in the content potentially pass value back to you.
- Blog and feed lists are sometimes picky about partial feeds, and may opt not to include your site.
- Potential distribution partners like full text, because it gives them the opportunity to keep the visitor on their site (but if these deals get done, they almost always mean link juice back to you).
Obviously, business goals may overrule this recommendation, but it's wise to be aware of the possible impact.
Since it's a short list, I'd love if anyone in the comments can link to posts or recommendations (yes, even if it's your own stuff!) that can also be helpful on this subject.
man i had the cname redirect setup for my feedburner feeds and i want using it... doh! thanks for the reminder its fixed now
and i have a question... what about the link that feedburner rewrites (like this https://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CameroidPics/~3/xbXWobzFFAU/1DJ8Q-A1) would it be better to turn off click tracking so you get the original url with scrapers and such or are the redirects done correctly so they pass juice ? thanks for your help!
Yeah, I would also like to know a bit more about this, as I am new to feeds and wanted to use absolute URLs like mentioned in the post.
Great post btw.
Good advice Rand Thanks.
So from your prospective, how often should you be feeding the beast? Once a day? week? Best case?
Depends on your goals, but my feeling is actually that quality is usually better than quantity. IMO a blog/feed with only 2 posts a week that is always amazingly good is going to far exceed a blog that posts daily with average or subpar material.
As always good tips, I have though a questions. I am aware the benefitis of feeds for blogs and news sites, but can an e-commerce site use feeds to get SEO benefits?
great article, tks....
Good basic level post. I only disagree with the full feed advice beeing better for SEO.
Yes, People like full feeds and distribution partners sometimes too. But, depending on the strength of a customers site, you will get trouble with duplicate content, Scrapers not linking to you etc. This leads to other sites ranking with your content, earning links, ranking better...
And personally, i like partial feeds in my feedreader. if i am interested in the topic, the author will get my visit.
I agree with you on that. I've noticed that with the feed reader on my phone I can read the SEOMoz entries in their entirety (thanks!), but Search Engine Land only gives a snippet - which inevitably leads to me visiting the site (more often than I usually would) to read the full article.
I wouldnt worry about duplicate content, from what I have seen the whole issue around dupe content is a scaremongering myth unless you go really over the top and by really I mean ridiculous
I think it depends, if you own a great trusted domain, it will be difficult for scrapers to rank better than you with your content.
Yikes, hate to say it but I wish this was true, but it isn't. Had a wordpress blog outrank a very old domain just last week, sucks.
If you'd like to see an example, here's one, the domain yipmag.com.au is the originator of the article :(
Fortunately, the webmaster of this domain is a really cool guy who will provide a link back, so it's just meant as an example
Amazing though, the words Your Investment Property magazine (the brand of the magazine!!!!) are in the search, as well as the article title, and it still ranks the third-party blog first.
Now I have to go learn all about feeds. You saved me some future headaches.
Great stuff. For someone who's new to blogging and SEO articles like that are very useful.
I don't want to have to learn everything from my mistakes!
very useful
thank you rand for summarizing all basic needs for earning links and increasing readership using given tips altogether but all these needs social media effort to gain.
I've got a question.
If I bookmark a site/link in my social bookmarking site I use and the link is DoFollow but... the link isn't a direct link, it's a redirect. Will the original site still get the link juice or does the redirect cancel that out?
For example, if the DoFollow link is feedproxy.google.com/url and when clicked it redirects to the source article, does that source article get the link juice or did that feedproxy url break that chain?
Thanks
Did any of you try this out yet?
I just wanted to but I can not find this setting in my feedburner account. Neither do I see a "pro" option anywhere. Is this still up to date? The original post is from 2007..
go to feeds.searchengineland.com/searchengineland and try to see if you can subscribe and it doesn't work to allow you to subscribe.
Good advice, I don't understand why JohnMu disagrees with using Absolute URLs, surely it's always best to do that on a dynamic site anyway? Not just for your feed but for usability, because one mishap and a relative feed no longer works.
That being said, it is pretty difficult to change a bunch of absolute URLs if you every change domain.
Ye better make it long.
Rand -- Do you use the #1 suggestion on SEOMoz? It seems that your feed url is: https://feeds.feedburner.com/seomoz but I might be missing something.
Thanks for all the great info!
One thing we have been doing recently is trying shorter blog posts that have several links within them to more in depth information. I have taken this idea from SEOmoz as they typically post every blog with several links to important related information. Thus far the results have shown more users and diving deeper into the meat of our website (instead of reading one blog and exiting) and our conversions have increased slightly. I haven't looked at the effects on our feed readers but this post makes me wonder what effect this direction has had.
From a user perspective I like full posts but if the partial post is well written and interesting I always click through to finish reading. Same with Tweets that provide URLS.
Interesting post about something I understand I have to put upper in my list of SEO priorities.
Anyway, I didn't really understood - about #1 - if that can be done also for the Rss feeds of those blogs that already are Cnamed to Blogger or Wordpress.com. I think it can be, but as I'm not so deeply fond on this "domains name" stuff, so I'm not that sure about it.
On the other hand, I will test on a new personal brand blog I'm starting (following there some of the suggestions of an old Danny post).
Follow all his suggestions except the web hosting.
The server is too slow.
Thaks Rui
Thanks for the info...I started looking into it ...and thinking of taking up that server...but on hearing from you...I have to think once again
I have a follow-up to #1:
If I did the cname thing, would I loose my subscribers count? I've been working a while to get the followers I have today, so it would suck to loose the count.
PS: I mean the stats count, not the actual followers.
I really wish Joomla! or Drupal would develop an extension that performs the same services as FeedBurner!!! So annoying.
The only reason anyone really uses FeedBurner is for the analytics and ability to post how many subscribers that your website has.
But your right. You loose the control and link juice (unless you do the subdomain thing).
I'm thinking of sticking with our pretty feed URL: https://airopia.org/feed/rss
What do you think Rand? I ask because our site is still new, and we have the option to change it.
Great post Rand.
Do you think targeted keywords in feed URL does help?
In terms of full vs. partial, what about another option that I've been doing by necessity rather than design.
Our main feed is a limited selection of the full number of stories we have on the site, containing only the absolute top news in our field. This came about because the feed scrolls across the TV channel and not every story was relevant/ worth being on TV.
Due to previous restrictions that feed became the main feed and is the one distributed to most partners, however there's a lot of news on the site that doesn't make the cut.
So, this RSS feed displays the news that you absolutely have to know but in this case only as headlines and a 'bullet point' breakdown. You can of course do the same stripped down number of stories but with full stories.
The main reason I read RSS is so I dont miss anything but this way there's always a reason to visit the site when I have time to see what else is happening. Would you find this annoying or actually beneficial?
No, it does not annoy me. In most cases it is also easier to read the full text on the site with better formatting, Images etc. than in feedreader.
Thank you sir - read it, learned from it.
Thanks Rand! More work for this over worked SEO...
Very timely post! Google Analytics just announced Integration With Feedburner.
It appears that Feeds are no longer just for Readers:)
Good advice, thanks.
Thanks for sharing this.. Its really helpful for feed submissions and blog marketing.