This post is going to be all about the adcenter Ad Intelligence plugin for Microsoft Excel. For those that don't know what it is, this is a nifty plugin for excel which allows you to import keyphrase data into your spreadsheets.
Why do you care about Ad Intelligence
Reasons you should care about the Adcenter Ad Intelligence plugin for Excel:
- It's really easy to install
- It works from right within excel so is really easy to use with existing keyphrase data
- Data feels like it's right at your fingertips - running functions and querying data is VERY quick.
- The comparative keyphrase traffic levels are well correlated with Google's so you can use this data to predict Google data with a high degree of accuracy*
* - Please see below for some maths notes. This is NOT a linear correlation so you can't just use a multiple of the data to generate the data. The important take-away for non-maths types is that the ORDERING of the keyphrases with respect to traffic levels is well correlated to Google's data.
Screenshots
The plugin integrates very smoothly with Excel (as you would hope!) and can be installed very quickly, once installed you see a new tab within Excel with the following options:Or, if you're in the UK you get fewer options:
There's a couple of awesome things to realise about this:
- Since it's just another tab within your excel it's going to integrate with zero hassle into any other data that you can format in excel - for example a keyword export from adwords or from google analytics...
- There's a country/language dropdown which allows you make sure you're getting the correct data. International support FTW (though this is limited to only a few countries at the moment).
Keyword Extraction
You provide the URL and the tool returns a bunch of relevant keyphrases. Here's the data for SEOmoz:Keyword Suggestion
The keyword suggestion tool is really handy for doing speculative keyphrase research - trying to find keyphrases that you might have missed. There's three aspects to the keyword suggestion tool.The first is the "Campaign Association" which looks at the keywords that other advertisers have in their account as well as the selected phrase. For example here is the data for the term "football" (from the UK) and you can see that it contains nicely related phrases but which don't always contain the keyword in them. Note how this has a commercial bent since it's pulled from bidding data not search data:
The second is the "Queries that contain your keyword" which returns everything you might consider to be a phrase match in Google Adwords and is pulled from search data so doesn't skew the data to commercial phrases:
The third is the "Related Search" which is most useful for pulling in keyphrases you might not have thought of. The following is the data returned for the phrase "car insurance" - you can see that not all keyphrases mention car or insurance (note that this is also pulled from search data not bidding data):
Popular Keywords
The popular keywords tool is useful for analysing trending terms and spikes in your data. I'm not as convinced about the usefulness of this data - looking at it I think tools like Google Trends are probably more useful. Here are the screenshots for the Animals Category (because the data it pulls out is amusing and all about monkeys):"Traffic Spikes":
"Top Frequent Search Queries":
Traffic
This is, for me, one of the most interesting features of the tool and probably the one that I will use most frequently. This tool generates monthly (or daily) traffic figures for a list of keyphrases that you select. For example:Note that this data has been chopped up a bit to fit into a blog post - in reality it gives you data going back 12 months as well as the projected data for the coming 3 months. This is pretty awesome. Of course, it's only awesome if the data is accurate right? Suffice to say that the data is pretty damned good. As stated above, the data correlates very well with the Google search volumes so you can use this tool to order keyphrases in order by traffic levels very quickly. Note though that the correlation is NOT linear so you can't apply a simple multiple to the data to generate the estimated Google search volume. More on this in the maths section below.
Demographics
The demographics tool is very cool and not only gives you a breakdown by age (truncated in the screenshot below - in reality the percentages add up to 100) but it also gives you a gender breakdown which can be very useful information:Note how this data at least correlates with what you'd expect - the phrase "auto insurance quotes" is heavily male dominated while the more generic "car insurance" phrase is split about 50:50.
Summary
In summary, this tool is essential for performing keyphrase research - not only is the data solid but it's also lightning quick (compared to other sources anyway) and provides you with some information which it can be very difficult to get elsewhere (such as the demographic split). There are a few other features which I've not included here, mainly related to bidding on adcenter or related to the content network. They're not so applicable to keyphrase research so I've not included them here. Perhaps a future blog post!If you're a Non-maths Person (NMP) then you can stop reading here.
Maths
So while the above is all very well and certainly shaded pretty colours (that's all done by default by the tool!) it's pretty useless if the data isn't of a high quality. I've spent a fair amount of time trying to ascertain whether the traffic data is worth using or not and the conclusion is that the Google Adwords traffic data that you get through the Adwords Tool is well correlated to the traffic data generated by the Ad Intelligence tool, but the correlation is not linear. Instead, I've found for UK data that the following equation determines the relationship:How did I determine this formula?
Step 1 - Pull out keyphrase data levels from the adwords tool and the ad intelligence tool for the top football keyphrases (as determined by the Google tool)
Step 2 - Look at the correlation between the two data sets.
This provides some really positive-looking graphs like this one for instance over the top keyphrases related to 'Football':
However, looking at this data more closely we see that this data is severely skewed by the head terms - they're so much bigger than the small values that the correlation coefficient is essentially looking at a straight line between the small figures and the one or two head terms. Removing the top four or five head terms we see that the correlation quickly falls apart:
This is still being skewed by the head terms. Trying to come up with a way of smoothing the data I decided to analyse the logs of the traffic levels. What I saw was quite a remarkable result:
This shows a strong correlation over a large data set and implies that there is an underlying correlation but that it's not linear. In fact, this is exactly the forumla (y=0.8055x +2.1158) that I've used to generate the above equation for estimating Google data from Adcenter data.
Please note, one thing that I've not really touched on in this post is the fact that the Google Data isn't 100% accurate (and in fact can be quite a way off at times) so I'm not advocating that you can find the true search volume, merely that you can find a relation between the data that Google gives you and the data that Adcenter gives you.
Step 3 - I pulled out the data for plenty of other verticals and compared the data from Adwords and Adcenter.
Collating all the data together across a number of verticlas we see that there isn't a particularly strong correlation:
Collating all the data together across a number of verticlas we see that there isn't a particularly strong correlation:
This is still being skewed by the head terms. Trying to come up with a way of smoothing the data I decided to analyse the logs of the traffic levels. What I saw was quite a remarkable result:
This shows a strong correlation over a large data set and implies that there is an underlying correlation but that it's not linear. In fact, this is exactly the forumla (y=0.8055x +2.1158) that I've used to generate the above equation for estimating Google data from Adcenter data.
Please note, one thing that I've not really touched on in this post is the fact that the Google Data isn't 100% accurate (and in fact can be quite a way off at times) so I'm not advocating that you can find the true search volume, merely that you can find a relation between the data that Google gives you and the data that Adcenter gives you.
This is a phenomenally good post Tom, I've never been convinced of the need to go beyond Google's keyword tool until now. Thanks for being so thorough and as for the maths formula - well now you're just showing off!
No seriously the question of whether MSN, having such a tiny share in the search market, can produce data as accurate as the monolith Google is the killer one on this issue and I wouldn't have had a clue of how to measure that!
Nice run through Tom.
Been meaning to give this a look over, but hadn't gotten around to it.
Now, if we could just calculate a correlation between "football" searches and "monkey" searches, I think we might have something.
cheers
This is not as far-fetched as you might think: https://is.gd/1pWX3 (620,000 results)
Am I the only one who noticed "coffee taster tongue insurance"?
The problem I tend to run into in my industry (honeymoon registries) is that most tools are drawing from a light enough set of search queries that some goofball running a search like that 2-3 times can skew the results.
Also, on more heavily searched topics (popular travel destinations would be my example) I've found across the board that the tools will report some peculiar phrases getting a TON of searches....peculiar enough that you know it's not real humans.
Speculation: people running bots against search pages, scraping the results, and fabricating pages from the results could be causing this...especially if the pages are getting generated daily. In these cases I'd think that the spammer would have hand-entered a small collection of search phrases into his evil tool to generate searches & search results. Any other ideas, anyone?
You certainly need to take this data (both from adcenter and from google) with a pinch of salt. I agree that some numbers are particularly inflated. These tools are most useful in my eyes for looking at relative search volume and I think they do a pretty good job of that. If you want to do more detailed keyphrase research in your niche then looking at PPC impression data is one of the few ways to get really detailed information.
I'm going to install it an try it. I know nothing is 100% but it can only help.
Thanks.
I really love that you all give detailed, factual and graphical articles that truly educate. This is a great tool if you are data-driven person, which you must be in this industry.
Do you need to provide a credit card in order to $ign up?
It won't allow me to $ign up without a credit card. Anyone got a promo code? They want $5 to "establi$h an account".
I should know to expect nothing le$$ from Micro$oft.
(Please, Google....may the Gods be with your new OS and may it drive M$ and Window$ back into the stone age.)
Excellent post! I've been using the tool for a few months now and find it fantastic. The bit about data being at your fingertips really needs to be seen to be believed for those still stuck using the G online tool - the ability to slice 'n dice is extremely handy when you're working with large keyword lists. I like the fact that it pops out the results in a new tabs so that you can easily pop back and forth between data sets.
For those working with PPC campaigns who are noticing the advantages that Bing brings, this is going to become a very, very relevant tool.
Small bonus - conditional formatting in Excel 2007 makes the extended reports very visually appealing to clients.
That’s a fantastic post,
I am always interested in keyword research and you are right, it is always the lesser topic of conversation but so vitally important. I am most interested with this tool and I am going to give it a go and let you know how I get on. Currently I use Wordtracker and Google Keyword tool although, lately I am not happy with Wordtracker at all. (Concerning results)
The only thing I like about it is the newly designed interface but what good is that when the data is so inflated or just damn right out of context...
Many Thanks
O many many thanks for this post! Sounds like a very handy plug-in I might have otherwise missed out on! Might give it a test run for a little while, see how it does!
Fascinating!
We've been using the tool for a couple of weeks now, and have been highly impressed with how much it can streamline elements of our research process.
The only significant question having over the tool is one of how accurate it is, and how it compares to Google's and other data sources - now we should be able to start piecing together and clarifying some of that information. Excellent!
Have been tinkering with this more and more, and doing the regression analysis means we should all buy you a beer. Every test I've run using that equation has been pretty spot on.
Also love the 12 months of data in looking for trends. Great tool and a fabulous post.
Would be nice if this was available for openoffice aswell :D
Getting strong value from this tool, especially in tandem with SEO for Firefox plugin. Saving me a ton of time spent researching competitors' kp's
ah thank you for the post, i agree this excel plugin is awesome and it seems that with the Bing launch that the MSN Adcenter team are working to improve it further.
Thank you for posting this.
Adcenter excel plugin looks stunning to me.
and I am very surprised that you cracked the formula lol. Great job!
Thanks for this post Tom, I finally got around to downloading it. As for some of the feedback in the comments, Microsoft and Google are charging a small fee per new account these days, and Google's tool can still be accessed for free, so be thankful for that at least.
Just been through the process of signing up to MS adcenter. Paid my £5 BS charge only to find... im not using Office 2007 and the plugin wont work unless i am!!!
So now i have to argue with the boss about upgrading...
*forehead slap*
Good post tho! I spend hours copying and pasting from wordtracker and Google to excel spreadsheets so anything that can save me time and also save me from the inevitable thumb cramp of excessive copying and pasting is welcome!
Hey tom, great post on this - I was really looking forward to trying it...
until... I realised:
It doesnt work on Excel 2003 (which most big business's have)
It doesn't work on Excel for Mac's.....
Bit crap really.... :(
When I first downloaded the add-in there was definitely a version for excel 2003. Maybe they discontinued it but I am sure it should still be around somewhere.
i havent seen this before ill check it out. thanks for showing the work you did and not just something that you made up. i cant see why they would provide data that wasnt in some way usefull and i definately think you have shown there is a relationship
This is a very neat resource. It might be what I need to cave and buy Office.
I ran a similar test about 1 year ago whe the tool was young and the Google adwords tool had just started providing absolute rather than relative traffic data. I cam up with a positive correlation of .7 for the ~40 terms I researched. I didn't get get the same R square value though. It was a low sample size and probably not enough to be statistically meaningful. My intuition and a few data points at the time suggested that queries that were more female demographic oriented had a slightly higher correlation than male oriented queries. However this was contingent upon my own correct gender interpretation of a query.
Great post and nice regression analysis!
That said how many of you see more traffic from bing than you did with live + msn?
I think 40 terms is a very small sample size. I ran the data over several thousand keyphrases. For small data sizes I think the fact that some terms have much more traffic than others can easily skew your correlation (hence all the business with logs).
Thanks for sharing, I had never considered using another keyword research tool before but this has done it. I love the Excel Plugin and really don't care if it matches Google's data or not because I feel their data is always skewed too high!
Nice work Tom.
The maffs bit made my brain melt - but I think I get it... sorta :)
The more power Bing gets, the more essential posts like this are. Big ups for this post!
I used Ad Center a handful of times about a year and a half ago then fell back into the Google tool exclusively. Thanks for reminding me about all the cool features! The Demographic info is particularly useful for persona development and for creating targeted PPC landing pages around keywords.
Anyone know if this data is available through the AdCenter API?
If so, that would be cool.
Nice post Tom and thanks for the Formula.
You're spot on about the innaccuracies of the (heavily normalised) Google data. I must admit I tried this tool and initially wasn't impressed. I'm going to go back and have another try now, so thanks for the inspiration :-)
Likewise! I will suspend my scorn of Adcentre for one more try and see if it's worth it.
Thank you for writing this overview.
I was aware of the tool but your explanation of the functions and analysis of the data is very useful.
Great post. I also had blinders to just about any KW tool but Google's. I downloaded it am testing it out now. It also seems like it will be relatively simple to insert your formula into the excel file to get an automatic estimate of Google's data.
Tom,
do you know if they offer a Mac compatible version of the plugin? The page you linked only has an .exe version.
One cool feature that wasn't mentioned is the keyword categorization feature. Just select a list of keywords, and Ad Intelligence will assign the two most likely categories. It's super helpful for finding outliers.
Great post.
I never used it in my life but this time I tried. I installed it and tried to use. It requires sign up with Micro Ad Center which requires to pay and add credit card information.
is there any other way to use it without paying to them?
Thanks