I love a mystery… especially a local search ranking mystery I can solve for someone.
Now, the truth is, some ranking puzzles are so complex, they can only be solved by a formal competitive audit. But there are many others that can be cleared up by spending 15 minutes or less going through an organized 10-point checklist of the commonest problems that can cause a business to rank lower than the owner thinks it should. By zipping through the following checklist, there’s a good chance you’ll be able to find one or more obvious “whodunits” contributing to poor Google local pack visibility for a given search.
Since I wrote the original version of this post in 2014, so much has changed. Branding, tools, tactics — things are really different in 2018. Definitely time for a complete overhaul, with the goal of making you a super sleuth for your forum friends, clients, agency teammates, or executive superiors.
Let’s emulate the Stratemeyer Syndicate, which earned lasting fame by hitting on a simple formula for surfacing and solving mysteries in a most enjoyable way.
Before we break out our magnifying glass, it’s critical to stress one very important thing. The local rankings I see from an office in North Beach, San Francisco are not the rankings you see while roaming around Golden Gate park in the same city. The rankings your client in Des Moines sees for things in his town are not the same rankings you see from your apartment in Albuquerque when you look at Des Moines results. With the user having become the centroid of search for true local searches, it is no mystery at all that we see different results when we are different places, and it is no cause for concern.
And now that we’ve gotten that out of the way and are in the proper detective spirit, let’s dive into how to solve for each item on our checklist!
☑ Google updates/bugs
The first thing to ask if a business experiences a sudden change in rankings is whether Google has done something. Search Engine Land strikes me as the fastest reporter of Google updates, with MozCast offering an ongoing weather report of changes in the SERPs. Also, check out the Moz Google Algo Change history list and the Moz Blog for some of the most in-depth strategic coverage of updates, penalties, and filters.
For local-specific bugs (or even just suspected tests), check out the Local Search Forum, the Google My Business forum, and Mike Blumenthal’s blog. See if the effects being described match the weirdness you are seeing in your local packs. If so, it’s a matter of fixing a problematic practice (like iffy link building) that has been caught in an update, waiting to see how the update plays out, or waiting for Google to fix a bug or turn a dial down to normalize results.
*Pro tip: Don’t make the mistake of thinking organic updates have nothing to do with local SEO. Crack detectives know organic and local are closely connected.
☑ Eligibility to list and rank
When a business owner wants to know why he isn’t ranking well locally, always ask these four questions:
- Does the business have a real address? (Not a PO box, virtual office, or a string of employees’ houses!)
- Does the business make face-to-face contact with its customers?
- What city is the business in?
- What is the exact keyword phrase they are hoping to rank for?
If the answer is “no” to either of the first two questions, the business isn’t eligible for a Google My Business listing. And while spam does flow through Google, a lack of eligibility could well be the key to a lack of rankings.
For the third question, you need to know the city the business is in so that you can see if it’s likely to rank for the search phrase cited in the fourth question. For example, a plumber with a street address in Sugar Land, TX should not expect to rank for "plumber Dallas TX." If a business lacks a physical location in a given city, it’s atypical for it to rank for queries that stem from or relate to that locale. It’s amazing just how often this simple fact solves local pack mysteries.
☑ Guideline spam
To be an ace local sleuth, you must commit to memory the guidelines for representing your business on Google so that you can quickly spot violations. Common acts of spam include:
- Keyword stuffing the business name field
- Improper wording of the business name field
- Creating listings for ineligible locations, departments, or people
- Category spam
- Incorrect phone number implementation
- Incorrect website URL implementation
- Review guideline violations
If any of the above conundrums are new to you, definitely spend 10 minutes reading the guidelines. Make flash cards, if necessary, to test yourself on your spam awareness until you can instantly detect glaring errors. With this enhanced perception, you’ll be able to see problems that may possibly be leading to lowered rankings, or even… suspensions!
☑ Suspensions
There are two key things to look for here when a local business owner comes to you with a ranking woe:
- If the listing was formerly verified, but has mysteriously become unverified, you should suspect a soft suspension. Soft suspensions might occur around something like a report of keyword-stuffing the GMB business name field. Oddly, however, there is little anecdotal evidence to support the idea that soft suspensions cause ranking drops. Nevertheless, it’s important to spot the un-verification clue and tell the owner to stop breaking guidelines. It’s possible that the listing may lose reviews or images during this type of suspension, but in most cases, the owner should be able to re-verify his listing. Just remember: a soft suspension is not a likely cause of low local pack rankings.
- If the listing’s rankings totally disappear and you can’t even find the listing via a branded search, it’s time to suspect a hard suspension. Hard suspensions can result from a listing falling afoul of a Google guideline or new update, a Google employee, or just a member of the public who has reported the business for something like an ineligible location. If the hard suspension is deserved, as in the case of creating a listing at a fake address, then there’s nothing you can do about it. But, if a hard suspension results from a mistake, I recommend taking it to the Google My Business forum to plead for help. Be prepared to prove that you are 100% guideline-compliant and eligible in hopes of getting your listing reinstated with its authority and reviews intact.
☑ Duplicates
Notorious for their ability to divide ranking strength, duplicate listings are at their worst when there is more than one verified listing representing a single entity. If you encounter a business that seems like it should be ranking better than it is for a given search, always check for duplicates.
The quickest way to do this is to get all present and past NAP (name, address, phone) from the business and plug it into the free Moz Check Listing tool. Pay particular attention to any GMB duplicates the tool surfaces. Then:
- If the entity is a brick-and-mortar business or service area business, and the NAP exactly matches between the duplicates, contact Google to ask them to merge the listings. If the NAP doesn’t match and represents a typo or error on the duplicate, use the “suggest an edit” link in Google Maps to toggle the “yes/no” toggle to “yes,” and then select the radio button for “never existed.”
- If the duplicates represent partners in a multi-practitioner business, Google won’t simply delete them. Things get quite complicated in this scenario, and if you discover practitioner duplicates, tread carefully. There are half a dozen nuances here, including whether you’re dealing with actual duplicates, whether they represent current or past staffers, whether they are claimed or unclaimed, and even whether a past partner is deceased. There isn’t perfect industry agreement on the handling of all of the ins-and-outs of practitioner listings. Given this, I would advise an affected business to read all of the following before making a move in any direction:
- How to Delete a Google My Business Listing: A Common Question with a Complex Answer
- Why You Cannot Ignore Practitioner Listings on Google My Business
- Practitioner Listings: To Claim or Not to Claim
☑ Missing/inaccurate listings
While you’ve got Moz Check Listing fired up, pay attention to anything it tells you about missing or inaccurate listings. The tool will show you how accurate and complete your listings on are on the major local business data aggregators, plus other important platforms like Google My Business, Facebook, Factual, Yelp, and more. Why does this matter?
- Google can pull information from anywhere on the web and plunk it into your Google My Business listing.
- While no one can quantify the exact degree to which citation/listing consistency directly impacts Google local rankings for every possible search query, it has been a top 5 ranking factor in the annual Local Search Ranking Factors survey as far back as I can remember. Recently, I’ve seen some industry discussion as to whether citations still matter, with some practitioners claiming they can’t see the difference they make. I believe that conclusion may stem from working mainly in ultra-competitive markets where everyone has already got their citations in near-perfect order, forcing practitioners to look for differentiation tactics beyond the basics. But without those basics, you’re missing table stakes in the game.
- Indirectly, listing absence or inconsistency impacts local rankings in that it undermines the quest for good local KPIs as well as organic authority. Every lost or misdirected consumer represents a failure to have someone click-for-directions, click-to-call, click-to-your website, or find your website at all. Online and offline traffic, conversions, reputation, and even organic authority all hang in the balance of active citation management.
☑ Lack of organic authority
Full website or competitive audits are not the work of a minute. They really take time, and deep delving. But, at a glance, you can access some quick metrics to let you know whether a business’ lack of achievement on the organic side of things could be holding them back in the local packs. Get yourself the free MozBar SEO toolbar and try this:
- Turn the MozBar on by clicking the little “M” at the top of your browser so that it is blue.
- Perform your search and look at the first few pages of the organic results, ignoring anything from major directory sites like Yelp (they aren’t competing with you for local pack rankings, eh?).
- Note down the Page Authority, Domain Authority, and link counts for each of the businesses coming up on the first 3 pages of the organic results.
- Finally, bring up the website of the business you’re investigating. If you see that the top competitors have Domain Authorities of 50 and links numbering in the hundreds or thousands, whereas your target site is well below in these metrics, chances are good that organic authority is playing a strong role in lack of local search visibility. How do we know this is true? Do some local searches and note just how often the businesses that make it into the 3-pack or the top of the local finder view have correlating high organic rankings.
Where organic authority is poor, a business has a big job of work ahead. They need to focus on content dev + link building + social outreach to begin building up their brand in the minds of consumers and the “RankBrain” of Google.
One other element needs to be mentioned here, and that’s the concept of how time affects authority. When you’re talking to a business with a ranking problem, it’s very important to ascertain whether they just launched their website or just built their local business listings last week, or even just a few months ago. Typically, if they have, the fruits of their efforts have yet to fully materialize. That being said, it’s not a given that a new business will have little authority. Large brands have marketing departments which exist solely to build tremendous awareness of new assets before they even launch. It’s important to keep that in mind, while also realizing that if the business is smaller, building authority will likely represent a longer haul.
☑ Possum effect
Where local rankings are absent, always ask:
“Are there any other businesses in your building or even on your street that share your Google category?”
If the answer is “yes,” search for the business’ desired keyword phase and look at the local finder view in Google Maps. Note which companies are ranking. Then begin to zoom in on the map, level by level, noting changes in the local finder as you go. If, a few levels in, the business you’re advising suddenly appears on the map and in the local finder, chances are good it’s the Possum filter that’s causing their apparent invisibility at the automatic zoom level.
Google Possum rolled out in September 2016, and its observable effects included a geographic diversification of the local results, filtering out many listings that share a category and are in close proximity to one another. Then, about one year later, Google initiated the Hawk update, which appears to have tightened the radius of Possum, with the result that while many businesses in the same building are still being filtered out, a number of nearby neighbors have reappeared at the automatic zoom level of the results.
If your sleuthing turns up a brand that is being impacted by Possum/Hawk, the only surefire way to beat the filter is to put in the necessary work to become the most authoritative answer for the desired search phrase. It’s important to remember that filters are the norm in Google’s local results, and have long been observed impacting listings that share an address, share a phone number, etc. If it’s vital for a particular listing to outrank all others that possess shared characteristics, then authority must be built around it in every possible way to make it one of the most dominant results.
☑ Local Service Ads effect
The question you ask here is:
“Is yours a service-area business?”
And if the answer is “yes,” then brace yourself for ongoing results disruption in the coming year.
Google’s Local Service Ads (formerly Home Service Ads) make Google the middleman between consumers and service providers, and in the 2+ years since first early testing, they’ve caused some pretty startling things to happen to local search results. These have included:
- An episode in which Google’s requirement for Advanced Verification resulted in something like 90% of listings being kicked out of the results in San Diego
- SABs who haven’t signed up for LSA being removed from 3-packs and relegated to no-man’s land at the bottom of ad units.
- Mass removal of home-based businesses from the local results, due their lack of a visible address … and then Google saying this was a bug
- Spam listings disappearing and then reappearing
Suffice it to say, rollout to an ever-increasing number of cities and categories hasn’t been for the faint of heart, and I would hazard a guess that Google’s recent re-brand of this program signifies their intention to move beyond the traditional SAB market. One possible benefit of Google getting into this type of lead gen is that it could decrease spam, but I’m not sold on this, given that fake locations have ended up qualifying for LSA inclusion. While I honor Google’s need to be profitable, I share some of the qualms business owners have expressed about the potential impacts of this venture.
Since I can’t offer a solid prediction of what precise form these impacts will take in the coming months, the best I can do here is to recommend that if an SAB experiences a ranking change/loss, the first thing to look for is whether LSA has come to town. If so, alteration of the SERPs may be unavoidable, and the only strategy left for overcoming vanished visibility may be to pay for it... by qualifying for the program.
☑ GMB neglect
Sometimes, a lack of competitive rankings can simply be chalked up to a lack of effort. If a business wonders why they’re not doing better in the local packs, pull up their GMB listing and do a quick evaluation of:
- Verification status – While you can rank without verifying, lack of verification is a hallmark of listing neglect.
- Basic accuracy – If NAP or map markers are incorrect, it’s a sure sign of neglect.
- Category choices – Wrong categories make right rankings impossible.
- Image optimization – Every business needs a good set of the most professional, persuasive photos it can acquire, and should even consider periodic new photo shoots for seasonal freshness; imagery impacts KPIs, which are believed to impact rank.
- Review count, sentiment and management – Too few reviews, low ratings, and lack of responses = utter neglect of this core rank/reputation-driver.
- Hours of operation – If they’re blank or incorrect, conversions are being missed.
- Main URL choice – Does the GMB listing point to a strong, authoritative website page or a weak one?
- Additional URL choices – If menus, bookings, reservations, or placing orders is part of the business model, a variety of optional URLs are supported by Google and should be explored.
- Google Posts – Early-days testing indicates that regular posting may impact rank.
- Google Questions and Answers – Pre-populate with best FAQs and actively manage incoming questions.
There is literally no business, large or small, with a local footprint that can afford to neglect its Google My Business listing. And while some fixes and practices move the ranking needle more than others, the increasing number of consumer actions that take place within Google is reason enough to put active GMB management at the top of your list.
Closing the case
The Hardy Boys never went anywhere without their handy kit of detection tools. Their father was so confident in their utter preparedness that he even let them chase down gangs in Hong Kong and dictators in the Guyanas (which, on second thought, doesn’t seem terribly wise.) But I have that kind of confidence in you. I hope my troubleshooting checklist is one you’ll bookmark and share to be prepared for the local ranking mysteries awaiting you and your digital marketing colleagues in 2018. Happy sleuthing!
Great Checklist here for finding why a business is not Locally Ranking! I work with mainly local service businesses, and continuously find that they have old listings and their NAP is all over the place online (home addresses, old business office addresses, employee's addresses, etc.) Great insight and I think if a business owner or consultant honestly runs through this checklist thoroughly it will be obvious why a business is not in the map pack. Well done!
Hi Nicholas!
Exactly what I was hoping for - terrific to know you feel this will be helpful for owners and consultants. Thank you.
Hello Miriam,
Again this was a great post about Local SEO. I would like to add a piece to the puzzle. I have often notice a better ranking in my Google Map competitor when their landing page was closely related to Google My Business listing.
I've seen an agency that created websites, sometimes with very low Domain Authorities and few domain citations, rank first in local because they created a pages for each locations.
Their method is simple, and essentially the same for each of the websites they create. Each location pages had opening hours, employees images for that location, unique phone number, address, and they even added keywords for each district of their areas.
Again, they rank first almost everytime. What do you think about this?
Also, how would you prepopulate questions an answers with common FAQs? I think it is a great idea. Do you have an example?
Thanks
Hi Jean-Cristophe,
What you've touched on here is actually an interesting debate in the Local SEO industry. Some practitioners advocate that multi-location businesses link all of their GMB listings to their homepage, because it typically has more Page Authority than a landing page would and can potentially boost the ranking of the listing. Others advocate only doing this when the locations are in different cities - not in the same city. Personally, I've always leaned toward linking multi-location businesses to landing pages instead of the homepage, particularly for larger businesses, because of the improved UX this can provide, but I fully concede that a landing page typically doesn't have the high PA of a homepage and the PA needs to be built up as much as possible over time.
My thinking is that it just isn't good UX to have a user click on your "website" link in a GMB listing, and then have to click a second link on the website nav or use a store locator widget to finally get to the content that has been designed specifically to serve and convert them. I tend to be more swayed by UX concerns than ranking concerns, though all the UX optimization in the world isn't going to help you if your listing can't be found because it doesn't rank well enough.
What you are describing is different - if I understand correctly, you feel that you're seeing landing pages (rather than the homepage) boost rankings. I've never heard someone suggest this before in the homepage-vs.-landing-page debate. It leads me to wonder if in the geo-industry you are looking at, the competitors whom you see outranking others with this tactic are making more overall effort with their SEO/marketing. To test, I'd suggest comparing their overall DA and individual landing page PA with those of the businesses ranking lower. If you should see a case in which Business A is linking to a landing page with low PA but is outranking Business B who is linking to a home page with a higher DA/PA, that would be a very interesting finding. It would then need to be followed up with a complete competitive audit (like the one linked to at the beginning of my article) to see if factors other than the page being linked to are major likely contributors to the higher rankings. For example Business A has more reviews, or cleaner overall citations, fewer duplicates, etc.
I've mentioned this before: I'd love to see someone in our industry do a case study to prove out whether the suggested improved rankings from linking multiple listings to the homepage makes up for the potential loss of conversions from decreased UX. How many users do you lose by making them click multiple times to find the landing page? Does this represent a loss of conversions/money? You'd have to have just the right scenario to do a good test - it would be so awesome if someone with the opportunity could carry this out to bring more data to the debate!
As for pre-populating Google Questions and Answers with your FAQs, here's a good tutorial from Mike Blumenthal on doing this: https://blumenthals.com/blog/2017/08/13/11-tips-to-... and I'm making a guess that he may have helped his showcase client Barbara Oliver do this (see: https://www.google.com/search?ei=oFVWWtX5CpP6jwP7_...). It's a great idea!
Thanks so much for your interesting comment!
Thank you so much for this detailed answer.
When looking at this particular example, I've noticed that their clients are in less competitive regions with low population. I was wrong telling you that they had lower DA. They have much lower DA than we are use to see in these industries here in Quebec City, but even their PA is higher than most oft their competitors DA in those regions where business don't worry so much about their online presence. I should have thought about that. LESSON LEARNED!
So, as you said, they probably would rank even higher if they would link to their home page then.
Thank you for the resources! What I see is that we should populate Q&A, but not so much it takes over questions added by people!
Keep on publishing good Local SEO posts! I love it.
Very, very interesting and useful information! I'll use it with a friends local business web.
So glad you'll be sharing this with your friends, Luis. Thanks!
Good stuff here Miriam! I would definitely recommend checking GMB neglect first on your checklist, as alot of times a business will have wrong hours, incomplete info, or other easily fixable errors that can help local ranking. All great points and analysis though! Thanks for writing.
Definitely an important part of the checklist! Thanks so much for reading :)
excellent post Miriam !! as always ... it helps me update and pay more attention to local SEO strategies.
I think it´s a very important part of the checklist!
Miriam,
Thank you for your work this is a solid checklist. I have saved it into my Evernote as a reference. As I age my instant recall function has deteriorated so this checklist goes into my reference guide when I get stuck. Thanks again.
Hi Matt!
It's my pleasure, and don't put that down to your age ... put it down to how busy you are! If I didn't purposely bookmark and document everything I need to remember, I would be so lost! Cheers!
We've observed location as being a major local search influencer. Going just 10 miles in the metro makes a huge difference. That's not new news, but it could influence physical office location decisions.
Great checklist to remind us what to do and what we have missed doing. Thanks for sharing this with us.
Great Stuff. Thanks for sharing it.
My pleasure, param. Thank you for reading.
Hi Miriam,
What a great update!
Every day we face those little details that go to sank a local business.
I will focus on the most basic inacuracy, the site itself.
Many times clients cannot see the difference between the NAP and the mention of a neighbourhood into their own website.
If the NAP does not contain clearly the neighbourhood, they cannot include somewhere else, it has to be in the NAP first and foremost.
It is truly difficult that they understand that the algorithms do not read as we the humans do.
Other times developers decide to do "minor" changes like eliminate the neighbourhood from the NAP because it takes too much space and diminishes the designs.
Of course, next time we check we see that the sign of a verified business had dissapeard.
The work that takes months has vanished due to those "minor" changes.
If the physical address had change, therefore all the mentions all over the web should be changed too, or at least as many as possible.
The differences only make that the algorithms do not trust on the website as a reliable business that deserves to be shown into the search engines results.
Thanks for the great Local SEO 2018 update!
Good morning, Veronica! Always such a pleasure to hear from you. So, you have had clients substitute neighborhood information (like Sunset District San Francisco) instead of an actual street address (123 Noriega Street)? While including mention of neighborhoods in your content is good, it certainly doesn't replace NAP. I wonder why clients would think that it does. Interesting to hear this is something you've run into more than once. Thanks so much for contributing!
Good morning Miriam,
My pleasure!
On regard your question, I mean into the Google My Business we set the street, number, neighbourhood (like disctrict in English), city and country.
After all is ready, client decides to focus on other neighbourhoods, therefore he/she add other NAPs with different neighbourhoods into the same website. Or the developer erase the neighboourhood due he considers that it is too long and overlaps to the beatiful website design.
In sum, the issues are not only over the web but frequently into their own websites.
Of course the algorithms notice those inacuracys fastly.
Sadly, I face those issues frequently. I think that is caused by too many old post, all over the web that recommend those "SEO tactics" as success guarantee. Those blog posts have authority and sometimes belong to good SEO sources but they do not have a warning about the outdated content. Thanks for taking time to answer! :)
Oh, yes, I know just what you are talking about, Veronica. Thank you so much for adding more context. Ugh - that is a tough one. I know just what you mean.
You mentioned some really nice points here!
Thank you, Abel.
Miriam,
I appreciate the article and the depth of the answers. Below are a couple of comments/ questions.
Thanks again for your writing I find it informative and well though out. I also didn't realize I commented on this post previously so I obviously really liked what have you have to say. Have a great day!
Haha - hey Matt! Full confession: I have read just about every classic Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew mystery ever published. They are, indeed, wonderful, and Nancy Drew was one smart girl. Happy to know a fan.
I totally understand that Google's bias toward physical location makes virtual offices a temptation in so many ways. But, the thing is, as the Local SEO on the job, it's my responsibility to help the client avoid danger. So, what I'd do in your shoes is explain the risks and tell the client, flat out, that creating GMB listings for virtual offices is a guideline violation, regardless of whether they make good horse sense in the real world.
And if that doesn't work, you could always invoke the spirit of Frank and Joe Hardy who were big believers in playing by the rules. When the client attains that kind of success that enables them to get legit offices, the rules will be on their side and against spammers. For right now, they aren't there yet.
Great stuff here! Thanks for sharing!
Great stuff here!
Thanks, Joshua.
I really enjoyed this - and it is going to be helpful. There are some things that I have been researching which you flagged up here, and you provided me with some solutions I hadn't been thinking with. Thank you.
Great article.
About the image optimization. Do you think the additional photos and videos will improve the GMB ranking?