Houston, we have a problem
We SEOs, myself included, have a habit of almost always focusing our attention on what concerns us directly.
We suffer what I call SEOcentrism.
Everything is SEO and, and everything ends in the sphere of influence of SEO, as if Search Marketing was a gigantic black hole.
- Content? Clearly, it is SEO and SEO should govern Content Strategy!
- Social Media? SEOs are those who really understand it!
- Inbound Marketing? Isn't that a synonym for SEO?
In reality, though, things are very different.
Simplifying all components of marketing, SEO is only one small component of a much bigger strategy a brand may have:
That is why most brands, above all, tend to not consider SEO as essential as we would like. Even in the best cases, they usually do not consider SEO (or more broadly Inbound Marketing) as a discipline which could inspire and coordinate all others.
That quadrant can also help us understand why the more traditional media agencies tend to have more success in winning contracts than the new digital ones (not to mention the classic SEO Agencies). The reasons are twofold:
- Brands have the ability to have a unique and coordinated strategy designed and built by a single agency;
- For a traditional media agency, it is relatively easier to just create a digital (or just SEO) area within its existing structure.
Be aware that I am not saying that this is the best choice a business can make; I am simply describing the reality I see every day.
This Venn by Econsultancy explains all the complexities of a complete integrated Marketing strategy
However, there is another problem.
Even if we are good at analyzing data, fixing technical issues, creating content marketing campaigns, influencing community building… even if we follow the instructions of the "good marketer" book, many times the results we obtain still don't make us feel fully satisfied with our work.
We score a hit, or maybe more than one, but many times that success is extemporary and does not translate into continuous and long lasting improvements... and maybe for that reason our clients may fire us.
Why? It is ironic to say it, but this is mainly because we do not think organically.
Because of our innate SEOcentrism, we lose or do not take into full account the global marketing strategy of our clients, and we do not see how our job is influenced and may influence the overall marketing strategy.
For this reason I am going to describe how Lego has designed its marketing strategy, what principles guide it, how all the channels are connected by a common "brand storytelling" and what we can learn from the success of Lego.
Why Lego and not another brand? Because Lego really is a brand that is winning in marketing. It is a perfect case history and—let's be honest—if The Matrix exists it is built with Lego bricks.
Start with why
Ten years ago, Lego announced losses of over $400 million USD.
- The liberalization of the patents related to its famous bricks; and therefore
- The birth of numerous competitors that offered to the public substantially similar products at a cheaper price; and
- An almost total impermeability to customers and fans.
- Inspire
- Think creatively
- Invent
The mission statement is also fundamental for understanding the archetypical figure Lego wants to represent, and that permeates all its messages: the Builder (and it is not a case that, for those who know the reference, we all are "Master Builders").
Reading the "Mission and Vision" page of Lego, then, we are able to understand how Lego pretends to make its Why real:
- Pioneering new ways of playing;
- Pioneering play material;
- Pioneering the business model of play;
- Leveraging globalisation and digitalisation.
The last two points (and partly the first) have a direct influence in what Lego did and does in marketing.
Takeaway
We must remember to start always from the "About us" page when pitching and building a strategy for our brand or our clients.
That nearly always-forgotten page is where we can understand the core of the marketing message that must pervade the strategy and work as an unconscious connection with our audience.
Exercise
Pick one of these other great About Us pages and try to define the Why and the How:
Audience
As I wrote before, one of reasons why Lego went into decline was that it was completely misaligned with its audience.
Lego took a long time to realize that it was no longer just a game for children, but that those children who were playing with its bricks had grown up and, because they loved Lego, they wanted it to grow up too and start creating products that could respond to their new needs.
Lego Ambassadors
Lego, then, created the Ambassadors Program (now that I am writing the post, the page is under construction for redesign, but this other page explains what it is quite well).
Lego Ambassadors, because of their über-fan nature and their evangelizing Lego values and initiatives in forums and blogs, have the function to operate like a communication bridge between Lego itself and its wider fan base, and they do it on a daily basis.
Lego Ideas
In 2010, then, Lego created the Legoclick community, which evolved into what now is Lego Ideas, a place where fans do not just discuss and present their own Lego inventions, but also can see them becoming a real Lego product, thanks to other fans' upvotes and a final review by Lego itself.
If we have the Delorean Lego version or the Lego Ghostbusters car, it is thanks to the fact that Lego finally understood how its audience had changed. Moreover, the entire Minecraft Lego series, now quite popular, started as a Lego Ideas project.
I will return to this concept later, when talking about the importance of fandom and prosumers in marketing today.
On the other hand, Lego also created a community place for its yourger target: My Lego Network.
If you click on the previous link, you will see that Lego also prefers not to use social sign-ins, but how it relies on a detailed process for creating "Lego IDs". This is not just for retrieving useful information, but also—from a marketing point of view—for offering children (and parents) the fan pride of owning a well-defined identity in the Lego world.
Letting your audience create what you cannot
Have you ever noticed how Lego City or the simple bricks' boxes present no weapons? This is a voluntary choice by Lego, which does not extend to products created through co-marketing (e.g. Lego Star Wars).
- Lego allows the forums to "live," while maintaining a discreet control over them;
- Lego sends very detailed technical specifications to the companies, which manufacture unofficial pieces so that they can accomplish their work while respecting the level of internal quality of Lego itself.
Let's build
Let me finish this chapter describing how Lego did not forget that its other main public are the children. We saw how their mission is all about them.
Lego targeted them anew, not only with a stronger attention to kids' inputs (and possibly answering them), but also with its foundation, which has a similar mission of building a future where learning through play empowers children to become creative, engaged, life-long learners.
Products and marketing around the power of learning through play and through building is at the base of the "Let's build" tagline.
Building the game, for Lego, is the common passion that links its two audiences: children and adults.
Takeaways
We must put the users at the center of our marketing strategy, and this starts with achieving a precise audience analysis.
We must always remember that our audience is multifaceted and that, often, there may be personas with totally opposite characteristics, but having in common the love or interest for our brand.
Finally, let's remember that it is in our nature to be data-informed, and that it is in our DNA to retrieve and understand data points that are not the ones commonly taken into consideration by more classic marketers. We must use this as one of our competitive advantages.
More about Audience Analysis:
- How Inflow Does Audience Profiles
- Personas: The Art and Science of Understanding the Person Behind the Visit
The Fandom/Canon pendulum
Whenever we deal with a Brand, especially if it targets the main public, we should always remember that there exists a constant dialectic between the Canon and the Fandom. Let me explain:
The Canon represents the official branded content and messages produced by the brand, and it is defined by the official marketing strategy.
Moreover, the Canon develops its actions in the so-called "cultural industry channels (e.g. a movie like "The Lego Movie").
The purpose of Canon is always profit, even if it may be through actions that deal with or encite fandom.
Fandom, on the other hand, represents the original content fans create using the same brand's products—a repurposing of the original content a brand creates.
Fandom is usually delivered using channels independent from those of the brand. To use the Lego example, Vine, Instagram, and YouTube were used by Lego fans far before Lego started using them. Those channels follow very different production principles (e.g. crowdsourcing), and it's main purpose is pleasure.
The importance of strategy in marketing and brand storytelling
Lego is very much aware of this dialectic, and explores every possible way of taking advantage of it while spreading its own brand storytelling.
From the canonical one, Lego creates (using a typical Transmedia term) a "Bible" for each one of its campaigns and products' lines.
The Bibles, which we might also call strategic plans, are documents where everything related to a campaign is defined:
- Business model
- Audience
- Brand storytelling
- Media/Platforms
- Execution
- Experience
- How all these elements interact between them and when.
Moreover, for every single action previewed in the campaign, the strategic plan also defines:
- Business model (because a website follows different rules than a TV series);
- Audience (a campaign may target just one of the different personas we have defined);
- Premise (what is causing and justifying, from a storytelling point of view, this action?);
- Genre (in our cases this could be the kind of content: long forms, infographics, white paper, video...);
- Theme (or what facet of the general storytelling the action will be about);
- Narrative synthesis (somehow a sort of adaptation of what the content will narrate);
- Technical Specification (a field where we can contribute, as demonstrates Richard Baxter in his latest posts here on Moz and on Builtvisible
- Expansion (the content created can possibly expanded, and this is where we should think about repurposing the content we create).
Now let's take Yoda Chronicles, and let's consider it as complex marketing campaign for giving new force to the Lego Star Wars products.
If we look at the Yoda Chronicles campaign by Lego, we can easily find all the elements described above:
- The general business model is the co-marketing with the Star Wars brand, which is at the base of the Lego Star Wars' product line (generic business model);
- Yoda Chronicles is a spin-off of Lego Star Wars (premise);
- It it set in the Lego version of the Star Wars universe, in a consistent continuity with it, and it narrates the adventures of a group of young padawans and their master, Yoda;
- The audiences targeted are both the Star Wars fan (Yoda) and their sons (the Padawans);
- The media/platforms used were:
- TV (the 8-episode miniseries aired on Cartoon Network, but we should also consider the classic promotional teasers and trailers);
- Microsite (intelligently hosted inside the main Lego Star Wars section in the Lego.com site);
- Online videos, hosted both in the Lego Star Wars section and in the Lego YouTube channel;
- Images of any kind (wallpapers, avatars, ready-for-memes images);
- Several apps, for pre and post-launch, and for iOS, Android, and desktop browsers;
- Billboards;
- Guerrilla marketing actions;
- Books.
- The TV Series is produced by Lego itself, while external companies take care especially of the pre-launch marketing actions (Execution);
- Users have plenty of occasion for engaging with Yoda Chronicles, and are enticed to revamp their own fans' nature, thanks in particular to guerrilla marketing actions, games and message board on the site (Experience);
- The games allow users to relive the adventures of Yoda and his Padawans, and the games incite players to discover secret codes to use on the site, guiding them into a web ecosystem that see also the possibility to buy the Lego Star Wars products and discuss them (interactions between all elements).
3,000,000+ bricks were needed for creating this 1:1 X-Wing Fighter. The buzz was of similar scale.
(Photo by
Pascal on Flickr)
When it comes to Fandom, Lego simply allows fans the freedom of doing (almost) everything their imagination inspires them to create, and doesn't try to control (at least in most cases) their creativity.
This attitude is key for letting consumers becoming prosumers—people who create new original content from brands' products, helping grow the brands' recognition and
The "philosophical" reason is that products become part of the life of the buyer, and extension of his personality, which shares the same values of the brand. Letting the buyer freely share and produce content with its own products, then, is like creating a promotional force for the brand at zero cost.
Remember, fans look for pleasure... so we should concede them the liberty of finding pleasure with our products.
The liberty of building, then, is extremely consistent with the company's Why, and denying the freedom of literally building content would be going against its own principle.
For this reason, too, Lego lets fans doing everything with its bricks and does not commit the mistake George Lucas, for instance, did not understand about the force of Star Wars fandom when he tried to block it.
Takeaways
When we design a strategy for a brand, even if it is "just" a search marketing strategy, we should always remember to ask the right questions, which can help us understand the general marketing landscape our action will be a part of (it will determine ours).
Consistency is key in marketing. If it is not present, then the message fails to pass or our actions can even produce results opposite to those desired.
Creating a "Bible," which not only takes into consideration all the possible connections our strategy has with other marketing channels, but also defines and describes the specs of every action and the brand storytelling consistency common to all them, will help us with the following:
- Maintaining control over the development of the campaign;
- Developing campaigns aligned to the general marketing campaign of the brand we work for;
- Getting inspiration for new actions and new campaigns; and
- Offering clear expectations to the client.
When creating this document, then, we must always answer these questions:
- What facet of the brand storytelling do we want to narrate?
- How are we going to narrate it?
- What is the genre we will use?
- If we use different elements for narrating a story, how do they relate to each other?
- What kind of engagement are we looking for?
- Will this engagement influence the evolution of the campaign and of the storytelling?
- How will we manage the engagement and what control we will let the users have over the story?
- How can we create synergy between online and offline engagement?
- What platform will we use (and not use)? And do any of them really add value to the users?
- Will we start targeting a massive audience or a small subset?
- Will the experience be free for everyone, or will we go for a freemium or invite-only model?
This last two points are very important, because a strategy should be thought of as a modular building, so that we can start developing it even if we do not have a big budget. Remember, a marketing strategy that previews the deep interaction with the fans can also have its start in something like Kickstarter, which means that it can even be paid for by very engaged fans.
Exercise:
Choose two brands, for instance Betabrand and Beardbrand, and analyze how their marketing is based on the dialectic between canon and fandom.
Experience
If we put users at the center of our marketing efforts, then we should create a marketing strategy that is not only able to answer our customers' needs, but also able to make them feel our brand is partly theirs.
For this reason engagement is so important, as was explained well by Rand Fishkin in his last Whiteboard Friday.
One mistake we do make, though, is considering engagement to be something related only to Social Media.
In fact, engagement is the consequence of a principle, which must be at the basis of every action realized by a brand in every aspect of its relationship with its audience: creating positive experiences for its users.
If we understand this, then we see how all the best practices in every field of marketing have logical meaning, and how all of them have a common purpose: earning such trust and loyalty that when we receive a critique, it will always be a constructive one.
(note: Lego answered to Greenpeace announcing that it will not renew the contract with Shell)
Lego has understood this well, and almost everything I wrote above about Lego proves it.
- Customer care
- Products
Customer care
Lego, even though it also uses its social media profiles for instantly attending to customer care issues, prefers to maintain this facet offline, paying extreme attention to the quality of the service offered.
In some cases, it decides to go further and personalize the experience such a way that a simple customer care answer can become a pure marketing action, as in the case of this letter sent to a kid by a customer care representative, who responds to a problem the child had with the Sensei Wu minifigure:
It is not a surprise that a letter like this saw a viral response on social media last year.
Products
Sometimes we forget that products are marketing. Moreover, sometimes we forget that creating a product that can result in a winning marketing action doesn't necessarily need a huge budget.
A good example of this is a very simple idea Lego had for this holiday season: the Minifigure Family.
Minifigure Family is based on a simple idea: It offers users the possibility to share on their social media profiles a virtual Happy Holidays postcard, where users and their family are portrayed as Lego figures.
A simple product, a simple idea and a great success on social media (here's Twitter data by Topsy).
But if we want to find a product that us SEOs know well, and that the most intelligent brands, and Lego is one of them are starting to offer to its prosumers, that is data under the form of APIs.
Moreover, APIs now for us SEOs are starting to have a new interesting consequence: structured data and better Semantic SEO.
In fact the best APIs (and unfortunately this is not the case of Lego's ones yet, a better example is Marvel's API) can be available also via JSON, and JSON LD is also a way to inject structured data into a website. Hence, APIs can be a bridge to semantically optimize every website using them, and so making the brand, which owns them, more visible.
Drillability
If experience leads to engagement, and engagement leads to spreadability, then we must add that experience and all its consequences can be achieved also thanks to drillability, or the creation of really targeted content/products, which is able to combine two different passions our audience has in a simoultaneous experience.
In the case of Lego this is achieved mainly through franchising and co-marketing actions with other brands, as is in the case of Lego Star Wars, Lego Minecraft, Lego Marvel, Lego DC Comics, etc.
Having found other passions of its fanbase, Lego was able to expand its audience into new markets.
In cases more like the ones we deal with everyday, this may lead to opportunities for writing a regular column in a website our audience visits, hiring an influencer to write for our company blog, or any other "co-marketing" opportunity.
Takeaways
Marketing has changed. All marketing—not just SEO.
Users now are the main protagonists of every action, and sometimes they even are the ones creating the actions that market the brands.
For this reason everything - from the website performance to the product description, from the content we create and the support we offer - must be focused on offering positive experiences to our audience, so to earn trust and loyalty, and having it becoming our main commercial force.
Lego does it, Mattel does not... and the results are here to demonstrate it:
Conclusion
In the past weeks I have been asked several times what my previews about SEO and marketing are for 2015.
Sincerely, I do not have an answer to those questions.
What I know, though, is that more and more, every marketing channel influences every other, and therefore, SEO must be absolutely aware that it is part of something bigger.
It is increasingly clear to me that the boundary once existing between online and offline no longer exists. We should not talk about multi-device, we should talk about OnOff as the only existing reality.
Google itself is urging us to think this way, since we've been many months now with Google Universal Analytics and, recently, with Adwords' In-Store Conversions.
What I do know is that the best brands have become publishers, and Google is well aware of this evolution and rewards it.
Everything is content, I hope we will understand it once for all.
What I see is that there is no more space for extemporary actions, and that with no strategy behind it even the more resounding success will quickly be forgotten and will not help achieving the goals that we have set.
What my intuition tells me is that we are in a transition phase, in a time when we have to decide what we want to be and really understand what our competitive advantages are. Those are the ways we can actually help businesses and assume a well-defined role in their marketing.
If we do not decide and understand, then we will become nerds at the service of the big media agencies, or working in their shadow.
This is why I hope that, more and more, the strategic component of our work will be considered the foundation of every campaign that we SEOs realize.
That's why I wanted to describe to all of you what Lego can teach us about marketing: because it responds to a finely defined strategy, which has helped Lego go from near bankruptcy to dominating the toy industry.
Spot on Gianluca - I teach Digital Marketing at University and the key underlying theoretical and strategic strand is the change from a service economy to a (customer) experience economy - this was first explored by Joseph Pine in the 90s (check out Pine's Ted talk here for example ). I.e. economic value is now (in 2015) = customer experience.
Since marketing is concerned with 'generating value for customers' (and value is not just monetary!), in 2015 it's all about creating a positive, memorable customer experience, across ALL touchpoints and channels (consumers don't think in channels).
My prediction for 2015: Brand will continue to increase in importance in strategic marketing, since it's the one thing that is able to hold together and communicate an experience, and convey a value (monetary and otherwise) irrespective of channels.
Anecdotal case in point: Regardless of Ryanair's website becoming much more user friendly and customer centric, I still will avoid them like the plague if there are alternatives and I will continue to spread negative advocacy (largely due to their sexist CEO). See also Apple - another brand on my list of NEVER EVER.
Another prediction: Consumers will increasingly vote with their wallet. This is a wild guess, but I notice this in myself (see above examples) and with friends and families. People appear to start getting sick of buying from phony / inauthentic brands or those that do not appear to care about their customers (e.g. by providing a bad UX on their site). Genuine trust and likeability appear to increasingly matter, and this too is all about wider brand issues and fundamentals. I definitely have a soft spot for Lego (even though I haven't owned bricks in many years) and even got the Lego Movie (3d) for Xmas!
Thanks for the post then, and I hope it gets the attention it deserves, what with most people hopefully being off the grid (AFK) and enjoying time with their loved ones just now :)
SEO is a complete package now, its inbound strategy that makes your brand stand out in the digital world.
Salman, it's not Inbound Marketing or SEO or Social... it's Marketing what makes a brand stand out.
By the way, again, I thought it was quite clear that for me SEO and Inbound Marketing are not the same thing (Inbound is much bigger than SEO)... if you think the contrary, than you're falling in the SEOcentrism I was writing about in the post.
You're absolutely right sir :) Inbound Marketing is much bigger than SEO and I meant the same up there
There is something that runs through almost the entire post,something Lego and many other smart (and with enough resources) company implemented - gamification.Excellent technique for engagement and users retention.
"Service and customer care are expression of the value of a brands" - absolutely agree.I would only add "and potential customer" care.Ignoring someone because atm is not a customer is,in my opinion,big mistake.
Gianluca, this is a great article -- as someone else who thinks and writes a lot about marketing as a whole, I agree that a lot of digital marketers need to think about the big picture. However, in a wonderful essay that implores people to think beyond just "SEO," you never define "SEO" except to equate it with the (also loaded) phrase of "inbound marketing." (I don't mean to single you out -- very few people will take a stab at that controversial issue.)
And I think that's a really a big issue in our industry. Take the early days. Ensuring that Google could crawl, parse, and index a website and then writing keyword-inspired tags was "SEO." Then, "SEO" became all about getting links too. A little bit later, I saw "SEO" people and publication talking about social media. Then, I saw everyone talking about conversion-rate optimization -- is "doing social media and CRO" now "doing SEO" too? I could go on and on about everything that now seems to be under the "SEO" umbrella.
However, if a term means everything, then it starts to mean nothing. But if Google's algorithm seems to take into account almost everything -- see Rand's most-recent WBF on overall online engagement as a ranking factor that people are ignoring -- then "SEO" must seem to need to take into account everything. But if that's the case, then isn't "SEO" just pretty much "good marketing and web development" today (or at least just good "digital/online marketing)?
I don't really have a good answer to my own question -- it's just more of a thought-experiment: What exactly is the dividing line between "SEO" and "not SEO"?
Personally, I've dropped "SEO" from my CV and social outlets and personal website as a result of a sentiment that I first saw Rand tweet about two years ago: “the more advanced Google becomes, the more SEO feels like a bonus for getting marketing and web development right.” (Plus, so many people would still think in 2014 that I'm a spammer of keywords and links.)
But that's just my opinion. Mozzers, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
Maybe I did not give a definition of SEO, because that is something I gave many times in others posts.
Said that, for me SEO is Technical Marketing specialized in Search as marketing channel.
1) Technical: because we must know the technical specs for which a website (or any digital presence) must respond to for obtaining the most from search algorithms (not just Google, but also YouTube, Google Maps or even what have become vertical search engines de facto, like Amazon)
2) Marketing: because - at the end - the final purpose of SEO is to market a website, and that's partly related also to what you usually define as Digital PR.
I don't think that SEOs should appropriate and pretend Social Media, CRO and other disciplines as they were "SEO-subsets". What it's sure is that the interations between all channels and how they influence each other is a reality, hence SEO should know about them responding to the t-shaped marketer figure, and to collaborate with the professionals specialized in those disciplines.
But they should do it also with all the other marketing channels/figure working, as it does, on promoting a brand.
I agree, Google has been trying to get the SEO community to think about the big picture and dig our heads out of the "SEOcentric" checklists for a while now. My wish is that more clients could have a thought-out identity and branding (beyond getting sales). This is definitely an area where I feel that we as marketing professionals can help our clients find their center and use that information to find and use strategy to speak to the right audiences.
I agree with everything you said Gianluca. I find that SEO (by itself) is a harder & harder sell with all the Google changes as well. Clients want their site to show up & be optimised but there are no guarantees. If they spend on PPC, there's a guarantee someone saw the ad & clicked it. Same on Facebook ads, Twitter ads & remarketing. Same with Youtube - if you allow it to be skipped, someone still saw it to skip it. For the most part, you are guaranteed that if you pay for ads, they show up to your customers.
With SEO (and social) there's just no guarantee. Build a FB page with 50k likes and post an update - maybe 500 see it, maybe 50 tomorrow, maybe 45000 the next day. We just don't know. Same with SEO - you can build a great site, do proper white hat link building and guess what? Someone may outrank you with 140,000 unnatural links. Sure they will be penalised soon but someone else will replace them with the same tactics. The cycle repeats and that "long term" strategy puts you out of business.
The first image in this post is the most telling & memorable. We need to remember that SEO is such a small part of "marketing" while we see it as the end-goal. Page 1 helps you but without good CRO, landing pages, UX and site speed you may not get any sales despite ranking. It's ALL omni-channel, everything connects. That's MY big lesson from 2014 and I think this post ties it all together very well
Out of interest, did you need Lego's permission to include them in this case study, or did they perhaps pay to be included?
Thanks
no and no.
Lego isn't or wasn't my client, so there is no presence of NDA. Moreover, all the information I give and used is public.
No, Lego did not pay a dime for me writing this post. They even did not know I was writing it, if not after its publication, because I'm pretty sure they monitor their own brand mentions.
We were thinking the same thing. Solid brand mentions for free!
Well, if a brand is so good to become a case study, it deserves it: Lego, Zara, Amazon, Zillow or whatever brand it is :-)
Hi Giancula,
I think the most important thing for you is to respect other people's hard work, which you obviously don't do so well. I found my image of me staring into the milky way galaxy used in your article Universe of Graphs. I have reported it and tried several attempts to reach out to you.
I would suggest that next time you ask me for my permission first before using my photo for anything. I have reported it on quite a lot of sites where your article has been reposted.
I would be grateful if you could stop doing this in the future. Thank you evry much for understanding that you have ruined my beautiful image by stealing it and placing it in your article without my permission.
Have a good weekend!
Bimal
Hi Gianluca !
Article very comprehensive and utilie for webmarketer. Thank you!
Awesome....!! Very useful and informative information here...Thank You
Brilliant post. Very impressive! I had never looked at Lego like that before. I love the term "SEOcentrism" also. I'm going to start using that! This place just keeps cranking out hits!
great post .. thanks for sharing, bookmarked :) the lego experience can teach us all!
Hey Gianluca Fiorelli
Brilliant case study! few days before i heard that SEO has dead but now I thought it will never end. Infect area of SEO became broad. Past A year link-building was the synonym of SEO but now Inbound marketing, Affiliate marketing and influencer marketing are synonym of SEO.
My analysis says, SEO terms that - improving business reach to potential customers via organic searches states SEO. Either customer is reaching through direct from search engine, by any referral links of content or elsewhere.
Once again thanks for this wonderful post!
Nicole,
In the post I'm actually saying the contrary: Inbound Marketing is not a synonym of SEO.
On the other hand, Influencer Marketing is just another defition for Relationship Marketing, and that's something that since always has been part of the best link building practices.
And Affiliate Marketing, well, that's a business model not a marketing discipline, and as any business model it needs not just SEO, but also Social, Email Marketing et al for being successful.
Excellent writing, as always; however, I can't help but be a little critical.
I see pieces like this on the MOZ blog regularly now, and I get it!! SEO has to tie into all other marketing efforts.
This works great and is definitely applicable if you work for an empire or giant corporation like LEGO, or Hasbro, or GE.
The only problem is that most of us don't work in the big leagues, we are doing in-house work or consulting for salons, diners, local shops, regional franchises, or B2B companies, where nobody really cares about the "brand", they care about the services or products companies provide.
I am not going to get people to buy t-shirts and make christmas cards for my local area salon. I can't get people excited about my branding for a custom case B2B company that sells designs and provides manufacturing logistics for OEMs.
My point is that all these grandiose master plans simply don't apply to most of us in these niche industries. For us, it really IS all about SEO.
I can literally get a correlation coefficient of .9 or higher when doing data analysis on organic keyword rankings to in-store sales. It seems as if the waters get muddy when you try too hard to create such a complex branding scheme and campaign for a small business, when it's just not realistic. What I am saying is that sometimes we need to calm down and be real about what we can do for a client.
You're not going to create some super brand for that cool salon down the street, that will be easily recognized by anyone outside of a few zip codes, but if you really have some laser focus on local search rankings, and make sure your website is miles better than the competition, usually that's enough to really make an impact on your client's bottom line...even if you can't make million dollar movies about your client's product becoming animate objects:)
I hear you Sean, and I have privately discussed with my friend Aleyda about this same objection my post may arise, and surely I will have to write a follow up post presenting case histories of "normal" brands that achieved - in the given proportions - the same kind of success.
My post - and I am sorry if it did not pass through - was not about what Lego did and does, but the strategic philosophy behind its actions:
These 4 points, I believe, are applicable to all kind of brands, also B2B and small ones. What I've learnt is that is that even the "coldest" business company was founded with a great idea (I.e.: concrete > making building rationale and for all), that even the smallest brand has a marketing life offline, that we tend not consider, that has more than one audience (the direct consumers but also the people interested in the broad topics touched by the brand... Again: concrete > engineers, but also architects, designers and artists).I used Lego because because is the most known brand doing things right right now, so I was able to use just one case history for explaining in all details my idea, but in businesses I cited for the "exercises" you will see also brands like Beardbrand, which cannot be told as a big brand at all, but one that - following the principles I cited, is being able to dominate its niche.
p.s.: Service and customer care are expression of the value of a brands, that's why I wrote about it too in the post. Sometimes, especially in B2B, they are the most powerful weapon also in marketing terms.
And I definitely agree with those concepts as a solid marketing foundation. For the record I also love LEGO and everything they do:)
My main point here is that sometimes we, as marketers or SEOs or whatever we want to call ourselves, try to overcomplicate things when dealing with "smaller" types of clients. Usually this leads to more stress and worse results than if you were to just really focus in on SEO.
A very astute and excellent response though, and I loved your article for the record. Happy New Years Mozzers!
Excuse my English so basic :). lately is that the brand is very important and I'm starting to use it with enough strength in my seo strategy, even so I wonder if when I put the title Yoast SEO, is it a good idea to leave the url of my website ?.
example:
5 Things to Do Before You Die myweb.com
thank you :)
Hey Gianluca,
This is indeed the excellent and well-described post from your pen. It's always great to read these kind of case studies on the brands as they inspire marketers to take initiatives and strengthen their skills. The way Lego spotted the problems and took the initiatives, they truly deserves the appreciation.
I'm currently analyzing the marketing of AirBNB and I must say these folks are also doing exceptional work.
Thanks for the great piece.
Cheers,
Umar
Thanks Gianluca, very appropriate case-study topic this Holiday season!
Thanks Gianluca, It's a great case study. You are absolutely right that SEOs should change their mindset because this mindset is not only limiting them but also hurting them
Fantastic post. Congratulations
Hi Gianluca,
It's good to read this article. I get a lot of information that change my mind about SEO and the conclusion is good and clear.
Thanks for sharing !
Fenny Angel King
[link removed]
impressive article.These points are helpful to us.Thank u for sharing excellent post