At some point during your University's SEO 201: Advanced Keyword Research & Targeting class, they probably gave a few lectures and case studies on how to effectively split up your keyword research list across multiple pages and use those terms/phrases to maximum benefit. But, for those who might have missed that lesson (which would be, umm, all of us, since no formal education in SEO exists), a handy refresher might be in order.
Many SEOs struggle to answer questions like:
- How many keywords can I target on a page?
- Should I try to target all of my most important terms on my homepage (since it gets the most link juice)?
- When I should try to target similar phrases together vs. splitting them up?
This post is meant to help with precisely those issues.
At the end of the keyword research phase you've established which terms and phrases are worthwhile. Now you'll need to determine which keywords to target where, and how. This four-step process should make that easy (and apparently, checklists are awesome).
I'm using comic books both because they're fun, and because a recently retired-from-Google friend opened his own comic shop in West Seattle, so I've got superheroes in tights on the brain. In the example above, I've sorted several high demand keywords into groupings that relate to their core subject - in this case, by superhero. You can do this with products, articles, blog post categories or any type of content.
Next, I need to segment the keywords in each group by the intent of a potential visitor. This is absolutely critical, because even if two keyword terms/phrases are very similar, putting them together can be disatrous if the goals of the searcher are different. It's technically worse to rank 1st and convert visits at 0.1% than to rank 10th and get a conversion rate of 2%. By segmenting on intent, you can make sure to uniquely target searchers seeking a specific goal without cannibalizing or misdirecting traffic to the detriment of your site's usability/conversion rate.
If possible, you'll want to use the insight you gain from the keyword research and targeting process to help determine the site's hierarchy and information architecture. Even if you're deep down in the weeds on an already existing site, you can employ intelligent cross-linking to make sure visitors can find what they're seeking from potential landing pages. The concept should be to make the primary content of the page the most likely target of the searcher's intent, then provide navigation to secondary, tertiary or more specific needs.
You now have the keyword groups segmented to individual pages and a hierarchy for your site, so the final step is assigning the keyword targets to individual pages and providing recommendations on Titles, URLs, Meta Descriptions and page functionality. In the example above, I've employed multiple keywords in the page elements (plural and singular versions of "comic" as well as "dc comics" and "batman comics") to help attract that traffic. I'm also listing "detective comics" here, though technically, I might even have a separate subcategory for that individual series that's linked-to on this page.
This planning process is key to getting the best results possible. Over time, your analytics data can help show you where assumptions have been incorrect and you can course correct. What's important is understanding the basic rules for keyword targeting:
- No page should target keywords just because it "can rank for them;" you need to also consider the visitor experience and whether the page's content can serve as many "keyword masters" as you're targeting.
- Pages can target multiple keywords and phrases at once so long as the intent is the same. Don't arbitrarily split up pages or make a new page for every permutation of a keyphrase simply so you can have "optimum" optimization. Remember it's much easier to earn links to one page than to many (and much easier to build one good funnel than two).
- Keyword targeted pages need to provide the content a visitor is seeking and the links to the detailed pages they might want. Search engines are pretty smart - if visitors aren't getting value from your pages, they're not going to link to them, not going to click them in the SERPs and not going to recommend them to others. Even if you manipulate your way to the top today, in the long run, the engines will identify methods to get relevant, quality content ranking.
I'd also suggest checking out previous posts on:
- Perfecting Keyword Targeting & On-Page Optimization
- Optimizing for Multiple Word Order Search Phrases
Hopefully this has been valuable and I'd certainly appreciate examples and suggestions from the community on how you employ keyword targeting for maximum benefit.
p.s. I may have overstated when I said there's "no" formal education. Market Motive offers some great online classes and certification as does Search Engine College. And yes, SEOmoz has a video training series, too - the metaphor was meant tongue in cheek :-)
Nice walk-thru.
Of course I'm sure the biggest challenges you see fall into one of two areas:
Great post. If your budget and launch schedule leave room for doing so, card sorting can be useful in determining how to organize the keywords.
Participants in a card sorting session are asked to organize your keywords in a way that makes sense to them. Participants review your keywords and then group these items into categories. The participants may even help you label these groups. Card sorting helps you learn how users think about your keywords and often provides insight into how best to organize the information on your Web site.
Mmm... do you mean it as it was some sort of "usability keyword test"?
Sounds interesting
Yes, that's exactly what I'm suggesting. I have no personal experience with OptimalSort, but they have a good reputation. Also, most usability consulting firms offer card sorting as a service.
Who makes the graphics for the posts? I can't believe it's you yourself, Rand!
Excellent little guide, its exactly the process im using tho i go longer tail with sub sets... im currently working through 30,000 terms, grouping and workgin out the site map based on these.
For seo purposes i would make sure that internally and externally the core terms for each page are linked at least once using the anchor text to ensure cohesion.
Great Article, I really like the way that you have presented with the images and make things really simple to follow. With the little background pages for Batman, Superman etc it makes SEO fun! :P
Now I have something that I have been getting quite confused about and I was hoping that you were going to answer it in this blog post, but didn't quite find that answer. (I could have missed it though).
I want to know how do I know which keywords to target for the home page, because the homepage has the most authority on the website, the most page rank and link juice usually.
Do I just pick the biggest competition keywords that we are trying to go for?Is it okay for the homepage to be a more broad overview of EVERYTHING you might provide? Eg. Clothing Store, might be T-shirts, Pants, Hats, and Shoes or something.
It's starting to make sense to me now to find then best keywords with decent searches, do competitor research to find out how much competition there is for the keywords, and then work out where to place the keywords on the website.
If anybody has some good advice when it comes to optimizing the homepage I would gladly appreciate it!
Thanks again. Sheldon
I realize the post and all comments are plenty old but I too have the same question as you SparxWebSolutions. What I'd like to see is what keywords Rand might use to target the top level Batman page as well as the home page.
I totally get what Rand is saying in this article and try to explain this idea to clients all the time, but in the real world, most times my clients don't have sites that go any deeper than the "Batman" level page. They don't want to invest time or money in writing more content. Or I am faced with a shopping cart like Shopify that makes it difficult to do SEO right and I have to get most of my SEO mileage on pages that can't be so well targeted.
So Rand, if you don't mind commenting on a year old post...what's the answer? What would keywords would be used for the home page and top level Batman page in your example?
This is one of the most usefull posts that i have read this year. it explains keyword targeting in such a clear way that this is perfect reading material for all my friends that want to know something about SEO.. Definitly worth retweeting...
yeah if only Googles seo starter guide was this useful lol.
When we promise ourselves that this 2010 would have been a great year for being SEO, I think we were right. And the great quality of all the posts published here in the SEOmoz blogs is a (corollary) sign of how confident the sector is feeling... and I am sure it's not only a beginning-of-the-year factor.
Talking about keyword targeting, I think it's really connected with how you're going to structure the arquitecture of your website. The correctness of this relation is evident in the post.
Therefore, before even targeting the exact keywords, it has to perfectly fit the argurment(s) of the website, whatever it is. This imply a well done and thought definition of your public (as also remarked by Rand).
Just when targeting public > web's topics > arquitecture > internal navigation are finally well define, then you are able to define the keywords hierarchy of all the pages too.
Then it will come the analytic factor, which is as important in refining the keywords targeting as the previous studies (especially for the neck and long tail keywords).
Finally, you're so right with your sarcastic note about official SEO studies. Also here in Spain (and Italy) they aren't so present on a university level or post-graduation one (but we have fantastic degrees on papirology or 'ancient-roman-graves-inscription-translations'...). Personally I'm negotiating with a really good School for Devs and Web Designer here in Valencia in order to establish a SEO application course. Maybe it should be also to us to start proposing and pretending to be taken seriously by the Academic world, don't you think?
Great Post. We all like easy to follow steps. I wish there was one for PPC.
Thanks Rand for this excellent post on matching keyword relevancy with visitor intent.
I am interested in learning the average bounce rate for the Search industry, for key phrases like seo, seo services, and so on. Is there any study like that? Are people sharing their data somewhere? If not, would SEOmoz consider having a survey?
What a great post. Randy, thanks for sharing all those great concepts, techniques and knowledge.
Could you post an example of the keyword plan for the batman category page? I'm a bit confused about the risks of keyword cannibalization between category and subcategory pages
Hi Rand, great post but I'm not sure if I'm missing something...when looking at 'Step: 2 - Intent & Segmenting' would you base these decisions on each bucket of broad associations in Step 1 individually or would you re-look at ALL your keywords as a whole rather than the sub-sections.
The issue being user intent will cross over the broad association dividers...
This make sense?
Great guide Rand. Distilled recommended it as further reading in their DistilledU program.
Average number of keywords driving traffic per landing page can also be a valuable KPI to evaluate the SEO process performance. See more on this at point 4 of the following post:
https://www.seomoz.org/ugc/seo-kpis-to-track-with-google-analytics
We've had some success with creating landing pages for specific keywords. If you are using AdWords you will get a better quality score for those keywords if your landing page is optimized for them.
Great post on segmentation - it's important that you target keywords with specific content and landing pages to increase their effectiveness.
What about blogs? How does one use a blog for targeting specific keywords? How many keywords do you allow yourself so you can keep your blog topics varied?
Thanks for the article Randfish,
I have grouped related keywords for each of my webpages and have spoken to various SEO guys helping me with my site on setting out title tags. They seem to split in to two camps - some people say write in a natural way like you have, or some say to write in a very exact way. The guy I currently use for my SEO would say (using your example) to lay out the title tag in a very exact way like this:
Batman Comics | Batman Comic Book | Comicstore
(notice the use of Batman Comic twice in the title)
I prefer your more natural method which covers all the related keywords in your group. I prefer your method, but i'm concerned it might not rank as well for the exact keyword phrases? Also, should I avoid repeating keywords in the title tag like in my above example?
Thanks,
Rob
Great post Rand. It's obvious since the home page gets most of the link juice making it the most authoritative property on the domain if you havent sectored out yet that you'll be scared to segment into each category.
Nevertheless, I see that if you have good link juice to the home page, that will automatically give you some authority with Google to your category pages if well optimized, not so much based on incoming links to those category pages but on-page optimization.
One question that has been bothered me lately. If I understand things correctly you should always use one (1) page per term? Never write two pages about the same subject? Does that mean that the size of the whole web site doesn´t mather? Using the batman idea Google doesn´t say: "Gosh - the whole website is about Batman. That means that it must be a great resource - lets rank all pages a little higher?"
Rand, I can see that this post is quite old (especially considering the rapidly changing world of search engine optimization), but the tactics and strategy you recommend here is still relevant 4 years later.
I'm focusing on a re-vamp of my website Business of Architecture, and I will definitely be using this "plan ahead" approach to optimizing content. I can definitely say that in the past my strategy has been a little more "shoot from the hip" but I think making the kind of outline and keyword research you suggest will provide a solid foundation for future content.
Concerning the comments above about plural words, I've personally found that plurals rank differently than their singular counterparts.
Really awsome recap Rand! You make things look so easy with your graphics tbh! :) Grouping keywords is something that i always seem to have trouble with :)
Just what I was looking for. Thanks!
Thanks Rand man. I'm late to the party and everyone's said it ahead of me, but this was a great and instructive post so it bears repeating.
Excellent keyword tutelage. The posts here at the moz have really been great as of late.
This is exactly how I try to formulate my site structure.
I was wondering if you can suggest any programs or websites that allow you to take your long list of keywords and segment them into different categories easily?
This would help clients to visually see how each "theme" or "category" should have its own page.
Excel. While not directly intended to do this, through creative uses of Excel you can definately break keywords down into smaller, segmented catagories.
Hi Mark
Although not as automated as you might seek, I find the following pretty effective (and relatively quick):
1. Keyword research using Google Keyword Tool (GKT), set to Exact match (I also add the 'trends' column)
2. Export your first set of results from GKT into Excel
3. Run additional, more targeted keyword searches, exporting and adding the results into your first spreadsheet
4. Once you've compiled your long list, order the spreadsheet by the keyword column, alphabetically (A-Z)
5. Scan the list, removing any unrelated terms that have crept in
6. Now order by the Global Monthly Exact Volume column, ranked highest to lowest
7. Insert a new column to the far left-hand-side of the worksheet and then, moving down the Keyword column, identify distinct categories, highlighting the terms with the highest search popularity for that category as you go
Before I continue, an example of point 7 might be helpful here. I researched 'Gift' related terms, quickly built up my long list, then moving down the list I identified the following as main Gift categories -
gifts
baby gifts
gift baskets
gadgets
gift ideas
birthday gifts (etc etc)
In the left hand column I marked 'gifts' as g01, 'baby gifts' as g02, 'gift baskets' as g03, etc, and then...
8. Once the main categories are identified, copy the cell containing the relevant number (e.g. g01), and go down the list pasting the number next to any related terms (e.g. g02 against 'baby gift', 'gifts for babies', 'baby's gifts', etc)
9. Once this exercise is completed, copy the worksheet and create a new sheet for each category (e.g. I created separate worksheets for gift ideas, birthday gifts, etc), then delete the unrelated rows from each
10. Now, for each worksheet/category, continue the Keyword research process from step 1, to identify long tail results for each
Next steps:
11. I then copy the keyword columns for each worksheet/category into separate WebCEO reports, export the SERPs ranking results from there as CSV files, and add this data back into the relevant Excel worksheets
12. This lets me quickly identify which landing pages are ranking for individual search terms, and the popularity of those terms. I can then make judgements on how best to spend my time from there...
- Are some landing pages inappropriate or otherwise not the optimum?
- Are some landing pages hovering just outside of page 1, and if so are there opportunities for some quick on-page SEO improvements?
- Are there terms we simply do not rank for, and if so wht not*?
Etc, etc...
*Using this technique some 3 months ago I identified that we, along with our competitors, had overlooked the American English spelling of a major gift-related term (i.e. ending '...ized' not '...ised'). Some quick work to include this spelling resulted in near-immediate page 1 SERPs for a number of implicated terms - a quick and simple correction. We've seen significant additional revenue as a result, and my task list now includes setting up more tailored landing pages (Gateway page and sub-category pages).
Hope this helps!
Thanks... it helps
Totally agree that Excel can be a great tool for this and while not perfect, using the Google Keyword Tool can be a quick and easy (and free) source of keyword research.
To ramp it up a little, you might want to check the YOUmoz post I did awhile back about the Excel tool I created to help annualize the GKT Local Searches data.
Your timing is uncanny, as I was discussing the best way to tackle this just yesterday. You've saved me a whole load of head scratching, thank you.
Nice addition erocket. I really like it when others share their techniques. It makes this a much more valuable post.
Just to nod my head with the other comments here eRocket, superb offering - now I have another whole lot of work to do instead of Modern Warfare haha
I'd say my own personal attempts have gotten me about 80% of the way through your walk-through. Segmenting by intent is something I felt I should be doing but didn't quite have the steps in the right order to where I do it consistently. Thanks to this post I should have it nailed going forward.
Excellent post!
I've been reading about how I need to target with multiple keywords to optimize the traffic drawn to my site, but there often aren't any specifics on how to do it. I might have been on the right track, but learning this strategy will help me immensely and save me some time.
This is an excellent post. It is pretty close to how I construct my keyword research and plan my tags, anchor, etc.
I will definitely be passing this along.
Another really interesting and useful post to read.
It’s something a lot of people need to know, a lot of people try and squeeze every possible keyword onto their homepage, and this just doesn’t work. We have found by breaking down keywords into their own relevant category also helps with bounce rate, as you are taking them direct to the relevant products/services they want.
And that's a good thing also to avoid paying tons of bucks in Adwords and pay per click advertising...
Agreed, targeting specific, relevant keywords on lower pages in your site's architecture will increase both your overall relevancy for keywords but it will also inprove your visitors' experience.
RFK is so very correct about being careful Not to overdo search phrases, particularly on any single given webpage. Take your time and do focus each page on something specific, typically, just one phrase. Do Not word stuff. Use your phrase in the SEOmoz best practices recommended fashion and you will do well in a surprisingly short period of time, even when up against so-called leaders. However, do not believe that you will outrank them if you do not have high quality and adequate numbers of backlinks with high Page Ranks. At any rate, do Not over do. less is definitely more when it somes to on-page SEO. www.HomeArchitects.com
By the way, I agree, these are all excellent and well-informed SEO comments. I think together we can start the SEO University with the Socratic Method.
I've just taken over a site and had it re-built using wordpress. I'm working through the structure and all the keywords, urls and descriptions. This may sound like a dumb question, so sorry in advance, in the post you mention about using plurals. I always thought that there was no need to do that because the engines would automatically allow for that and still include them. e.g. just use widget and the engines would automatically include the page for widgets as well.
Am I wrong?
i'd use plurals as the defacto standard for the title tag but use singular in selected anchor texts where possible... it works for me :)
Yes, Richard, you're wrong. "Widget" and "widgets" are two different words for Search Engines, so if you need to target both, you'll have to include both in the keyword list.
Thanks guys. That's really handy to know, I'll make sure I apply that
Hi Richard,
It'd be better to have both singular and plural in your content because SEs treat them as different words. Also synonyms are recommended.
Yes, and no.
The engines are good about stemming and singlular/plural versions, however having exact usage or phrasing as the search query can help send that stronger signal to boost ranking over "relatively equal" competitors.
You'll even find treatment may vary depending on how comptetitive the phrasings are or whether the singlular or plural version carries extra significance, such as a considerably more dominant spelling or if one may especially connote different searcher desire: research vs. buy vs. a book or song title.
If you know one version especially meets your audiences needs, say one yields huge bounce rates with no conversion and the other yields very high conversion, then it may be worth focusing on the relevant version. Otherwise, combining them like Rand has, focusing on the specific sub-phrasing patterns that seem appropriate, giving the primary declared search term the prominent position is a popular approach.
This is only a very cursory check, and not intended to conclude anything scientifically, but the following check certainly implies that Google treats singular and plural forms differently. The website I look after is currently ranking* as follows:
gift (position 3) / gifts (pos 8)
valentine gift (pos 2) / valentines gift (pos 5)
[special note - as this example reminds us, plurals can of course occur within the phrase]
unique gift (pos 1) / unique gifts (pos 3)
mens birthday gift (pos 6) / mens birthday gifts (pos 1)
*Note on ranking - although I've disabled personalised search, these results will be affected by factors such as geographical location (we're UK based)
We're generally seeing a higher ranking for singular variants, although as the last example above shows, this is not entirely consistent. Also, we're not following a precise pattern of singular/plural forms in on-page SEO (content, meta tags etc), so the relevant landing pages for the examples above will differ between categories. Plus internal and external linking text will differ etc etc.
An additional point to make is that in some cases we are seeing different landing pages ranking for singular and plural forms of the same term.
As I say, not a scientific test, but certainly an indicator that it could be worth using both singular and plural forms on the page. I'd be interested to hear the views of others on this.
Your post is really helpful. As it explains the minute details that one should remember while while choosing keywords. I will surely apply them.
Thanks
Why is the keyword "action comics" in Step 1 under Superman it would seem this general keyword maybe better placed as a home page keyword or possibly on a page that gives users a listing of comics by genre; same can be said of "detective comics" even though I can see the relationship between batman and "detective comics'
For most of us I think bucketing keywords is rather easy when we are talking about specific products like batman comics, but when you get to general keywords like comics, action comics, detective comics books or collector comics books this is where understanding user intent, creating a proper funnel and assembling keywords become more complicated.
My typical solution for this problem is using pages that are likely to be linked to more fequently like the home page to address this issue but this can't be the only way to handle such items or this may even been incorrect.
If you can see the relationship between "detective comics and batman", the relationship between "action comics and superman" should be obvious.
Please see: https://www.freewebs.com/collectables-info/Action%20comics%201938%20number%201.jpg
Maybe I was not clear.
I was speaking in regards to the relationship between the keyword and the category. "Action Comics" as a keyword could be easily applied to both Batman and Superman while I doubt you would find anyone who would say Superman is a 'detective comic' therefore in regards to the buckets of Superman and Batman 'action comics' applies to both while 'detective comics' in my opinion applies to neither but could loosely be apply to Batman.
It would seem it better to group general keywords that you couldn't know the users intention in a different place not a category specific page like Batman Comics, Batman Books, Superman Comics or Superman Books.
Ah... keyword research. I have to pick on this one as a Batman fan. But Batman is the character that has pretty much defined DC comics (Detective Comics).
In the example given by Rand, "detective comics" has been grouped under Batman. I'd say that it's fair to assume that this isn't as general a keyword as it might see, but will more often than not bring targeted traffic.
I'd agree once again that you'd have to refer to your analytics data and refine your tactic - but you are doing that, right? ;)
Yeah - as I noted, "action comics" and "detective comics" could also go under their own separate categories, but the intent is the issue. It could be that someone is specifically looking for that series, but since they're the most popular "associated comics" with those characters, they might also be seeking the entire range of comics that feature Superman/Batman, respectively. Your analytics data would be able to tell you for sure.
I like the focus on intent as well as broad association. That's often overlooked.
Great visuals, too, they really drove the point home for us humans. Too bad that to a bot a picture isn't worth a thousand words. Ha ha ha, sigh...
maybe the page would rank better if Rank had put in Googlebot?
Rand, two words: Thank You. Between this post and a post you did a couple months ago (https://www.seomoz.org/blog/perfecting-keyword-targeting-on-page-optimization) you have layed out the basics of keyword tageting and how to implement it effectively.
Best,
And what about spiderman?
Perhaps Spiderman provided too many easy puns with the word "web".
Anyway, on topic, this is a very useful refresher and it certainly did me no harm to go over these techniques again. I'd encourage plenty more of these level of posts, useful to new and seasoned SEOs alike.
Rand, this has to be one of the most useful refreshsers ever.
This also neatly accompanies your advice on optimizing for misspellings without damaging credibility from the recent DVD, so that's also appreciated.
Thank you, thank you, thank you from the bottom of my little non-SEO savy heart! There is so much information out there that's almost impossible to wade through due to 'assumptions' - the main one being that the reader actually knows something about SEO! While I have the rudiments, I'm trying to educate myself so I don't make major mistakes that later costs millions to repair!
This is the best and most direct post I've come across. Thanks again!!!!
Erin O'Neal
Good article. But I take issue with the URL naming convention being suggested here.
comicstore.com/batman/batman-comic-books
While it seems like a great idea to repeat keywords, and even if search engines don't penalize for doing it, it seems a little spammy to me.
Simply on the basis of structure;
comicstore.com/batman/comic-books
...makes more sense.
Again, search engines may not penalize for this, in fact, they may even reward you, but I just think it's kind of spammy.
Actually, I simply did it because it's logical given the convention structure above (not for repetition purposes). The parent page would be mycomicstore.com/batman, hence the child would maintain "batman" in the folder structure and not simply be "comic books" since that could refer to a broader set.
I see your point, and either way would likely be fine. I rarely worry about spamminess when it makes sense for users/convention in this fashion though.
Good to know, as sometimes I have these same kind of doubts about "spamming" the URLs
Fair enough. :P
yes very awesomeness post... will help as im making my different targeted landing pages and its nice to see i had the right kind of idea. once again you have solidified what i was already thinking of and its nice to know im on right track
thanks
Rand...
Idea for you....
Semantical relations with Kw phrases with common domain/dir/pageURL.
(floats paper airplane over Rand's head and watches his brain leap up from his seat and chase after the paper airplane..)