This is the third and final installment in this mobile SEO blog post series, covering the impact of the new Google smartphone bot and how you can use it to make the most of your mobile content. The first article in the series discussed how the new smartphone bot works and which sites will be most affected. The post from last week discussed how to author redirects correctly to ensure that your mobile content will be properly indexed by the smartphone bot. This final post will review common search engine indexing problems that mobile sites and mobile platforms have, and how you can prevent them.
Some SEOs insist that we must believe what Google tells us about how and why they index things the way they do; that indexing is consistent, predictable and flawless. Unfortunately, that is not the case, especially in mobile where there are more pages and more potential for things to go wrong. Believing that indexing will always happen correctly, and that you need not mitigate risk factors for mis-indexing will not create the ideal SEO scenario. It will leave your sites (mobile/desktop/tablet) exposed when there are changes to the algorithm, or when new crawlers are evaluating your site for the first time.
If you are trying to ‘dot all your ‘i’s’ and cross all your ‘t’s’ in the world of mobile search engine indexing, here is what you need to know to prevent mis-indexing:
Avoid Duplicate Content
Google has never and will never like duplicate content. Google’s new smartphone bot, and their decision to index and cache mobile redirects may be a way for Google to avoid or minimize the need to index entire mobile pages (possibly), but it is still hard to tell how it all works. Adding mobile pages into a mix will always presents the RISK that something will be misunderstood as ‘duplicate’ and cause problems.
To keep Google happy, in the mobile world it is especially important to avoid the sneakier kinds of duplicate content that some webmasters forget about, otherwise known as DUST. The acronym stands for Duplicate Url Same Text [Acronym shared with my by the awesome Lindsay Perkin-Wassle, of Keyphrasiology]. DUST happens any time more than one version of a URL will resolve in the address bar but the browser shows the same page. The easiest example to understand is a page rendering with or without inclusion of the ‘www’ in the URL (the canonical v. non-canonical discussion usually stops here), but DUST can also be seen when there are multiple versions of a home page or category level page, as in the examples below:
Desktop |
https://www.yoursite.com/ |
It is quite common for sites to allow all four of these URLs to be linked to or typed into the address bar so that the home page will be served. (This can happen at category level pages too, like |
Mobile |
https://m.yoursite.com/ |
Adding mobile pages to the mix makes this even more confusing and cumbersome for Google. |
In the mobile SEO world, it is quite common for mobilization platforms to control the servers and databases that generate the mobile content, and they are infamous (maybe only in my mind) for generating lots of DUST. Even the best mobilization platforms typically have minimal understanding of SEO; they try to set their servers to be very flexible with what page requests they can correctly render, and render as many different variations of a URL as possible. Instead of doing this, the platforms should be setting up the servers to 301 redirect any version of the URL that is not the canonical ‘chosen’ to redirect to the ‘chosen’ version of the URL. This is also how you can set up your own servers to prevent DUST.
Avoid 404 Errors and Misdirects
There is a risk that Google’s new smartphone crawler may be overly literal at first, and rely exclusively on the redirects that are in place, but not evaluate other signals or algorithmic elements. This means that it will probably also have a heightened the sensitivity to errors that are present on a site or in a redirect.
In general having lots of errors on your site can hinder crawling and indexing and cast your mobile site (and possibly desktop site too) in a bad light. Be sure that you check the content frequently for indexed 404 errors in Webmaster Tools, especially if you are generating dynamic mobile pages or using a hosted mobile solution to generate your mobile pages. To make finding and fixing 404s easy, you should set your mobile content up in a separate Webmaster Tools account. This way, you can see just the errors and information related to the mobile content, and not have to subtract out desktop figures to generate meaningful information.
Many 404’s in mobilization platforms are caused by improperly expired mobile content, but you should also watch for 404 errors caused by a lack of capitalization normalization and trailing slash rules set up on the server. See the example below, where one version of a URL is working fine, but the same URL with a capital letter is understood as missing, and being redirected to the mobile home page. (This is also DUST – your server can automatically normalize URLs to remove capitals.)
Capital letters in the URL cause a 404 or redirect to the mobile home page:
Actual URL: |
https://m.yoursite.com/cindy/ |
Successful |
The presence or absence of trailing slashes can also cause problems, as shown below:
Actual URL: |
https://m.yoursite.com/cindy |
Successful |
Whether the page is 404 or just redirecting to the home page, this is a problem. Stuff like this REALLY happens all the time, especially when the mobilization platforms are in charge of the server, so if you are working with an external mobilization vendor, go check this stuff out when you are done reading the article. Error-based redirect to the home page could be somehow mis-indexed as the mobile redirect.
Mobilization platforms will usually not archive mobilized pages for long periods of time, especially for sites that generate new content on a daily basis, but they also generally don’t have a proper mechanism to expire the content in a way that is good for SEO so a very similar scenario could happen with a 404 error on a page that has expired.. Mobilization platforms will generally just remove the content and leave a 404 error, which makes the mobile site look bad, because as you are constantly generating new content, you are also constantly generating new 404 errors at the same rate.
What if Google took the 404 errors on the mobile pages seriously? What if Google somehow associated the errors on the mobile pages with the corresponding desktop pages even though they were still live and fine? Hopefully Google would not let the 404 on the mobile page drag down the credibility and rankings of the desktop page that was redirecting to it, but it is not worth the risk! If you are worried about it, there is a Mobile SEO Tool to help you check indexing of one domain across the desktop and WAP index.
When you are optimizing your mobile content, the best bet is to always play it safe, and keep your content and your server settings as neat and tidy as possible. Avoid the risk of mis-indexing by checking your URLs and watching for errors. When you add more pages and more redirects, and potentially even more servers and different companies to the mix to achieve a good mobile user experience, you increase the risk of mis-indexing.
Thanks for tuning in to this mobile SEO series about optimizing for Google’s new smartphone bot! If you missed the previous articles, they cover important information like how the new bot works, which sites will be affected and how to generate the right kinds of redirects to ensure that your content is correctly indexed by the new bot. Good luck with all of your SEO efforts and stay mobile!
I was having the duplicate issues as well, adding Canonical tag has really me in keeping my website away from getting penalized.
Some SEO's say that there is no risk of duplicate content problems with mobile, but it can definitely happen. Glad the canonicals worked for you!
Yes I would agree. m.example.com would still be considered duplicate no matter how you look at it or how the page looks. So it should be assumed that aoll mobile versions would have the canoncial tag as the home page? Assuming the content is the same?
This was a really great and informative series and I liked this post specifically. I think the worry about duplicate content can be a serious concern when thinking about mobile versions of content. While the mobile space is a great opportunity for businesses and SEO; it is definitely going to have to be in the forefront of everyone's minds on how to use this channel properly
I especially like the tip about setting up a separate Google Webmaster Tools account for the mobile side to check it separately of the other content. Also, the tool provided for check the mobile code is appreciated; every SEO loves another tool to use! Thanks again
Glad you liked it. I am hoping Google Webmaster Tools will add in some more data for mobile soon. Based on what you can see in adWords, they know what carrier people are on, and if they are using WiFi or 3g. That would be really interesting to see included in Webmaster Tools!
this is something out of the world ... awesome ....
One of the things my clients hate the most - I NEVER ALLOW DUPLICATE CONTENT!
SEO 101
Great stuff!
Hi Cindy,
Saw you recently at SMX Sydney and you were fantastic.
Thanks for this series of posts. We recently launched a mobile site that accounts for approx 10% of all our visits. Whilst the on-page elements are somewhat optimised, we didn't really give a second thought for indexing/duplicate type issues. Your series of posts certainly explains these issues well.
Thanks
Just go responsive then no need to worry about duplicate content issues
Hi Cindy,
don't know if you'll ever see that comment and reply, but could it help by having the Google Webmaster tool account set up for mobile, to declare another specific XML sitemap for mobile?
Thanks
PS: saw you a couple of years ago at SES London, and you were already in advanced mode regarding mobile. Thank you for sharing your knowledge!
It seems like responsive design solves all of these issues.... No duplicate content, plus your site will be mobile optimized reducing your mobile bounces, increasing time on site. I have experimented with mobile versions of sites and they are hard to implement and buggy.
Sounds like so much trouble to optimize for a seperate mobile website. Do you think the new mobile responsive design platforms Google mentioned last week will make mobile optimzation obsolete? I know duplicate content won't be an issue because mobile responsive design's don't require a seperate mobile URL.
Responsive design technologies are not new and have been around for some time, fluid template designs as an example, and used in the past for different reasons.
These new CSS techniques utilising media queries to interrogate the display platform will go a long way for many site owners enabling them to provide their most important information, using the same desktop content, but styled and modified dependent on the device being used.
It may not be the perfect solution for all situations but offers the opportunity for most smaller businesses, without massive development budgets, to maximise the potential of increasing use of tablets and smartphone platforms.
Another great post Cindy - thanks for more awesome tips. Like many other folks here, the rise of mobile is definitely keeping us on our toes with new rules to live by for best results. Your article is quite timely!
LOL - it keeps me on my toes too! Really happy to hear you liked the series! Thanks!
Hi Cindy,
So Google's smartphone boat making life more tough as handling DUST and 404 errors becomes more tricky.BTW I have one question. Boat redirects desktop pages to mobile when it is possible as you have said. Suppose if we delete one page from desktop version then will it automatically be removed from mobile index or will generate 404 error?
Thank you!
Pages can be indexed on their own, but as I understand it, they will then have to rank on their own, and that is difficult, since historically desktop pages rank better, even in smartphone search. I would think in a situation like that you would want to possibly 301 the desktop page to a similar page then set up the user-agent detection and redirection from that page to the mobile page.
Hi Cindy,I love you trilogy and it is a great enrichment in my knowledge of Mobile Phone Handling / SEO.
Your part 2 got a little to less notice I guess because of Rand's blog post directly after yours about the Venture Financing of SEOmoz.
Thanks - glad you liked the series! I was happy to get any traffic at all with that kind of amazing news. I am really excited for everyone at SEOmoz, and looking forward to whatever the future brings. It was very exciting news!
Cindy,
Thanks so much for this great series. It is so clear, concise, and useful. I also enjoyed your piece on Marketing Land.
PLease keep us updated on smartphone bots and mobile SEO - we're only seeing more and more of our users moving over to mobile, so we need to keep our hand on the pulse!
Thanks!!! Really appreciate your comments! What a nice thing to say!
Yet a other thing to watch, mobiles! :) That is why I call myself a Web Specialist. We must know everything.
Hi Cindy,
Nice post, I have been a few mobile SEO projects recently so this is a good area for me, I think the two key areas you raise are important for mobile optimization.
the biggest area I see with mobiles is size of image content and how quickly the site loads, also in regards to the content, I mean you have to write content for mobile sites and it has to be sized up for mobile sites becuase if you have 1000 words on a mobile site page its too much imo keeping it simple and short is the key to moving ahead.
But thanks for putting these guides on SEOmoz, some great content.
Yes- I absolutely agree that those are important. I have actually developed some tools to help marketers assess their file size, and how many images they are pulling in. The number of DNS requests seems much more important form mobile - at least in terms of user experience.
I like this article. However, instead of keeping the same content for both platforms mobile/desktop and avoid duplicate content. From an SEO point of view, would it not be more beneficial to have two different versions with unique content for each?
Desktop version full of rich and unique content. Larger images.
Mobile version less but unique content, smaller images for faster load times. Or would it be better to use the same content for both: If the desktop is ranking now the mobile will rank. How does Googles mobile SERP work? is it a reflection of a desktop SERP?
Well - in this case, Google says that smartphone bot rankings are currently based on the desktop page but then redirecting to the mobile page, so having different content betwee the two could cause problems - especially if the bots are comparing the pages to make sure they are a good match and not spammy. This system is actually ripe for abuse, because as far as I can tell they are not doing that check yet.....so take that for what you will :)