Ok, in the mobile world, it is important to understand that Google sometimes lies (Uhhh! Say it ain’t so!) Actually, all of the major search engines do it with mobile results - It is called 'transcoding.' In some cases, the search engines will want to rank a particular page in mobile results, but they know they shouldn’t because they can tell that it will be a bad mobile user experience. (Usually because the file size is too big, or the page has lots of mobile-unfriendly code like Flash or loads of JavaScript).
When this happens, the search engine will show the full search engine listing for the mobile-unfriendly page (like normal), but when you click on it, they will automatically take you to a temporary url that represents a ‘transcoded’ version of the page you requested, (rather than delivering you to the actual page listed in the search results). This temporary transcoded page actually lives on a subdomain hosted by the search engine, and shows a scraped version of the page you requested. The scrape usually just shows the text and small images of the page, but omits anything that might cause problems for a mobile browser; sometimes this can include background images, big images, animations, videos, iFrames, and heavy/complex code.
You Might Want Transcoding, but Probably Not
If you have totally ignored the mobile web, transcoding can be a good thing, because it allows you to rank in mobile results when you otherwise might be omitted. (Ranking with transcoding is better than not ranking at all). Unfortunately, none of the search engines do a stellar job with their transcoding. In Google, pages that are transcoded usually closely resemble the ‘text-only’ version of the page that Google keeps in its cache. In some cases though, the transcoding can really mess up a page, missing core navigation, breaking long pages into multiple pages at odd places, or cutting out important sections.
Remember that the search engine use of transcoded pages differs from phone to phone, so just because pages are not being automatically transcoded from search results on your phone does not mean that they are never being transcoded by the mobile search engines. The less sophisticated a mobile browser is, the more likely the search engine is to transcode a page; based on my experience, this is happening mostly on BlackBerry's and WindowsMobile devices. To see what a page looks like when Google transcodes it, there are two options:
1.) You can perform a search on a mobile phone, then click the ‘options’ button to the right of one of your results in the SERP, and then select ‘Mobile formatted.’ (Illustrated below)
2.) You can also put your url into Google’s tool, here: https://www.google.com/gwt/n? from your computer or your mobile phone.
The image below shows what Realtor.com looks like when it is transcoded by Google, and it is obviously not a great experience. You can see, in this instance, that two header images are missing, including the logo. It also turns the JavaScript navigation into text links that are a bit squished together, and hard to understand (Find a Home Home Finance Home & Garden). Last, since the transcoding software can't render JavaScript, it has been served an error message, telling it to turn on JavaScript.
Preventing Transcoding
If you are pretty confident in your mobile site rendering, you can include the ‘no-transform’ cache control in the headers of your template, and that will usually prevent your pages from being transcoded by the search engines, but it is not 100%. The good news is that with faster network connections and better mobile browsers, transcoding by the search engines is becoming much less common. The important take-away here, is to at least test to see what your pages look like when they are being transcoded (even if you have a no-transform cache control in place). In many cases, minor on-page code tweaks can make the transcoded experience much more user-friendly and palatable, improving your ability to reach the widest range of mobile customers, regardless of the phone they are searching from.
Hi Cindy,
Great post (thumbs up reminder)
I foresee another hiccup in this practice. If the Search Engine takes visitors to it's scarped version of the site rather than the actual website there will most likely be an inaccurate tracking of visits to the site and an impression that the site is NOT as relevant as it really is in a give search.
The other downside is for sites that have constant changes on a daily basis. Which version is showing up in the SE's scraped view. How is it effecting user experience? For instance, if you have a sports related website and are posting information about the latest sports news but the scraped version is showing something that was on your site a week ago....
Since more and more web users are using their mobile devices more than their desktops for searches, the implications for websites that would fare well on a computer but not in a Search Engines scraped temporary version are HUGE.
But how does google react when you are using CSS to display a mobile version of the same content?
I didn't even know that. It's good to learn that Search Engine do that. You told that it could be good if search engine transcoded "better" and remove duplicate content / index. What about CSS media queries ? We can change CSS style of the same, the same page, for more usability so transcoding is not useful if we can do media queries and control the display ?
Nice. Pretty good post on Mobile Search Engine Transcoding. I am not aware of this before. Will be looking back for updates on this.
Hey Suzzick.
Can you recommend some tools for testing different mobile browsers from a PC?
Thanks for a great post, I know absolutely nothing about mobile SEO and I should start, so thanks for the lesson.
So having a mobile friendly site may create an SEO advantage in Wedding Dresses?
Great content but the styling of the text isn't right, looks like a copy paste from MS Word
Great info, I wasn't aware search engines did this. Makes a good case for creating a mobile version of your site.
Just a note for next time, the font size/type used in this post wasn't exaclty user friendly IMO. Or maybe I just need glasses?
I think your post can also explain why my WordPress blog looks so different on mobile browser, and that I can see Google ads on the top of my blog on mobile but not on laptop.
Thanks for the great post!!
There are some really cool wordpress themes (and plugins) specifically designed for mobile users. Your wordpress would switch theme based on either a full web browser or mobile browser and show the appropriate theme based on your visitors platform. I've had great mobile success using them. <3 wordpress.
Do you have a specific wordpress mobile plugin to recommend?
Thanks!
I agree with @LCsimon. I actually don't think that your blog is being transcoded, because I have never seen Google add advertising on any of its transcoded pages. It sounds more likely that you have integrated a mobile plugin that has advertising with it. If the advertising doesn't bother you then all is good, but it sounds like someone else might be making money on your traffic if the banners/adSense are not delivering money to one of your accounts.
Great Post, and interesting information, I am far from a expert on mobil search but Iam sure in the future mobil search will be more different from what it is now, and it will be more focus on local search/business,
Thank you for great information
Marios
Can you imagine the SEO potential if Google didn't do this? With so few websites available in mobile format I feel like it would be farily easy to rank highly without transcoding from the search engines
Yes... but what about user experience?
I totally agree. Google's mission is to provide relevant search results and to do so they will have to transcode sites that aren't yet available in mobile format because they contain the most relevant content. I'm sure they'll figure out the most efficient way to do this soon (or at least I hope).
I think if Google improved their transcoding software/engine it would be great for webmasters; It would save them from having to make extra pages, just for mobile, and it would save room in the Google index, because they would not have to index a copy for traditional and a copy for mobile (not duplicate content, in terms of ranking, but still duplicate content in terms of indexing).
Ah good point. However I still doubt that many webmasters will completely agree with Google's rendition of their mobile site because of the user experience aspect. But Google is smart :) so we'll see.
So having a mobile friendly site may create an SEO advantage?
Thanks! Glad you liked the post! Thanks for all the nice words! Hopefully we will do another mobile SEO series at some point soon!
Two thumbs up for that : )
Nice article and very helpful. Would love to see more stuff like this focused on mobile search optimization.
Great follow up post Cindy. Mobile is a foreign world to me so I'm sucking up your pearls o' wisdom big time.
Your comment the important take-away here, is to at least test to see what your pages look like when they are being transcoded has wisdom that transcends mobile and I try to apply it to all web work.
Quick comment about the new typeface: It's a lot harder to read than the previous typeface. I'm not complaining, just lettin' you know.