When I am thinking about mobile SEO, I pay specific attention to the order of the results and the inclusion of Universal Results. In their nature, Universal results are infinitely more clickable, as we know from traditional SEO. But in the mobile world, Universal Results are the fun results – because they are often have more potential for interaction with the phone than they would on a traditional computer. You can click on a phone number to place a phone call, click on a map to get walking directions, click on a song to buy it or play it, and you can even click on an app to download it directly to your phone from the search results.
Interactive and fun, but so far, it is hard to predict when you will get a certain type of Universal Result and when you won’t, and there have been lots of major algorithm tweaks with little attention or fanfare. For example, I have screen shots taken in the past year comparing the search ‘Britney Spears’ on an iPhone and a traditional computer. The traditional computer had music downloads near the very top of the page, but the iPhone didn’t. Why? The results weren’t iTunes results, so they wouldn’t have worked on the phone – so there was no need to rank them. (Kind’a cool!)
Last week, the Verizon/Google coalition got lots of press about a proposal that appears to fly in the face of basic Network Neutrality tenants that Google has supported for a long time. Believe it or not, this has been something on my mind for a long time, because the carriers are in-fact impacting search results, and have been for a long time (2008 interview about Mobile Network Neutrality – starting at 3:30 m:s). All of the major mobile carriers have mobile portals that they use as ‘start’ pages for web access on the phones that they sell. These ‘start’ pages of-course, include a search box, and it usually includes a logo of one of the top 3 search engines: Google, Yahoo or Bing. It is definitely much smaller in scale, but to me, this has always seemed a bit … less than neutral, and possibly even … ‘evil.’ Search engines broker deals directly with carriers and handset manufacturers to secure pre-loaded placement on phones.
Carriers Universal Search Results:
I like to say that the Universal Triggers in mobile search seem to be more erratic, and sometimes on a hair-trigger. It is rare that there will be just one type of Universal Result in a mobile SERP – it appears to usually be an all or nothing proposition.
But, speaking of propositions, did you know that Google is doing deals with carriers to provide their on-deck search? It is true that there are financial agreements between search engines (not just Google) and both mobile phone carrier companies (ex: T-Mobile, Verizon, etc.) and handset manufacturers (ex: Samsung , LG, iPhone, etc.) The search engine agrees to provide a search engine for the default web home page included on the phone. These are generally branded with the name & logo of the search engine, so most people would think that they provide the same results as if they were searching from Google.com or Google.com/m but THEY DON’T. While the results appear to be based on the existing algorithm, searches performed from these start-pages will give different results that appear to preference content from the carrier or handset manufacturer.
To see how this works, go to T-mobile’s start page – https://home.web2go.com and search for ‘poker.’ This is a very competitive search in the traditional and mobile SEO space, but you will find that, instead of the gaming websites and news sites, one of the top ranking results Lady Gaga ring tones for the song ‘PokerFace from T-mobile. (This test works on an iPhone too, as long as you start from the web2go home page). Other than that, the results are largely the same as normal mobile web search that starts from Google.com or Google.com/m. (This has been happening with the carriers for a long time – you just might have missed it!)
If you knew that, (I’m guessing you didn’t), here is something you probably didn’t know: T-mobile sets a cookie, SO now that you have done a search that started from https://home.web2go.com, any time T-Mobile has a universal result that they would like included in your SERP, it will be, unless you clear your cookies, even if you just start from Google.com or Google.com/m. (Those jerks!) You can see this passed in the search string.
When the cookie is there, it looks like this: https://www.google.com/m/search?client=ms-hms-tmobile-wow-us&channel=portal&q=Poker
When the cookie is not there, it looks like this: https://www.google.com/m/search?q=poker&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari
Carriers Impacting Mobile SEO
In reality, many people will assign new home pages on their phones, and eventually clear their cookies, but not everyone. Many people are still not web-savvy enough to change their ‘start’ page on a computer, much less a mobile phone. The carrier and Carrier Universal Search Results are a new variable that most SEO’s have never had to deal with. But they have the same impact as any other type of Universal search result; pushing other listings down below the fold. It will be hard to anticipate how many people are getting the carrier-specific Universal results in their search results, and how much mobile traffic those results will take from our listings.
This, like personalization and localization, makes predicting mobile search results accurately almost impossible. None of the search engines have been particularly open about the carrier-deals that they have established, and the carriers are rarely clear or opened about how to get content indexed on their portals. The one thing you can be sure about though, is that these deals were not made for free, and the carriers are paying to have their content indexed and included differently than other organic results.
This is the first in a series of three mobile marketing posts!
First of all, my compliments, Cindy, for your first post here on SEOmoz. I was wondering whenever you would have started publishing s'thing here. And to know that this is going to be a miniseries it's just great.
I think it was time to start looking deeper to the Mobile experience here in SEOmoz, also because this year (or maximum the next one) is previewed to be the Year when Internet Mobile will overtake the classic Internet experience, as stated by the Morgan Stanley Internet Trends Report of last June.
Therefore, to finally start discovering and learning how SEO is for Mobile, but also to stop looking at Apps as little-toys-to-play-with-when-bored is a duty we working in the Internet Marketing field have to do. Just imagine how Internet Mobile can be a great opportunity for Small and Local Business thanks to the geotagging features.
Finally, one small note about Google (and Search Engines in general) and Carriers. It's not just an American issue, but a global one:
Ciao and thanks again Cindy for this post.
Thank you Cindy for this very good insight.
You are talking about the cookies and clearing them, but I think that it is already something that most people are not doing on their computers. So I can barely picture anyone doing it on their cell phones, don't you think so? same thing with changing the carrier's homepage?
You're absolutely right I seriously doubt many people are clearing their cookies/cache often. The only group that probably does it once in a while are IT people and others who know about this stuff.
Yup - I don't think most people know how to delete cookies or even change a home page on thier phone. Some phones won't keep cookies, but most of the newer ones do.
Thanks for the post,
But it is a common and long established trend that 'war' of search engines spills out and provides us with products which are not neutral.
Take browser, it never is neutral each comes with predetermined search engine and it will take you a few minutes to figure out how to switch back. Sure this gave a big push to Bing when they imposed it on all who downloaded new version of IE.
So no surprise that they will offer carrier preferential treatment (their results at the top) in order to maintain their audience and market share in mobile, in order to make money from mobile ppc.
And that's why the European Community obliged Windows to give users the opportunity to choose which browser to use when installing Windows7...
I see a big difference between the two Tatiana. It's one thing to have your "home" search engine chosen for you. While inconvenient, you can easily go to whichever site you prefer to search from.
It's quite another thing to for a search engine to return skewed results. In my book that's unconscionable.
It is bad and I do agree with you,
But if at 'home' it is just an inconvenience, then in Mobile it is the same as Cindy stated that:
"(This test works on an iPhone too, as long as you start from the web2go home page). Other than that, the results are largely the same as normal mobile web search that starts from Google.com or Google.com/m."
So you can go to "which ever site you prefer to search from"
But yes, SE must be neutral and it is unacceptable for Carriers to have such power over SE.
Thanks for an illuminating post Cindy. I had no idea this kind of thing went on with mobile search.
It shouldn't surprise me, but it really did. I already knew about how the cell carriers wielded their clout over the device manufacturers. Many a time I'd read about some great functionality in a new phone release, only to discover that Verizon (...can you hear me now?) had the feature disabled.
But to tamper with the search results? It's not so much a good vs. evil thing but rather a right and wrong kinda thing. For me, it's a definite wrong!
Millions have been conditioned to trusting the results coming from the SERP's as most relevant for them. To dilute the SERP's by including what's best for the mobile carrier really, really...well you can fill in the missing word with as scathing a choice as you can think of.
Anyhow, I'll get off my soapbox and say again, great to read you here at the moz.
rally good post for mobile seo
Nice post Cindy...I have a small doubt. As I can see that 80% of the Mobile SERPs are same compare with usual. Then what is the use of doing seo for mobile carriers alone?
Good point. It is obviously important if you are selling things like mobile ring tones and wall papers. It is also just important for us to be aware of this because none of the ranking tools or mobile test serarches that you run would bring this to your attention. It could explain things like drops in mobile traffic for a particular keyword - if the keyword was not returning a Carrier Universal result, and then all of a sudden it was, and that pushed your result down.
One of the points that I was makeing is that the Carrer Universal result did not really match the most probable user intents for the search - a bad user experience, and also something that could impact lost of other keywords in weird and unpredicatable ways.
A good SEO agency gives your online efforts the power it needs to show you the best possible results of your online advertising. =============Seo Projects
Great research. thank you for showing the Mobile Carriers for who they are.
Hi Cindy,
Interesting post. This post clearly reveals your interest and knowledge on mobile web marketing. I agree with your point here that there is really some immediete impact on purchase decisions when it comes to mobile marketing. It is not only the games, applications and fun. There are lots regarding marketing here.
Nice first post and provided a good insight through the very first post.Good work!
Hey Cindy,
Do you think mobile carriers are trading with search engines?
"Make your search results in our favor from our devices, and we'll make you the default search engine for our devices."
-Therefore, it would be an 'even' trade and no one would directly get paid from it.
Ps. I just bought your book, can't wait to read it!
Hey Donnie,
I am not sure exactly how the deals go down. I would like to believe that Google *tries* not to be evil, and there is a good argument that this kind of adaption of search results is good for the user; but then again, the ring-tone inclusions would be MUCH more relevant if I had searched for 'poker ringtone' instead of just 'poker.' Maybe if there had been links to poker game apps for my phone that would be reasonable, but it is a long-shot to think that when I search for 'poker' on my mobile phone I am really looking for a Lady Gaga ringtone....
Very interesting to know but I'm not surprised. The ugly truth is that they try to "hide" with native feature.
The one thing you can be sure about though, is that these deals were not made for free, and the carriers are paying to have their content indexed and included differently than other organic results.
How do you know this? Is this just a guess?
Hi Steven - it is not just a hunch - I have seen the press releases, but usually they don't say how much money changed hands. Securing a place 'on-deck' is big money for lots of top media players including search engines.
nice post cindy. I have read your articles on search engine land. Here is another nice article by the author on search engine land:
https://searchengineland.com/mobile-social-strategy-with-platforms-you-already-know-48193
Glad you liked the articles - thanks!
Aha! I knew something evil was amiss. Ok it is not so evil (not like direct spam SMS from the carriers), but interesting post. I have been largely ignoring mobile search, thank you for reminding me of how important it is becoming.
I still don't think a lot of people make big purchases or decisions on their mobile phones. They may but an app or music, but I believe (without evidence but hear me out) that mobile search is a bit less serious. It is way to pass time, play games, and find some quick information but I think people largely do their serious research / purchasing on their home computers. Anyone have any statistics / articles about this topic? I'm very interested to be proven wrong or right :)
Check out the Morgan Stanley Report I've linked above. It gives 96 slides of infos of that kind.
Hey great link thanks for that! Slide 25 about the $50 billion gap in internet advertising was a real eye opener and slide 26 shows how cheap internet advertising is compared with other forms.
I didn't see anything really specific to people's mobile device usage besides the iPad being used more like a computer than a typical mobile device. Certainly usage is increasing overall but the big question for me is: How are people using their mobile devices?
It's more a psychological research and a presentation of what is going to be technically, but this interview I've found in the Intel's Pressroom using your same question as keyword can help you help.
I think you are absolutely correct that people have different search intent when they are searching from a mobile device. The interesting thing is that it tends to be more immediate, and have more immediate impacts on their purchase decision. The stats that I have seen indicate that your hunch is correct, but I think as the interface and accessability changes though, this will change. I have definitely tried to access the Consumer Reports site when I was car shopping, but maybe I am the only one.
I work in a book store part time, and people are definitely using their phones to conduct searches on products we carry or products they are looking for. But it's an interesting twist on shopping and search because if they check out a title on Amazon while they are in our store and buy it from us, Amazon didn't really benefit from the search.
Unfortunately for brick and mortars though, the reverse is also true. They come to the book store to peruse the books they are considering, then check online to see the price differential.
If it's more than their max, they'll walk out and order it online later. Or to add insult to injury, they'll use the stores free wifi to order it right on their mobile device while they sit in the free air conditioning you provide.
The internet has become quite a game changer for retailers.
This is very cool and interesting stuff, thanks for the post. It's always exciting to watch these things change right in front of you.
Great post, Cindy!
Wonder how this behavior fits to the "don't be evil" credo of G. But why would it be different.. it's apparently just in human nature to be greedy