There's no doubt that naming a business, particularly an online business, is an incredibly frustrating task. A number of parallels can be drawn between this process and the web design hangups Matt discussed in July. Recently, a new friend from San Jose's SES show, John Anderson, recounted his struggles publicly:
I hope I never think about a company name again. Chao and I have collaborated since way back in 1999, and we’ve never had a single contentious discussion till we butted heads on the topic of company name – and by default association – our URL. It was painful, hugely educational experience...
...Yes, the name is and always will be a sacred word to us. Sure, it will ultimately be a single-word embodiment of our brand identity, but today, it is just one little tile in the mosaic of brand identity. Here’s the kicker… early on – that mosaic is sparsely populated with just traces of ideas, some alpha code, but no history, no customers, and no passionate community. When you see a mosaic of one tile, you just see one tile - so you want that tile to be shiny, beautiful on it’s own. This is the paradox of a startup naming exercise.
I concede that this process is agonizingly harsh and oftentimes filled with animosity and self-doubt, especially as more people are involved in the process. We got lucky, stumbling on 'SEOmoz' after A) agreeing on what we wanted our brand to represent and B) searching for the shortest combination of words that got that point across and included "SEO." Since then, it's been remarkably easy to grow into the name and have it absorb everything we hoped it would (though I sometimes wish SEO could be more inclusive of online marketing as a whole).
Not everyone is so lucky, and since I've helped to name more than a few web-based businesses over the last 9 years, I thought it would be valuable to give a list of items I seek when creating a new one:
-
The Ideal Name has no Peers
When developing a name, it's preferable that a Google search for that unique term returns fewer than 2000 results. If you can find a name that produces absolutely no results whatsoever, you've got something truly amazing, especially if it fits the rest of the criteria. A completely unique name can be tracked, online and off, with remarkable accuracy, and there's never any confusion about the reference when it comes up in a blog, a conversation or a phone call. Zillow, eBay, Google, Skype & Firefox are all examples of "peerless" company names. -
Accurate Topical Association
When you hear names like Ning, Frappr, Squidoo or Altria for the first time, there's no way to make an association between the word and what the company's field of operation. This is in contrast to firms like PayScale, Farecast, Travelocity and StumbleUpon. My preference has always been for names that have a topical relationship to the industry or focus of the firm - even if it's not completely obvious, it makes name recognition and association easier, even if you've only heard of the company once. -
In All Things, Brevity
The fewer the letters in the name, the happier I am. Frankly, this one is easy to explain - the shorter your name, the easier it is to type in the domain or perform a search. It also eases the process of spelling the name over the phone, writing it in emails, making it memorable, etc. -
Clear, Obvious Spelling
This one has been lost in the Web 2.0 generation, and even SEOmoz itself runs into spelling problems at times. Names like Amazon, Yahoo!, Gateway & IBM fit this criteria well, while Flickr, Del.icio.us, Last.fm and Digg are either seplled misleadingly, or make it difficult for unfamiliar users to type in their URL. -
Unregistered
Obviously, owning the .com domain for your business name is critical - if someone already has it, the process to taking that name from them is long and arduous. It's also a good indicator that your name isn't entirely unique, so unless it's a case of cybersquatting and you can buy the name, keep searching. -
Keywords in the Name
Being an SEO, I can't help but be tempted to use keywords in the name and URL of a company. This works very well in certain instances, i.e. SEOmoz, Copyblogger, Findlaw, Open Directory, HowStuffWorks, etc. It's not universally applicable, though, and a healthy dose of common sense is required, so please don't try including "jackson hole real estate" in the name of your company. -
Brand Worthy
Before you have a name, you've got a business model and a unique brand identity - the qualities that set your business apart from its competitors. Before you decide on the name, make sure that it fits logically and emotionally with these ideals. I.e. Just because the name "darkstar" sounds cool, doesn't mean it fits with providing open-source access to physics data. In this case there's a logical connection with the subject, but a conflict with the brand. -
Charismatic
This is the toughest of all the criteria - a great name has to carry emotional power with it. Not everyone has to agree, and this criteria is frequently subjective, but the target of the charismatic quality IS NOT your users - it's you. If you (and your business partners) have a name that you believe in, that you want to represent you and that you feel confident and comfortable sharing with that mean uncle who's always giving you a bad time - bingo! You've got your name.
I'd love to hear more ideas on naming conventions, and I'm sure there are more than a few Silicon Valley entrepreneuers who'd appreciate it, too.
Hi,
I want to introduce myself first of all. Im a swedish web designer living in Athens Greece with a 10 years od developing websites and some 2 years of SEO and online marketing.
I have never found it that hard to make up a name for a business. Its quiet easy and if SEO involved even easier because you know what limits there can be. Keywords are always welcome and make life easier in a name for future use online. Panomedia was one name i camup with for a friend photographer making panoramic protography...
Imagine your company name is made up to me Mozaik and you are a marketing company branding specialist and also have a seo development website... thats a little bit harder and its made the opposite way for me...
I hope to learn more about SEO here than anywhere else... im doing retty good in greece for SEO but one can always learn more....
Great to have you here spagetti! I'm thrilled that we can provide value to an international crowd.
As for naming - I think that some struggle with it more than others. For a small business, like yours and mine, it's much easier than a business who has a board of directors and is seeking venture capital or investment dollars. Those folks have to pay a lot of attention to perception in addition to all the other factors.
Hi Spagetti! [my apologies to all for dirtying up this thread a bit!] I couldn't help but respond...I'm an SEO living in the DC area, but prior to this I spent a number of years living in Thessalonica, Greece. I'd love to pick your brain as to what the search landscape looks like in Greece. I'm fluent in Greek and often thought that I may be able to find work there (when Greece eventually gets itself into the 21st century!) I'm not sure that this is the place for you to respond (unless it's of interest to others here?) otherwise, perhaps you could drop me a note to: [email protected] Cheers! -Andrew
I feel that avoiding an overly generic (common) name for the URL is very important. In "The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding" by Al and Laura Ries, we are warned that "the kiss of death for an internet brand is the common name."
URL names like computers.com, wine.com, or OnlineBookStore.com are next to worthless from a branding perspective, regardless if squatters were able to unload them for hefty sums in the past.
They are inferior because the mind files a common name is a different category than a proper, or unique name. For instance, it is rather difficult to remember or recommend a retail vitamin shop called "The Vitamin Shop." Why? Well if you say, "I went to the Vitamin Shop yesterday and they had a great selection...," people will think you are talking about any random vitamin shop. The branding is totally lost.
The top auction site is not OnlineAuction.dom com, it's eBay.
The top search engine is not NetSearch.com, it's Google.
The top bookstore is not OnlineBooks4Less.com, it's Amazon.
From a SEO perspective, I think fusing prime keyword with a non-generic complimentary word or phrase (like SEOmoz, YogaZone, CDFreaks) is ideal.
If you aren't going to include a keyword in the title, then having a succinct, distinct, unique but somewhat relevant-sounding ring (like Digg, Reddit, Flickr, or Tribe.net) is a good choice.
Brett - Excellent comment. I totally agree.
Now I am no Matt Cutts (and no Jack Kennedy, either)...
but I always *assumed* that because I've seen keywords highlighted in the URL names when I checked the "Cached" results on search engines, that keywords in the URL were given some kind of consideration.
I think that google does not either but SEO is a whole package optimized pages, titles, metas, internal links, exterian links, etc etc that i think that google IS considering the total package attractive or less attractive... small important issues that need optimization in order to work with all the other small issues...
That is my picture of SEO and that my friends considering the URL also...
Rand ... good post.
To learn a great deal about naming a business I'd suggest reading a book by Seth Godin "Positioning". He has a good chapter on "Naming a business". I also wrote on this subject in my blog, https://www.bizmord.com/Blog/archives/62
In #6 you say that having a keyword rich URL is important for SEO. In what way other than the Anchor text benefit? Does Google value the keyword-rich URL and give it more value?
I'd say that along with a little bit of search engine juice, you're also making it very obvious and clear what you do and what you're relevant to. i.e. If someone thinks SEO, they think "SEOmoz" (hopefully) :)
Rand, you avoided the question. :-)
Do you think that Google favors keyword rich URLs? other than the Anchor rich factor.
Oops - sorry about that. Yes, I do believe they give some weight to the keywords in the domain name. I know EGOL's strongly behind that theory as well.
Thanks Rand,
When I spoke with Jill from High Rankings, she was 100% positive that the answer is the opposite. Google does not favor URLs in domains. Go figure.
I like to comment on that, I totally agree with you. Google does consider if you have a website selling fish and the URL will be cheapbananas.com, then it would be much stronger to have a domain like freshfish.com or maybe .net would be even stronger haha or would that be considered stronger only of you sell fishing equipment??
Well, what if you're a company called Liponics that sells fish? Do you now have to change your name to cater to Google?
MSN does favor keyword rich URL and I've seen the prof. Google on the other hand ... not really.
Rand, I think it's interesting that you "sometimes wish SEO could be more inclusive of online marketing as a whole" because I wasn't quite sure of the difference between SEO and SEM until the NY SES show. I thought it was all SEO. I guess it's all semantics.
You can always capitalize the M in your company name for Marketing, and you'd still have a cool or even cooler name - SEOMoz.
Hey, who wants to share some rejected business names?
Ours were: the Clicksie Chicks. Clicky Longstockings. Google Moguls.... and lots more where that came from (and where, you ask, is that? Let's just say the sun doesn't shine in that particular location).
Final Choice: Gravity Search Marketing. Hurray!
-Gradiva Couzin https://www.yourseoplan.com/
Excellent tips here, This is a very struggling part of finding a name for a company thats not already taken.
i use to tell my clients to write down all words related to their profession and location. After its easier to kind of merge part of the words together, making a search for the new word or company name and make up their mind with a name that leads their user into understanding their name and activities ;)
Excellent tips. I am very much interested in acquiring some top domain names at DomainKa.com and I could use your points to buy domain names like a pro! Keep it up!
this is an excellent post !
next time when i register my new domains would keep in mind some of the important pointsÂ
Another thought that comes to mind is that you might actually want to "brand" your NAME like rand has done with Randfish or my feeble attempts with "G-Man" :)
Yeah - I've actually been mentioning that to people on the social media marketing track. It is invaluable to be the same "identity" across platforms.
The Sensuality of a Name is also important - but takes EXTREME - EXTREME Talent.
Imagine each of your five senses being Stimulated by one Name - and it STAYING in your Long term memory. as well as providing intrique whenever one thinks of it.
It is almost an impossible feat - but will reap rewards for a lifetime.
R&S
Google indexes on keywords in hyphenated urls but not on keywords in underscored or conjoined urls. Yahoo indexes on keywords in hyphenated and underscored urls but not keywords in conjoined urls. MSNs behavior is not reproducible at the moment. (Ref: https://www.seo-blog.com/keywords-in-urls.php)
GeoffreyF67
"Since the code for doing so could probably be written in less than a day".
It's what you do with it afterwards that's not so easy because of interpretation. Is it 'authorship' or 'author ship', 'drawstring' or 'draw string', 'panhandle' or 'pan handle' etc. But I agree with you it's coming.
What, exactly, does SEOmoz mean?
IIRC, when Rand explained it to one of my co-workers, it was that they were an SEO company, but that they try to adhere to the priciples that Mozilla was founded on. I've probably bungled up that explanation pretty good, but I think that was the jist.
Good stuff, Rand. I'd say these are good criteria for any business that intends to have an online presence -- not just web-based companies. I'd mention a client of mine that specializes in this, but we've got an NDA.
I'm not quite clear on your point about keywords in the name and domain name. Assuming you're talking about their value in search and not just branding, then names like SEOMoz or FindLaw don't work, since a search engine is not going to see the individual words in the name.
Ohh... I have an obsessive facination with coming up with names/brands... many more things I want to say, but can't.
Cool post, though!
I deal heavily with branding concepts, and this is a big one that I'm glad you have covered. If anybody hasn't checked out the Igor Branding Blog, I'd suggest you do so. It helped me out big time with developing my own name (I re-named and re-branded my biz about two months ago).
Here's how I'm gonna pick my 2.0 name... https://www.andrewwooldridge.com/myapps/webtwo...
Is this true, though?
"Assuming you're talking about their value in search and not just branding, then names like SEOMoz or FindLaw don't work, since a search engine is not going to see the individual words in the name."
I also thought that this was the case until I noticed that individual words in run-on urls are actually bolded in the SERPS. For example, search for "jalopy" in Google and the second result is for "www.jalopyjournal.com" of which the first word, "jalopy" is bolded! Am I missing something here?
The highlighting of the SERP is (I'm told) a separate application that just looks for strings of characters. The search itself is based on actual words, so it would treat jalopyjournal as one word even if the highlighter bolded "jalopy".
#2 and #6 can present problems legally. Not in "it's illegal," but more like, "It's hard to get a registered trademark." The more fanciful the name, the easier that trademark is to get. The more descriptive, the harder. That doesn't mean you can't strike a golden mean and find something that is just fanciful enough to get the circle-R and have it still include search terms and allude to the product and have a .com available and be easy to spell, it just means that it's ... hard.
Great list Rand. Once all those items are in place I'd also make sure the final candidates pass the old bumper sticker test. If someone saw the name briefly on a bumper sticker, would they be able to recall it the next day? If a name can pass that test, it would have to include each of Rand's points.
I've had success with exposing people to names without letting them know what they were seeing, then asking them to recall the names later. Some names stick in everyone's heads, others are totally forgotten.
Since the code for doing so could probably be written in less than a day, I would assume that the search engines are able to split the URLs up. If they're not doing it already then I imagine they'll be able to do so in the near future.
Excellent criteria and insight. Having come up with a few business and product names myself, I agree it can be a daunting and frustrating task. However, the satisfaction of that EUREKA! moment is priceless.