It can be hard to keep up with all of Google’s updates recently, but around the end of last month, you may have started seeing search results that look something like this:
See what I did there – it’s a bulleted snippet about bullets. See? SEE? Never mind.
Google formally started rolling out this format around August 26th, and we’ve already started hearing the obvious question – how do I get those? First, the official word from Google:
If a search result consists mostly of a structured list, like a table or series of bullets, we’ll show a list of three relevant rows or items underneath the result in a bulleted format. The snippet will also show an approximate count of the total number of rows or items on the page (for example, “30+ items”).
The key point – this is being generated by Google from your existing on-page lists. It's not a microformat or a tag you can simply add to your page. Google gives the examples of tables and bulleted lists (let’s assume they mean <ul></ul>), but that’s about all we’ve got to go on. So, I thought it would be interesting to explore some examples in the wild.
Example 1 – Basic Bulleted List
Let’s start with your basic bulleted (unordered) list – here’s an example from DMOZ:
The list on the page itself is pretty standard:
What’s interesting is that Google skips an entire screen of other lists, including categories and languages, suggesting that they have some idea that this list is unique to the page it’s on.
Example 2 – CSS-styled Bulleted List
Of course, modern day lists tend to get a bit more complicated than that, and the unordered list tag (<ul>) is often used for more complex CSS-styling. Here’s an example search result from Dell:
The bulleted list on this page looks much different:
While the code is fairly clean, this is clearly a much more complex structure for Google to parse. It’s also (like the first example), not the first list on the screen.
Example 3 – Separate Bulleted Lists
Here’s an example from MetroKitchen.com (thank to Bobby Kircher for pointing it out):
This is another example of unordered lists for CSS-styling, and on the surface, it doesn’t look that different from the Dell example:
If you dig into the code, though, you’ll see that each item is its own unordered list (<ul>), not just a list element (<li>). Google has still managed to connect these separate lists as one, big list.
Example 4 – HTML Tables
Shout out to Jill Whalen for pointing out this one – she’s got a bulleted search result based on good, old-fashioned tables:
Each entry on the page is a standard table row (<tr>):
So, we’ve got various incarnations of unordered lists and standard HTML tables triggering bulleted search results. How about more complicated CSS?
Example 5 – Nested DIVs
Here’s an example from SEOmoz - the YOUmoz home-page:
Visually, it could easily be a CSS-styled unordered list:
If you dig into the source code, though, you’ll see a more complex structure of nested DIVs. The individual entries use a sizable amount of code (for complex styling), but again, Google seems to be parsing our list results appropriately.
So, Why Don’t I Have Them?
At this point, it seems like Google can turn just about anything into a bulleted list, and yet they often aren’t. Even here on SEOmoz, the YOUmoz page has a bulleted snippet, but the main blog page, with more authority and the same structure, doesn’t.
Part of the problem is that they’re new, and Google is still working out the kinks. If you want to encourage Google, though, here are a few tips:
- Use a consistent structure, whatever it is.
- Keep extraneous code to a minimum.
- Test removing your META description or setting it to “”.
Proceed with caution on the last one, as you’re handing control over to Google. Removing your META description is generally safer, though, than using the same description over and over.
If you’re not sure what makes for a clean structure, browse SERPs in your industry – you’ll find plenty of examples, even though the feature is fairly new. See what kind of code Google is already “rewarding” (if you think it’s a good thing), and make life as easy as possible for the spiders.
Update: I want to clarify something on removing your META description. That should only be done as a limited test (say, a couple of pages). The META description is a de-duplication cue, and removing it will put your snippet even more under Google's control (although having one doesn't stop them). If your test is successful, you'll have more data to make an informed decision.
I suspect Google is testing bullet points on less popular pages. They may or may not roll them out, depending on how they are received and in particular how they affect click through rates and behaviour. Personally, I don't like these bullets - I think they look cluttered, untidy, and... well... rather old-media I guess.
I'm curious what the impact of the bullets is on user click-through from the SERPs. To me, they seem to densely-packed with text to be skimmable. I'm also curious why each bullet doesn't have a link to the product/post/page/whatever that it's linked to on the entry page (as in your DMOZ example).
Are folks who have their results showing up with the bulleted snippet seeing increased traffic vs. the status quo?
I'm actually curious about this as well. If it doesn't effect the traffic is it really worth doing it? I would wonder though if they would ever do numbered lists because typically if I am doing a list of any kind it would be numbered not bulletted unless I am putting together a report or the order didn't matter.
We have them on a few pages we manage. I would discourage people from removing their meta descriptions in the hope that you have your list featured. The best recommendation by far is to have a relevant list of information that people will find useful. Other SEO rules apply. Otherwise you stand a greater risk of lowering the quality of your page on the off chance you get a list to appear.
I should make it clearer that that's just a suggestion for a limited experiment (as in a couple of pages as a test case). We've found that blank META descriptions are often safe, and they may encourage Google to take liberties. Granted, that's not always what you want.
Right now, Google's application of the bulleted snippets is inconsistent even within sites, so I'd encourage people to play around a bit, as long as they don't get carried away. Picking a couple of pages and trying new things shouldn't get anyone in too much trouble. Too much :)
I agree with your recommendation.
Experiments are really good and my feeling about it is that Google are checking to see if those lists generates better positive clicks, by adding those lists to some but not all results the have the ability to measure the difference this change is making in clicks as well as engagdment.
We should be doing the same test in order to tell if a search result with a list converts better on our site.
I agree that removing your META description should only be done on a few pages. You don't want to give Google total control over most of your site, as that might undo whatever on-site optimization you may have done up to this point. It's worth a test run, however.
I had been see these and I was wondering about it. Thanks for the information.
Thanks Dr. Pete. I am so glad I don't have to do all the leg work on figuring this one out now. I did find a bullet snippet that I thought was interesting. So how does one code for the ★★★★★?
(btw I just cut and pasted that, and I can't find the alt code for the star symbol anywhere online )
Here is the screen shot I took: https://pestcontrolseo.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/bullets-in-search.gif
Interesting... Google seems to be pulling those from the page, too. I've seen their rich review data (where the review is above the snippet), but hadn't seen the star format in the list snippets. Expect even more of this going forward. Google wants to experiment with everything, even things we'd rather they leave alone. This is actually driving me crazy on the PPC side.
Sky Items [☄] U+2604 ☄ COMET [★] U+2605 ★ BLACK STAR [☆] U+2606 ☆ WHITE STARSorry for the troll ;x
I like the post, but I hate the way Google's implemented it. The bulleted lists look messy... very cluttered and (ironically) disorganized.
I'd much prefer an easier way to get the 12 pack sitelinks or even the smaller variety of sitelinks than bulleted lists, but yknow... a guy can dream, right?
It does seem that the bulleted lists are more structural, almost like microformats (but not quite), whereas sitelinks depend a lot more on authority and the nature of the query. It also looks like Google has pulled the 12-pack down to a maximum of 6, but I haven't seen official word on that. They must still be testing, but 6 is the most I've seen for the last week or so, even for mega-brands.
While I find this test interesting that bullets are an option as your description in a SERP, I do not like the look of any of those results in your screenshots. My eyes just don't agree with that format.
I also got this snippets on my sites (click sry, in polish).
@Jonathon D. Colman - I see no difference between results with sippets and results without. I got one site on 5th place and the CTR (and traffic) is on the same level.
Interesting. I'm curious if the bulleted snippets somehow affect conversion then... do visitors who see the bullets become more qualified somehow?
Hi Peter, I've seen some results with bulleted lists also in the Italian and Spanish SERPS and, as others have said before, I too believe that it may be a good choice for some kind of site.
Said that, I would also underline the renewed importance of the meta description tag, as it is the element used by Facebook (and Google+) when a link is shared.
Therefore, my personal first option would be this:
Hi Gianluca,
Excellent observation regarding the use of the meta description outside of the SERPs. You click throughs and shareability (is that a word?) can be adversly effected if the shared content does not look attractive enough to click on.
Schema.org is a daunting prospect for alot of my clients with older websites. But the new ones all get told that it should be the standard. Even if it is not widely used staright away, it futureproofs the site and gives it a better chance in the long run.
Right... and, but this could be the topic of another post, I sincerely believe that CTR plays a role in SEO.
I agree with both of you!! The more a listing is clicked on (CTR), the more useful the public is find that listing/ad to be!
Quiet interesting - I just made a view search queries and really - I found many bulleted snippets.
One strange thing I remarked some time ago: It makes a difference with which browser you surf the web. If I use e.g. Mozilla I see e.g. the bulleted snippets - if I surf e.g. with the old IE7 version I neither see them or the new sitelinks.
Wow, very strange - I just loaded the SEOmoz SERP in Adobe BrowserLab as IE7, and the bulleted snippet is gone (I can see it fine in IE8). Worse, since the snippet would be bulleted, Google is cutting it off at 1 line. Someone on Twitter just said that Opera does the same thing.
Here https://plus.google.com/u/0/110888291105162872119/posts/RqzNcKE9NSc Rob Watts states that by simply adding a common css class to your list elements he got the new snippets. I didn't test it personally but will try to do it soon.
It'd be interesting to test that against more examples, but it does make sense. A lot of the examples I looked at had custom styles defined, whatever object they were connected to.
I've got the bullets showing.
I use nested divs for the list and also use the role attribute to markup "list" and "listitem" elements.
Don't know if the role attribute is helping, but it may be one of the signals so it could help.
I'd like to know how the text is generated. On mine some text does not seem to come from the items copy?
I don't know if others already assume this is a factor, but I noticed that all the pages I have seen with bullet lists displayed in the SERPs, have the titles linking on the items in their lists rather than just a button or anchor text linking in the description of those items or articles(on the page not in the SERPs).
Has anyone found examples where this isn't the case? If not, I would note that on page, titles should be linking for whatever you are listing, before implementing other techniques to obtain bulleted SERPs.
How to get them:
- proper URL structure and consistency
- list style HTML (ul or ol)
How we got them:
Google SERP
https://www.intechopen.com/books/show/title/biosensors
All other pages for books that contain chapters are organized in the same way.
I think that meta description will have ever lower impact on SEO as google will introduce rich-snippets where it sees fit.
Great article IMHO
I notcied that the botw directory uses this technique. Compound search that term and you'll get a bulleted response eg. https://www.google.co.uk/search?pws=0&q=botw+ammunition
I got Google's Bulleted Snippets after study your post thanks for this valuable information.
<removed link>
I find it a little poor that Google shows these snippits for content created using tables that isn't tabular data. It's like going back to the sub 2005 era!
Dr. Pete,
I found an example... If you go to Google.co.uk and search for Betting then you will see a site called Oddschecker.com at #3 and it's showing sports events each day. It's a big and popular site however it's amazing how the actually visibility on the SERPs changes so quickly each day.
Interesting - I thought that was a vEvent microformat, which produces very similar looking results, but it does appear to be something Google is creating.
i noticed today that Google no longer displays the bullets next to the list items.
Hmmm for me is still showing it. What browser you are using?
The question for me is - how do I get rid of them? I am working for a children's charity who have recently changed the layout of their landing page to include a table and now information that probably shouldn't be in the SERPs is being displayed there, in a messy, non- bulleted format. I doubt this is improving the CTR but I will have to review the data in WMT.
Unfortunately, once Google decideds to take these liberties, there's not much you can do. The cures are usually worse than the disease - like using the NOSNIPPET tag or making your code so ugly Google can't parse it. In most cases, you're probably better to just write a solid META Description and hope for the best.
In a service related field like I own, do you see Google using these bulleted lists for services? If so, is there a best practice for that?
nice post had lot of info in it
But if you can't really control them what is the point ?
Better without them...
hm very nice post...question arises is that if this indeed helps or hurts traffic of a site? I personally think if I get the info I need in a SERP, then I am less likly to click on the actual link in the SERPs
Same argument can be used for RDFa\Microformats for ecommerce sites. If Google returns rich snippets for all ecommerce sites, then people are less likly to click on a few link to find the one they want and just click on the one with lowest price\highest positive reviews..etc.
I see like to see more data on how it actually helps a site.
What about <blockquote>? I've started using a <blockquote> in each post...
It seems that Google is testing with his snippets. Last week I found several bulleted snippets, but this week have disappeared...
I did a search for Polygun..and the standard link list came up and I only got the bullet list when I choose see "more".
Are these bullets rolled out in every market (metro areas)
I believe they're rolled out everywhere, but there are some exceptions. Most notably, the seem not to show in IE7 or Opera - apparently, expanded sitelinks don't show either. I've seen some other quirks.
I've seen this on an informational page I have been testing for something else over the past few weeks and haven't really seen too much discussion on it. (thanks for starting it) Most of the content on the page is just a tabular list of information, in this case without any links out.
The page contains a meta description and NOODP. Google is also ignoring the text content at the top of the page.
I think what Google is really trying to do here is to provide a little more inside information as to what's on the page to allow the user to make their click choice more relevant. I think if you can get over the eye-strain, they have actually done that in some cases. But, I think overall it's too cluttered and hopefully a beta test that will be improved or eliminated in the future.
Yea I'm seeing them with dates on some of my properties. However, they don't seem to be displaying the most recent date as much as whatever's at the top of the page. So I'm going to do some testing to see if I can mitigate that.
They seem to be crossing the streams on the bulleted snippets and auto-generated blog snippets (with dates), and not doing it particularly well. I've noticed the search totals tend not to be very accurate, either - a freakish number of them say 15.
Good to know that using unordered lists was good for more than just looking classy.
Another great post of the ever changing Google platform, Thanks Dr. Pete! I'm not crazy about leaving the META Description blank though. Given Google can display whatever they want, I feel a blank description tag will hurt the page's value. We (SEO's) have always said that the META desc is a key element for the On-Site SEO of any web page.
What are your thoughts on it?
Generally, I agree, and I do believe in a strong, unique META description. I'll say, though, that it seems Google is much more forgiving of a blank (or missing) META description than they are of duplicate META descriptions. The other problem is that Google seems to be taking these liberties no matter what now.
I guess the question is - do you WANT bulleted snippets? Some people don't, clearly, and some people want total control over snippets. That's going to be less and less likely, but the best way to retain control is still to write a unique, relevant, appropriate-length description. If you want Google to have a go at it, then removing the META description is something I'd test (if it were me) - "test" being the operative word.
Nicely put sir! What about the rest of the Moz community? Do you really think these bulleted snipets will increase CTR and if so, are more conversions a by-product?
p.s. I caught on to the bulleted snippet about bullets and thought it was a great play on words! lol
I'm curious will Google makes items from the bulleted list in SERPs clickable with direct link to each product? We can see something like this in sponsored links on the top? What do you think?
That's a pretty interesting find. I haven't actually seen any bulleted lists yet, going to have to do some searches today and see if I can dig some up! I'd love to see how the list affects CTR compared to a 2-3 line snippet description. Oh the joys of being in a constantly developing industry!
Hi Dr Pete,
I have noticed it come up in the SERPs for Tickets to live events. More interestingly I have see it auto update with a date attached to the event, so Google is always showing the freshest ticket information.
On looking at the source code for the sites that display this, it look like they are using somekind of dynamic description that fetches the description from an XML file. Cool stuff.
Have you come across anything like this?
I doubt that implementation is directly tied to the bulleted snippets. I'm guessing that Google may update these snippets more often than they check for new META descriptions, or they may even be generated on the fly, just like query-dependent snippets.
Nice dive into Bulleted List Snippets Dr. Pete. I've been seeing them lately and wondering about them because they didn't seem consistent with typical "Lists". Good to see that it's more because they coded in <UL> & <LI>.
I actually just started seeing these results this weekend while searching some competitors. My site does not currently have them but I am hoping they will show up.
Hi Dr Pete
Great post as always. I have two questions though :
1. If you remove the meta description then surely there is also the possibility that Google will use your description on your Dmoz listing(for example). I've seen some sites using the 'noodp' and other meta tags. How will this tie in with the new bulleted snippets?
2. We have quite a few of our pages already being listed with bulleted snippets, and to be honest it does not look as nice as it did when it showed our carefully written descriptions on the SERP's - is there a way to opt out of this new feature or will we have to look at changing our site structure?
noodp reference was made in https://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo/basics-of-search-engine-friendly-design-and-development amongst others :-)
(1) Google's use of DMOZ descriptions is a bit erratic, but also seems to be fading. The NOODP tag should take care of that.
(2) Unfortunately, no. Like query-driven snippets and other liberties Google takes, there's no way to tell them not to do it. I definitely wouldn't make your page structure worse on purpose just to try to disrupt the bulleted snippets.
I see the benefit to these snippits as a little more real estate in the serps. I found one example thats almost 300 characters! Aside from that, I think they look like garbage.
Certainly the bullets are great for attracting clicks, they commit more property SERPs with other entries and thus consideration of more interest and clicks.
There are quite a few features of 'the essential and HTML that Google can be used, which are not classified. Google has already shown that it is fully qualified to act in a well-planned semantic markup and use it to get more information about the user.
Are they better for attracting clicks though? They look kind of messy to me due to the formatting. I much prefer the extended list of results with a short summary under each link. These bullet lists look like too much text without enough clearly defined links.
They look messy and a bit spammy to me too - doesn't feel natural like a page description ought to. Not sure I like the change at all.
I don't think they look so great either. Personally I'm not a huge fan of them but I wonder how they will affect click through for e-commerce sites.
I can see this been handy for a few e-commerce clients.
Especially if you want to acquire more real estate within SERP's via long tail pages which are not driving too high CTR and sales for example.
We have been testing some of these changes with various websites over the last few weeks, also the great changed to real estate listing websites micro fromats information is another interesting area.
But overall great post Pete thanks for sharing.
FYI, several of the bulleted snippets I was looking at yesterday included the meta description, then went on to the bulleted list. It's not necessarily an either/or thing.
Was that a 1-line chunk of the META description or the whole thing? If you see a full META description + bulleted snippets, let me know what the search was - I'd love to check it out.
Yeah, it was the one-line chunk. I see it in one of your screenshots, too, so, okay, I'm not saying anything super new. But it does seem to make shortening your meta description more desirable than removing it. If it's going to take a short chunk, make the short chunk as meaningful as possible.
I like the idea of just shortening - this might make for an interesting experiment...
I would imagine results with the bulletpoints will see greater click-through rate, I have certainly seen increases in CTR on listings with rich snippetes (events, reviews etc), but I personally think the bullet results are a little ugly...
Very ugly indeed. Seems like they just wanted the feature online and didnt bother styling it. In my oppinion it doesn't look very "official".
I've got a very large number of these appearing for the site I work on, which is a directory. One observation that I can add is that the appearance of the list option will depend to some extent on the number of items in the "list" on your page.
As far as I can see, the cut-off seems to be around 7 or 8 - at least that's where it starts to get fuzzy.
I've seen list snippets with the legend "5+" items for lists with 8 and 9 entries in them, whereas for pages that have seven or fewer items in the list I see my meta description.
Of course, this may not be definitive - just sharing what I see...
I've definitely seen more than that - a few 15s and even a 40, if I recall correctly. I have noticed that the counts don't seem to be that accurate.
I haven't made myself clear, I'm afraid.
I too have seen 5+, 10+, 15+, 20+,25+, 30+, and 40+
The point I was making is that I think you need at least 8 items in your 'list' before the snippet will display this way.
The counts that I've seen for pages on my site are pretty close if you compare them to the Google cache.
It's really interesting stuff though - thanks for the article!
I hate this. We have a major competitor who has repeat descriptions on almost every page. So Google has igrnored them and replaced with a bulleted list. So now they have BETTER results than us because they have one more line of Google results! So if you have no description or spam descriptions this becomes better than having good descriptions because Google gives you more real estate!!!
Good job Google! NOT!!
Sorry to clarify they actually have 5 lines compared to our 3!! Who will get more clicks?! Google is rewarding spammers. Simple as that.
But if you rank above their listing it would not matter if they had 10 bulleted points under their search result :P