Option #1: 301 Redirect the Old Domain to Your Existing Domain
The easiest and least time consuming option is to 301 redirect the old domain to your existing site. This tactic obviously works best if both sites are in the same sector and are targeting the same keywords; otherwise, if you have a pet supply site and you buy an old Texas Hold 'Em poker site, a redirect probably might raise some eyebrows among the search engines. If, however, your site is brandnamepets.com and you buy onlinepetsupply.com and 301 redirect the domain over, you're inheriting a lot of topical and appropriate links.
PROS:
- Is the least time consuming option
Benefit from the value (about 95% or so) of the old domain's links(postscript: Danny Sullivan has recently blogged about expired domains and their link credit, and it appears that buying a domain and redirecting to your site for the link benefit may not work since the links may not pass credit from expired domains.)
CONS:
- Old branded anchor text pointing to your new site isn't going to help as much as a keyword-rich anchor text
- If the old site had a penalty (for shady link building, cloaking, spamming, etc.), the penalty could carry over to your new site (I can't confirm this to be true, but a lot of SEOs I've talked to believe that this is a possibility, and some have sworn that they've experienced it firsthand, so I guess you just have to be cautious)
The second option requires a bit more time and effort than a 301 redirect. You could do a mini overhaul of the site and turn it into a microsite for your main domain. This option is good for exact-match domains for your targeted keyword, and there are other reasons for going the microsite route that Rand's highlighted in his post about root domains, subdomains, subfolders and microsites. This strategy also works better if the old domain has decent rankings for the keywords you're targeting.
PROS:
- Can cross-promote/cross-link to your existing site
- More real estate in the SERPs means more branding and potential conversions for your site
- You can do stuff on your microsite you may not want to do with your main site (e.g., launch silly viral content, experiment with a promotional tactic)
- You don't have to have a completely robust site; a lot of microsites are smaller and have a single focus (e.g., center on a quiz or a centric idea)
CONS:
- Can be time-consuming to do an overhaul of the old site
- Aggressive promotion and linking to the existing domain can seem spammy and you could get penalized for reciprocal linking or setting up a link farm
- Your current site isn't inheriting any of the old site's link value that would have come via a 301 redirect
- Microdomains can be used ineffectively (see Rand's Whiteboard Friday about the microsite mistake)
The third option is the one that's the most time consuming but also has its benefits. It's like having a successful restaurant and buying another restaurant and operating them simultaneously. They're not the exact same restaurant, but both are popular in their own right and make you money. The same goes for Option #3. You could update the content on the old domain and sell the same products that you're selling on your current site. If you can get both sites to rank alongside each other in the SERPs, you're increasing your conversion chances and sales potential.
PROS:
- As with Option #2, you get more real estate in the SERPs if you can get both sites to rank for your targeted search terms
- You don't have to work hard to brand the old site if it's a generic, keyword-rich domain--you can just focus on getting rankings and conversions
- The old site already has links pointing to it and is more established than starting with a brand new domain
CONS:
- You have to ensure that the old site doesn't mimic the new site and runs into any duplicate content issues
- It's time consuming to revamp and maintain the old site (you've essentially doubled your workload)
- As with Option #2, aggressive cross linking between the sites can raise red flags
Here's where I open things up: do any of you have experience buying old domains? If so, what do you do with them and has your decision worked well for you? Are there any other strategies you recommend?
In almost all cases I'd argue that the 301 redirect is an awful option.
Remember Toys-R-Us? They bought toys.com. Suddenly they owned two domains in a lucrative, competitive query space. Toys-R-Us 301 redirected toys.com to toysrus.com. In response, Google eliminated toys.com from the index and rankings.
When acquiring and transferring domains, one should be careful about resetting ranking signals. Changing registration, hosting and content all at the same time is bound to raise the eyebrows of ranking algorithms.
If a whole domain, favored by numerous and diverse external links, suddenly 301 redirects to the home page of another web site, it provides search engines the perfect excuse to disregard or dampen the authority generated by those links.
About the only reason I can think of to use the 301 is if you are protecting your brand or trademark via domain or TLD squatting. For example brandname.net, brand-name.org, etc.
If you are not brand or trademark squatting then you acquired the domain for a different reason, perhaps type-in traffic. I will wager that whatever reason you acquired the domain for will also support maintaining the site's existing content or redeveloping the site in a way that preserves and grows its authority and trust.
I definitely agree with you. I think though that another great use for a 301 redirect when buying an aged domain is NOT to redirect the entire domain name but rather to just 301 individual pages that used to be on the old site (from the old domain owner) to new pages on the new site that you are creating.
the same thing will apply with what Thomas posted
those old individual posts will be delisted
i think if you transfer just individual pages to other invidual pages in a different domain that it 'may' look shady
Potentially very true. Keep in mind that I am advocating redirecting old individual pages to new individual pages on the same domain and NOT necessarily to new pages on a different domain.
Really interesting perspective, Tom. Thanks for weighing in!
Surely if you purchase a domain (domain1.com) and redirect it to your existing domain (domain2.com) you expect to loose all ranking for domain1.com. If 301's are used then the objective is simply to pass on authority, not dominate the search results with 2 domains. If you want to keep domain2.com in the index then you would take Rebecca's option 2 or 3.
Having said that I do agree that purchasing domains through the usual channels my send to many signals, this is when a bit of lateral thinking is required.
A prime example of when a 301 should be used and will help rankings is when a company changes its name and insists that it's domain name is changed too.
Yeah, ToysRUs were really stupid with toys.com. They spent $5m on it and then just 301'd it - why, when they were already ranking #1 for "toys"!!? Would have been much better to build up toys.com as a content-rich site about toys, and build a community around it, which fed indirectly to the Toys R Us brand...
No, no, no. ToysRUs made a perfectly logical decison that most any business would do and Google tanked them for it. ToysRUs wanted the url toys.com to direct to their site. They're all about toys and they simply bought a url that described their business and told the url where to take people. Google tanked them in the rankings because Toys.com came with link juice. Google assumed that Toys.com was doing this to manipulate the search engines but there is just, to my knowledge, ZERO evidence of this. This is another case of Google caring more about the possible spam threat than the actual rankings for searchers.
Wow, amazing advice Thomas. I was actually confused about what should I do on this case, but you made it clear. Redeveloping the websites seems like the best way. Thank you :)
Here's my experience.
If you buy a dropped domain from Snap or Namejet, the backlinks seem to be worthless for SEO. They are valuable for traffic if it's targeted to your site. Go ahead and 301 redirect into your site because it's the traffic from the back links that is worth something. I use the Google URL builder to redirect these names so you can see the domain the traffic is coming from.
If you buy a domain from a 3rd party, the backlinks are valuable. I always wait a few months before redirecting, so just set up a quick minisite until two page rank updates have passed and then go ahead and 301 redirect. However, it seems that you'll get the link juice from the back links, the anchor text is ignored by Google. Buying a domain at Godaddy TDName expired auctions, seem to not count as a dropped domain if you immediately set up a mini-site.
If you buy keyword specific domains, you're really buying the type in traffic. I use the URL builder and redirect through that URL so you can see how much traffic your getting from the keyword domain. There seems to be no rythme or reason to what keyword domains deliver traffic and what don't. By tracking traffic with the Google URL builder you get a feel for what names are giving you traffic and which are not. ie. the plural, the singular, two words, three words, the possessive, etc.
nice post!
Can you explain this statement please?
Hi,
I don't know if you want me to defend the statement or just clarify, so I'll do both.
Snapnames.com, Namejet.com and Pool.com auction expired domains. There are two types of expired domain auctions at these venues.
1) pending delete auctions. These are domains that were not renewed and are going through a pretty complicated drop process. You can backorder these names at the auction venues and then each attempts to "catch" the dropping domain. If one is successful you win the domain at $59 if you're the only one to backorder the name. If more than one person backordered the domain a 3 day private auction is held. Once the domain goes through the drop process, the back links have pretty much zero SEO benifit to the new domain owner.
2) prerelease auctions. These are domains where the auction venue has contracted with the registrar, like Fabulous or Moniker, to auction off non-renewed domains. Just before a domain enters the pending delete process, it goes to a private auction to any person who has backordered the name. Some people feel that back links on these type of auctions still provide a SEO benifit. My testing indicates that there is zero SEO benifit when these domains are redirected into another site. So if you get a domain with "pink squirels" in a lot of achor text to a domain and then point it at your domain, you don't rank for "pink squirels"
I hope this answers the question.
Thank you. I didn't know/realize that if a domain that goes through the drop process loses all of its value.
So me finding and buying domain with PR, backlinks and age on those services is a complete waste of time?
Thank you for your reply.
Chad
I have observed a similiar phenonmenon, but it is inconsistent. My theory is that initially the big G devalues the links and doesn't count the links as "votes" But eventually if the links stay, then they have to give some weight as votes for the site they are redirected to.
"My testing indicates that there is zero SEO benifit when these domains are redirected into another site."
Could you please clarify how extensive this testing was?
I'm offering my opinion here and I'm not a SEO EXPERT.
My testing involved redirecting more than 10 and less than 100 keyword rich, generic, aged domains with older back links. Up until 3 months ago the back links would show up in Google webmaster tools along with the anchor text. Then poof, one day they all went away.
The site would also rank in the SERPs for a crazy anchor text term. Then poof it didn't.
I think there is value in older domains with back links, but it's not the SEO benifit you would hope for. You're buying the traffic. If the traffic is targeted to your site it has value, if it's not targeted to your site the traffic from the back links is worthless.
Here's a test I have in process. I bought an old $5 closeout domain from Godaddy TDname expired auction. I put a quick minisite up and linked to it with a crazy anchor text phrase. The domain is ranking for that crazy term now. It's gone through one pagerank update and I'm waiting for a second to come. Then I'll redirect the domain to another minisite. I suspect the second site won't rank for the anhor text, but we'll see.
I search through niche directories and link lists for our e-com sites at least once a week with Xenu to find expired domains.
If they have a good number of backlinks (niche related), PR, etc - we buy them and either 301 or set them on a separate IP and develop them to link with in the future. Works like a charm if you do it right.
Some links don't last forever as webmasters check on and update them, but I've found that a lot of times they will keep the link to our site anyways and update the anchor text to something even better.
Using this method I've been able to build links from competitor's sites (lol), buy up old out of business competitor's domains, niche blogs, niche forums, and more.
I've been lazy lately and have just been doing option #1. Much easier to just 301 redirect to the existing domain.
I agree, the easier way is much better.
Building a site is the only option that makes sense to me. 301 redirect will gradually cause the domain to lose its value. Content is king, remember.
I've acquired a few expired domains from 2008 political candidates. The sites were mostly small, with very few deep links and only a few pages showing up well in search results.
In each case I rebuilt the most important pages of those sites, keeping substantial content from them (no copyright was claimed). For now I refer to them as legacy campaign websites, preserving the history of the candidates' campaigns.
Of course I added some links to my own sites in the content, and I also added my own spin in places. For me the value is mainly politics - I believe these candidates will run for something again and I will have a significant say about them. The sites all rank #1 for their candidates' names.
When they do run again, or if they make news in some other way, I will add content about that. Fairly easy to do, while offering unique and meaningful content about something important. And that last bit - isn't that what Google really wants us to do?
Please note that you should be careful about legal issues. One of the candidates has threatened me with legal action. See: Phil Steck Letters
This is for those of you who think #2 is a good option:
When do you feel is a good time to start to add links to the site once you have content so google does not think you are just purchasing it for links?
Good articles and very usable information. It's not popular to mention buying old aged domains and domains with existing popularity as technic for seo where as in fact it's one of the best "tricks".
Everybody going to start using old domains should also know how to get them, I'm going to post soon article about it on seomoz as there are several ways starting from online rankings and lists up to dedicated seo tools that you can run on your computer and get precise and actual data on demand for any domains lists. Anybody intersting in such tools please visit our website: https://en.exdomain.eu/
Interesting post Rebecca!
Personally if I was to use an old domain name it would solely be to redirect it towards my main one.
Now, honestly, I don't do that either because I'm (maybe overly) concerned with the domain history. I feel "safer" and more in control with a new one.
Nonetheless, I found interesting to be reminded of different ways to use an old domain.
Good timely post Rebecca as I am just setting up a few microsites for exact match keywords.
I do have a question that I have not seen discussed yet and that is how google handles domain names that have been 301'd for a long period of time and then get setup as a site in their own right.
e.g.
I am assuming that over time google will recognise the 301 as being removed, I just wonder how long this will take assuming backlinks, sitemap etc... are taken care of.
Great info! I will be referencing this post often. :)
Great information!
I think though that another use for a 301 redirect when buying an aged domain is NOT to redirect the entire domain name but rather to just 301 individual pages that used to be on the old site (from the old domain owner) to new pages on the new site that you are creating.
Just FYI, I purchased this domain that had in bound links and no page rank since it was for sale.. I put a little bit of content out there and a couple of weeks later google did its up date and I have a pr2. I would assume that they are counting the links to an extent.
If there was bevor you a good projekt, you dont will have some troubble. all old sides go down an your new content will be listned fast
but this "old" projekt is for a long time like a new one. you must dayly post your ne content and all will be good..
i user 140 old domains an 80/90 runns verry good ! ( much better than new projekts )
sorry 4 my bad english.
Apply conventional wisdom - will buying that domain/company add revenue to your business. If so, how much and what is the cost associated with it.
Web is a dynamic world and domains keep coming up and going away - buying a domain name just for the years of its existence is not a sustained business model (at least not for me - I am sure companies like Marchex and dozens of others here may disagree).
Rajat
https://www.tripoutlook.com :-)
Your guide is great. I have tried a few tactics that you provided in here but now have a general understanding of how to do it through the entire process. Thank you very much for sharing this. :)
I think you should ask yourself 'this technique may hurt google in some way' ..we are talking on altering serp results in an un-natural way, and this seems to be against google rules, yes you could get benefits for the moment, but the algo is always evolving and what you get today could be a penality tomorrow.
What about option #4 - Redirect your existing domain to the old domain? I bought an old domain that is 100% relevant to my current domain but currently has with very little content. It did have more content fours years ago. The old domain is 13 years old, pr=3, while my current is 7 months old pr=1 and a decent amount of content. The old domain I purchased was not expired though and I do not know if this makes a difference. What are the pros and cons of option #4? Am I correct to think that option #1 would result in no benefit from the old domain's age value and if so why is it not listed as a con, a MAJOR one. Its hard to believe that a 301 using option 1 would give my existing domain 13 years credit but I'll take it if it does.
I've got a question regarding buying expired domain names: would you rather buy a domain name with a high page rank, domain authority and strong backlinking profile or focus domains that are in the same niche as the sites you are going to link to?
Hi, after buying expired domain what do you do with the old URL's? just ignore them? restrict them in robots file or actaully create them and redirect to new pages? I ask becasue the old domain was html and the new site is .aspx do I need to recereate all html pages and 301 them or leave as is just submitting the new URL's?
expired domain is a best source of fast ranking for me .
I using this method for more then 2 years ,all my websites now have good position just because of expired domains.For example see one of my blog ,it is not that much good but yeah it is almost a good expire domain but few good links. Anyone can raise himself by an expire domain.
Options 2 and 3 are going to need a little care so that Google doesn't notice your organisation is running both properties.
What about intellectual property rights? Is it legal to buy an expired domain and its content - in essence buying the website itself - and display the old content after the websites have changed ownership?
i generally use expired domain finder to find good domains with some metrics.
Great options! I'm still a newbie in buying expired domains and I love the idea of trying out a microsite rather than to use the 301. I also found a site named domainka.com and I'm planning to buy from that site to start.
so what the conclusion?, is it safe to use 301 redirect technique?
Considering that it could be a waste to buy these domains through the drop services.
Are there any suggestions, guides or systems for helping to get them before they get into the drop systems?
Of course the website for sale sites - but most are overpriced and none of them have impressed me yet.
What are the best places to find websites for sale or how do you find sites that might be for sale?
I don't necessarily agree with some that dropped domains don't have value for SEO purposes but either way one thing you can do is to check out our tool for finding auction domain names (the tool has a database of domains available buy from GoDaddy and SEDO and also give additional SEO criteria to look up for the domains like backlinks, Compete data, CPC, Google stats, Alexa stats, etc. and there is also an option to schedule auction domain alerts so that you can be notified via email if a domain name meeting criteria you specify gets put up for sale) or you could use our tool fo domains dropping soon that shows all domains dropping in the next 5 days that way you can be ready to snap them up right away.
namejet has the prerelease domains
auction starts at 69...and most times nobody bids on it
so you end up getting a bargain
Yes, we port in all of the domains from NameJet, SnapNames, etc. There are a lot of great deals to be found. Some are absolute trash of course but if you can sift through them and put some time in (hopefully that is what we are trying to do with our tools is save time and give some value add with the SEO metrics, alerts, etc.) then you can find some great bargains.
Does prerelease mean they never drop and lose their SEO benefits?
Or you just get first dibs on them?
one has nothing to do with the other
pre release means they are released before they expire
losing any SEO benefit is another argument
please read the article/comments
Great post and useful methods to take advantage of a domain with old links... another interesting post could be how we can identify those domains , which could be available out there in our niche.
Great post. I just figured out a way to get expired domains with backlinks, PR and aged, but had no clue what to do with them. Still not certain, but this gives me my options.
I get these after they drop - which based on some comments I have read reset the domains. NOT what I want.
How do you find and by domains without resetting them?
Chad
Very informative post indeed.
I feel Thomas M. Schmitz has nailed it perfectly in his comment about rationale and value of such practice.
I'm sure most of the SEO's use only the 301 method as it's hassle free.
Interestingly Danny Sullivan too posted a brilliant post on similar topic just couple of days ago. https://searchengineland.com/do-links-from-expired-domains-count-with-google-17811
As just a real world example, we merged two domains a year ago that each had about a couple hundred inbound links to them (some from the same sites), were registered for over 5 years each, and each had unique content (about law).
About two weeks later, tthe dominant domain increased its rankings dramatically. It was doing well for most searches on page one, but started to rank high for all sorts of more niche phrases.
It's almost like in an ideal world, with no budget, I would tell clients to launch two independent sites, then merge them at a certain point in the future. Of course, the efforts may just be better in putting everything into one site. But in this case, it definitely worked to have two independent sites with unique content and link building.
>>> It's almost like in an ideal world, with no budget, I would tell clients to launch two independent sites, then merge them at a certain point in the future.
It's probably a bit dark-grey hat. But this would be a way to get multiple links when link building. Any propositions that are accepted could be followed up to request a link to your second domain.
You now have 2 links - merge the sites and you just doubled your inbound links.
Indeed if you 301 the second site to the first except for the SE bots (ie for browser only UA strings) then you've doubled your placements in the SERPs too. Though I'd be pretty sure you'll get caught.
Also note that Google, at least, pay attention to domain ownership information (eg whois, IP address).
It's obviously tough to consider this move when latency from search engines are invoved. So many unknowns and different directions base on algo shifts, which lead me to believe that evolving content that already exists is almost always better, then 301 redirecting on the page level is second best.
A sitewide redirect seems to do the trick if tyou are ok with getting 10% of the value you paid for with the older established domain.
My 2 cents.
Great post and excellent info. I've always been a fan of using the first option, but I love the idea of trying out a microsite instead of just using the 301.
Great info.
I think it will depend on the person's time/resources.
If I were to buy an old domain, then I would cultivate it with new content and new links to it THEN point it to a domain. Point links not 301 redirecting. ....and of course not multiple links...but some .
A site that has a lot of pages indexed in Google, ranks high, and has fresh links coming in is way better than a site that does nothing but a 301 redirect.
Basically.....
A live site is better than a dead one
I was under the impression that if you buy domain names that have expired, then all the backlinks pointing to it were worthless.
not true
I have a local friend who buys domains on a constant basis
Some of his domains have expired...but were like 8-9yrs old before expiring.
He has HARDLY DONE any work on 1 domain i know about...and he ranks really well. The domain came with like a few hundred EDUs, and also gov links. These links are about 5yrs of age
I'm sure the owner reads this blog, and I'll let him chime in..and maybe he'll even post his link.
I was wondering this myself, using 301 to redirect the old domain to the new domain sounds like the best option for my work (it's not something we do at the moment - could be in the near future). I do like the idea of using a microsite - it wouldn't work for all clients but it's an interesting idea all round.
Great information! What about pages that have changed/no longer available. Is it better to redirect to a new page/relevant page or just use a user-friendly error page for those pages?
I think the best thing to do is to redirect to a corresponding page that's identical or as similar to the old page as possible. Failing that, you could redirect to the category page or to the home page. I definitely recommend custom 404s though that contain search boxes and handy links (to category pages, home page, etc).
Awww that post from Danny on the 20th means I've got to actually do some testing now! Doh!
One of the very best things you can do when you purchase an aged domain is to first go to the Wayback Machine and look up all of the different file names of the old site in the Internet Archives so that you can set up your 301 redirects.
Sometimes it is also smart to check and see if any of the search engines have any historical pages still indexed from the domain and then 301 those as well.
I would not recommend using a 404 page no matter how user friendly it is because ideally you want to use the old pages to pass some link juice, if any, on to the page(s) of your choosing and not just a 404 page.
I personally like to 301 the old pages to the page that is most relevant to the old page even if it means creating a new page.
Sometimes of course this is just too time consuming and then you can just 301 the old pages to some of your most popular new pages or your home page.
Great tool. Got my first thumbs up.
I agree with that Joel. 301 redirect is the best search engine friendly method for redirecting a webpage.301 redirect is better option for moving a particular page or changing the filename.
Excellent post, thanks a lot.
I have tried option #1 a few times. Brought some old domains with 50-100 links each and redirect them to various sites of mine (2-3 old domains to each of my sites).
Problem is I haven't seen any effect :( My sites still rank like they have always done and now it's been almost 6 months...
What could have gone wrong? Or do I need to be even more patient (oh no...)
I redirect using .htacces, like this:Redirect 301 / https://www.example.com/
Thanks,phi
depends on many factors including
1, how competitive your niche is
2. the value of the 2-3 domains
3. the value of the backlinks the 2-3 domains had
4. was your site better than the other 2-3 domains
as i wrote earlier.....a live site is better than a dead site
(live dog is better than a dead lion)
if you would've cultivated the site for 6months....your primary site would've been ranking a lot better than just doing the 301 redirect.
Buying the domain and doing the 301 is a temporary & quick fix
Would be interested in a WBF on this. Seems to be a lot out there about this topic. I have never tried the 301 redirect, but I do not see where it would be beneficial long term. I think google would not count the links after a while.The other two, if they are done right should work and currently do work I think.
I feel the best way to do it, but hardest way, is to purchase directly from the old owner and via a contract keep the domain in their name so it does not appear as though there is a changeover.
Here's an old post on search engine roundtable that claims google's policy is to discount previous backlink juice when a domain changes ownership. I'm not convinced whether this is actually true or something Google says to discourage excessive domain buying / 301 redirecting for SEO benefit. The comments above seem to give varying opinions on this matter. Would be great to get to the bottom of that one!
I would go with option #3 personally. I think it's more work but the benefits are greater as well. I would only do option 1 if the backlinks were highly relevant.
nice post, it is something that you always talk with clients about but they sometimes say dont have the budget, followed by is $15,000 too much to spend on adwords a month...
if you are buying an old domain, and you are doing something shifty dont change too much of the hosting/dns/owner records and just slowly change elements add some new fresh content, maybe a back link or two and leave it.
I agree with operating two businesses, one of my clients has another site that was setup for a very niche brand term and it doesnt get much other web traffic outside that term, but the main site could never rank for those terms.
So buying an old domain/site can have the benefit that you can have a very niche or specific term that your general site may never be able to rank for or would have to sacrific other keywords for small volumes..
i would agree with you but i have a current website that tells me otherwise
here's my experience with a website
1. it was a wine website now into a seo blog
2. it had a few backlinks to it
3. the website changed owners...and of course the content/template was changed
i had the domain parked for a few months, then just about in feb/march i decided to start blogging on it.
late in march i decided to go after the keyword SEO
within 2-3 weeks of targeting the keyword...i appeared on page 3 out of 260 million results. This is after broadcasting the blog for only 49days
*Warning - I normally dont post links because i know there are a lot of jealous folks who like to fill out spam reports and of course Google watching (i was on page 3..went to the bottom of page 4 after posting the link here)
...for educational purposes...my link is in my profile :)
I've seen some people comment about losing the link value of domains that have expired and picked up, but what about non-expired domains? Let's say a competitor is going out of business and they still have a year or two left, and we buy their domain and site. Is there a risk changing registrant info and registrars, even if I keep their site up and mostly the same as before? I was under the impression that I'd want to keep it under their name so as not to hit the uber-reset button on the domain's inbound link value.
I think old domains should remain intact and new websites be created to run independently. If the old domain is not something the owner wants to keep then it could be put up for sale if it doesn't involve physical inventory.
I have recently taken an interest in buying cheap expired domains with ranking and creating a new website in the same area as what the previous owner was using the domain for. It looks like they might be able to keep their ranks. Here are two that I have done recently: Orient Occidental and Soundtrack Arcade
- Casey Removed Link
Really good information. Once I have more time I am going to read through the comments. Looks like there is a lot to be said.