When Google Analytics doesn't know where a traffic source comes from, it assumes the traffic is direct and lumps it in with your direct visits. This happens frequenly with social shares, as many of us make the mistake of not tagging our links accordingly.
In today's Whiteboard Friday, Rachael Gerson sheds some light on "dark social" and explains why tagging in Google Analytics improves the accuracy of your referrals. Take credit for the work that you're doing, and tag your links!
Video Transcription
"Hi, everyone. I'm Rachael Gerson. I'm the head of analytics at SEER Interactive. We're a digital marketing agency in Philadelphia, although we are growing and spreading across the world. Although we're primarily known for our SEO, we actually have an amazing paid search team and a really talented analytics team. I want to share our story with you. The timing on this story is actually really convenient because it ties with what I wanted to talk to you about.
My sister wrote a blog post last night. She has a new blog. No one ever goes to it. I think I may be the only person who knows it exists. She wrote the post. I read it this morning and went, "This is really good content. I'm going to share this." And I put it out on Twitter.
She saw me share it, and she put it on Facebook and thought, "Okay. Let's see what happens." In the last 8 hours, she's gotten 74,000 page views to this one blog post. I'm looking at the real-time traffic right now, down here. There are 1,500 people on the site. This thing is blowing up. It's going viral.
We can see it spreading through Twitter. We can see it spreading through Facebook. We can see it being referred by random sites, but we're also seeing a lot of traffic come in as direct. Since no one knows this blog exists, I highly doubt they're typing in the 40 plus characters of the URL to go directly to this page. They're not. It's being shared socially. This is the idea of dark social.
It's not a new idea, but it's a fascinating idea, and that's what I wanted to talk to you about today, was this idea of dark social, that content spreads, if it's good content, socially, organically.
Dark social sounds like a bad thing. It's not. It's actually really awesome and really fun to dig into. Let's say that someone read this post earlier, and they shared it on Twitter, Facebook, whatever. We kind of know where that came from for the most part. They may have texted it to a friend or copied a link and sent it in chat. In both cases, when the person clicks on the link and goes to the site, they come in as direct.
Direct is Google Analytics' version of, "We have no idea what this is, so let's call it direct and throw it in that bucket." We know it's not direct. That's our dark, organic social. It's spreading organically in all different ways, and we're getting traffic because of it. It's pretty amazing.
I wanted to talk to you about the analysis I'm doing on the dark social side because it's really fun stuff. Unfortunately, in talking to a lot of people, I found they're not there yet.
Here's the problem. When we say direct it's our catchall bucket and we need to look at direct to get an idea of our dark social, organic social, whatever we want to call it, if things are not tagged properly, we can't dig into to what's [out] to this dark social side. Actually, we can't do anything. If things aren't tagged properly, you're not taking credit for the work that you're doing.
For your paid search, for your social media, for email marketing, whatever it is, you have to tag your links. Otherwise, you're not getting credit for the work that you're doing.
You know what really sucks, by the way? When you work really hard on a project and, at the last second, your boss takes credit for it. That was your project. You did all the work for it. Why is he taking your credit? It sucks!
What we're talking about right now is the digital marketing version of that. It's the online version, where you're giving your credit away for the work that you're doing. Honestly, you need that credit to keep your budget, to keep your job, to get a promotion, to get any of these things. You need to prove your value.
When we talk about tagging, it's using UTM parameters. Dark social, organic social, that's really sexy. It's fun. We can dig into that. UTM parameters are not sexy. They're not fun, but they're necessary. If you're not doing this, you're wasting your time and you're wasting your money. Now that sucks.
How are you wasting your time? If you're not doing this, you're putting all kinds of time, hopefully, into analysis, if you're looking at what you're doing, but your analysis is based on data that's not accurate. You're putting your time into marketing efforts that may not actually be working as well as you think they are. You're putting your money into marketing efforts. You need to know that your stuff's actually working. Keep doing that. Make your well-informed decisions to help the business and drive it forward.
Again, time is money. You need to make sure you get all this stuff right, so you can do all the other stuff.
Let's talk about a few examples of where tagging actually matters. If we're looking at Twitter, if you don't tag your links, things will still come in. You'll see t.co showing up. In your real-time traffic, you'll see Twitter as social coming in, and you'll see some of that in your multi-channel funnels as well.
If you tag your links, you're going to always know it's Twitter. You're going to know which campaign it was. You're going to know all the information you put into it. You're also going to be protected from the other side of it. That's when people use Twitter apps. For example, HootSuite doesn't come in as Twitter unless you've tagged it. People clicking on a link that you post on Twitter that's untagged in HootSuite are going to come in as HootSuite referral usually.
If you posted on TweetDeck, they're coming in as direct. By the way, I'm still playing with all of this, and it all changes. I've played with stuff that's changed before. So if this is different by the time it comes out, I apologize. Just keep up with it all the time.
That's our Twitter side. On Facebook, if we don't tag our links, they'll come in as Facebook referral. It's nice and easy. It's clean. We know what it is. The exception to that is if someone's trying to open a link in Facebook, they click on the link, it doesn't load fast enough, they're probably going to click Open in Safari if they really care about it. Once they open in Safari, that's a direct visit. We just lost the Facebook tracking in it.
There're also a missing piece here, and that's if you do tag this stuff, you get an extra level to your analysis. You can say, "This is all the same campaign. It's the same effort, same content." You can tie it together across all these different platforms, and that helps.
We get to email. If you're putting time and money into your email marketing, you want to take your credit for it. If you're not tagging your email, it's usually going to come in one of two ways: One as a referral from all the different mail things that can come in or as direct.
At least with the mail, where is says mail.yahoo.whatever, we know it's mail. We can't track it down to what you did versus what someone sent. We have some analysis on it. If it's direct, you lose everything. So tag your email.
Paid search. It's nice. AdWords actually makes it really easy for us to tag our paid search. We can connect Google Analytics and AdWords very easily, and they play really well together. It's awesome. The problem is when you don't tag your stuff. If you don't tag your paid search, either through AdWords or through your manual tracking parameters on other platforms as well, it comes in as organic.
This actually happened to us at SEER. One of our SEO clients, we were watching their traffic, and organic traffic spiked. The account manager went, "Hey, guys, this is awesome." To which the client responded, "Oh, we forgot to tell you we launched paid search," and the account manager discovered they weren't tagging their paid search. This paid search manager accidentally just gave away their credit. We don't want to have that happen.
Let's say you've actually tagged everything properly in your URLs. All this is done. These are just a few examples, but all of the other stuff is taken care of. Let's look at the tracking on the site itself. We see this happen pretty often with paid search landing pages, where we have to put this on our checklist that this is done immediately.
We'll create brand new landing pages that are optimized for paid search for conversion. They're different from the rest of the site. They're a totally new template, which means that if the Google Analytics code is in a template already for the site, it may not be in here. If we don't have someone add it back in, what's going to happen is paid search will drive all this traffic to the site, they'll get to that page, go to page two. Page two has the Google Analytics code, but they don't know where it came from. This is going to show up as direct. Paid search just gave away their credit. We can't have that happen. You worked too hard for that credit.
I've also seen it where people make little mistakes with the tracking on the site. Spotify did this a few months ago, and I sent them a message to help them out with it. They were tagging all of the links on their site with UTM parameters. When visitors would hit those different links, they'd reset the visit ,and it would be a new visit with each one. Spotify, all their marketers were giving away their credit through that.
Let's say you've got all this other stuff right. Good job. That's awesome. There's still stuff that you can't control unfortunately. There are a lot of things that can cause traffic to come in as direct when it really isn't. I have a short list that people have been adding to at [bitly/direct-wrong]. If you have others, keep adding them because I want to have a giant list of all the things we can tackle and fix, but the list just keeps growing.
If you look at mobile traffic, for example, iOS 6, we can't tell if it's search or if it's direct. That's a problem. For me, if I'm doing an analysis and I really need that part, or I really need to know that part for sure, I may cut that out so it's not throwing off my data. There are different ways to deal with that, and that's a whole other topic.
The point is control whatever you can. Where you control the spread of information, make sure you're doing your part. If you're sharing a link socially, tag your links. That way, if people want to share it or retweet it, the tracking is already in place there. If your posts on the site have social plugins, put the tracking in your social plugins too. It makes it easy if someone wants to hit the share on Facebook or to share on Twitter. It already has the tracking. It goes through, people get to the site, your tracking's in place, and you can breathe a sigh of relief.
Now once you've done everything else up here, your tagging is right on your URLs, your tracking is right on the site, there's nothing you messed up by accident, you've controlled everything you can with these other issues, you kind of have to accept what's left. You know that there's stuff that you can't account for. There's direct in there that may have been shared through a text, through a chat, through any other thing. You don't know where it actually came from.
First off, that gets a dark social. We can now start doing our awesome analysis, like dark social or other things, because we have confidence in our data. We can trust that we're making the right decisions for our business, and we can save our time and our money this way.
If you have questions or thoughts, hit me up on Twitter or in the comments below, because I love talking about this stuff. Maybe another time, we'll talk about this organic social idea."
Thanks Rachel for sharing this. I agree that tagging is important, and I do get annoyed w/ those things that are mistakenly listed as direct (they really should create a new category called unknown). Anyway, while you bring up excellent points, and I agree w/ you, as a Non-SEO person, I don't know how to tag things. Could you provide some advice on that?
Genuinely, I am also not aware about tagging thins while share pages or posts via twitter and Facebook, It will be highly helpful if Rachel or somebody else in this forum give some examples on effective tagging Process Please
Take your link fill out the info here https://support.google.com/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1033867 then grab the link and share the new url
Just a small note on this
The tool David linked is indeed very useful but all it is is a nice, neat form to create a URL shortener (like the video says, utm_source isn't sexy) but the url is shortened to goo.gl, which, of course, Google tracks ;)
You could achieve the same thing by using any URL shortener (like tiny url, etc).
not necessarily, highland. keep in mind that google might (and probably does) assign greater importance to urls run through its shortener (never underestimate the power and importance of google and its products, and the benefit of utilizing them at every reasonable opportunity).
Hi Debbie, just a quick heads up - I'm going to pull together some quick resources and will post them here for you shortly. Thanks for the great request!!
Just realized I've already done this homework: bit.ly/how-to-tag
A few resources you can use. If you have any questions, hit me up on twitter @rachaelgerson. I'm happy to help.
Tag, like keywords or some importtant words in the article.
Fantastic Whiteboard post (yes again) - well done Rachael.
Only thing I would add to this (and I appreciate you were only covering "online") - is that this can also be useful for ANY offline promotions companies do that they want to track back to their websites.
Radio Ads, Leaflets, Exhibition Stands, Brochures etc can all be tracked through Google Analytics.
Showing a slightly different URL to your normal one e.g. instead of SEOMOZ.org you have SEOMOZ.net - this redirects automatically to SEOMOZ.org but with the utm tagging to say that this has come from leaflets you were handing out at an event. You can then measure the effectiveness of your offline media to driving traffic to your website (and conversions). Slightly harder than online links but can help companies get a better understanding about what advertising is working for them (through their website).
Fantastic addition!
An excellent share Rachel. I just learned abot this recently (on G+) but have not added the coding to any of my pages yet. The following link (not trying to hijack) will make it easy for anyone who wants to give this a try: https://blog.kissmetrics.com/how-to-use-utm-parameters/
Anita Clark you share a link of a blog over analytics which is quite fruitful for the peoples.
Thanks,
Thanks Anita. I will check that out.
Thanks for that link, I need to read that post about UTM parameters
Anita, thank you for posting that link!! I'm glad you were on this so early to provide such a great resource. For anyone looking for additional resources, check out bit.ly/how-to-tag. It's just a quick bitly bundle of a few articles, with the one Anita shared included.
Thanks for the bundled share Rachael. 4 good articles that should put all of us novices (maybe I am the only one!) on the right track.
No problem! If there are any questions, please feel free to reach out to me on twitter (@rachaelgerson), too. I like when I can take a few minutes to help answer questions there.
thanks fro that share, I was just about to ask a question about bitly. sure I will get the answer there..
Anita,
As we all know there are many, many,...MANY layers deep in the rabbit hole we can go in our field. Many of us tend to look at and see things from a high level perspective and miss important details but thank God for Rachael pointing out this extremely important and valuable level of subtle detail in our work. It's so inspiring to work in a community willing to share to make us all better! Thank you Rachael and Anita for sharing such valuable info!
Thanks Blake! Love the positivity :)
Dear Rachel,
There are times on moz when I pause from work, watch a WBF, read a good blog, or a great answer on Q&A and I say to myself, "Damn, that was good. I just got better for it."
Rachel,
Damn, that was good! I just got better for it!
Thanks
Robert, thank you!! Your comment just made my day :)
SUPER IMPORTANT!
Tag your paid search campaigns using the utm parameter cpc. cpc shows up under paid search in GA. Tag your BingAds and your FacebookAds with Google's URL builder; otherwise, your paid search will be recorded as organic! If you are using Bing/Yahoo paid search, in GA check Traffic Sources > Sources > Paid and click "source". If you don't see Bing or Yahoo in there, you have a tagging problem.
Rachael, thanks for the WBF. I haven't commented on a post in a while, but your WBF was really good.
Agreed, that's a super important recommendation! Thank you for the feedback :)
Another way to use tagging is to tag your Bing/Yahoo Ads. If you tag these they will show up as a separate result. Before I started doing this I could not find out where they were being recorded, but after watching the video it was probably in direct traffic or in the Bing or Yahoo organic results.
This is definitely a good use for them, and hopefully would be one of the first places someone would look to use such tracking.
Absolutely! If you're running on AdWords, get your auto-tagging set up. If you're running on Bing/Yahoo, everything needs to be manually tagged. Otherwise it all comes in as organic.
Thanks for the informative post Rachel. You mentioned:
If you look at mobile traffic, for example, iOS 6, we can't tell if it's search or if it's direct. That's a problem. For me, if I'm doing an analysis and I really need that part, or I really need to know that part for sure, I may cut that out so it's not throwing off my data. There are different ways to deal with that, and that's a whole other topic.
Would you please elaborate more about the different ways you deal with that?
Awesome question :) Will be in touch shortly.
Another way of tagging is Google's URL builder. These tags will cross over to Google Analytics.
https://support.google.com/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1033867
In Google Analytics, you will find your tags under Traffic Sources>All Traffic. You will see traffic separated by source/medium. I like to use the secondary dimension to give me even more insight.
Right there with you! I use the secondary dimension and build custom/customized reports frequently to get to additional information.
Thanks for the tips Rachel, we don't do any of this yet!
I'll be looking to implement it asap. Do you have any links to places that explain how?
Hi Jazy, thanks for the positive feedback! I have a bundle of links that can help here. If you have any questions, let me know!
Thanks Rachel for this White Board Friday and Thanks Anita
The UTM parameter adding is good tip for me. I thinks it is like tracking. Easily track the traffic send by each fellows affiliated
No problem! That's exactly it. Track your links, where you can, and get your credit.
You’re right, tracking the performance of ads is so critical, it’s not optional. You can’t be profitable unless you’re weeding out the nonperforming keywords and ads.
One thing that always mystified me was a finding a simple way to do it and I thank you so much for providing this simple guide to tagging in Analytics. DUH! Why wasn't I doing this, like, all along?
Great reminder about tagging / tracking links. Thanks for sharing the story about your sister's blog.
BTW, some readers may like Google's URL Builder to help with tagging. It's found under their Custom Campaigns documentation for Google Analytics.
We tagged our "Holiday" email back in December, and I'm still seeing traffic come in from time to time. It makes me smile when I see that. Thanks for reminding me to tag EVERYTHING.
Love it!
Tagging is great for analytics but time consuming for editors/publishers. I think we will see more automated tagging and tag management solutions in the future.
Any thoughts on using a custom link shortener, like Pretty Link for Wordpress, to hide URL parameters - make the links pretty and more sharable?
I'm a big fan of using URL shorteners for just that purpose. My links throughout the comments do that very same thing :) Great addition!
Great job showing the need for tags ... Now I have to learn how to create the tags and integrate them into our e-mails.
Thanks Rich! Try starting here: https://bit.ly/how-to-tag. If you have questions, let me know!
If you want a URL Builder for bulk tagging and and integration with the bit.ly to shorten those tagged links, check out https://bit.ly/bulk-url-tagging its a tagging spreadsheet i built that helps speed up the tagging process and keeps your source/medium selection consistent which is key when analyzing the tagged traffic.
Very cool!
Glad you like it, it is a constant work in progress (primarily the encoded URL for bit.ly) but it saves tomes of time and keeps teams organized when selecting a source/medium combo. The consistency makes me a happy analyst!
Great whiteboard Friday Rachel, look forward with interest to see where your research leads. Thanks to Anita Clark also for the link to the article on utm tagging.
Thanks!
really like the personable intro.. really personable and human.. i don't want to watch marketing commercials.. i want someone communicating with me.. i notice a difference.. not that 'marketing commercials' can't convey good information, but communicating in a more personable way is mo better in my opinion.. great job.
Anthony, thanks for the feedback here and on twitter! I haven't actually been able to bring myself to watch it yet, but I read the transcript and feel like I said most of what I wanted to :)
I enjoyed your video Rachael and learned a new term "dark social" :) I have always been tagging URLs for all paid and email campaigns, but have never really thought to do it for social since I've setup many of the social platforms to feed each other, that can be quite a mess? In any case, I see that many are new to URL tagging in the comments, so here's a great link https://gaconfig.com/ that has a "URL Builder", along with many other great analytics tools. Enjoy, and thanks for the vid...nice job!
Thanks Dario! And great addition with Raven's GA Config site. If you've already been tagging paid and email, you're ahead of a lot of people I've talked to. If you're able to post to just one social media platform at a time, tagging each is easier than if you're posting once and sharing to multiple platforms. It could definitely happen that someone copies your link from twitter and pastes into facebook, which would throw things off, but at least you're controlling as much as you can.
Very good and informative post. Rachel I would be grateful for practical examples of how to make the properly marked code implemented to the sites...
Basic info about utm tagging here:
https://www.intownwebdesign.com/google-analytics/google-analytics-utm-link-tagging-explained.html
Thanks Andrew! I have a bundle of help articles here: bit.ly/how-to-tag
Tunji, thanks for adding your resource!
Great topic Rachael! I found the biggest challenge making sure that everybody who is working on the website is aware of tagging and consistent, especially when offline marketing, SEO, social, email and paid is managed by different companies.
Thanks Virgil! Totally agreed. We need to get everyone on board to tag in the first place, then provide them with a template to make it easy and consistent.
Good post. Some real examples would be good i.e. how to actually tag on FB and Twitter. The UTM is great but how many people use it or would know how to? So I guess you have to create these links using the Google Analytics tool for every social medium you use, very time consuming. Thanks to @Anita Clark for the link to kiss metrics, this post is good but still a little vague.
Virginia, thanks for the feedback! I tried to find a good middle ground to explain why to tag, once I realized people weren't already tagging. The post Anita shared is a great one. I can also put together some recommendations, including ways to tag quickly, easily, and make sure you're using the same naming conventions across the company.
Hi Rachael, thanks and that would be awesome if you did have time to put together some recommendations
Hi Virginia, check out bit.ly/how-to-tag. It's just a quick bitly bundle of a few articles that I thought did a good job of explaining the "how to" side of tagging. If you have any questions, please let me know!
Thanx Rachael..4 provide .. Grt Job.
LOl, tagging!
In June 2011, I thought I'd stop WMT bellyaching about all of the useless parameters that facebook and othr sites were adding to all of my nice clean URLs, so I edited my display program to do a 301 redirect to the clean URL.
I had been bitten by google before, when a powerful site started messing around with my URLs, truncating them to fit their structure. I just edited my display program so that if there was enough of the URL to display the story, I'd display it. Then google decided we had duplicate content and slashed our traffic from about 20,000 visitors per day, to almost nothing.
So my question to Rachael is:
If I stop doing those redirects, what happens in WMT?
What do you see in your own or the WMT of others, when there are all of these weird trailing tags, and what do you tell WMT about that, if anything?
Hi Alan,
To clarify, are you 301 redirecting your URLs to drop off the tracking parameters? If so, that will keep GA from getting that information. The alternative would be to set GA to ignore the parameters so you don't end up with tons of the same URI listed with different random parameters in place (only if they're not UTM parameters), then tell WMT that it can also ignore those parameters (UTM or otherwise). This will help the Google recognize that the parameters don't alter the content on the page.
Does that answer your question?
Hy Rachael,
First - great post!
You can also tag links from PDF documents and presentations :)
Great explanation of UTM tags and why they really do matter! I was wondering what the best way is to cross-post simultaneously to multiple networks using Hootsuite? For example, let's say I want to post the same message and link to Facebook, Google+ and LinkedIn. If I don't include UTM tags, clicks don't show in the campaign report. If I use a generic UTM source tag like "hootsuite," I'm unable to see whether clicks came from Facebook, Google+ or LinkedIn in GA since the referrer is hootsuite. That leaves me with the option of using a different UTM source tag for each network, which takes more time and means I can't take advantage of Hootsuite's ability to simultaneously post if I want to know which network clicks come from.
Does anyone know of a way to get the best of both worlds? Solid Google Analytics tagging + the ability to use a tool like Hootsuite to simultaneously post?
Very good post and you're right, it's right on time for what I'm seeing in my Google Analytics account. I will keep looking into it.
Hi Guys,
I think you all - just like me was intrigued with this post, but were struggling with the HOW to implement this on your site.
Did some 'Googling' - and came across this very helpful post. It certainly cleared my mind up. Thanks again, for a helpful whiteboard Friday topic.
https://blog.kissmetrics.com/how-to-use-utm-parameters/
Thanks for posting the resource! If you're looking for additional sites / articles, check out bit.ly/how-to-tag too.
Article great, but comments also are a good help. Learn something new.
Great post Rachael.
I've found it helpful to create a spreadsheet w/ pre-defined drop down values for all our utm parameters so everyone across the marketing department can pick their values and have a tagged link built in the next cell.
Not sure if this was mentioned in comments (I watched video but skimmed comments), but a follow up video to help clean-up some of the missed traffic would be great. Using simple regex's and advanced segments to catch twitter.com, t.co, facebook.com, m.facebook, etc. So, if you can't get buy-in on tagging you can catch and bucket them appropriately.
Hey Scott, you're the first to mention it, but I'm right there with you. Great addition!
Hi Rachael -- I think I'm missing something basic. You say:
"Let's say that someone read this post earlier, and they shared it on Twitter, Facebook, whatever. We kind of know where that came from for the most part. They may have texted it to a friend or copied a link and sent it in chat. In both cases, when the person clicks on the link and goes to the site, they come in as direct."
Links on sites, like twitter, facebook that comes in always as referral, not direct. What don't I get? Thanks
Hi Christopher, There are instances when traffic can come in differently than you would expect. If someone's using a tool like Hootsuite or Tweetdeck, it alters how the traffic comes into GA. Same if they open the facebook link in Safari on the phone because it's loading too slowly. Lots of exceptions, may as well tag! Plus if we tag, we can get more detailed information into (and out of) GA, tying campaigns across multiple sources and media.
Great stuff... I'm considering to begin the utm tagging and this WBF has been very helpful
Thanks for the post and great content. I find we have tons of stuff falling into our direct bucket due to what I think are IS logging issues. I will see a spike in direct traffic that is likely one of these logging issues. The tag gets dropped.
It seems like a lot of things can break tagging and with dozens of sources, we lose plenty of tracking. My question would be, "Do you experience similar issues of utm tags getting broken? And, if so are there specific things that can lead to tags being dropped that we might look for and avoid?"
Thanks much, Blair
Hi Blair,
Thanks for the feedback! For things to focus on, I'd look first at the GA code on the site. Make sure it's on every page of the site, especially any specially-built landing pages. This tends to be one of the biggest culprits. If that's not the case, look for any redirects you have in place that strip the tracking from the URLs before the info can get to GA - this happens more often than you would expect. If you have a specific site in mind and want me to peek, let me know!
Thanks!
Rachael
Thanks Rachael,I never properly tracked the campaigns that i had before, Your post now guiding me.. Thanks a lot
Thanks! Happy it could be helpful.
Great Post Rachael!!
+1 for the SEXY dark social sharing!
Very, very useful
Thanks Racheal for writing this article... Understood the importance of tagging.
Thanks Rachel - some great insights in here. Just a week ago I found out way too many direct entries on my client's Analytics.Now I know the reason!
No problem! Good luck getting everything fixed moving forward. If you have any questions, let me know!
Hi Rachael,
Very nicely done. I am familiar with how to install and apply GA, but I was unaware of being able to track ones social share gizmos.
You have any resource handy where I could learn more?
Well done on your WBF presentation by the way.
Cheers
Mark
What are the chances of getting a videos teaching us how to tag our content?
Thanks
I can share these resources for now: bit.ly/how-to-tag
If additional information would still be helpful, please let me know!
Just fill this form and everything should be good ;)
Then, you will see these visits under traffic sources > sources > campaigns category in Google analytics.
I am glad to know about google analytics..
Thanks for informations. that tagging is very important.
This is very helpful topic and helps the small business to get more traffic from Google.
As a trucking business owner thanks to the publisher.
Great video. What was your sister's post to get that many hits:)
I tend to forget about tagging so this was a great reminder. I will be building my tags out pronto!
Thanks Pamela! Her post was https://thebigsocialpicture.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-oscar-protest-that-you-didnt-know.html. She also wrote several great follow up posts to examine the traffic she got. I personally find those even more interesting!
Rachael, excellent video. Really useful and succinct.
Here are two more types of inbound links that you could potentially add GA campaign parameters to:
- the URL that you push a QR code to
- the URL that you redirect a vanity URL to
At the Google Analytics Test project (for which I'm developer and admin), the content team emphasizes the importance of tagging to fight the scourge of false direct (and organic) traffic - it's great to see these important lessons presented so clearly in your video.
This post and comments have left me a bit confused. Not too mention the behavior of some of the members as well. Calm down everyone, after all it is only SEO.
Jose, sorry if anything I said in the video was confusing. I'm happy to connect if you have questions or I can help clarify anything.
Thank you so much for the article, I just started my first job out of college and am trying to learn as much as i possibly can about SEO. I do have one question though; what exactly is the issue with UTM parameters? Aren't they just tags within the URL? Thanks again.
-Tracy
That's exactly what they are - they are variables passed to Analytics in order to track where that click came from :)
I used to tag everything and then.... it took your WBF to get me to start tagging again!
Thanks! Great video by the way.
Awesome, welcome back! And thanks for the feedback!
Awesome topic, Rachael! Give credit where credit is due!
Thanks Chris!
Thanks Rachael! Similar to others, I tag most everything on site but fall short on tagging social content- this has motivated me to get to tagging that content as well.
Erik, great to hear! Would love to hear how this affects your stats.
Any advice on adding tags for a news website? I would love to implement this but with hundreds of URLs published each day, this may be a little prohibitive.
It's only prohibitive if you need to break down the categories of your campaigns into many different bits. If you just want to know if a click came from a social media platform or news e-mail etc, just copy & paste the UTM's onto your URLs before you shorten them. Don't know if that helps?
Juanita, with that much content being put out, there are a few things you can do to make your life easier. First, if you're using social media sharing plugins on the site, make sure they're set up to include the tagging. It's one less thing you'll have to worry about. Second, create a template for how you want to tag links. Make it as idiot-proof as possible. If you're not the person sharing the links, make sure they know how you want things tagged and that they're actually doing it. Anything you can do to make it easy will result in the tags being used more.
Rachel, Thanks that was one of the most intriguing WBFs for ages, I don't know too much about tracking Social but I do know where the tools are and so will be implementing this as soon as possible.
A good follow up would be some form of video tutorial of you actually tagging and tracking...I think that would help the noobs and the nervous, as well as being an awesome resource to compliment this one.Thanks again.
Thanks Phil! I'd be game. If it happens, I'll let you know :)
Hey Rachael - great WBF, thanks!
We created a free extension for Chrome:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/professor-traffic/kjpcccjghfeaclemdjgebbojcmfcbnca
that adds the Google Analytics tracking tags to the URL for you.
The LinkedIn bit fails to track (because LinkedIn strips out the UTM bit of the URL), so that will be removed soon but the rest seems pretty robust.
It's a tool we were using internally, but figured it was useful and so we made it available for everyone to use.
Let us know if there's anything we can do to make it better...
Would this be useful in any way for outbound links?
For example, if I have a blog with many email subscribers and I frequently make outbound links to other bloggers, normally those other bloggers will just see the inbound traffic as coming from gmail or other mail services, correct?
But what if I included a utm source tag? Could they then see where the traffic is coming from?
Hey Mike, it would be useful for outbound links in your situation. If you receive the SEOmoz Top 10 email, take a look at the tagging. They do a great job of keeping the tagging consistent with what would come into GA naturally, while letting sites know where the traffic came from.
To be totally honest, though, I use it for fun :) Check out the tagging on the links in this comment: https://www.seomoz.org/blog/why-google-analytics-tagging-matters-whiteboard-friday#jtc214818. I've been known to say hi to friends in GA tagging, and I'm not the only one. I've seen several people send messages through GA, then wait to see if people are actually looking at their stats.
I wish I had found your video sooner, but now I'm here. I like your fresh points in this video. That's just so very refreshing. i am really thankful to you for this Whiteboard Friday's article.
Hi Rachael,
I always waiting for the whiteboard Friday session and I really like this wonderful editions, It does not matter who is delivering the speech.You shared your sister blog information that pretty good.how dark social and tagging is important for the peoples, you explained nicely.
Thanks a lot to share wonderful information with us.
Rachel, I had never heard about this and clearly need to pay attention. Thank you for the heads up.
No problem! If you have any questions as you're working on tagging, feel free to reach out!
Great info, so many people dont have clue why direct and organic data is off this is really helpfull to open peoples eyes. We find phone tracking based on url tagging also to be huge win :)
Thanks David! Phone tracking based on URL tagging is awesome. And that's the whole point - get the foundation right, then get to the super fun stuff :)
Anyway to tag the phone link in the new Adwords mobile/enhanced campaigns?
Best to use a 3rd party program like marchex so all clicks from adwords can get tracked but google does have a call extension to use that helps a bit.
Thanks :-) Much appreciated!
Yes, It's true. I am using google analytics url builder for this. It's very easy for me to track if i share my blog post on facebook or twitter then i can easily check in analytics how many visits i received for this post. Not only this but i also help me to understand that i have my target audience on twitter... Nice article..
Thanks!
Thanks so much Rachel. Appreciate the article and the links you shared in first several posts, Know of any Wordress Plug in that help you automate this on your blog posts?
Hi Rob! There are a couple plugins that can be used for social sharing (ShareThis and AddThis are the ones I've used previously). I know they can be customized to include the tracking parameters, but I haven't done this part personally. If anyone else has, please jump in!
Great Post Rachel, Can you explain how this dark social or organic social relate to paid search?
Thanks Rohan! The dark social traffic shouldn't affect paid search initially. If paid search traffic isn't properly tagged, it will usually come in as organic. The dark social side from paid search could come into play if someone visits the site through paid search, remembers the site, and emails / tweets / texts / chats it to someone else. This is the organic social spread that we would hope to see with good content. Does this make more sense?
Rachael,
So, SEOmoz has a recommended number of tags limit. Could you explain that a bit? How many are TOO many? etc.
Thanks for the teaser on Dark (organic) Social!
Hi Jeremy!
I'm not familiar with SEOmoz's recommended number of tags limit. Are you able to point me to a link?
And no problem. Hopefully everyone comes back and says their tagging is all set so we can talk about Dark Social next time!
Thanks a lot Rachael Gerson to Whiteboard Friday I am very glad that i have seen this video and I love to say that its been very informative to me.
Thanks!
Hi Rachael,
Good coverage, nice WBF, congrats overall - but can you also comment on the downsides of taging the links ?
Thanks! As far as downsides, the only one I can think of off the top of my head is that someone might copy your tagged twitter link over to facebook. Then anyone who clicks on that link from facebook will come in looking like twitter traffic. It happened to me when I created the short link to the Direct Traffic post. I used it again because it was already a shortened, customized link and I know where the traffic came from (since I'm the only person looking at the analytics for my own account), but if you look at the parameters, it says the traffic was from SearchFest, rather than SEOmoz.
Did you have any other downsides in mind or anything you were concerned about?
Great job Rachel. Case in point, in 2011 we were doing email campaigns without tagging them. In 2012 wee added tagging. As a result, our year-over-year direct traffic is showing a 30% descrease...but not actually because it's lower, but because the traffic that was being wrongly labeled as "Direct" is now correctly being attributed to email campaigns.
I agree with Webmaster Servant's comment....With dozens of campaigns, thousands of products, hundreds of Adwords ads, etc. what is the most expeditious way to go back and tag everything?
Thanks Dana! This is a great example.
On the AdWords side, do you have your paid search and Google Analytics connected and set to autotag? That should make the first part easier, if not. If you're able to start tagging from today forward, make sure all of your new efforts are properly tagged, you'll at least know your new campaigns are set up. Then you can go back over time to tag the rest. Just make sure you're annotating when you make these changes in GA, so you can quickly reference when the changes occurred and their impact. If you have any questions, let me know!
Rachael, I was wondering if you know of any clean way to incorporate tag containers w/ tagging links? I am hoping to find a way to streamline the effort in tagging all links. We have been using short code for our WordPress sites and that helps but always looking for a faster way. Thanks for the info!
Hi Bryant, great question! I believe the two should be kept separate. The links sending traffic to the site from other areas need to contain accurate information, so that once the visitor gets to the site, the tag management system can identify the type of traffic and use the proper tags. This is not something I'm an expert in, though, so would welcome any additional comments!
Thanks for discussing the whole "Direct Traffic". I did not realize it was as ambiguous as it is! I will certainly start using tagging more than I currently am!
Ambiguous is the perfect word to describe it. Calling it "unknown" would be so much more helpful.
I knew there was something I wasn't doing enough of - there's going to be a lot of recoding of social shared links in particular for us. This was 10 minutes well spent as part of today's work. Thanks for the insights :-)
Martin, love hearing this, thank you! If you get a chance, ping me once you start getting more data in. Would love to hear the impact on your traffic breakdown.
Sure thing. I have hooked up on Twitter (via @moxby_SummitWeb). Already implemented this on one client's shared URLs. Will need to instruct the rest of the team on it as well :-). Thanks again!
Awesome, will speak with you over there :)
This is a very practical lesson. It takes two seconds to do and it gives you credit for efforts. I'm going to start implementing this process into my marketing efforts today.
Great to hear! Check back in once you start getting data - I'd love to hear how your stats are affected!
As well as having some great information, this video really shows how excited you are about this. Very well presented.
Thanks Gareth!
Hi, I am read this post, it's very nice explain about the google anaytics.... Thanks for sharing....
Thanks!
This is the way from where you can get direction for your online work and you can judge and then apply some of the ideas to your work.
Exactly. Learn, test, analyze, rinse, lather, repeat.
some good info - nothing wrong with tagging - but (respectfully):
1. the term 'dark social' is totally uncool & foreboding (yes, i know the author didn't invent it) - among many other things, good seo/sem requires creativity - 'dark social' is neither creative nor appealing - we can replace it with a term such as 'anonymous social', or any of bazillions more that reflect greater creativity, understanding, and precision.
2. you use the commonly-referenced misnomer "time is money." sorry ma'am, but contrary to popular belief, time isn't money - time is time, money is money - the two aren't synonymous. i say "quality of effort determines quality of results." i think this is a more appropriate and precise way of expressing the intended sentiment.
3. "you work really hard on a project and ... your boss takes credit for it." no kidding. that's the way many - if not most - 'bosses' are. a good 'boss' or 'manager' doesn't do this - it's yet another simple way of separating the good ones from the bad.
4. "control whatever you can." yuck. sounds like apple - not a good thing - it's a core (pun unintended) reason why apple's going down and google rules the internet (and a whole lot more). (and yes, i know apple's financials look good, but judging success and failure strictly by financials ignores the bigger picture.)
5. probably the biggest issue i have with this article is that it's all about who gets credit for what. here's a thought: do the best you can with what you have. people know. if you're really good, you don't have to tell them - they tell you. you don't have to take credit for every little thing you do (again, unless you want to be like apple - in which case, you might want to rethink your position and your priorities).
Hey Joel, respectful debate is what encourages us all to get better, so I'm all ears and appreciate the feedback. I'm going to go through using the same numbers to respond.
1. "Dark Social is totally uncool & foreboding" - I've heard people talk about dark social more like the idea of dark matter. We have no idea how much there is, as it can't be accurately measured. I'm with you, though, in that I think there's more to it than just being unseen. That's why I look at it as "organic social," since it spreads organically when people find content valuable. Whatever we want to call it, though, it's something we should all be aware of. It's not that people are suddenly magically aware of a deep URL on our site and just decide to type it in. If there aren't tagging issues, that was a social share that we should look at differently from our actual direct traffic.
2. I just wrote out then deleted three different examples of how time can be money, tried explaining how efficiency can give more time for quality work in less actual time, etc, then stopped. It's an old cliche that's used frequently for a reason. I realized at that point how much time I was spending answering this part, while my husband waits for me to relax and spend some time with him. I'm going to just let this one go.
3. Agreed! Hopefully everyone reading this is lucky enough to not have to deal with that.
4. "Control whatever you can" may have come out wrong. What I meant was that you can't control everything, no matter what, and that's a good thing. Traffic can end up untagged or mistagged because good content gets shared. We want our content spreading like crazy, and hopefully bringing a few conversions along with it! Since we can't control everything, we just need to make sure we're doing our due diligence to get everything tagged in the beginning. Once we've done this, it's time to "let go and let God." (Not meant in a religious way, just that at a certain point, it's out of our hands and there's nothing wrong with that.)
5. As the owner of your own company, you don't need to prove your value to a boss. But your clients may need your help when it comes to budgeting. Having accurate data will help you to help them make their case. But if people aren't getting accurate data because they don't care about getting credit, they could be sinking actual money into marketing efforts that aren't actually working, or aren't working as well as other things that can be done.
(Edited to try to add spaces)
Rachael. I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around what you said here:
She saw me share it, and she put it on Facebook and thought, "Okay. Let's see what happens." In the last 8 hours, she's gotten 74,000 page views to this one blog post. I'm looking at the real-time traffic right now, down here. There are 1,500 people on the site. This thing is blowing up. It's going viral.
Really? Most bloggers take years to get 74,000 page views, but a Tweet to your list of a few thousand and a Facebook post got these amazing results? Really?
On my highly-optimized blog, 1,500 people on the site at the same time was crash my site - and I've got VPS hosting.
Update: So I see Rachel replied to almost every comment but mine. Are we to assume that these 74,000 pages views in just 8 hours is just a little white lie?
Update #2: I see a bunch of comments have surfaced below mine now. Here's the thing. There was no need to mention her sister's success in a post about GA tagging...
... But my BS detector was off the charts when I heard this. And it distracted me from the rest of the presentation. And now that Rachel obviously skipped over my simple question, it just gets weirder and weirder.
Why in the world lie about 74,000 page views in 8 hours when the video is about tracking. I just don't understand.
Ironically, I watched this just after reading her boss (Wil Reynolds) admit this:
https://twitter.com/wilreynolds/status/312531144321167360
I also remember reading Wil say this as a guest blog post on this site:
Every day we tell our clients to build good content and Google will reward them we know that it’s a white lie most times, because the other side of that coin is and ALSO build anchor text links so you can actually rank well, because community building is not enough of a factor yet.
Link: https://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-google-makes-liars-out-of-the-good-guys-in-seo
Just sayin' - keeping it #RCS - don't hate the messenger.
Update #3: Rachel is still saying it was just one tweet and Facebook post...
... But then we have this:
https://twitter.com/RachaelGerson/status/306440134155440130
And I quote:
"@michelejkiss Primarily social (twitter, facebook), then social sites (reddit, forums). A-may-zing. 208k+ now"
Hello Markus,
I see that Rachael has left five responses out of over forty total comments, so I doubt she's singling out you for not making a reply. We've sent her a note to make sure that she sees this, and appreciate your understanding in the time it can take an author to respond to comments.
Thanks Keri! I tried to answer everything quickly, but Fridays tend to be busy days. Appreciate you jumping in to answer in the meantime!
I think we assume nothing and believe her. She gave us a WBF that was extremely valuable and made a solid point in tagging things properly so we can get accurate data when we dig into it later.
Thanks, Scott, for keeping everything in perspective :)
One of my blog posts was one Stumbled a few years back when my blog was only a few months old. I had thousands of hits overnight and within a week had cleared more than one million views. It's not entirely unheard of.
We don't get to see the post in this demonstration, but it comes back to creating content that users find valuable and want to share. I read hundreds of blog posts per week that do not inspire me to share them at all, but ready three or four great ones (such as this one) that inspire me to tell everyone, sometimes even more than once.
Annalise, thanks for sharing the info about your post! This was truly one of those lightning in a bottle events. Love that you've been there, but also that you brought it back to what really matters - creating that great content that inspires people to share.
I'm interested to see the blog post as well - not because I'm questioning Rachel's stats but this could be a great lesson for myself and many others on what is truly engaging content.
Great WBF by the way.
Libertine, thanks for your feedback! I think you may appreciate her analysis posts more than anything in the original post.
Hi Markus,Sorry for the delayed response - busy work day! I do intend to answer everyone.
To answer your comment, this is my sister's blog post: https://thebigsocialpicture.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-oscar-protest-that-you-didnt-know.html. The post was incredibly timely and was so relevant to people that it just kept spreading throughout the day. If you check out the second image in the Blogger section of this SEER post, it shows the traffic to her site on Blogger. We didn't have GA code on her site until midday February 25. I literally sat in the SEOmoz office setting up her GA info and watching the real-time traffic skyrocket. It was an amazing thing to see and I was so proud :) Once we did get the GA code up, here's what GA shows for the traffic: https://bit.ly/bsp-traffic.
She's not the kind of person to be content with just getting the traffic, so she proceeded to write these posts to analyze why she got the traffic and what others can learn from it:
https://thebigsocialpicture.blogspot.com/2013/02/i-reached-150000-people-in-one-day.html
https://thebigsocialpicture.blogspot.com/2013/02/i-was-wrong-about-facebook.html
https://thebigsocialpicture.blogspot.com/2013/02/tips-to-prepare-your-blog-for-increased.html
I'm off topic, though. I shared this during the video because it was something that was happening right at that moment that illustrated what I initially wanted to talk about. The point was that her blog was getting a ton of "direct" traffic. As you noted, it can take bloggers years to get a really strong following. There was no way tens of thousands of people were typing in her URLs to go directly to her traffic. And that gets us to dark social, which is such a fun topic, but it can't be analyzed until all of the other tagging is in place.
Hope this helps!-Rachael
(edited to adjust the tagging in my links)
I see. Cool (I think).
So there was more than just a tweet and Facebook post that got this going, yes?
Nope, that's all it was. I tweeted, she posted on facebook, people saw the post and it just took off from there. Traffic started slowly in the day, then picked up momentum in a huge way.
That's beyond belief, Rachel.
I'm sure everyone here would love to see another White Board Friday on how you pulled that off. Because quite frankly, after reading your sister's blog post (three times now), I don't see the appeal to attract that much traffic with so little effort.
Maybe I'm just getting old.
This year, 40.3 million people watched the Oscars. Not everyone watched and cared, but a whole lot of people did. It's kind of like how I find American football painfully boring, but the 108.4 million people watching the Superbowl this year disagreed with me.
The appeal doesn't have to be in the content, it just has to be the link.
"/the-oscar-protest-that-you-didnt-know"
I really could personally care less about the Oscars, but that is a link EVEN I would click on! Its linkbait 101.
If I were the type to care about the Oscars, I could certainly see that being worth a share.
The best content in the world doesn't go viral, its the timely-relevant-interesting-controversal content that goes viral.
What is wrong with this guy? A WBF on how to go viral? There is no formula or "How to" on going viral.
Markus, let me explain this to you from the perspective of a noob.
As others may have stated, whatever got the attention did not have to be nobel prize winning. It could have been a blank page! That is not what got traffic. Its all about the link. Also, about people being so curious, as our species tends to be.
Also, NEVER underestimate the stupidity of Facebook people. In all honesty. A majority of FBers get excited when they see a cat with a funny hat. I could create a page and call it "/Cat-does-backflips" , and it would get just as many views. Seriously, think before you jump on people. :/
Also, NICE ! Thanks , Rachael!
Thanks Haiden! By the way, I have people who would be very excited about that /cat-does-backflips post, if it ever happens ;)
Nice to see the thumbs going up and down and see who is taking sides and in what direction :)
Although I don't agree with Markus picking this fight that's not worth fighting for I don't think the rest that followed should also get that heavily involved in comments beside Rachael that has the right to reply.
I see what you did there with the utm campaign parameter ;)
What can I say, I have fun in my own geeky ways :)
Wow, the worst use of RCS ever. Real companies (and decent people) don't try to out someone publicly, they don't have time and they realize that it tarnishes the way people look at them.
They are also professional and will email someone privately vs trying to make people who are trying to do good, feel like crap on public forums.
Markus, she and her boss are two different people. It's not ok to assume that something that Wil says, means it pertains to her. If you have an issue with Wil, please take that up with him elsewhere.
The post she mentioned was completely pertinent because she was using it to make a point about the need for using tracking... which is what her entire video is about.
Look, Jennita:
I'm tired of this industry (I've been involved in since November of 1997) making it seem SO easy to get free, white-hat traffic.
Rand tells us that SEO is amazing because it's free and organic.
Yet if that's true (and I somewhat agree), then why is SEOMoz spending so much money on paid traffic:
https://www.spyfu.com/domain.aspx?d=-4530455124116454415
Yes, I'm certainly in the middle of my mid-life crisis, and admit I'm tired of the white lies and whoppers of a lie. I've lost my patience. And I'm tired of seeing hard-working people sold the dream when it's really a big lie.
And of course when they follow the "experts" and "gurus" and ultimately fail... well, you know the rest of the story.
The idea that two clicks of a mouse gets an unknown blogger 74,000 page views in just 8 hours is HIGHLY HIGHLY HIGHLY unusual (if not impossible). And if this really happened, I'd sure like to see how it was done because I'm wasting my time workin' hard putting out 15,000 word reference guides as blog posts.
Sure, if Beyonce was in her birthday suit and wearing a meat jacket - I could see it.
But something just doesn't seem right about this. Her sister's post was just utterly confusing.
About two different people... I'm not so sure about that. When I employed over a dozen employees, most drank my Kool Aid. Most mimicked my values. Heck, some even used the same jargon I used via osmosis. That's the risk of working for someone - their good and bad rubs off.
One more thing (while I'm at it). Why is everyone still bowing to Google when Google is totally screwing us all over? Why are we setting up our private analytics with Google when we all know they're going to shut it down? I mean Google lied (again) and said they shut down Reader because of lower usage - but usage was not only growing, but soaring higher.
Why?
Ahh okk, so you're actually upset with the entire industry. Got it.
As someone who is employed, I don't drink the Kool Aid of my very well-known boss. I have my own thoughts and experiences and although we often agree, the beauty is that we have our own opinions.
Thanks!
That's great, Jennita.
I'm big into being sentient and not part of any collective.
One last thing. Can you tell me why I'm being semi-censored? None of the links I post are clickable. Did I do (or say) something wrong?
Hey Markus, I'm not sure what's going on with the links. You're not being censored at all. If anyone edits your post it would show that it's been edited, and who did it. The only edits on the posts are by you.
Why do you keep updating the comment? She has stated clearly that her tweet and her sister's Facebook post are what STARTED everything. She didn't say that's the only thing that happened AT ALL.
Please refrain from updating the comment again, as at this point you are clearly trying to just make Rachael look bad for reasons that are unclear. She has given all the information that you've asked.
chill, jennita. dude's just as entitled to his comments as is anyone else. you don't have to like and agree with everything he writes, and he doesn't have to like and agree with everything rachael (or anyone else) writes. i don't think he's trying to make rachael look bad - yet he receives many 'thumbs down', which i think are unwarranted.
This is our blog and we maintain a standard of professionalism. Calling someone a liar without sound proof, is simply not cool. He's definitely entitled to his opinions, but being rude is not ok on our blog.
jennita - please be aware that your comments sound overly defensive, unduly biased, and even somewhat elitist.
"standard of professionalism?" exactly how does that manifest?
whether or not i agree with them, i appreciate and respect both rachael's post and markus' comments - no need to 'take sides' - it's all good.
seriously, lady - please step down from your pedestal - the air up there may be a bit thin, and the view somewhat distorted.
As a video professional who was following related events the day of the post, I just wanted to chime in and attempt to explain what was extraordinary about the circumstances around this post.
The story was important to a tightly knit group of people, post production artists, who are very socially connected in both the digital and real sense. The protest took place adjacent to a very popular social event, the Oscars. There were at least two incidents during the evening that were potentially inflammatory to the group, raising social commentary amongst them. There were no mainstream news articles of substance to come out that day, only true linkbait that explained nothing in the couple sentences that they posted. It took several days for the mainstream outlets to even attempt to document or explain the protest.
The only sources that I came across that day that explained the event and related issues in a meaningful way were on blogs; the one referenced in this WBF, and another blog post unrelated.
So, if you want to try to formulize the event, it would go something like this.
Write meaningfully about a story important to tightly knit, sizeable social group
+
Proximity to nationwide social event
+
Inflammatory incidents during social event
+
Mainstream media's disinterest or inability to report on the story in a timely fashion
So... not easily replicated. In hindsight, I don't find it surprising that their tweet and facebook post got retweeted, reposted, posted by third parties on reddit, etc. to reach that many people in one day. It showed up in my Facebook feed several times before the Whiteboard Friday was even recorded.
(Edited to fix paragraph spacing)
Great additions, Elijah! One of the highlights of that day for me was when I finally told you what the blog was, after we'd been talking about the traffic, and you and your friends had already been talking about it. Closest I've ever been to something truly viral :)