The nice folks at SEOChat have made yours truly the moderator for a new section - the Search Technologies Forum. The description for this new area is:
Discuss search engine technologies, algorithms, technical papers and other advanced search concepts.
I'm very excited to be able to present this type of work and hopefully see others start some thread on the subject matter as well. Already, the concept that keyword density should be replaced by term weight is spreading throughout SEOChat. I hope that other misconceptions can be put aside as well.
Already, this new forum and trend in the online SEO communities has resulted in some controversy over the reasons and value of the IR research material to the common optimizer. Nick W, of threadwatch fame, posted a thread called preeching to the choir (sic):
I just know someone will say, "to understand future algos you need to look at what may come" - yeah yeah, clearly, however this self trumpeting phenomenomom goes way further than that and if, as i suspect, it's goal is to make everyone else on the forum think your real clever, it's not working with me. It makes me think your a prat.
As prats often do, I responded with a thread - Value of Search Technology & IR Research Papers to the Common SEO - that I hope will help SEOs to understand the value of reading complicated IR white papers, slogging through difficult-to-read threads, and taking the time to really understand this work. Nick's a great guy and I'm glad he stirred up this debate - it forced me to explain why this information can be so valuable to the community. Let's hope there's something we can all learn.
" the concept that keyword density should be replaced by term weight is spreading"
Ah, I see a great tip! I will note this. It makes sense. You don't want to say too many keywords but instead focus on the best keywords or most often searched. Wait a minute though... doesn't that mean you miss out on a TON of related queries because you cut back on your number of keywords in favor of top searched keyword usage only? Sounds like a lose - lose situation to me :(
"value of reading complicated IR white papers, slogging through difficult-to-read threads, and taking the time to really understand this work."
I agree that this appears to be INVALUBLE to SEO's. I have already read the research paper on the stanford website that the creators of Google made while they were still in college! It gives great insight into the original purpose and goals that the makers of Google had in mind. By knowing the kinds of sites they want to see at the top, you know what to do to bring your site to the top.