When last I wrote, we had added the ability to see local universal search results along with your campaign rankings. I'm happy to let you know that we just launched an update that adds sitelinks, video, and photo results as well. Now you can get even better visibility into exactly how good that organic link position is, and see how well your universal and enhanced search results are helping you improve your presence and visibility in a SERP (search engine results page). Here's a quick walkthrough of this update.
Universal Overview Module
The first change you might notice on your ranking overview pages is a new module in the report header. Within this module, each universal result type is represented by an icon. This icon is followed by the number of times you appeared in a universal result block of that type and the total number of times that type of universal result was included for the keywords you track.
Below, in your rankings overview, you will now see these icons show up along with rankings in SERPs that include these types of universal results:
Image Results
Depending on your business, image results can be a great opportunity to surface your content or products in a way that grabs the searcher's attention. Image results are most commonly displayed as a horizontal block of 4 or 5 images in Google:
If one of the keywords you happen to be tracking includes an image result, you will see a little camera icon below the ranking. Hovering over the icon will show the detail for the local results:
If you drill down into the ranking detail, you will see the image results both in the history graph, and below, in the SERP detail:
As with local results, if you are in the results, we will show the icon with a little starburst above it. For images, this looks like this:
Image Optimization Tips
If you are interested in optimizing for images, check out this great YOUmoz post with an excellent discussion in the comments: Is Optimizing Photos More Important Than You Think?
Video Results
Video universal results often show up in a horizontal or vertical block embedded on a SERP. A horizontal block is embedded as its own content block and doesn't count toward organic ranking position:
Blocks of individual video results are another format that we've seen become much more common in Google results. If there is more than one result in this style, we consider this a universal block and do not count them in the natural results. In some cases, we do see just one video result included with the other rankings. In this case, we count the video result as a natural enhanced result, rather than a universal block.
Here's a great example of a SERP that has both a universal image block followed by a block of video results:
In the ranking history, this will appear like this:
Video Optimization Tips
If you are focused on making your video content more easily available to and visible on search engines, here is some good reading:
- A great post walking through how to set up your video sitemap: Video Sitemap Guide for Vimeo and YouTube
- An entertaining whiteboard Friday by our friend Danny Dover, including a cameo by Doc Brown!: Video SEO Basics
- More great technical detail and strategy for video SEO: https://moz.com/blog/hosting-and-embedding-for-video-seo
Sitelinks
Sitelinks are blocks of related links that show up as part of the first natural search result. These are most commonly displayed when the search keyword is associated with a branded company or organization name. For example, Google includes sitelinks with Seattle Children's Hospital's #1 result for the keywords "Seattle Children's" and "Seattle Children's Hospital".
As you can see, this sort of result is the most prominent presence in the search results, and not only contains links to key areas of the site, but in this case also includes a review and embedded local result. On your ranking history page, this result will look like this:
As you can see, we catch the local enhanced result but don't pick up ratings yet.
Sitelinks Optimization Tips
If you don't have sitelinks for your company name, or the elements in your sitelinks aren't targeting the most important areas of your site, here is some good reading:
- Google's own description of sitelinks gives a great overview and tips about how to help them discover the right content and name it correctly. Their key recommendation, "...for your site's internal links, make sure you use anchor text and alt text that's informative, compact, and avoids repetition." They also give instructions about how to demote inappropriate sitelinks via webmaster tools.
- This Q&A discussion has some good speculation about what Google algo likely considers when deciding whether to include sitelinks.
One More Important Note
Showing top organic ranking placement vs. top overall ranking placement
We have heard some confusion and occasional frustration of late about an update we made to ensure that we show top natural results in our rankings summary. We have always intended that the rankings we display represent the top natural results (which excludes universal results). The reason for this is that optimization for natural rankings is a different focus and process than for universal results. For a period of time, we had been including local results in this calculation, which pushed the natural results down. We made an update that corrected this a little over a week ago. While we heard relief from some people about getting the rankings they expected, we heard concern from others who saw their rankings appear to fall, since the position they were tracking was actually part of a local universal block. For this unannounced change, we apologize. You can still see that local ranking position in the ranking detail reports for these keywords, but not at the summary level.
This led us to the idea of another feature for the rankings section, so I thought I'd run it by you all. Rather than showing only natural ranking positions (excluding universal results) on the ranking overview page, we would offer three options:
- Show best natural ranking position (excludes universal results - as we do today)
- Show best universal ranking position (only shows universal placements, given the universal verticals that we track)
- Show best absolute organic ranking position (shows the best position, whether it is a natural rank, or in a universal block)
This would allow everyone to better focus in on the types of rankings they are most interested in optimizing for.
It may take a little time for us to get this in place, but let us know if you think you would use this feature; it would help us with prioritization.
In Conclusion
Well, that's about it for this update. As always, please share your thoughts and let our help team know if you run into any problems. We are probably going to take a break from adding more universal result types in the near term to focus on some other improvements, but we will be listening. If there is another type of result you really want to see with your rankings, let us know. We will take your requests into account when we look at this again a little later this year.
Nice work folks. This will give me not only better data, but a bit of cool new stuff to show clients in their reports.
Loved the post, appreciate the efforts that SEOMoz team is putting into making SEOMoz more useful for its customers.
Hello,
it's a great feature, but I can't see it in my SEOmoz bar;(
Thanks! You are right that we don't yet include any sort of univeral recognition in the mozBar. Out of curisoity, is there a specific implementation or context in which you would want to see universal results in the toolbar?
It feels as if the toolbar would be tough, since it doesn't display ranking but overall "strength" metrics for site and page.
Maybe a total # of results for which the domain/page show for universal, i.e. same icons with a count by each (count, not ranking). </end brainstorming>
Caveat: If the toolbar gets too crowded, there can be UX issues.
Good thoughts! At the simplest, I could see us adding the universal placement and detail into the .csv export, though with frequent changes in the format for universal results, it may be hard to keep the toolbar up to date.
I'm really happy, well, thrilled, about having universal results!
I'm curious about this statement/approach:
In some cases, we do see just one video result included with the other rankings. In this case, we count the video result as a natural enhanced result, rather than a universal block.
As I watch the SERPs for uni listings, the moment I see even one instance of a video (not in a block), that's an indicator that the query is "prone" to become one for which a client should/could begin targetting SEO for universal. Why do you not consider this universal and only an enhanced SERP?
Great question, Dana!
Our original rationale was based on an observation that most frequently, when we see single videos in the results, they are counted as part of the natural results (part of the top 10 on page 1). That said, we see more and more variation and frequent change in how Google presents these.
As you say, since the result includes video, it often matters more to know that Google sees it as a video-related query than how they count results for page one. This allows you to focus on the best way to target content for that term.
Given your feedback, and comments from other folks as well, we are reviewing this designation and are working on some changes that should further clarify video and other universal results and offer more flexibility and consistentcy in how we present them.
Thanks! Look forward to the updates, Adam.
I'm one of many who are excited about the new universal results!
My goodness this is great stuff. There are so many insights given here in addition to the what is a premier software program and support staff.
The features that Moz continues to add in this fast changing sector is amazing. Keep it up guys and gals.
Glad to see the sitelinks update! Thanks!
This is a little off topic but I never really understood how the local rankings are supposed to work. I'm not seeing the value in tracking this if you can't specify a location. Ie. If I'm search for "coffee shops" from Seattle I'm going to see different local results than a search performed in Chicago. I guess I could add a keyword with a location modifier to to SEOmoz like this, "coffee shops chicago, il" but is that how the local ranking is intended to work? Am I missing something?
You make a great point. Right now the local results only work when a location is specified as part of the keyword, which works fine for many queries, but misses a lot as well. We are investigating offering the option when you select a search engine to choose a locale as well. So for your 3 search engine choices, you could get rankings for:
- Google US
- Bing US
- Google US, Seattle
Or if you wanted, all 3 could be location specific.
This is still a little ways out, but is something on our backlog that we are looking into.
That would be a perfect solution and would be very useful for some of my clients! Thanks for the response!
Actually we would only like to know where we can see and use this feature outside of the MozBar and when or if it will be included in the mozBar?
Gotcha! At the moment the universal results are only included in the rankings section of campaigns. So if you set up a campaign for your site and choose the keywords you are focused on, you will see the universal results inline with the ranking results.
As for the toolbar, we do not currently collect any rankings there, but it is something we might look into later on.
But the question is are these ranking softwares are good enough to show the real results.
Thanks for the update! I've already visited the link to the feature request page and voted it up.
One of our clients has many "local-oriented" keywords, some of which trigger blended local results and some of which do not. After the last few ranking updates, when I saw that the local results weren't impacting the ranking, I thought I was going to have to go looking for a new program to track their rank. We need to know the actual visibility for our client - are they the number 2 result people see on the page - or are they "number 2" but buried way below the fold by 7 local blended results and an image block? Or are they the number 2 place on those image results, really showing up as number 3 on the page, but now the SEOmoz rak tracking indicates that they don't exist anywhere in the first 50 results?
So... yes, the "absolute organic" ranking would be extremely helpful - and especially if that's an option to export in the historical ranking, as we use that to make "ranking over time" charts for our client.
Any estimate on time it might take until this is realized?
Thanks for putting so much effort into helping SEOs do SEO!
-Aviva
Thanks, Aviva! It's really helpful to understand how this feature impacts you and your clients, and I apologize for any frustrations.
I don't have a date for this yet, but we are investigating the complexities of making this happen and will have more info to share in the next couple of weeks. Unfortunately it is not as straightforward an update as it may seem.
I'll keep the feature request thread in the forum up to date with the latest developments.
Great update, great article and attach it with the images has been a good idea.
Thank you! I'll test it ;-)
Thanks for the explanation on the changes to the reports and for your hard work. Excited to dig in. Also really appreciate the continued cross linking to relevant blogs and articles discussing how to implement various strategies (keeps me from having to hunt down those articles on video sitemaps again :).
Keep up the good work.
I was wondering what those icons were all about! Jolly useful, thank you.
The Show best absolute organic ranking position option would be very handy. For a large part of the market i work in the universal results are firmly positioned at the top of the page, and I've had several client sites go from position 8 or so in the natural results to only apearing at the top of the universal results. Considering the type of market, a position 1 universal result is often a lot more valuable then a position 2 natural one if it means being below 6 similar competitors.
Awesome. Can't wait to see these new features run on my campaign. By the way even though the natural/universal ranking problem remains difficult to solve it is usefull to show to clients a report with at least 2 groups : kws that are currently impacted by universal search and those which are not. This will probably lead to at least 2 types of recommendations.
The natural/universal ranking problem is a hard one to resolve.
With places the natural and universel listing is merged into one so it is natural and universal. If you exclude it from natural results then many websites that would have been top in the natural ranking are excluded just because they got merged.
I personally track the natural ranking just for client reports (because they want it) and follow univeral ranking for my own analysis (because it's closer to reality).
Awesome new update. Something to add to the client reporting :) And once again, Norquay is the first commenter.. damn this guy's good.
Great little addition. Just one comment - in my SEOmoz rankings report, it comes up as:
[image of camera/video/local] ‐ 0/12 instead of [image of camera/video/local] - 0/12
Thanks, Brad, for that catch. We'll get this fixed.
Great stuff guys. Google is changing the display frequently these days, its hard to keep up !
So so true, I'm sure our engineers would definitely agree as well. :)
Very nice update SEOmoz team, I have been suprised too see many ranking software never offer the sitelinks and or image and video within results so it is a breath of fresh air to see SEOmoz once aggain lifting the bar in the SEO world to provide award winning software for its customers, congrats team great work.
James, agree that's a truly useful feature
Hi James, that's a very cool feature indeed, and it's great it was added to SEOmoz software! Lots of webmasters will find tracking universal results useful. There are local online businesses that rely heavily on Google Places search results, for example, thus they’ll benefit from it greatly. Or there are total niches dominated by image and video blocks.However, I should say the idea is not totally new. gShift tools check rankings in Google Places https://www.gshiftlabs.com/product/features/rankings-in-google-places/. Link-Assistant.Com’s Rank Tracker has been monitoring universal search results since February 2011: https://www.link-assistant.com/press/seo-powersuite-universal-search.html.
That is very cool. You guys continue to amaze me.
These are some awesome new updates that are being released. Thanks for the update!
Good job SEOmoz, thanks for the update. :)