Ranking for branded keywords is obviously quite a bit easier than for unbranded terms, but it takes some thought. We don't just want to send everyone through our homepages; it's far better to send them to the page that best answers their query. In today's Whiteboard Friday, Rand covers four steps to be sure you're setting things up the right way.
For reference, here's a still of this week's whiteboard!
Video Transcription
Howdy, Moz fans, and welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. Today I'm going to talk a little bit about getting your branded search terms right. Branded search is very important, because when people perform branded queries -- your brand name plus some other modifier, some noun, some information they're seeking around your company and your brand -- you want to make sure you show up correctly in the search engines.
One of the challenges here is that, as SEOs, a lot of the time we think about trying to target queries that can bring us new traffic, which often means unbranded searches, things where people haven't yet decided what brand they're going with. But branded search is incredibly important. It actually makes up a huge amount of volume of Google and Bing and Yahoo's total search queries.
Here I performed a search for ZIIIRO Watches. I'm wearing one of their watches. I like them a lot. They have a weird spelling. It's Z-I-I-I-R-O Watches. If you searched for ZIIIRO Watches a few months back, their website was a little funky. In fact, most of the internal pages weren't crawlable.
I remember when I performed a search for ZIIIRO Watches, the only page that actually mentioned that they were a watch company, I think it was either their about or contact page would show up. That was the first page that ranks for ZIIIRO Watches. That's not ideal.
What you really want to rank there is either their homepage or their products page that lists all their watches. Those are the two things that I could potentially see as being valuable, and if it were me, I'd particularly want the watches page to be ranking, especially if they're expanding into other items beyond just making watches.
Now what you want here as a brand, when people perform branded types of queries, is the most relevant, useful page to answer queries about that specific thing. That's why I said if I were the brand manager at ZIIIRO or if I were the SEO at ZIIIRO, what I would want is my watches page there rather than my homepage. The reason I want that is because getting to that information as quickly, as fast as possible is likely to have the best impact on both my SEO and on how the visitors will perform.
If I list my homepage there, I'm asking visitors to make one more step to figure out my navigation system and get to my watches page, or whatever page it is on my website. I don't like forcing that step. I want them to get right there. Generally speaking, that can help with things like pogo sticking. It can help with time on page and engagement. It can help with conversion rate optimization. It's just the best way to drive traffic through search.
The second thing, you want a title and description right here that's going to really earn that click. Contact ZIIIRO Watches, phone, address, email form, that's awful, right? That doesn't entice me. Even if I did want to get in touch with them, what I really want there is if I put "ZIIIRO phone number" or "Contact ZIIIRO" or "ZIIIRO Help," "ZIIIRO Support," what I want to see is something like "Contact ZIIIRO and get immediate help. You can email us, call us, or one click to fill out our form and get responses in 24 hours or less."
That's what I want the description right there to say. It creates the action, the desire for me to click that, and the indication that I'm going to get what I want.
The other thing that I really like doing is making sure that the headline on the page itself, once I reach whatever page this is, I really want that headline, the big thing that comes up bold at the top, to closely match. It doesn't have to mirror exactly what the title says, but to closely match that title so that I never get that experience of a searcher clicking and then going, "Wait a minute. This isn't the page I thought I was about to get."
That's a bad experience. That's why I try and make those match up. Then the description as well, that intent should match.
Finally, the last thing that I urge folks to do here is to have internal links that point to the pages that are most likely to guide the searcher's next few steps. If I know that the next steps in a visitor's journey from the watches page are often to check things out by price group, or to check things out by color, or to check things out by types of, I don't know, wristband or whatever it is, I want to make sure that those links are very prominent and easy to access on the page that I'm showing them here.
What you don't want to do is let the wrong pages show up here, like we have in this ZIIIRO example. I can actually walk you through a process, step by step, of ways that I would actually urge every SEO to go through this process either once a year, or once a redesign, and find all the pages that might be ranking for branded queries that you don't intend to be ranking there, that you wish weren't ranking there, and how to change those up.
Step one, you need to get a list of your branded terms and phrases. This used to be easier than it is today, thanks to keyword not provided. But still, we are lucky that not provided is only 90% of your Google search traffic.
There are those 10% of queries we can get some of our branded search queries through there. You can do a filter inside of Google Analytics by performing a search on the referring keywords. Or you can also do this in Moz Analytics, if you set up a branded rule for your keywords.
Bing provides you keywords as well. Bing powers Bing.com and Yahoo searches as well. In the U.S., that's about 20% of searches or so. In Europe, obviously much less. But you can get some keyword data there.
You can use auto suggest and related searches, meaning I start typing "ZIIIRO" here, and I hit the spacebar and I see what else populates. By the way, the auto suggest tends to work better on Google's homepage if you set up "don't auto send me to the search results page." You can sometimes see more search suggest on the Google homepage than you can on the results pages.
You can use related searches, which is a box down at the bottom. If I were to scroll to the bottom of the results, I'd generally see a box down here that says "related searches" and five, six, seven, eight different queries that I could look at there.
You can also use your internal search query data, of course. You can use things like Google AdWords, the AdWords keyword tool. The challenge there is with a lot of low volume searches, which many of the longer tail stuff in the brand tends to be lower volume, it can be challenging to figure those out via something like AdWords.
Step two, we're going to depersonalize and search. We're going to take the keyword that we're looking for -- in this case ZIIIRO Watches -- and we're going to form a search query just like this, "Google.co.nz". Why am I looking in New Zealand? I'll tell you in a sec. "search?q=ziiiro+watches&GL=US".
Why this weird search query format? Well, what's happening here is that if I go to Google.com and I search for ZIIIRO Watches, I can add something like "&PWS=0" to the end of my search query, which will depersonalize the results, but it won't remove the geographic bias.
What I really want to see is no geographic bias when I'm performing these searches. To do that, I take myself out of the country, out of the U.S., into New Zealand, and then I put myself back in the U.S., thus removing any personalization that comes from geographic biasing. You can do this with
.ca, .co.uk, dot whatever. It doesn't actually matter. I like generally doing it with a country code that matches the language you're searching in, though.
By the way, when you do this, if you do it in a new incognito window, meaning you're not logged in, you don't generally have to worry about also adding "PWS=0" to remove personalized results.
If applicable, go to step three. Applicable meaning you need to localize. If I'm searching, for example, and I want to see how this looks in Seattle, Washington versus Portland, Oregon versus San Diego, California or Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, I can actually use the "&near" parameter at the end of a query like this to see what it looks like in a specific geography.
You don't have to, by the way, go out to New Zealand to do that. You can just search in regular .com. Then I can see what search results for people near Seattle, Washington, or I think you can also now use near equals a ZIP code if you want to get that granular.
Then your job is simply to list the non-ideal results and start fixing them one by one. So I take a list of these keywords that I've got, a list of any of the search results that I didn't particularly like, and I prioritize based on how much traffic I'm either getting for that keyword, how much search traffic that landing page is receiving, or how much the estimated volume might be in something like AdWords.
Now I've got a prioritized list that I can run through and say, "All right, got to fix this one. These three look good. Got to fix this one. These four look good." For that process, you can refer to some other Whiteboard Fridays that I've done on how to get the right result ranking for the search query term you're looking for. Generally speaking, it's not going to be that hard when it's a branded search term.
All right, everyone. Hope you've enjoyed this edition of Whiteboard Friday, and we'll see you again next week. Take care.
Don't forget not only brand names but other branded terms such as;
Essentially, everything I would label as a "PropWord" (Propriety Keyword) - you should make sure those are returning what you want in search.
The way I usually scale this brand name process, is for example;
Also - you can see more search suggestions within a Google search if you go to "Google.com -> Settings-> Never Show Instant Results" (Hat Tip to Wil Reynolds for that one)
EDIT - ha, I totally forgot I had done a video covering the ubersuggest process here
Fair point Dan, I think in tandem with that its always useful to try and visualize the search journey as funnel - Non-brand through to brand searches. Interruption through to intent. Like Rand said "we spend a lot of time trying to get new visitors" - as SEOs that would position us as advertisers, which we aren't. We are simply shepherds of intent.
So many companies / people just go "We rank well for it, we need to focus on something else we don't rank for" ... there's two things SEOs are supposed to do.
1) Get it in a Clickable Position
2) Convey the Click
I've had FAR more success ranking #2 or even #3 and having better UX. The UX all starts with the title (SERP URL) and the description. Setting up good expectations avoids frustration and makes for higher than average click-thru when the #1 result or PPC ads are written poorly. Works VERY well with informative search results.
Which would you rather click on?
Pawn Shop in Austin | Moz Pawn & Loan Austin, TX
Need a pawn loan, car loan, or payday loan in Austin, TX. Visit our Austin Pawn Shop location.
or
Moz Pawn & Loan in North Austin
Voted the #1 Pawn Shop in Austin for 3 Years in a Row. We specialize in pawn loans, car loans, and payday loans.
So many SEOs want to write stuff like the top one because it's "what you are supposed to do" ... but it doesn't play well in a real world. Sure you might rank, but what are you telling people? That you are just another generic SERP?
Totally agree. And, IMO, Google's using the user/usage data signals to determine if folks don't like your snippets or pages and are clicking back (the pogo-sticking problem), so you're not just hurting your engagement, but probably rankings, too.
No doubt. It would be very interesting to track a controlled experience.
SERP #1 and SERP #2 - Both virtually the same, but you give a light bump to one to push it in to #1 placement, then you have people from all over (or proxies) click through to the #2 result without being logged in. Repeat the experiment with users that are logged into their Google accounts. See how responsive Google is to the difference.
Rand: "For that process, you can refer to some other Whiteboard Fridays that I've done on how to get the right result ranking for the search query term you're looking for"
For others interested, these are video's I found about the topic:
How to Move Rankings Up On Older, Existing Content - Whiteboard Friday
6 Ways to Earn Higher Rankings Without Investing in Content Creation and Marketing - Whiteboard Friday
Thanks for listing those!
Hey Rand, I think that's a good idea. You should mention relevant White Board videos in the bottom of each White Board Fridays Video. This will help you to mention and highlight old lessons with new one. (visitor engagement can also be increased).
Well, Thanks to touch this beautiful topic.
YousufSEO
Thanks
Hello Rand,
Thank you for the another great WBF. You picked a very important topic this time, people are going crazy over the "Branding" persona these days and the majority of the businesses aren't following these kind of fundamental things.
Your listed steps to get the branded searches are great and I love the "Geo-biasing" point. Surely, gonna try them over the weekend.
I like to know how much time on average will the keyword "Ziiiro watches" required to land on a homepage? also what do you think went wrong here? Is it only the content or meta responsible? or Google also share the crime?
I also like to know your input over the latest trend in Paid advertisement, people are targeting the branded keywords of their competitors that are unbeatable in organic searches. Is it okay to use them? and don't you think we could take the little help of Google keyword planner as well?
Your feedback needed!
Thanks,
Hello Umar, Using Branded keywords in PPC Ads are ok as long as you have legal right to use their trademark in your ads in case of companies like Dell, HP, Samsung, Apple etc. it is ok to use their name in your ads if you are selling their products.
But when it comes to target the brand name of your direct competitors. It is full of risk and if your competitors find you doing this you can be in trouble. Check out this post about Interflora and M&S case https://econsultancy.com/blog/8040-brand-bidding-on-adwords-is-ok-rules-eu-in-interflora-vs-m-s-case#i.cgsrla1d16du31
Hello Noman, Thank you for your valuable input. I'm aware of this case but I like to know if we come to know, our competitors using our branded keyword in their paid campaigns, will Google keyword planner provide us some more variations of our branded keywords like Rand mentioned here..
Yes Umar Google Adwords Keyword planner can provide us different variations of our Brand name along with their search volume.
Hi Rand,
A nice post on a problem I think many people put off solving, which is a shame. As you say it can have a definite effect on conversion rates, especially because branded searches are likely to be performed by existing customers.
One useful tool you missed, though: Webmaster Tools. We've found that since (not provided) proportions have increased GWT has been a great resource for discovering which keywords our clients are getting impressions for. It's definitely been much more useful than AdWords since as you say the AdWords tools are not very good for the long tail.
Yeah - GWMT isn't comprehensive, but it certainly can be another source. Good call!
Don't forget to optimize for just [brand name] and dominate your page one results!
Here's an older WBF but most of it is still relevant:
https://moz.com/blog/whiteboard-takeover-branded-se...
Brilliant tips for optimizing your website for brand related queries. Monitoring your brand queries is really important. One of my client use to have 47% CTR for his Brand Name. When I search for brand name myself in Google. I didn’t find Title and descriptions much more useful. I change the title and descriptions and include some discount offers with in it and suddenly saw a great boost in CRT it goes from 47% to 89%.
That is incredible! Totally shows the importance of investing in snippet optimization around branded terms (and terms of all kinds).
Thank you Rand; Agreed that Snippet Optimization have a huge impact in increasing CTR no matter its against Brand name or a keyword search.
Happy Friday Rand!
Thank you for sharing this process to 'fine tune' your branded searches. Google Webmaster Tools was left out of your list as it still reveals search query data ;-)
Branded searches aren't always "easy." A lot of "brands" are generic or have crowding because their branded product is sold at various outlets.
That is part of the value in branding, making sure that it is unique, not easily copied. But you have to work with what you have, not what you wish you had.
Howdy Rand,
Brand is so important in the online marketing that If your brand is zero your sales, your business is zero. To optimize your brand properly is the necessary thing. If you are not optimizing your brand properly than it will damage your brand reputation. As rand mentioned in his video about ziiiro watches, that shows a great example of how brand optimization is important.
Always remember that Brand is your business and you business is your Reputation. If you are not able to control your brand reputation than you will have to loose lot of money and customers.
If your brand will damage than it is very tough thing to rebuild its reputation, so always be careful when you are optimizing your brand.
Some very helpful tips in this weeks WBF from Moz. Especially the custom url to enable a Google search while omitting localized results. I definitely book marked that. You are so clever Rand Fishkin, lol.
Very good, but this makes me doubt whether Ziiiro watch is Moz's SEO client? no offense, just a idea came to my mind when I first saw this video. Rand, well done job!
White board always brings something different. Thanks for this also. It showed me doors to brand searches.
Thanks Rand!
Also if some brand is getting unwanted Page link at it's Site-links Presentation in SERP, they can demote it using GWT Service.
Additionally putting emphasis on Knowledge Graph will also have extra value for Branding of business.
I totally agree with the concept of not having your home page be the first page that shows up when you do branded searches. Your products or services page should the first page that shows up. If you are a company that makes 95% of its profit on a single app (like Candy crush) then I actually think that is the page you need to direct users to.
What happens if your brand is an EMD?
Getting this right is a tricky business.... thanks for the info, hope to be implimenting with my own whiteboard video marketing :)
That was a great whiteboard friday full of replicable ideas for getting branded searches right.. useful tips also to use togheter with branded searches SEM strategy. Thanks for sharing this insights! :)
Hey Rand, great article, as per usual. I though I would give you are shout out from over here In New Zealand (we pronounce the country abbreviation "N-Zhed")
I noticed your use of our favourite homepage to unbias search results. I just have a question of the use of New Zealand's CCTLD to remove geographical bias.
But First, some roughly accurate, true facts! Auckland, our main city (Pop 1.5 million people) has a huge chunk of our countries total internet users, as well as about 50% of our overall devices. Marketing campaigns and creative content can really shape the digital landscape when just targeted at one city. We are a teeny, tiny nation; Everyone in New Zealand is basically separated by 3 degrees of connection. Because we consume so much US culture, there are also a lot of US based sites there that we tend to follow, read & subscribe to (Even more so than Australian & UK internet domains), despite this, there only being a few handful of Americans living in NZ. On the flip side, we are also fairly multicultural, our population has a huge amount of ethnic minorities which were born in other countries (we have fairly friendly immigration policies too, which results in many ethnic groups being born and raised in little old "N-Zhed"), which does serve to give a nice sample of the total international market:
New Zealand 2,980,827 (74.85%)
United Kingdom 256,164 (6.43%)
China 96,441 (2.42%)
India 67,17 (1.69%)
Australia 62,712 (1.57%)
South Africa 54,279 (1.36%)
Fiji 52,755 (1.32%)
Samoa 50,658 (1.27%)
Philippines 37,299 (0.94%)
South Korea(Best Korea) 26,604 (0.67%)
Because the digital industry is still in it's infancy over here, it's really easy to gain traction very quickly, and lose it just as fast. Searching from Google.co.nz might remove the geographical bias found in US based searches, but wouldn't it also introduce a whole mass of additional, hard to understand, culturally specific bias to replace them with?
Hi Rand!
Another great WBF from MOZ! Thanks
I would also like to highlight a thing here which you also mentioned in the video and that is that we should not ignore the other search engines like Bing, Yahoo! and any other local famous search engines that are being used in a country you wish to cater too. It is very important that you optimize engines based on geographical use too. Sometimes working on other search engines gives us some keywords that have not been used too much for SEO but still might get you good traffic from the search.
Hi all,
I am very new to the SEO world (been self-teaching myself the past 6 months), but I am a little bit confused as to how the "&near" parameter operates. Can someone please explain?
I really needed this WBF Rand. One of my clients had a lot of brand searches and the landing page was contact us page which seems similar like yours. I started targeting those search terms in my home page meta data and things started working. Thanks for the suggestions that you have enlisted here also the idea from Dan Shure was really good one.
Hi Rand,
Loved this video. You gave us a simple and useful tactic to implement. This video gave me a lot of new ideas to implement and I consider that it worth for an entire year of Moz Subscription.
Thanks for sharing and opening my mind (again).
Great to see you Fabio! And thrilled that you found the video valuable :-)
Thanks for step 3, I didn't knew that...
Dear Rand! wow! first I would like to say new mustache styles looks Cool!!! Such a great information we received from this post! ... Steps are looking fresh from the oven! Thanks for this.
Top video, Rand. The point about guiding the visitors next step is crucial. Not only does it give good UX, but it's also vital for turning these visitors into potential leads. One of the sites I work on is an ecommerce site, and this is something we're always reviewing as we want to make sure we're not missing an opportunity to convert a significant amount of visitors to a certain page.
Really Nice!
I m new to this but hope this will really work for me. Thanx
Excellent WBF, Rand. It's too easy to NOT implement a strategy and send all traffic to the HP, but (as you so clearly demonstrated) is NOT conducive to a best answering a query.
Great tips for "Branded Search" terms Rand.
I usually use "search options" and than use "place" where i put in the city or germany when I want to see no local results or special local results. Don't know how that works in us - on google.de its working fine. Zip Code isn't working here. Google can't figure out my real position - cause we have no DSL in our region, I go online via LTE Flat and Google allways things I am from Freiburg or something - round about 800km far away and germany is only 900km :)
Have a nice WE
Does the &near=cityname parameter work for you?
Thats working in that way:
www.google.de/#near=hamburg&q=restaurant
Thanks Sir Rand Fishkin this is very informative. Keep up the Good Work.
Regards,
Ahmed Adnan
Hi Rand,
Really an informative article and it helps me alot. Now i got familiar with the branded searches. And i like the example which makes me to understand much better. Thanks
Cheers!
Dinesh Arulmani
Brilliant tips for how to get the no-bias search results.
Thank you Rand!
Now I'm going to check how my "[brand name] + blah blah" keywords perform, which is ignored by me all these years.
Tips for the marketer in all of us..that is why we come back every Friday to get what we have misplaced in our minds or put back on the shelves...thank you
I am sure Ziiro is appreciating the influx of traffic ;o)
Well deserved. Those watches are just so darn cool.
Rand when you try this theory and compare for example .co.uk with .ca with .ie, the results are all different.
Have you tried using https://search.aol.com/ to de-personalized and de-localize SERPS? Seems much easier.
Marc - I've never seen different results when using this methodology (and we've tested massively all over the globe with it). Here's four examples - can you tell me if you see anything different between these?
.com.au, .co.uk, .co.za, .ca
Rand, I think atleast Google, Bing and Yahoo are quite clever to show such phrases results on top. I tried 3-4 sites and it showed me the correct results at the top without working on such activity.
Could you please let me know what could be the reason behind it?
Love the tip/trick using google.co.nz and they re-inserting your location back on the States. What a great way to truly get an unbiased SERP. Thanks, Rand! I've used that many times before and will continue to in the future.
Hi Rand,
Thanks for post,Its really nice video.
Hopes may work 100%,Will try definitely.
Keep share a such a very helpful and information information
Many Thanks
-Ram