Yesterday I wrote a post: Ten Question Litmus Test for Professional SEOs. Today, as promised, I'm providing my answers to these questions. Note that these aren't the only way(s) to answer correctly, as some of the questions are more open-ended. In the answers, you'll also see citations to sources for the answers.
- Which is more likely to have a positive impact on a page's search engine rankings and why - 10 links from 1 website or 1 link each from 10 different websites?
_
All other things being equal, there appears to be a very strong correlation between higher rankings and a diversity of linking domains. Hence, earning 10 links from 10 unique sites should provide greater benefit. My opinion is that Google rewards this type of linking because diversity indicates both broad popularity/importance and greater editorial citation vs. a single site (possibly one which has a relationship with the linked site). The larger quantity of linking domains is also a far greater barrier for marketers and businesses to earn vs. the single site's links.
_
(References: Correlation of Rankings, All Links are Not Created Equal)
_ - Explain the difference between the following items and how the search engines treat them - 301 response code, 302 response code, canonical URL tag and meta refresh.
_
A 301 redirect tells browsers and search engines that a page has been permanently redirected to a new URL. A 302 redirect indicates a temporary redirection that will change again or revert back in the future. Search engines such as Google and Bing interpret a 301 redirect by passing the link equity and ranking metrics from the 301'd URL to the target page. 302 redirects do not always receive this treatment (though exceptions exist) and may show in the search results with the original URL/snippet even after the 302 redirect is in place.
_
The Canonical URL tag is a < link rel> item in the header of a document that serves as a suggestion to search engines, indicating the "original" or "canonical" version of that page's content. It is intended to tell engines which URL is suitable for indexing when multiple pages contain the same or very similar content.
_
The meta refresh is a directive in the header of a document indicating that, after a certain quantity of time is passed, the browser should redirect to a new location (or reload the page). Search engines appear to treat most short meta refreshes (a few seconds in length) as permanent redirects, passing the link equity and ranking metrics to the target page (they also claim to do this 100% of the time for meta refreshes marked with "0" seconds of delay). Longer meta refreshes may be indexed as normal.
_
(References: SEO Advice: 302 Redirects, Canonical URL Tags, Google + Yahoo! w/ Meta Refreshes)
_ - How can the meta robots tag impact how search engines crawl, index and display content on a web page?
_
The meta robots tag can be used to specify whether a page is included in a search engine's public index (for display in results), whether links on the page are followed vs. nofollowed and the display of the snippet (removing the description and/or excluding titles/descriptions from the Open Directory Project or Yahoo! Directory for example). The tag can also be used to prevent a cached version of the page being available via the search results.
_
(References: Meta Robots Tag 101)
_ - Who are the top 2 search engines (as ranked by share of queries) in the following countries - the United States, United Kingdom, Russia and China?
_
In the United States, it's either Google & Bing or Google & YOUTube (though the latter is technically owned by Google and thus, could be considered a single entity. It's also true that YOUTube is a specialized site exclusively for video content, and thus may not "count" - this argument is often made in comparison to Twitter searches, many of which come through APIs). The UK matches the US on this front. In China, #1 is Baidu and Google is #2. In Russia, Yandex is #1 and Google is #2 (BTW, Yandex's English language results are pretty darn good, and have that nice, early Google minimalist feel to them).
_
(References: October 2010 US Search Engine Rankings, Hitwise UK Top Engines, iResearch data for China via Bloomberg, From Russia w/ Search Love)
_ - Name at least 3 elements critical to ranking well in Google Local/Maps/Places search.
_
Any of the following would be reasonable answers - registration/verification with Google Local/Places; listing presence & consistency in Google Places sources; ratings and reviews from Google Places users; proximity to centroid and match on local phone number/address; listing prominence in Google Places sources (e.g. Yelp, Citysearch, Urbanspoon, Dexknows, etc.), listings/references from sources that feature in "more about this place" (typically from local coverage websites); business listing title/name/domain name.
_
(References: Local Ranking Factors, Ratings the New Reviews, Google Places Guidelines)
_ - What aspects of social media marketing have a positive impact on search engine rankings (apart from the value of direct links from the social sites)?
_
Social media is a form of awareness marketing and branding, which can bring a wide variety of search engine ranking benefits. The most obvious and direct is the potential for creation of links and references to the sites/pages that garner traffic and attention through social media. Another powerful influence is the use of social results directly in SERPs as seen by Google & Bing's integrations with Twitter (and Bing's integration with Facebook). Google also has connections, often via Gmail and other services to "results from my social circle" which can bring results to page 1 that otherwise wouldn't appear). There's also indications that tweets, in particular, may be directly influencing rankings and being treated as links, particularly for queries that call the QDF algorithm. Finally, brand associations and mentions may be mined by the engines from social sources and used in brand entities or co-citation algorithms to help a site/page be seen as more relevant or related to particular keywords and more "important" or "popular."
_
(References: Use Twitter to Rank in 5 Minutes, Google's Tweet Ranking Algorithm, Facebook + Bing's Plans to Make Search Social, Google Social Circle Goes Live)
_ - List 5 tags/locations on a page where employing a target keyword can have a positive effect on search engine rankings.
_
Any of the following would be reasonable answers: Title element, domain name, subdomain, URL string, body element, alt attribute, bold/strong tag.
_
(References: Perfecting KW Targeting + On-Page Optimization, Correlation of Google/Bing Rankings, Explaining Google's Algorithm w/ Math)
_ - Describe the distribution of search query demand and what is meant by the "fat head" and "long tail."
_
Billions of searches are performed each week, but the vast majority of these (~70%) are query terms/phrases that are searched for less than 10 times per month. This distribution of demand is represented by a chart with a trailing line called the "long tail" (as coined by Chris Andersen of Wired). The head of this curve, where the queries are searched thousands-millions of times each month (very popular terms) is called the "fat head."
_
_
(References: Hitwise Blog, Illustrating the Long Tail)
_ - Name 6 tools/sources that will display a list of external URLs that link to a webpage.
_
Any of the following sources would be acceptable: Google Webmaster Tools, Bing Webmaster Tools, Google Link Command (despite its shoddiness), Yahoo! Site Explorer, Yahoo! Link Commands (only available via non-Bing powered Yahoo!s), SEOmoz Linkscape, Majestic SEO, Blekko, Exalead, Google Blog Search, Alexa, or a site's own web analytics/log files.
_
(NOTE: Although there are many other tools in the SEO realm that contain link data, all of them (to my knowledge) are powered by one or more of the above sources.)
_ - What are some ways to positively influence the ratio of pages a search engine will crawl and index on a website?
_
There are a large number of potential ways to answer this question, so experienced SEOs will have to use their judgement about the answers given by others, but here are a few of the most obvious/sensible ones:
_
A) Reduce the quantity of low quality, low value and/or low unique-content pages.
B) Add and verify an XML Sitemap to send URL information to the engines.
C) Produce RSS feeds of pages/sections that frequently update with new content and use ping services to alert engines of changes/additions. D) Reduce the click-depth required to reach pages on the site.
E) Eliminate confusing navigation and architecture such as high quantities of pagination, large numbers of faceted navigation or multiple versions of categorization/organization hierarchies.
F) Reduce or eliminate duplicate content (or leverage solutions such as rel=canonical tags).
G) Earn more links (or tweets possibly) to pages that are being passed over for crawling/indexing.
_
(References: Diagrams for Solving Crawl Priority, An Illustrated Guide to Matt Cutts Comments on Crawling + Indexation, Testing How Crawl Priority Works, Google's Indexation Cap, Crawling + Indexing: Not as Simple as Just In or Out, Solving Indexation Problems)
_ - BONUS! Describe the concept of topic modeling and how modern search engines might use it to improve the quality of their results.
_
Topic modeling is a way for search engines to mathematically resolve the relationships between words and phrases and help determine if a set of content is relevant to a query. These systems typically leverage a vector space model in which the degree of "related-ness" is represented with an angle or "cosine similarity" - smaller angles are more similar while larger ones are further away. Many tens or hundreds of thousands of dimensions may be necessary to accurately represent a corpus' collection of "topics" and the words/phrases that are related. Specific algorithms like LDA, LSI, LSA, pLSI, etc. are all forms of implementation of topic modeling.
_
(References: Google Tech Talk: Topic Modeling, Topic + Keyword Re-Ranking for LDA-Based Topic Modeling, LDA + Google's Rankings)
_
Eventually, we'll be replacing our old SEO Expert Quiz with something more like this. I also saw a number of requests for certification from SEOmoz - it's something we've talked about, but had lots of concerns with (structure, logistics, policing, liability, etc.), but I'd love to hear your thoughts on this - is it a service you'd like to see from us? Is MarketMotive or another vendor doing a solid job here already?
Thanks for such informative content, Rand! Personally, I'd like to see something more along the lines of the Google Analytics Exam from SEOmoz. You guys are known for providing free and affordable tools and education. Why not make the certification affordable as well?
Also let us take a test and display the results on our site for some sweet SEO street cred. I'd totally install a html/widget combo that showed my "MozIQ/certification," along with maybe my MozPoints, SEOmoz User Rank and nice juicy link back to SEOmoz. As an SEO, I don't know of many industry signals of social proof - maybe I'm not looking hard enough. This could be just that.
Nice ideas... and funny the image of a website all ribboned as WWII General due to all those SEOmoz badges :)
This is a great idea! The marketmotive stuff looks cool, but the price is pretty steep, and something like the Google Analytics test (where the info is free for study, but you have to pay for the test) would be great!
And the widgets from the results would be good link building :)
Rand, These quizzes are great to keep us sharp, but I for one would also like to see SEOmoz do certs. Firstly, I rather the tools be completed 100%, but once that is done, I think certification is great. Everyone in the SEO world knows SEOmoz, and would value a cert from you if the test are well done! You could offer them at testing stations like PMI.org does.
You could offer Jr. SEO Certs for up to moderate knowledge, and Sr. SEO for Advanced knowledge and Expert SEO for those who live and breath SEO. Although I think PMI.org would be a good model to follow, please do not have a 3 hour test YIKES!
Saying you know SEO, and knowing some terms is not knowing SEO. Getting your knowledge certified by the most recognized SEO company on the planet? Priceless.
I agree with Richard. I got my Adwords Certification "Adwords Qualification" from Google a few years back. However there is no certification for SEO anywhere. If there was a legitimate SEO Certification, then I would have it already. Rand was concerned about liability issues. Maybe he should copy & paste Google's Terms and Conditions for anyone having a MCC Adwords account. I see there are people against SEO certification, but I'm all for it with a very reputable site. Come on Rand, you're not going to let Aaron beat you to the punch, right?
Sorry I know it's miles too late to post this but in reply to there being no legit SEO certs... what about Market Motive? I've just done the SEO course and it's comprehensive, plus it's made by some legends. I would do a cert if SEOmoz had one, or if Market Motive courses mean you become SEOmoz endorsed then I'd do it again :D
Should make some Advanced Questions, becuase these ones are a lil basic for any one who has been doing SEO/ Social Media for a while...But yeah Great questions for people going for a interview =)
Excellent answers, and a great update to this vital topic area. Speaking of topics, I'd like to see more about topic modeling on SEOMoz... it seems like an important thing that SEOs should understand better... .like how do you apply it to what you are doing for site content?
Maybe - just a suggestion - why not ask to some great Web Copywriters to write a guest post on SEOmoz about the techniques of writing for the web medium?
<!-- @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } -->
Your answers are really great and very useful.
got to admit I am still (struggling) to get my head around LSI etc
I think the University of San Francisco definitely does a solid job with SEO training. There are plenty of reviews on LinkedIn and The Internet Marketing Club (disclaimer: this site was created by a USF professor however there are many students who took the courses) that all say the same story.
Well I think providing a syllabus for people to follow, learn and get accredited for would save a lot of people a lot of time foundering and blundering until they finally get it.. So yea great idea should have been around 5 years ago I may have less gray hair!
great debate and update Rand...cheers..Google local still causing me problems.
I have an idea for the cert... I think it would have to be something were you continuously have to take tests on it or your cert becomes invalid. Sort of the same as what doctors have to do, they have to have continuing education or their license is taken away. So what I think would work best is if the cert is valid for x number of days or months or whatever and then you have to re-certify and if you fail to re-certify your cert is no longer valid. This way the cert will continue to always mean something as the holder of the cert will have to be up-to-date with what is going on in the SEO industry. Anyways, what do you think Rand?
Thanks for sharing these question.
That graphic says it all and then some
These answers are in line with what we were thinking. You reminded me that meta refreshes can pass link equity when set to "0". We were having conversation about this last week in our office, and I can make reference to your information now about it.
We've got some correlation research due out on this topic in the next week
Thumbs down on the certification idea. In my opinion SEO experts cannot be certified. How do you certify someone who works to circumvent/beat/understand algorithms that are protected by trade secrets/patents and in a field where ranking parameters can change WRT Google's whims and fancies?
Nice refresher, although "All other things being equal" regarding links is never really true, in the same way that the average person has one testicle and one breast. I'd always go for 1 link from a PR4 page or above than 10 links from greyed out PR pages. In fact, I'd take that PR4 as being of greater value than 100 no PR links.
Andy - I hear you on the potential value of different link sources, but I'd be cautious about using PageRank as a valuation system for links. It's not well correlated with rankings nor does it necessarily indicate a more/less valuable site/page. It also hasn't had a full update since April/May (as far as I know).
I got 10 out of 11 right! I must have over thought the questions. This was really cool, thanks Rand!
I knew there would be links... you definitely practice what you preach - smart.
But seriously love your search demand curve graphic!
Ummm sorry Rand but i think #5 is wrong my testing is showing that Google Places is down to pot luck and more akin to hit and miss
We've got some correlation research due out on this topic in the next week or so; looking forward to seeing how the recommendations from local/Places SEOs match up to the data we've collected.
ok i'll wait for it, i guess a few screen shots to prove otherwise might have to wait... but again that is the issue it is not consistent but look forward to some more recent data on it
Depends on how many different verticals you have tested Google Places on or been using Places/Maps for years, I do not think Google places is down to "pot luck" if you are in a high competition local query (that been said their are 100s of instances for data where it is evident Google has stuffed up) But yeah for for a low competition niche then yeah any thing goes. The three methods listed are all important but their are many many more I mean I put together 20 pages the other day about Google Places optimization and that was just the start.
oh i just prefer the fun categories that have traffic...
But I do agree with you in some aspects I have seen some crazy review data, I mean I blogged about problems with Review data on Google and SE Land picked it up. But I think with Places Google is still testing the water any thing could happen in the comming months, you just need to be on top of it.
oh yes i love the merging of similar google local data into one places account...
Its nice. I want to ask one thing that in forum posting, a number of links are created through various thread in a forum. How will google treat these links?
Hey buddy thank you very much infact the reference url is much helpful
Talk about an SEOmoz Link builder. Badges for certification? I know I would have one on my site.
That said I think it would be a very cool feature to have, all of your concerns (listed above) aside.
About the SEO certification... personally I don't see SEOmoz as the place for that, but yes I would see positively a (stronger) collaboration between SEOmoz and Marketmotive. Maybe it's something you could talk about with Avinash in person next March when you both will be attending the Be Wizard Congress in Italy (or before).
Regardless of whether seomoz is the right place for SEO certification, it has to be said that existing accreditation bodies (yes, Im looking at you topseo's...) are frankly damaging to the industry in their approach.
Top SEOs is flawed because in real terms you can't 'buy credibility'. You're not going to hang on everyword I say about rocket science just because I bought an ad space on nasa.gov
Simply because SEO moves quickly, people would have to stay current in order for any 'qualification' to be worthwhile. But that wouldn't stop people who have passed from taking down their badges and other credibility-boosters from their websites and marketing literature.
Qualifications are a flawed idea anyway; they're all about meeting the spec. Well who wants someone who's goal is just to meet the spec, rather than a creative individual who you can judge on their merits, the client liason skills and other important factors.
Hypothetically, who would you hire: The guy with a 7 year PHD in SEO, or the guy with 7 years experience in an agency.
This Whiteboard Friday on Choosing an SEO Consultant is also worth a look: https://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-choosing-an-seo-consultant
I think these quizzes are great fun. I got these nearly all right and am feeling quite pleased with myself.
thank You for the tips.
Caroline
I am so addicted to the content of this website! Is there lifetime memberships available?