It looks like our ten questions post was a hit. To follow up, our own, intrepid point man, Scott Willoughby, will be crafting an advanced test/quiz on many different SEO topics - some fun, some serious - and should have it launched in the next 3-4 weeks. Await with bated breath (I know I am)
And now, the answers to last night's SEO questions:
- What four search engines comprise 90%+ of all general (non site-specific) web search traffic?
The most correct answer would be Google, Yahoo!, MSN/Live and Ask, though AOL would also be acceptable (AOL, however, pulls its search results from Google and is thus more of a portal that includes Google's search engine than a true search engine itself).
- Explain the concept - "the long tail of search."
The long tail is an economic theory of demand. It posits that in the modern American economy, there are popular products and unpopular products in every sector and segment of demand and that, in any of those given sectors, a demand curve exists with a few popular products that have high demand and a great number of unpopular products that have a much smaller amount of demand per product. Long tail theory says that in any given demand curve, the "tail" or unpopular products, when combined, will have a greater amount of demand than the popular products at the "head.'
Here's how this applies to search:
_
The above graphic does a good job of visually explaining the concept - popular queries in the head have thousands of queries, while unpopular queries in the "long tail" are rarely searched for. However, that "long tail" is actually, when taken together, a far greater amount of demand than the few popular queries. This theory seems to be vindicated by statements like those from Udi Manber of Google suggesting that 25% of queries have "never been seen before."
- Name the three most important elements in the head section of an HTML document that are employed by search engines.
Title, Meta Description and Meta Robots are the big 3. Although Meta Robots isn't essential to have, it's certainly able to control spider and search activity. Meta keywords is another common answer, but it would rank as a distant 4th, as our experiments show that none of the major engines will rank a page for a keyword that is listed only in the meta keywords tag.
- How do search engines treat content inside an IFrame?
The engines all interpret content in an embedded IFrame as belonging to a separate document from the page displaying the IFrame content. Thus links and content inside IFrames refer to the page they come from, rather than the page they are placed on. For SEO, one of the biggest implications of this is that links inside an IFrame are interpreted as internal links (coming from the site the IFrame content is on) rather than external links (coming from the site embedding the IFrame).
- What resource and query can you use to determine which pages link to any page on SEOmoz.org and contain the words "monkey" and "turnip"?
Use Yahoo! and search for linkdomain:seomoz.org monkey turnip.
- What action does Google threaten against websites that sell links without the use of "nofollow"?
Google's Matt Cutts has noted that pages and sites caught selling links for manipulative purposes may have their ability to pass PageRank (or other link juice weighting factors) removed.
- What is the difference between local link popularity and global link popularity?
Local link popularity refers to links from sites in a specific topical neighborhood (as identified by algorithms such as Teoma - now used by Ask.com), while global link popularity doesn't discriminate and counts all links from any site on the web.
- Why is Alexa an inaccurate way to estimate the traffic to a given website?
Because SEOmoz is 3X more trafficked than NPR...
Seriously, though, the underlying problem is that Alexa receives data from only those users who have the Alexa toolbar installed. As such, the sampling is massively skewed towards webmasters and technology buffs, who are more likely to use the toolbar than the population at large.
- Name four types of queries for which Google provides "instant answers" or "onebox results" ahead of the standard web results.
Flight searches, such as Seattle to Chicago; recipe searches such as chicken recipes; image searches such as those for Hopper paintings; stock quotes like GE stock quote and many more. Google lists them all on their features page. Of course, they neglected to mention our favorite (and I believe there a few more that aren't covered publicly).
- Describe why a flat site architecture is typically more advantageous for search engine rankings than a deep site architecture.
Flat architectures on websites allow spiders to crawl a large amount of pages without having to spider through many "clicks" or different pages to reach those links. A deep site architecture will force bots to crawl to many pages before being able to reach all of the content on a site. Flat site architecture provides three primary bonuses - first, search spiders are more likely to visit all of the content; second, the spiders are more likely to discover and index new content more quickly (as they don't have to visit as many pages to be exposed to new content); third, PageRank and link juice is more effectively passed with fewer pages and more links rather than more pages with fewer links, helping to keep content ranking and out of the (now defunct) supplemental results.
- BONUS - Name twelve unique metrics search engines are suspected to consider when weighting links and how each affects rankings positively or negatively
There are dozens of answers to this question, but some of the most relevant and important would be:- Anchor text (when it matches queries, it can have a significant positive impact)
- Placement on the page (MSN's research here describes how it may influence rankings)
- PageRank of the linking page (more PR = more good)
- Trust in the linking domain (more trust = ++)
- Link structure in HTML (inside an image, javascript, standard a href, etc.) - although Javascript links are sometimes followed, they appear to provide only a fraction of the link weight that normal links grant. Likewise, links from images (and anchor text in the form of alt text) appears to provide somewhat less weight than standard HTML links.
- Temporal nature of the link (when it appeared, how long it stays on the page for, etc.) - can affect how much weight the link is given and be used to identify patterns that may indicate manipulation
- Use of nofollow
- Relevance of page content to linked-to page (more relevant = better)
- Relevance of site to linked-to page (more relevance = better)
- Text surrounding the link (as the two above)
- Previous link relationships between the domains (if the page/site has already linked to the page/site in the past, it may be given less weight and this may also be used to identify and discount reciprocal linking schemes)
- Hosting relationships (if the domains are hosted on the same IP address, or same c-block of IP addresses, the link may lose some of its weight)
- Registration relationships (if the domains share registration information, it may be interpreted as less editorial and given less weight)
In addition to all this fun, Danny Sullivan, who apparently wanted to test his own SEO knowledge mettle (and mine) shot over another great group of questions to me via email... Please feel free to answer these in the comments (I won't spoil them for you - there's actually two that I didn't know and had to look up!)
- How do you seize control of a local listing on Google? On Yahoo? What fields can you change? How do you add a picture?
- What elements are important to ranking well in Google Video and YouTube?
- How do you get into Google News? In particular, what unique structure do your URLs need to reflect to even be considered?
- Google Blog Search -- full text or indexing off whatever you put out in feeds?
- How do you submit to Google Product Search? Yahoo Product Search?
- Do you have to have a mobile web site to be in Google Mobile? Yaho Mobile?
- How do you know if Google is personalizing your web results?
Thanks, Danny. Enjoy!
I had a stab at Danny's questions.
1.Google Local business center
Fields: address, category, subcategory, hours of operation, payment type, add photo, custom fields (price, specialty, areas served etc.)
2.Edit your YouTube category tags:
Other tips: add video meta data when encoding, surround video with relevant keywords and name the video file relevantly.
3. Google Help: Getting Into Google News
"If you’d like your news site or blog to be included in Google News, please send us the URL and we’d be happy to review it. Please note, however, that we can't guarantee we'll be able to include the site in Google News"
Technical requirements include a unique URL with a unique number that consists of at least 3 digits
4. This was a hard one, I don't know if Google has changed or not, but it looks like they still only do feeds, not full text.
5. Submit products via Google Base
6. No. You can see how your page would look on Google Mobile here: https://www.google.com/m?source=mobileproducts
7. You can install Joost de Valk's firefox plugin to see 'un-personalized' results without logging in and out.
shor - I did a simple test with Aaron's interview of Danny and you are right. Aaron only provides partial feeds and the blog search was not able to bring his post when I used text that only appears on the full text.
wow Shor - nice one...
Rand, are you posting the SEOmoz official answers to those or is Danny... urm.. or is that a rhetorical list for us muddle over?
I've deleted this comment as I realised that Shor mentioned what I was saying, but just not where I expected him to - must read harder!
Two things....
One:
Shor did an excellent job but got 7 questions wrong, the correct answer to the seven questions posted by Danny Sullivan is...
Attend SMX Local and Mobile in Denver Colorado!
Two: Rand, Your favorite one might be "How Many horns does a Unicorn have", but mine remains this one
My favorite google calculator question is better than yours, so ner!
Dude - that is just way too geeky
And it frightens me
Yup, Pat's easter egg is cool, mine is just geeky nonsense :)
I'm with Pat - kept trying to replicate this, but couldn't remember the exact wording required... good work!
A partial answer to Danny's question #6:
You don't have to have a mobile website in Google Mobile if you do mobile ads in AdWords. There you can setup so called Business Pages for mobile ads hosted by Google. Users clicking on your ad in Google Mobile are then lead to that business page.
But don't consider to do AdWords for mobile seriously until there will be solid keyword data for mobile usage which I'm sure is pretty different from keyword usage on the Google main search (more regional? more holiday-related? more business-travel related? shorter search terms?). But look forward to it - Google staff said me that keyword data for mobile usage will be available in the Google keyword tool later this year.
Related to question #9, you can get another very nice "instant answer" when you query google for the answer to life, the universe, and everything. And this is my very favourite one ;)
Edit: just seen that feedthebot has already submitted my very same query just few comments ago. Sorry for the dupe comment
I realized while reviewing for my AdWords Certification exam that Google has a sense of humor (Shameless plug, but took a screenshot just in case Google remove's the question from their page)
I forgot to mention this in my comment to the quiz post, so I'll say it here in the answer post: I disagree with the premise of question 10.
Yes, a flat structure is more likely to get all of your documents indexed faster, but providing a hierarchical structure to your site helps the search engine understand which pages are more important. You ought to have more PR on more general pages and let it trickle down via hubs, because the more general pages are ostensibly optimized for more general (and therefore more competitive) keywords.
So the home page of the bookstore site is more important than the the fiction page, the fiction page is more important than modernist fiction page, the modernist page is more important than the Joyce page, and the Joyce page is more important than the Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man page -- important meaning more general, more competitive, higher in the site structure, and a higher PR.
"Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man", being far less competitive than "books" doesn't need as much PR as the home page does.
Ok, so First - AWESOMELY nice post. I'm pleased to see your answers too - relieved mught be a bteer word:) - but I totally misinterpreted question 5...
I thought you were going to reveal the magic formula to finding which sites linked to SEOmoz with the text monkey and turnip in the ANCHOR text... rats, and I missed 'nofollow for Q11', but I managed to get 15 others... which are pretty much yours just a little diferent in some cases - hope it's ok to share and please shoot me down if any of them are wrong - I am taking yours as the grail and would love any feedback for incorrect assumptions on my part, from any/everyone.
(the edit was bad formatting on my part - *sigh*)
Outstanding answers! I would like to see a dedicated quiz on social marketing / bookmarking strategies. Is it just a rehash of link farms? Is it hear to stay? Which sites are most important? What is best way to implement consistent strategies?
Thanks again for great content!
Eric Darby
Yes! I would love to see something like this!!
I don't know what I am more shocked at....
The fact the I went from hero to zero, quiz 1 to quiz 2?
or... that this post, back in '05 had, 0 comments!!
MSN's research here *couldn't you make interns post comments or threaten termination?
*oh yeah.....thank you for the thorough answers, it was helpful.
I don't think we even allowed comments back when I first posted that :)
indeed - according to the comment tracker, it seems that you guys first enabled comments in August 05, as I discovered in a recent exchange re: your post on the value of blog comments...
I heard Google News only accepts sites with multiple authors.
Yep - we've found that they like a site to have multiple authors.
Also, contact details, etc... need to be clearly accesible.
"How do you know if Google is personalizing your web results?"
My Google Adwords Rep once told me that you never know if Google is personalizing the adwords advertisements you are seeing.
Basically she told me even if I don't have a Google account, the search engine will recognize that I'm not clicking advertisements in the 1st or 2nd position, and automatically serve different advertisements in an attempt to gain my interest.
I know this doesn't have anything to do with the SERPs, but is interesting none the less :)
Pretty cool. I must admit that this whole exercise has me feeling like it's tenth grade and I didn't read the chapter.
"Please don't call on me."
You know, maybe a couple months hangin' on the SEO blogs actually does not an SEO make.
Great quiz and answers. Definitely made me think in more detail about certain aspects that are often overlooked when optimizing sites. Thanks!!
Regarding Question #6 and it's answer...I understand how google's algo rewards links, paid or not, from an authoritative site, and how easy it can be, for a price, to manipulative that "flaw" in how heavily they rank inbound links.
Some thoughts on that...
Is linking to an affiliate site or any other indirect way of compensation for a link being put in the same bucket? Of course not...
How does google know your being paid from a link or if you are doing it for "manipulative" reasons?
I know there are the usual tell-tell signs of a paid link ("visit our Sponsors/ Advertisers" or the ever popular "Buy your Link Here"), but it can't be very difficult to get around a visible aka algorithmic way to not show your being paid for a link. Bloggers and sites that link to other sites for a gain of some sort, so almost every link is compensated.
It may be a necessary thing to deter blatent rank manipulation, but I think a better approach would be to adjust the algo to less dependance on links and easily manipulative methods to determine relevancy.
If millions of "googlputers" can't do that then what can?
Can I get an "Amen"?
Couldn't find an edit link after an hour of posting this...
One more thought...
Does this "link juice" restriction apply to link directories? And I mean the higher caliber paid ones like yahoo's Directory and even DMOZ (I heard bribing works in DMOZ).
A link directories obvious gain is from generating revenue from the linkies. So they shouldn't be able to pass link juice wither, right?
Awesome CURRENT material type questions...
I think Danny could have started with a single and more simple question that would rule out most "SEO Companies"...
What Is SEO?
;)
Ken Vitto
Cool quiz, here is what I've got!
3. To get into Google News your URL must contain a at least a 3 digit number that is unique.
7. If there is no &pws=0 in the URL Google may be personalizing your results.
Rand, one major factor you didn't mention is Google's trust in the links themselves, not just Google's trust in the linking domain.
Trust has to do with link intent (editorial VS SE manipulation) and the character of a webmaster. A domain with many editoral IBLs gains Google's trust, and a domain that links out editorially also gains Google's trust. A domain without many links Google holds off judgement till it gets a richer link profile. A domain with many editorial links from domains that Google trust is also well trusted as long as its own linking practices are trustworthy (no easily detectable paid links, not too many recips).
Google's trust in a site's inlinks and outlinks will determine how Google weighs a site's IBLs. A site with spammy backlinks may have inbound PageRanks (anchor text, and other juice ingredients) devalued so that the domain's pages fall out of the main index. In contrast, a site like Wikipedia with a high percentage of editorial IBL will receive close to 100% of the IBL PageRank.
HELLO, HOW ARE YOU? YOU LOOK LIKE AN ATOR. ARE YOU?
"Flat architectures on websites allow spiders to crawl a large amount of pages without having to spider through many "clicks" or different pages to reach those links."
From having wrote crawlers, I can tell you that usually flat/deep architectures isn't a problem unless you have a chain of not-too-well-linked-to pages linking to each other. For example
https://www.seomoz.org/users/?show=10&page=275
chained together by next/previous links.
Those urls are tough to crawl.
I'm big into product search. For # 5 - submit to Google Base and be sure to check their new specs. All kinds of great things in the pipeline. Yahoo! product search -- good luck! Participate in product submit aka Yahoo! Shopping... if anyone knows of a "Yahoo Base" please let me know, b/c I don' t think there is one. Though I've heard through some reliable sources that MSN is cooking one up.
Hi,
I am new to SEO and we( students of master in digital marketing) at IE Business School came up with a 1 page doc on SEO. WOuld be great to get your comments on it. We closely follow this blog for our course in search optimization.
Here is the link to our doc.
https://rahulnambiar.wordpress.com/2009/06/16/seo-take-away-guide/
Regards,
Rahul Nambiar and Team at IE
Great article. Nice to see that most of these notes are still around and relevant today.
I Like this post thanks for sharing this post... Raj Sharma
What a fantastic post. I know "experts" in the field that would not understand half of the knowledge you shared on this post, and certainly not know where to even begin in answering your followup questions.
excellent answer, I can't agree more
As I said the first 10 were basic SEO101 type questions.
I've decided to give Dannys questions a go..
1. How do you seize control of a local listing on Google? On Yahoo? What fields can you change? How do you add a picture?
Join the local business offering. Wait for a PIN to be mailed to your business address then verify.
Fields you can change.Name Address City State Zip Phone. Pic thing no idea lol
2. What elements are important to ranking well in Google Video and YouTube?
Video title tag.
Tagging -Tags should also match title and description of movieNo stop words should be used.
Getting the video popular??
3. How do you get into Google News? In particular, what unique structure do your URLs need to reflect to even be considered?
For a blog or website you will need to have multiple authors to be considered.
I believe 5 is the minimum.
The URL must display a three-digit number. The URL for each article must contain a unique number consisting of at least three digits.
For example, the news crawler can't crawl an article with this URL: https://www.google.com/news/article23.html.
It can, however, crawl an article with this URL: https://www.google.com/news/article234.html
4. Google Blog Search -- full text or indexing off whatever you put out in feeds?
Indexing whatever is in your feed.
5. How do you submit to Google Product Search? Yahoo Product Search?
Google
You can post items one at a time or via bulk upload.
https://www.google.com/base/help/sellongoogle.html
Yahoo -
Can be done with a Yahoo Store or via Adverising with Yahoo SEM
6. Do you have to have a mobile web site to be in Google Mobile? Yahoo Mobile?
No you can use Adwords ads and have people directed to your site or have them call a telephone number.
Yahoo mobile you can use Display Ads, Search Advertising and Video Ads
7. How do you know if Google is personalizing your web results?Look in the upper right hand corner.
If you are logged into any Google account, you're likely getting personalized search results.
In addition you can turn off personalized search.
Look at the search results page it shoud have a link to "Turn off peronslized search for these results".If you can see that link, it is another indication that the results were personalized.
If there is no link then I believe that no personalized results were displayed.
Ah, now Danny's questions are stepping it up a notch!
My favorite was (original set) question #3 moreover its answer provided as predicted. Thank you. When the day comes that I'm not routinely explaining why the Meta Keywords tag wouldn't fall into the top 3, I'll be doing the Smurf (blue in the face over it)...
Fun stuff.
I wonder, will this thread of posts perhaps become the basis of a refresh of what used to be your SEO Quiz (which came down somewhere between 01.27.07 and 02.08.07)?
I should clarify my question: Will Scott's forthcoming advanced quiz replace the old quiz, or will some version of a more basic quiz return as well? Just curious, mostly for bookmarks' sake (the old quiz isn't redirecting to anything at the moment).
This kind of Interaction i am looking for Ages. and i am happy i found it.
Also, in response to the mobile question. If your business has a phone element to it, you can have click to call for your mobile ads, and it does not require a mobile site. This is true for both Yahoo and Google. So essentially the customer will click on a hyper linked phone number on your ad and it will call from their mobile.
Thanks for Answers.
Off-topic: is the landing page competition running? I went to the premium member page and it's the same old one...
They'll start running shortly.
This is my first time to your site. I just want to say how informative it is. Many of these things about the computer go over my head, but, I'm catching on as I read more.
Thanks livinggreen - we're thrilled to have you here!
Random question for you Rand: when did it first hit you that the SEOmoz blog had hit "the big leagues"? What was the benchmark for you?
I agree with the majority of the comments. I found the first quiz was pretty basic but still required some thought. The second one from Danny is a real doozie. The questions aren't on my regular road to town.
I think I have most of the answers but i have no guts. I think shor is definitely on the right track and the right train, he gets a hearty thumbs up from me.
Someone PLEASE confirm this!
I just need some type of evidence that Google does look at your registration info to determine link quality/weight.
Not "talk" about Google being a registrar or "it's in the patent". Someone PLEASE confirm with actual data or a quote from Matt Cutts or another Googler... real proof.
I always thought you just had to spend $2k+ per day with Adwords :) I know 2 guys that got their sites in G-news through their rep. This was after repeated failed attempts through the traditional channel.
But apparently you also need a unique 3 digit number in each URL:
https://www.seroundtable.com/archives/003934.html
We got into Google News on our last blog within days of submission, and without any contact with our reps. And it was our biggest driver of traffic.
Rand, DannyCan you clarify #10?
Flat structure refers to link placement right (v. how you set up your folders on your hosting account).
So a page on www.url.com/directory/real-estate/california/mountain-view/page.html is okay if there is an inlink from www.url.com?
Or is it better to have the inlink and to put this page on this web hosting structure (less folders):
www.url.com/real-estate-directory/california-mountain-view-page.html
- David
I like Danny's questions!
I think Rand's are the best though for a business to ask a potential SEO firm. They need to understand the answers and be able to also spot the BS. I thought that Danny's questions were created to make us think and challenge us - not as a way to spot a good from a bad SEO in a bid meeting.
The part of me that is evil *LOVES* the wording of Q1 <teeheehee>
Hey folks,
Wow, what a great exercise this has been - The questions and the followup answers / comments have really been informative.
I was thinking yesterday (like many others here methinks) that I was going to fail the questions miserably but I actually answered the majority correctly.
Great topic, great dialog. I look forward to Scott's quizzes.
Thanks again Rand and the rest of you Mozzers.
I can't wait to hear answers to Danny's questions...
I do know the answer to the google local listing question. You have to go to the local business center at Google.
Rand you better do this one!
Google droped supplemental tag from its search results!!!
Maybe Google is finally begining to listen to activists!!!
I noticed last night that all the product pages in my store that used to have the "supplemental" tag don't anymore. I wasn't sure why, but here are some possibilities:
a) it's a Google glitch and tomorrow all the supplemental tags will be back
b) I've been working hard getting links to my supplemental pages, so maybe they've been pulled out of the supp. index
c) the supplemental index is gone forever (yippee!!)
Does anyone know anything about this?
option D) To stop everyone complaining about it they removed public visibility of the tag.
:)
Google officially removed the label earlier this week.
Actually the supplemetary pages have worked good since the revision of the algortithm in July.
Megium tail keyword phrases have been getting hit, but the supplementary stigma was hurting the pages.
Now that it is gone we are much better of, but we still have to build good content pages, get links to them, have a flat link structure...
So out with the sup stigma.
Thanks, Google.
Were you guys going to mention that here at SEOmoz? Because I depend on you for all my search engine news =)
Re: supplemental hell - well, I hope they add a feature to Webmaster Central so that we can still see the status of our own pages.
Knowing that a lot of my pages were in supplemental was a good thing - it motivated me to get links for pages that are deeper in my site, pay attention to unique title tags, restrict some pages to spread the link love to the really important ones, etc.
Now I can't really find out if my efforts paid off or not. Although, across the board they already have in many other ways =)
Rand - You missed my answer to your questions here. Where is my prize?
I don't play much with the rest of Google search products, so I have to say that Danny's questions are far more difficult.
Danny seems to be quite forward looking with these questions. Nice.
Great article... although I knew #3 was gonna be a trick question - you had me boggled yesterday on that.
Curious about #3 in regards to the head section of the html document. You stated that the top three would be
Could you clarify #2's weight as the article
What Separates Search Marketing Novices from Experts
States
I see a great number of sites where the meta description tags are either copied from page to page (i.e. non-unique) or contain only the first 2-3 sentences of the page's content. The former's issue is obvious, while the latter is unwise because the search engines will show whatever content is most relevant to the user's actual query if you provide no meta description, and thus you'll almost certainly get more long tail search clicks by letting the engines supply your description. The exception is if your intro sentences are excellent descriptors of the content on the page, which is sometimes the case with certain article sites or blogs.
Those to statements seem to conflict with each other
I agree with other meta tags as being important - I think that the fact that they are not generally included is why it was left out - but for sure you are bang on :)
I think Rand's point in the Novices vs. Experts article was that you'll occasionally get more search clicks without meta descriptions, not better ratings. I.e. if you let search engines provide your snippets by not have a meta description, they'll provide a snippet that's more relevant for long tail search queries than your description could be -- with the idea being that more relevant snippets will increase clickthrough, all other things (i.e. rankings) being equal.
I do find this curious, though, as I've found that Google consistently provides snippets other than the meta descriptions when I'm searching for words that don't appear there. Maybe this just means I should branch out with my search engine usage. :)
Exactly, the lack of the meta description will encourage the long tail to be more predominant, which as the article states is more abundant (more work too) and can create a unique market of traffic as most of those long tail searches are not only unique, but (again as the article stated) 25% are queries that have never been seen before.
If the meta description is recommended for top level hierarchy, at what depth does the benefit via lack of a meta description come into play?
Has anyone found an effectice way to set a meta description while allowing Google the freedom to snippet the description if they deem it to be more relevant? Or is it simply one way or another?
High-quality, keyword targeted meta descriptions on your main, category and sub-category pages serve as your first interaction with searchers...the first thing they read about you when deciding whether to click your result or the next one.
For deep pages, individual product pages, article pages, etc, NO meta description is better than the weak or formulaic one you'd probably use for these thousands and thousands of pages. Why none? Because GG will be able to pull relevant text (these pages tend to be more text heavy) for long-tail searches.
At the publishing company I used to work for we would dynamically create the description tag from the intro paragraph of an article. By training journalists (as I've discussed on YOUmoz) to summarise the main issues of an article, using relevant keywords, in that intro, we made sure that the snippet was
a - likely to include the searched for keywords
b - was in grammatically correct English, rather than the random tit-bits the engine might pull
I think that the same can apply to jobs, products, events, etc...
You've given a lot of extremely valuable information away here Rand. It's enough to set someone up in business! :)
Rand looks like Beren's advise about contacting Adsens for Google Qaulity Guidelines violation might work.
I went for Adwords Spam quality guidelines violation.
I was told they will investigate the bad Website and take action.
My communication with Google Adwords.
https://www.travelinasia.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4387