Last month, 766 of our readers took a few minutes to tell us what they thought of the Moz Blog. We were absolutely blown away by the quality of the feedback we got, and we're excited to share what we learned with all of you.
You told us you're squeezed for time in a constantly changing "need-it-yesterday" world. You told us you're sick of "ultimate guides," and that you're (for the most part) already well versed in the basics of SEO, and are craving more advanced tips, tricks, and tactics. You told us that content marketing and data analysis are two areas where you could use some help.
We hear you.
The rest of what you told us can be found below, and we'll be incorporating these takeaways into our planning for the Moz Blog over the coming months. The entire set of results is available as a Google Spreadsheet—if you're interested, please feel free to make a copy. If you learn anything beyond what we show here, please let us know!
Your job titles
One of the things we've wondered as we've made the transition from SEOmoz to Moz is whether our audience would begin to include a greater number of people from outside the world of SEO. As Rand explained so well, we can't just be SEOs anymore. So, we did what anyone would do—we tossed all of your job titles into a word cloud.
Two things are immediately obvious:
- SEO is still a huge part of what you all do, as it's the largest word in this cloud
- Given how large the word "marketing" is, there are also quite a few of you whose jobs likely include many other aspects, as well.
It'd be interesting to see how this cloud changed over time. Would those two words be similar in size six months from now? A year? Time will tell, but for now, our best course of action might be the T-shaped approach. Lots of advanced depth in SEO, combined with enough depth in other areas to make sure everyone's up to speed with the changes in the industry.
Your experience
Along the same lines, as our audience continues to expand and the Beginner's Guide to SEO continues to be our most successful piece of content, we wanted to know how experienced our readers were in their lines of work. As it turns out, we have a pretty good spread:
Your level of SEO expertise
It's no secret that Moz's background revolved around SEO, and so it comes as no surprise that most of our readers consider their SEO skills to be pretty advanced. On a scale of 1-5, 86% of respondents rated their SEO expertise a 3 or better, and 14% labeled themselves "industry experts." Given people's natural inclination to choose responses toward the middle of a scale like this (central tendency bias), we might even have more industry experts than these results show.
Still, there are a significant number of readers who are relatively new to SEO, so one of our challenges is to find the right line between basic and advanced SEO content.
One of the ideas we're considering is implementing more of what I call "pre-read transparency," making it easier to get a feel for what a post is about and whether it's relevant for you before you even start reading it. If done well, this could save our readers valuable time and make it easier to find additional reading that's relevant to your work. (If you've got ideas on ways to make that happen, we'd love to hear about them in the comments!)
How much SEO?
At the same time, 45% of respondents said they spend less than half of their time doing SEO work. More than 20% said they spend less than a fifth of their time on SEO. There are some blurry lines here, for sure (how much of your day-to-day would you need to spend on SEO before you considered yourself an expert?), but our read is that even the people who have the most expertise in SEO are finding themselves doing more and more work outside of that area.
Your greatest challenges
This was one of the more telling sets of responses we received. Our primary goal with the Moz Blog is to help you all become better marketers, and in order to do that, we need to know what you all need help with. This was a text-entry question; people could write as much or as little about their challenges as they pleased. We noted recurring issues in the responses, and tallied every distinct mention of each of those issues.
Some issues might seem like they overlap, but we think this paints a pretty clear picture of what our readers are struggling with in today's world of marketing:
Challenge | # mentions | |
1. | Changing industry | 93 |
2. | Content marketing | 70 |
3. | Clients/customers misunderstand my work | 67 |
4. | Time management | 52 |
5. | Politics and buy-in | 43 |
6. | Too much to learn and keep track of | 40 |
7. | Link building and maintenance | 39 |
8. | Measurement and analysis | 38 |
9. | Google and the algorithm | 32 |
10. | Limited budget/resources | 29 |
11. | Ranking | 28 |
12. | Managing people and relationships | 24 |
13. | Clients/customers are difficult | 23 |
14. | Social media integration and management | 23 |
15. | Strategy and goals | 22 |
16. | Reporting | 21 |
17. | Branding | 17 |
18. | Understanding SEO | 16 |
19. | Conversion rate | 16 |
20. | Competition |
14 |
We all work in a rapidly changing industry, and even the experts are constantly having to learn new techniques. One of our primary jobs involves not only informing you of those changes, but also offering recommendations on how you might adapt your work. We'll continue to seek out the best advice in that respect.
Content marketing is obviously an essential field for today's marketers, and there are relatively few good resources for people looking to improve their own content skills. We hope to bring you more posts to fill that niche and help you level-up.
There were also quite a few responses having to do with workplace productivity: time management, effective communication, and finding ways to convey the value of our work to clients and customers. These are areas we haven't covered much on the Moz Blog, but are vitally important for effective marketers. Look for more of these posts in the future.
Your reading style
What we were really trying to get at here was how long we felt comfortable making posts (we've had a few doozies in our time). Given that nearly two-thirds of our readers try to go for the entire post (and yet only have so much time on their hands), we're likely to try and keep things compendious so we don't scare folks away from even starting in.
This also suggests that we shouldn't worry quite so much about the inverted pyramid, since people generally tend to keep reading anyway, though in our minds that doesn't hold a candle to Strunk and White's age-old advice to "omit needless words." =)
The devices you prefer
This was a shocker for us. One of the items that has remained on our back burner for some time is creating a more mobile-friendly responsive site, especially for the blog, and we wanted to know how much of a priority it was for all of you. With mobile devices now accounting for 28% of all web traffic, we figured this was a high priority for our readership. Boy, were we wrong:
More than 92% of respondents listed "laptop/desktop" as at least one of their preferred devices; fewer than 8% left the "laptop/desktop" option unchecked.
One of the most interesting comments on the survey's blog post alluded to the idea that this could simply be a result of what people are used to, not what their preferences actually are, since many blogs (our own included) still lack responsive design. That's something we'll absolutely work on when we can, but at the same time, these numbers are so wildly skewed toward reading on computers that we feel pretty safe taking care of other priorities first.
Relevancy to your work
This might be more of a baseline to work from than a real metric of how we're already doing, but we were certainly pleased to see this curve leaning to the right:
We're planning on diving a little deeper into the data for this one, too. In a sense, the data behind this graph can provide us with a rudimentary content audit. We can look at the people who landed toward the top of this graph, and figure we're providing plenty of content that's relevant to their lines of work. We can also look at the people at the bottom of this graph and know we're missing the mark for them.
As a whole, though, it's certainly encouraging to see that most people find the majority of the posts on the Moz Blog to be pretty relevant. We'll likely conduct another (perhaps shorter) survey in a year or so in order to measure progress against data like this.
Accessibility
One debate we have frequently in the Mozplex is whether our posts are appropriately accessible. In other words, are people bored because they're not learning anything they don't already know? Or, are they confused because our posts go right over their heads?
Our customer mentor, Matt Roney, has done some fantastic work with Moz Analytics subscribers, and has found out that many people seem to be confused by the complexity of web marketing, and thereby of our tools. That made us wonder if folks were generally confused by our posts, as well.
As it turns out, most of our audience finds the balance to be about right:
One interesting note is that there are significantly more people who think posts are too basic than folks who think they're too advanced, confounding our expectation based on Matt's interactions.
Also interesting is the degree to which people find posts too basic or advanced. We asked respondents who chose "too basic" to rate just how basic they were on a scale of 1-5, and asked a similar question for people who chose "too advanced." The average score for people who thought it was too basic was 2.7—right at the middle of the scale—and the average score for people who thought it was too advanced was 3.6—much higher on the scale. This implies that our beginner-level readers are more lost than our advanced readers are bored.
There's a great solution to this, which is to offer help to beginner-level readers on the more advanced posts. Perhaps this comes in the form of tool tips with explanations and definitions of more advanced concepts. Maybe it's a couple of links in the sidebar that lead to relevant "background content," such as a chapter in the Beginner's Guide to SEO. Whatever the case, we're likely to lean just a little in the advanced direction while also offering beginners a way to catch up quickly.
Room for improvement
We asked you all an open-ended question about what you'd like to see different about the Moz Blog. We coded and tallied mentions of each request, and we have to say we're pretty happy with the #1 response:
Feedback | # mentions | |
1. | Nothing | 103 |
2. | More tutorials, how-tos, and action-oriented posts | 44 |
3. | More case studies | 39 |
4. | More video/multimedia content | 32 |
5. | More advanced posts | 23 |
6. | Need to branch out from SEO | 20 |
7. | Needs to be more accessible to beginners/non-SEOs | 17 |
8. | Needs better categorization/navigation | 16 |
9. | Post more frequently | 15 |
10. | Shorter posts | 14 |
11. | Posts should be more data-driven/scientific | 13 |
12. | Posts need more variety | 13 |
13. | Needs mobile-friendly/responsive design | 12 |
14. | More from Rand | 11 |
15. | Needs more varied pool of authors | 11 |
There's a lot of other great feedback in here, too, including a confirmation of your desire to see more tutorials, case studies, and action-oriented posts that keep you on top of your game. There was also an echo of the call for more advanced posts.
More than 30 people requested an increase in posts that include videos, with many of those expressing an appreciation for Whiteboard Friday. While we're pretty happy with just one Whiteboard post each week, there's something to be said for finding other ways to present video content, as there are a great many examples of successful educational videos. We've even begun offering our own educational videos to subscribers through Moz Academy. This is an area ripe for further exploration.
Oh, and for the 11 folks who asked for more from Rand, you may get your wish before long. =)
Topics
This was one of the most interesting sets of results for us. We asked about which topics you'd like to learn more about, hoping to gain some direct insight into the most valuable things we could post about on the blog. Respondents could select as many of these options as they liked. As you might guess, advanced SEO came out on top, with nearly 3/4 of responses selecting that option.
If we didn't already have enough evidence that content marketing was at the forefront of people's minds, this speaks for itself:
We were also interested to see how high data analysis ranked on this list, although with the volume of data we all deal with on a regular basis, there's no real surprise. The ability to transform information into knowledge and knowledge into wisdom is vital for today's marketers, and we'll do everything we can to equip you all for the task.
We'll use these responses (among other things) as a guide for the distribution of topics we post on the blog. It won't be an exact science—you won't see exactly 73 posts out of every 100 covering advanced SEO—but you can expect we'll post more about advanced SEO than we do about paid search marketing or community management, and so forth.
We'll also work hard to draw connections between these categories, realizing that it's impossible to silo them all away from one another. Social media is heavily connected to branding, for example, and video marketing is simply a specific type of content marketing. We'll use what we know about your day-to-day work as a foundation, and show you what you need to know about the other areas in this list.
Types of posts
Make no mistake, we will never title any blog post "The Ultimate Guide to ___" again. =)
This is no typo or data entry error—out of the 749 people who answered this question, not a single one indicated they wanted to see more "ultimate guides" on the blog.
We've talked about this quite a bit in the office, and our theory is that it is always a false promise. There's no ultimate guide to anything (in any sense of the word). There are really good guides, and there are some that many people will consider the best available—but if someone else put in enough effort, they could certainly make a better guide.
One of the many (many) lessons I've learned from Cyrus Shepard is that headlines are a promise to the readers. If what's behind the headline doesn't live up to that promise, you've lied about what you have, and are breaking the hard-earned trust you've built with them over time.
We also think that while some "ultimate guides" are impressive (and are widely shared as a result), they're usually far too long to actually read through right away. Given the well established lack of time that folks in our industry have, these posts often get pocketed indefinitely, undermining their true value.
That isn't the only useful part of these responses, though—it's quite clear that the most valuable posts we can give you all are those that contain truly actionable content. It isn't about inspiration as much as it is about helping you stay ahead of industry changes, and showing you step-by-step how to be more effective and efficient with your work. You can expect to see more tutorials and case studies as time goes on.
Now we go to work. Thanks to all of you, we have a great sense for what kinds of content we should seek out in order to provide the most value for you.
Here's a run-down of some of our biggest takeaways:
- While our readers are increasingly focusing on other areas of marketing, the foundation of their work still lies in SEO, and our content needs to reflect that specialization. We should think of our readers as "T-shaped," focusing on advanced depth in SEO while drawing connections to areas like content, social, branding, and others.
- Our readers are challenged by a constantly changing industry in which they're required to continually learn (and evangelize) new techniques to retain their expertise. They are frustrated by a lack of time and resources, difficulty in communicating and reporting their work to both colleagues and customers, and a need for up-to-date best practices in many areas—especially content marketing and link building.
- Our readers prefer to consume blog posts on desktops or laptops, and if they choose to read a post, most of them try to get all the way through it.
- Our readers generally have an advanced knowledge of SEO, but there are many who are relatively new to the field and feel lost when reading our more advanced posts.
- There is a great demand for action-oriented posts among our readers, including tutorials and case studies. This demand vastly overshadows the demand for more generalized overviews and higher-level strategies.
Given all of that, here are some things you might expect to see on the Moz Blog as we move forward:
- More actionable posts, including tutorials and case studies
- A tendency toward more advanced posts related to SEO, along with more basic posts that connect SEO to other areas of inbound
- More help for beginners in getting the background necessary to understand the more advanced posts
- High quality posts to fill the content marketing niche
- More posts on data analysis, competitive research, social media, workplace productivity, and other topics toward the top of the list above
- More "pre-read transparency," offering details to help you determine a post's relevancy to you before you click
We'd also love to see your analysis of this data: Did we miss anything? Get something wrong? Let us know in the comments below.
Thanks to everyone who gave their time for this survey; it was immensely insightful for us Mozzers!
My first reaction to the fact that most people prefer to read blogs on their computers vs. mobile devices, might be because of the simple fact that this blog as well as many others aren't responsive or overly mobile friendly. I wouldn't take that as a sign not to move toward a responsive site. The reason I chose the desktop/laptop option is simply that: it's easier to navigate. Of course, there is also the fact that most people use Moz while at work, and will therefore be on a desktop.
I completely agree with this. I see this as a sign that we've simply trained people to read our blog on a laptop/computer instead of mobile, because the mobile experience is so poor. Internally I've been a huge advocate for responsive design on the blog, and this data actually makes me even moreso. ;)
I also agree you. I usually read moz blog at workplace. Their blog inspires me to do something innovative :)
Part of me really wishes this piece was named "The Ultimate Guide to Moz Blog Survey Results". :P
Oh don't worry, we had plenty of fun talking about this in the office. =)
Great insights, that will surely help me focusing better my efforts when writing for Moz.
For sure, I have already seen the content areas where my contribution can have a more valuable sense.
Feeling a little bit disappointed by the small percentage of interest gained by International Marketing topics, as I see International as a strategic asset in this globalized economy...
One suggestion for all the people here, who'd like to see themselves published in YouMoz (and possibly promoted to the main blog): study well the results of this survey, understand your area of expertise and what the Mozzers audience desire from a post, so to present one which not only will be fitting editorially in the Moz blogs, but also will find that resonance between the readers that, ultimately, will help your personal brand getting brighter.
Not many surprises in the data with this one.
I expected content marketing to play big, and the desire for more advanced SEO posts seems right in line with the audience. More tactical SEO, too, makes perfect sense when you consider this is a community loaded with very talented folks who have been conditioned (smartly) to learn from one another.
I'm excited to hear Moz will meet the needs of folks at both ends, advanced and beginner. This keeps the "avid loyals" happy while working to grow the audience. What's more, a focus on more tactical posts is welcomed insofar as it means we can all read and share information that's likely to be immediately impactful to our jobs.
Also, great advice, Gianluca.
I agree that there aren't many surprises with this data. As SEO continue to evolve, the tight knit community here at MOZ continue to work with each other and share information.
Thanks to all that make MOZ possible!
I'm glad to see that the majority wants to see more about content marketing. I would personally like to see content strategy geared to attract engagement and to provoke social activity. I am looking for content strategies to increase social engagement throughout twitter and Google plus and especially LinkedIn.
No shock at all that people prefer to read posts on something other than a phone. I can't imagine anyone prefers reading something on a phone. Phones are for quick answers, not in depth article reading!
As far as the "Ultimate Guide" thing is concerned, your audience is clearly more advanced and appears to mostly be in the SEO industry in some capacity or the other, based on the tag cloud you provided. Not only do 90% of "Ultimate Guides" prove to be anything but "the ultimate," the really good ones that truly are "ultimate" contain a ton of very basic information (which they would have to do to be "the ultimate") along with more advanced things. The generally more advanced audience this blog caters to doesn't care about the basics anymore, and should skim those posts, looking for the tidbit or two that might provide a revelation. All in all, though, I'd say I hesitate to click on "Ultimate Guide" posts, expecting them to fall well short on their promise.
I think you're probably right on both counts, Scott, although as a bus commuter I see folks reading on their phones for half an hour at a time fairly regularly, and with mobile traffic at 28%, I was still surprised to see people's preferences land so far below that.
I completely agree about the "Ultimate Guides;" you make a great point. Even if someone were (somehow) successful in creating an "ultimate" guide, it'd necessarily include everything from the very basics to all the latest advanced tips, which is a pain for more advanced users to sift through. That's really the main point behind this survey: more signal; less noise. We wanted to make sure we weren't just throwing everything out there to see what stuck, and instead were more selectively finding and creating the content we know you all want to see.
Reading on a smartphone is quite normal... the fact is that people usually tend to read post on smartphones using apps like Feedly or Pocket, which offer a decent reading experience in that kind of device.
Also, remember that people may discover a post - a Moz one too - while on Twitter/Facebook and being on mobile... hence a good mobile experience for readers (maybe going for an Adaptive design solution, and not simply Responsive) should be thought.
Thanks again for being so open and honest about the data you receive, Moz. Great stuff. Neat to see where my answers aligned with the industry as a whole. Zero ultimate guide votes!? That's hilarious.
Thanks for the post, it's really nice to see what a all the seo counterparts think and are up to as I never really get the time to sit down with anyone and talk about how its all going, its normally oh look and update that's going to make some more work for me to fix..
Looking forward to some of the upcomming posts etc.
Good to know that you guys are tracking every single data needed in order to improve your service. We are all excited to see the changes and additional features you've listed above :)
Thanks, Barbara! We're excited, too. =)
One of the most interesting questions is 'what percent of your day-to-day work involves SEO?'. I'm guessing that people's perceptions of what counts as SEO really varies these days - some count content marketing as SEO, some as another channel etc.
Some really interesting data, like how many people feel there is nothing to improve :) The fact that the majority read on laptop/computer only - perhaps as many articles are longer form than the average blog post, people want the greater screen real-estate. Might have been interesting to see how many read the blog via an RSS feed and how many come directly the the site.
Screen real estate is something nobody had mentioned yet, and I think that plays a big part. So does navigation and the ability to try out what you're learning in a post, especially with some of the more tactical posts and tutorials. If I'm reading something about how to use Screaming Frog, for example, I'm going to want to open up Screaming Frog in another window and walk myself through it. That's really difficult to do on any mobile device.
Something we really haven't explored much is the fact that some individual posts (not just some blogs) are better suited for different devices. If high-resolution screenshots are required to get ideas across, that's best for a desktop with lots of real estate. If it's mostly text with some basic imagery, that works great on mobile.
Also: You can get a basic sense for how many folks come from various sources by appending "/stats" to any of our blog post URLs (there's also a link to "Post Analytics" at the bottom of the post, above the comments). Here are the stats for this post, and you can see Feedly and Feedburner sending somewhere around 1/5 of the traffic (at the time I'm writing this reply).
Great study, guys. Well done!
I can't remember if I mentioned this when I filled it out myself, but one error I've seen on the blog with other devices (phone and tablet) is that either a) some of the comment don't show up, or b) the order changes (I think it changes from most to least popular, rather than chronological order). Maybe something to look into?
Oh and "More from Rand = 11"? As if the guy isn't busy enough...! ;-)
That's interesting that it displays differently on different devices for you -- I haven't seen that before. If you get an example of that, would you forward a screenshot to me? (trevor at moz.com).
I think the comments sort by popularity for folks who are logged in, and sort chronologically otherwise. I might be remembering that wrong, and I definitely don't know about any decisions that were made. I actually think it works better this way, as it tends to bump the comments that aren't as relevant farther down the page, and put the really substantive discussions at the top.
And yeah -- I laughed at how many folks asked for more Rand, too! Although, with his new role, he might actually have more time to give folks their wish!
Hi Trevor, I'm logged in now and it's all chronological. I'm on the laptop now, but if I'm on the iPad soon and it happens again then I'll take a screenshot and send it across as requested :-)
If you're not logged in, they are sorted by popularity. If you are logged in, you can choose popularity or by time.
Well there's our answer - thanks, Keri!
Glad to know that those of us needing more basic info will be included!! I love the idea of the "pre read transparency too as it will help with posts that don't apply to what I am needing to learn and accomplish.
Trevor, thanks for the quick turn-around on the providing us with the data you collected! Of all the paying members of the Moz community, and those who don't pay, I'm surprised at the number of contributors. Were you guys a bit shocked as well or was this about right for what you imagined?
I read some comments about being shocked at how many read posts on their phones or tablets compared to their computers and I think they missed the actual result of your survey. You surveyed us, the people who are most likely at their desks all day working who contribute and read the Moz posts, so of the results you gathered, I'm not surprised to see the high number of us who read the Moz posts from our computers. That is what you were asking, right? You weren't asking about other blog sites or other users outside the community. Some comments turned it into a more generalized view about this. Yes, a lot of people read blogs from their phones and tablets and yes, many do not because majority of the web is not mobile optimized or sites being responsive, however, that being said, the results you are showing was strictly from the 766 Moz users, not a mass public outreach.
I for one, submitted the request for more actionable posts, especially tutorials. Case studies are always great to see as well, since you may have aspects applicable to a client you are working with, so that becomes useful.
"Ultimate Guides" at 0% = Hilarious.
I'm glad I contributed and more pleased to see the data and know your team is now looking to put items into place! - Patrick
Thanks for the note, Patrick!
I was actually pleasantly surprised by the number of responses we got. As the survey shows, folks in our industry are really pressed for time, so a post that actually requests more of their time isn't likely to get a whole lot of traffic. As someone else noted in these comments, roughly 1/3 of the people who viewed the post took the survey, which made us pretty happy. =)
With regard to mobile devices, there are really two sides to the coin. On one side, you're absolutely right -- these are primarily people who sit at computers for much of the day, and who probably appreciate that extra desktop real estate. On the other side, though, that could just be a preference now because that's what people are used to. If our site was responsive and our content optimized for a great mobile experience, would people's preferences begin to change? There's a quote that's often attributed to Henry Ford: "If I had asked the people what they wanted, they would have said 'faster horses.' " There's some of that here, too.
I got a good laugh out of the Ultimate Guides stat -- it's my favorite takeaway from this survey, because I've bemoaned ultimate guides for as long as I've seen them around!
Hey Trevor,
Finally you got a wonderful analysis finished and what a great insight I would say. Commendable one. The best part I like about Moz blogs are the Key takeaways part at the footer which gives a quick recap of all the insights mentioned in the body text. Although I am a big fan of Moz blogs but these are something which I personally love the most. Perhaps to make the content easily graspable, we use to prepare mind maps and now it comes in the form of infographics. You all are doing the ppt thing already which is really good to see and follow. I remember moz industry survey study and its power point presentation, I shared it with most of my colleagues as well. Keep up the good work and thanks again for sharing these insights.
Thanks for the kind words, Amit! Glad you enjoyed the post. =)
I actually saw a tweet from Loren Baker a week or two ago where he poked fun at Moz for not having a responsive blog design. I think it's definitely time to move that project off the back burner :)
it's really cool to see a company that likes to drill down deep to what their users really want, need and like.
Amazing Statistics!
Wow keri - thanks for sharing this info. Very helpful in figuring out what to blog about. no other publication shares this kind of valuable readership info.
Glad you found it useful, Larry!
Trevor was actually the one behind this survey, I just highlighted it in an email. Glad you've found it helpful!
Great Post ..It'll be nice to see more of an integrated approach to advanced SEO tactics with other areas of marketing.
These are some really interesting results! Thanks for sharing, Trevor. Can't wait to see the Moz industry survey results. Any idea when those will be published publicly?
Thanks, Brandon! I believe we're shooting for next month, but I'm sorry to say I don't have a more specific answer at the moment. We'll keep you posted as we get closer, though. =)
Here's the challenge: Google employs thousands of engineers organized in teams to cover every topic of search including paid display retargeting universal maps mobile social and so on... as illustrated in both figures challenges we're facing and room of improvement the main area where we're struggling is algo change and keep track of these changes as they impact tactics results started sooner. The MOZ algo changes page is so popular with reason. Ideally we should have an army to understand everything happening in search landscape, organized by specialties and headed by SMEs capable to respond to any question in their field of expertise. So I would suggest instead of organizing content by topic, better to assign roles to top contributors and give us a way to connect with them in order to discuss advanced techniques topic focused. I know it's not that easy but I find more valuable to follow on G+ specialists and reach out to them for help on demand than reading posts and bookmarking with no focus.
We actually did do that, and it was called Private Q&A. It simply wasn't scalable as we grew in users, and we had to discontinue it in March 2013.
Is there a big difference per state or even country?
We actually didn't collect geographic info on the survey. That's an interesting question, though - what differences would you hypothesize?
Hi Trevor,
I love this transparency, it’s so refreshing to see.
You mentioned feedback on the "pre-read transparency," - It would be great to have a summary of the content, for example whereas you have the TL:DR at the end, but something at the beginning would be great then you know what you’ll be learning.
I love Moz but one thing I personally feel I would like to see replaced is the Thumbs up, Thumbs down voting at the start of the posts. I would never click thumbs down on someone’s article when they’ve taken the time to write it, even if it’s not what I wanted to read. Saying that, it would be so nice to have Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced options up there so you know which ones are suitable for your level. I guess people could vote on what they think it is and that will let others know. :)
Hi Preeti,
Thanks so much for your thoughts. A summary of the post might just be the best way of moving toward that pre-read transparency, and the easiest one to implement, at that. I think it'd be a little different than a traditional tl;dr, as those tend to be more like Cliff's Notes, making people feel as if there's nothing to gain from reading the rest of the post. A shorter description, though (maybe something like the meta descriptions we post on the main Moz Blog page), would be a great add.
It's so funny that you mention the thumbs -- I had a conversation with Cyrus just yesterday about the thumbs being displayed at the top of each post, and whether that might color people's opinions of the post before they even begin reading it. One of the possibilities we talked about was exactly what you mention here -- replacing them with a gauge that let people know about how advanced the post was -- maybe a scale of some kind?
I love the idea, and while we'll likely test out more than one option, I think this a great one. =)
I like the idea of short description about post,and a scale which will indicate level of knowledge needed to understand the post.E.g. scale 1-5:
1)basic
2)medium
3)transitional
4)advanced
5)expert
And maybe average time needed to read the post.So everyone could decide do they have enough knowledge for that post,and time to read it immediately or mark it for later reading.
Definitely. I like the idea of adding something regarding the post's length on there, too. We already have a rough word count in the stats behind each post, so that'd be relatively easy to implement -- it could be a quick conversion to time frames based on average reading speed, weighted for the complexity of the post.
Thanks for the idea!
Thanks for the reply Trevor,
The scale seems like a great idea, defining the post level will make it so much easier to scan articles. Will you be adding similar articles on page that readers can navigate to, or next level if you read a beginner article?
It's nice to have a weigh in anyhow, no doubt you’ll have more amazing ideas coming through. Looking forward to what you guys have planned for 2014!
I'm not sure what form it'll take just yet, but that's the general idea -- building a taxonomy that can make connections between posts. This is background information for this; this is related to and more advanced than this; etc. With those connections, we can make huge improvements to the findability of our content. Can you tell I'm excited? =)
Can't Believe that only 766 of Moz readers took a few minutes to tell what they thought of the Moz Blog. :/
But I am happy that I am one of 766. :)
I thought that was low too, but then I looked at the analytics of the post and saw it had 2,415 visitors. I guess nearly a 1/3 conversion rate isn't too shabby.
Bingo. These results confirm that a lot of folks aren't much interested in posts that won't directly save them time and effort, so one that asks for their time was bound to have relatively low traffic. We were actually pretty happy about the number of responses we got with that considered! =)
Thanks for the insights Marisa. 1/3 is a good conversion rate if you get 2,415 visitors.
I'm not really that surprised that many users are logging in with their laptops, why are you guys? I mean, gee whiz, it's clear SEO and content marketing are two hot tickets here and both require writing. It's that time of year again when we giddily look in storefront windows and think of all the things we want. I think you and many other sites want mobile to happen, and that's great, but these things take time.
Personally I could care less about mobile. I hate my cell phone and carry it as little as possible. It doesn't help that I'm at the computer all day and don't need the stupid thing.
Still, mobile is local, no other way around it. I'll look for the local eatery on the phone, but I'll save the in depth searches of Spanish hotels and toe wax for later at home. I think many of the users of this site, and those not flitting about like butterflies on mobile, will be using laptops for some time to come. More people should focus on that and not so much on unproven and small aspects of their sites that at best often have negligible results for many just applying them.
I wouldn't have been surprised about a simple majority using laptops, but I certainly wasn't expecting the split to be this extreme. I doubt a majority of people feel the way you do about their cell phones (though maybe they hate them on some level, sort of like I hate the delicious breakfast sandwiches I eat all the time)... but that said, I think you're absolutely right about these things taking time, and I think that plays into what other folks are saying about the answers to this question.
It isn't that people would or will always prefer reading blog posts on laptops/desktops; it's just that they do prefer it. Given the current state of mobile devices and the current format of much of what's on the internet, our experience on a laptop/desktop is preferable. But those things might change.
Also important is that different people are always going to think differently about this. Some people are already passionately calling for responsive/adaptive blog design, as it would make their current reading habits more enjoyable. Some are more aligned with your thoughts, and couldn't care less.
At the end of the day, it's in our best interest to watch the general trend, and if/when a critical mass of people are already trying to view our blog from mobile devices, we should prioritize offering a good mobile experience for them. The numbers above make it seem like we're not there yet. Yet.
PS - I'm happy to say you now rank #1 for "Spanish hotels and toe wax." How's that for long-tail? ;)
No massive surprises in there - I completely agree that the content needs to have more tactical tips, ideas and tools etc, unfortunately of late I've been a bit turned off and I've been returning to MOZ less due to the genericity of some of the content.
Yeah, I think the majority of this data simply confirmed our suspicions instead of providing new points of view, but that's equally valuable for us. Now that we've got a firmer grasp on all this, we can use it to influence the types of posts we publish, and hopefully pique the interest of our more advanced readers more regularly.
Even if I agree about the need of more tactical posts, remember always this:
Tactics without a Strategy behind are nothing but shots in the air in the best cases, or ways for finding fast solution and screwing up things in the worst ones.
So, post about strategic thinking and even theory of Search and Social are needed, even vital. Without them you cannot explain really why the tactic works.
Saying this because it happens so often that people confuse a tactic with a strategy... and they are not the same thing
#justsaying
Fear not, Gianluca -- none of the topics in the results above will be cut out of the blog because they didn't gain enough responses. This data will simply inform which directions we lean and which topics we emphasize more than others.
One thing we noticed right away was that even though some topics had far more responses than others, no topics received votes from fewer than 20% of respondents. That's reassuring, as really knowing any of the topics requires having at least a basic understanding of nearly all the rest. The areas of inbound are inseparably intertwined, and we'll continue to advocate a well-rounded base of knowledge for all kinds of marketers.
#completelyagreeing
I know moving away from SEO as a term was strategically based on the changing landscape of Inbound Marketing but it no surprise that advanced SEO is among the top of the list. SEO has always been Moz/SEOMoz's strong point and main draw for customers/readers.
It'll be nice to see more of an integrated approach to advanced SEO tactics with other areas of marketing. This is not only where I feel the industry is headed but where Google wants it to go as well.
;)
As someone that wants more data analysis in their Moz posts, I'm glad a large chunk of other survey recipients agreed with me :-)
Although one of the areas where I think some more basic knowledge (along with advanced) is needed is local search.
Hi Dan, agreed. We'll be focusing on advanced SEO more than basic SEO, but will definitely still focus on fundamentals of other areas. We'll include local in that bunch, since many of the tactics are so distinct from traditional SEO. At the end of the day, we'll be primarily creating content for T-shaped marketers with a specialization in SEO.
One of the biggest things I'd like to see improved is the ability to search the blog on site. If it exists, I certainly can't see the function... Disclaimer: I may be missing something obvious here.
Hi Nick! We do have search functionality up in the top nav. It's that itty bitty hour glass, and it honestly is hard to find. We've seen a major decline in on-site searches since we changed the nav and have been talking recently about fixing that. We definitely want people to be able to search! Thanks. :)
Thanks to both of you (Jennita and Trevor) for the responses. I was aware of the magnifying glass icon but didn't seem very bespoke for the blog; it gives you the option to search all of moz, help hub and q&a. When it does return search results it does so in a manner which isn't anymore browsable than the blog listing pages themselves i.e 1-10, no further filtering.
I'm not moaning by any stretch of the imaginaton, just that there's a lot of amazing content here that could be more accessible :)
Wholeheartedly agreed, Nick! We've been working lately to kick off a project that lays a more connective information architecture behind our site, allowing for all kinds of improvements in organization and findability. We'll keep you posted. =)
Hi Nick, we do indeed have a site search -- there's a spyglass icon toward the right side of the top navigation. While we definitely want to try and improve its presence (and also find more ways to make the archive of blog posts navigable), that should get you what you need. =)
It's a great sign for a blog when 64% of readers say they read the entire blog post vs skimming it. Definitely an important metric.
I would love to learn more about content writing and developing brand identities on the web. I agree with Praveen that the old link building process is dead but how to proceed in this changed scenario. Any articles would be helpful.
Hi Adeel, thanks for your thoughts. We'll definitely be diving into content more than we have in the past, and I don't think it's possible to avoid the importance of effective branding, which ties into just about every other area of inbound.
I'm glad you specified that it's just the old process of link building that's changed, as I think many people are too quick to claim things are dead these days when they've really just evolved and matured. Link building is still as important as it ever was, but it requires a different approach than it did before. We'll definitely keep talking about the best ways to go about it!
Interesting post ..Good work.
How come I missed this interesting Blog? Thanks so much for the knowledge you share!!
I assume these are great results. But somewhere it feels weird to me that most of the people (who took survey) don't think 'Branding' is challenge to them compared to link building or Google's algorithms.
I guess this is the most important part of marketing where we want our product/company to be a brand. And if we are a brand, then we don't have to worry about Google's algorithm or link building, etc, that (links) we can acquire automatically as a brand in our niche. On a personal note, spreading brand awareness is something one of the biggest challenges we are facing today.
Wow .You are a genius and sharply observe things and this quality must be every blackhead should have and I also agree that being anonymous is quite an effective trick but I think IP can uncover you .Well you have great info and I enjoy your writing and you share most interesting points of using personas.
I think you put this comment on the wrong post perhaps?
haha, was this auto-spam?
I also shared my thought last month with MOZ. Where is my prize? :D