Aaron Pratt has a question about the timing of a site buildout at Cre8asite forums. The question he asked, which, at its core, is about how to make a site's internal and external feaures appear natural to the search engines, prompted me to think about the same subject. What does a "natural" growth profile look like?

My opinion is really that organic growth can't be faked effecitvely. Over the long term, a site that has updates on a normal, human time schedule (even if that schedule is relatively erratic) and grows links on a natural schedule, with newer links pointing to newer content and a few links now and then pointing back at old stuff will have patterns that stand out.

The search engine algorithms are really becoming more and more about pattern identification - there are clues that can tip the SEs off about whether you're running a link network or benefiting from one and whether you're serving up valuable content or scraped and re-purposed crap (it's taking them a while on this one).

Aaron's specific example was of a site that talked about water gardening. According to his post:

Say I register a new domain and on day #1 post ten focused articles covering all the various aspects of "water gardening. Since the 10 articles basically complete the website I leave it alone and get a couple backlinks pointed at it. A year later I come back and those 10 articles are still not even in the top 1000 when you do a search for the keywords.

I think Aaron's trying to shoot for sandbox dodging, and he's got a relatively good plan (although, IMO, you need a couple new links each month for that first year). The problem is that this site has no human aspect to it, and no relevance - even if those articles are the best in the world, there are thousands of aspects to any niche topic, and hundreds of news events over the course of a year that are worth covering.

If you aren't making that water gardening site your driving passion, you'll always lose out to someone (or many someones) who is.