This blog is for all of you. In a notoriously opaque and confusing industry that's prone to frequent changes, we see immense benefit in helping all of you stay on top of the game. To that end, every couple of years we ask for a report card of sorts, hoping not only to get a sense for how your jobs have changed, but also to get a sense for how we can improve.
About a month ago, we asked you all to take a reader survey, and nearly 600 of you generously gave your time. The results, summarized in this post, were immensely helpful, and were a reminder of how lucky we are to have such a thoughtful community of readers.
I've offered as much data as I can, and when possible, I've also trended responses against the same questions from our 2015 and 2013 surveys, so you can get a sense for how things have changed. There's a lot here, so buckle up. =)
Who our readers are
To put all of this great feedback into context, it helps to know a bit about who the people in our audience actually are. Sure, we can glean a bit of information from our site analytics, and can make some educated guesses, but neither of those can answer the questions we're most curious about. What's your day-to-day work like, and how much SEO does it really involve? Would you consider yourself more of an SEO beginner, or more of an SEO wizard? And, most importantly, what challenges are you facing in your work these days? The answers give us a fuller understanding of where the rest of your feedback comes from.
What is your job title?
Readers of the Moz Blog have a multitude of backgrounds, from CEOs of agencies to in-the-weeds SEOs of all skill levels. One of the most common themes we see, though, is a skew toward the more general marketing industry. I know that word clouds have their faults, but it's still a relatively interesting way to gauge how often things appear in a list like this, so here's what we've got this year:
Of note, similar to our results in 2015, the word "marketing" is the most common result, followed by the word "SEO" and the word "manager."
Here's a look at the top 20 terms used in this year's results, along with the percentage of responses containing each term. You'll also see those same percentages from the 2015 and 2013 surveys to give you an idea of what's changed -- the darker the bar, the more recent the survey:
The thing that surprises me the most about this list is how little it's changed in the four-plus years since we first asked the question (a theme you'll see recur in the rest of these results). In fact, the top 20 terms this year are nearly identical to the top 20 terms four years ago, with only a few things sliding up or down a few spots.
What percentage of your day-to-day work involves SEO?
We hear a lot about people wearing multiple hats for their companies. One person who took this survey noted that even at a 9,000-person company, they were the only one who worked on SEO, and it was only about 80% of their job. That idea is backed up by this data, which shows an incredibly broad range of responses. More than 10% of respondents barely touch SEO, and not even 14% say they're full-time:
One interesting thing to note is the sharp decline in the number of people who say that SEO isn't a part of their day-to-day at all. That shift is likely a result of our shift back toward SEO, away from related areas like social media and content marketing. I think we had attracted a significant number of community managers and content specialists who didn't work in SEO, and we're now seeing the pendulum swing the other direction.
On a scale of 1-5, how advanced would you say your SEO knowledge is?
The similarity between this year's graph for this question and those from 2015 and 2013 is simply astonishing:
There's been a slight drop in folks who say they're at an expert level, and a slight increase in folks who have some background, but are relative beginners. But only slight. The interesting thing is, our blog traffic has increased significantly over these four years, so the newer members of our audience bear a striking resemblance to those of you who've been around for quite some time. In a sense, that's reassuring -- it paints a clear picture for us as we continue refining our content.
Do you work in-house, or at an agency/consultancy?
Here's another window into just how little our audience has changed in the last couple of years:
A slight majority of our readers still work in-house for their own companies, and about a third still work on SEO for their company's clients.
Interestingly, though, respondents who work for clients deal with many of the same issues as those who work in-house -- especially in trying to convey the value of their work in SEO. They're just trying to send that message to external clients instead of internal stakeholders. More details on that come from our next question:
What are some of the biggest challenges you face in your work today?
I'm consistently amazed by the time and thought that so many of you put into answering this question, and rest assured, your feedback will be presented to several teams around Moz, both on the marketing and the product sides. For this question, I organized each and every response into recurring themes, tallying each time those themes were mentioned. Here are all the themes that were mentioned 10 or more times:
Challenge | # of mentions |
---|---|
My clients / colleagues / bosses don't understand the value of SEO | 59 |
The industry and tactics are constantly changing; algo updates | 45 |
Time constraints | 44 |
Link building | 35 |
My clients / colleagues / bosses don't understand how SEO works | 29 |
Content (strategy / creation / marketing) | 25 |
Resource constraints | 23 |
It's difficult to prove ROI | 18 |
Budget constraints | 17 |
It's a difficult industry in which to learn tools and techniques | 16 |
I regularly need to educate my colleagues / employees | 16 |
It's difficult to prioritize my work | 16 |
My clients either don't have or won't offer sufficient budget / effort | 15 |
Effective reporting | 15 |
Bureaucracy, red tape, other company problems | 11 |
It's difficult to compete with other companies | 11 |
I'm required to wear multiple hats | 11 |
More than anything else, it's patently obvious that one of the greatest difficulties faced by any SEO is explaining it to other people in a way that demonstrates its value while setting appropriate expectations for results. Whether it's your clients, your boss, or your peers that you're trying to convince, it isn't an easy case to make, especially when it's so difficult to show what kind of return a company can see from an investment in SEO.
We also saw tons of frustrated responses about how the industry is constantly changing, and it takes too much of your already-constrained time just to stay on top of those changes.
In terms of tactics, link building easily tops the list of challenges. That makes sense, as it's the piece of SEO that relies most heavily on the cooperation of other human beings (and humans are often tricky beings to figure out). =)
Content marketing -- both the creation/copywriting side as well as the strategy side -- is still a challenge for many folks in the industry, though fewer people mentioned it this year as mentioned it in 2015, so I think we're all starting to get used to how those skills overlap with the more traditional aspects of SEO.
How our readers read
With all that context in mind, we started to dig into your preferences in terms of formats, frequency, and subject matter on the blog.
How often do you read posts on the Moz Blog?
This is the one set of responses that caused a bit of concern. We've seen a steady decrease in the number of people who say they read every day, a slight decrease in the number of people who say they read multiple times each week, and a dramatic increase in the number of people who say they read once a week.
The 2015 decrease came after an expansion in the scope of subjects we covered on the blog -- as we branched away from just SEO, we published more posts about social media, email, and other aspects of digital marketing. We knew that not all of those subjects were relevant for everyone, so we expected a dip in frequency of readership.
This year, though, we've attempted to refocus on SEO, and might have expected a bit of a rebound. That didn't happen:
There are two other factors at play, here. For one thing, we no longer publish a post every single weekday. After our publishing volume experiment in 2015, we realized it was safe (even beneficial) to emphasize quality over quantity, so if we don't feel like a post turned out the way we hoped, we don't publish it until we've had a chance to improve it. That means we're down to about four posts per week. We've also made a concerted effort to publish more posts about local SEO, as that's relevant to our software and an increasingly important part of the work of folks in our industry.
It could also be a question of time -- we've already covered how little time everyone in our industry has, and with that problem continuing, there may just be less time to read blog posts.
If anyone has any additional insight into why they read less often than they once did, please let us know in the comments below!
On which types of devices do you prefer to read blog posts?
We were surprised by the responses to this answer in 2013, and they've only gotten more extreme:
Nearly everyone prefers to read blog posts on a full computer. Only about 15% of folks add their phones into the equation, and the number of people in all the other buckets is extremely small. In 2013, our blog didn't have a responsive design, and was quite difficult to read on mobile devices. We thought that might have had something to do with people's responses -- maybe they were just used to reading our blog on larger screens. The trend in 2015 and this year, though, proves that's not the case. People just prefer reading posts on their computers, plain and simple.
Which other site(s), if any, do you regularly visit for information or education on SEO?
This was a new question for this year. We have our own favorite sites, of course, but we had no idea how the majority of folks would respond to this question. As it turns out, there was quite a broad range of responses listing sites that take very different approaches:
Site | # responses |
---|---|
Search Engine Land | 184 |
Search Engine Journal | 89 |
Search Engine Roundtable | 74 |
SEMrush | 51 |
Ahrefs | 50 |
Search Engine Watch | 41 |
Quick Sprout / Neil Patel | 35 |
HubSpot | 33 |
Backlinko | 31 |
Google Blogs | 29 |
The SEM Post | 21 |
Kissmetrics | 17 |
Yoast | 16 |
Distilled | 13 |
SEO by the Sea | 13 |
I suppose it's no surprise that the most prolific sites sit at the top. They've always got something new, even if the stories don't often go into much depth. We've tended to steer our own posts toward longer-form, in-depth pieces, and I think it's safe to say (based on these responses and some to questions below) that it'd be beneficial for us to include some shorter stories, too. In other words, depth shouldn't necessarily be a requisite for a post to be published on the Moz Blog. We may start experimenting with a more "short and sweet" approach to some posts.
What our readers think of the blog
Here's where we get into more specific feedback about the Moz Blog, including whether it's relevant, how easy it is for you to consume, and more.
What percentage of the posts on the Moz Blog would you say are relevant to you and your work?
Overall, I'm pretty happy with the results here, as SEO is a broad enough industry (and we've got a broad enough audience) that there's simply no way we're going to hit the sweet spot for everyone with every post. But those numbers toward the bottom of the chart are low enough that I feel confident we're doing pretty well in terms of topic relevance.
Do you feel the Moz Blog posts are generally too basic, too advanced, or about right?
Responses to this question have made me smile every time I see them. This is clearly one thing we're getting about as right as we could expect to. We're even seeing a slight balancing of the "too basic" and "too advanced" columns over time, which is great:
We also asked the people who told us that posts were "too basic" or "too advanced" to what extent they felt that way, using a scale from 1-5 (1 being "just a little bit too basic/advanced" and 5 being "way too basic/advanced." The responses tell us that the people who feel posts are too advanced feel more strongly about that opinion than the people who feel posts are too basic:
This makes some sense, I think. If you're just starting out in SEO, which many of our readers are, some of the posts on this blog are likely to go straight over your head. That could be frustrating. If you're an SEO expert, though, you probably aren't frustrated by posts you see as too basic for you -- you just skip past them and move on with your day.
This does make me think, though, that we might benefit from offering a dedicated section of the site for folks who are just starting out -- more than just the Beginner's Guide. That's actually something that was specifically requested by one respondent this year.
In general, what do you think about the length of Moz Blog posts?
While it definitely seems like we're doing pretty well in this regard, I'd also say we've got some room to tighten things up a bit, especially in light of the lack of time so many of you mentioned:
There were quite a few comments specifically asking for "short and sweet" posts from time to time -- offering up useful tips or news in a format that didn't expound on details because it didn't have to. I think sprinkling some of those types of posts in with the longer-form posts we have so often would be beneficial.
Do you ever comment on Moz Blog posts?
This was another new question this year. Despite so many sites are removing comment sections from their blogs, we've always believed in their value. Sometimes the discussions we see in comments end up being the most helpful part of the posts, and we value our community too much to keep that from happening. So, we were happy to see a full quarter of respondents have participated in comments:
We also asked for a bit of info about why you either do or don't comment on posts. The top reasons why you do were pretty predictable -- to ask a clarifying question related to the post, or to offer up your own perspective on the topic at hand. The #3 reason was interesting -- 18 people mentioned that they like to comment in order to thank the author for their hard work. This is a great sentiment, and as someone who's published several posts on this blog, I can say for a fact that it does feel pretty great. At the same time, those comments are really only written for one person -- the author -- and are a bit problematic from our perspective, because they add noise around the more substantial conversations, which are what we like to see most.
I think the solution is going to lie in a new UI element that allows readers to note their appreciation to the authors without leaving one of the oft-maligned "Great post!" comments. There's got to be a happy medium there, and I think it's worth our finding it.
The reasons people gave for not commenting were even more interesting. A bunch of people mentioned the need to log in (sorry, folks -- if we didn't require that, we'd spend half our day removing spam!). The most common response, though, involved a lack of confidence. Whether it was worded along the lines of "I'm an introvert" or along the lines of "I just don't have a lot of expertise," there were quite a few people who worried about how their comments would be received.
I want to take this chance to encourage those of you who feel that way to take the step, and ask questions about points you find confusing. At the very least, I can guarantee you aren't the only ones, and others like you will appreciate your initiative. One of the best ways to develop your expertise is to get comfortable asking questions. We all work in a really confusing industry, and the Moz Blog is all about providing a place to help each other out.
What, if anything, would you like to see different about the Moz Blog?
As usual, the responses to this question were chock full of great suggestions, and again, we so appreciate the amount of time you all spent providing really thoughtful feedback.
One pattern I saw was requests for more empirical data -- hard evidence that things should be done a certain way, whether through case studies or other formats. Another pattern was requests for step-by-step walkthroughs. That makes a lot of sense for an industry of folks who are strapped for time: Make things as clear-cut as possible, and where we can, offer a linear path you can walk down instead of asking you to holistically understand the subject matter, then figure that out on your own. (That's actually something we're hoping to do with our entire Learning Center: Make it easier to figure out where to start, and where to continue after that, instead of putting everything into buckets and asking you all to figure it out.)
Whiteboard Friday remains a perennial favorite, and we were surprised to see more requests for more posts about our own tools than we had requests for fewer posts about our own tools. (We've been wary of that in the past, as we wanted to make sure we never crossed from "helpful" into "salesy," something we'll still focus on even if we do add another tool-based post here and there.)
We expected a bit of feedback about the format of the emails -- we're absolutely working on that! -- but didn't expect to see so many folks requesting that we bring back YouMoz. That's something that's been on the backs of our minds, and while it may not take the same form it did before, we do plan on finding new ways to encourage the community to contribute content, and hope to have something up and running early in 2018.
Request | #responses |
---|---|
More case studies | 26 |
More Whiteboard Friday (or other videos) | 25 |
More long-form step-by-step training/guides | 18 |
Clearer steps to follow in posts; how-tos | 11 |
Bring back UGC / YouMoz | 9 |
More from Rand | 9 |
Improve formatting of the emails | 9 |
Higher-level, less-technical posts | 8 |
More authors | 7 |
More news (algorithm updates, e.g.) | 7 |
Shorter posts, "quick wins" | 7 |
Quizzes, polls, or other engagement opportunities | 6 |
Broader range of topics (engagement, CRO, etc.) | 6 |
More about Moz tools | 5 |
More data-driven, less opinion-based | 5 |
What our readers want to see
This section is a bit more future-facing, where some of what we asked before had to do with how things have been in the past.
Which of the following topics would you like to learn more about?
There were very, very few surprises in this list. Lots of interest in on-page SEO and link building, as well as other core tactical areas of SEO. Content, branding, and social media all took dips -- that makes sense, given the fact that we don't usually post about those things anymore, and we've no doubt lost some audience members who were more interested in them as a result. Interestingly, mobile took a sizable dip, too. I'd be really curious to know what people think about why that is. My best guess is that with the mobile-first indexing from Google and with responsive designs having become so commonplace, there isn't as much of a need as there once was to think of mobile much differently than there was a couple of years ago. Also of note: When we did this survey in 2015, Google had recently rolled out its "Mobile-Friendly Update," not-so-affectionately referred to by many in the industry as Mobilegeddon. So... it was on our minds. =)
Which of the following types of posts would you most like to see on the Moz Blog?
This is a great echo and validation of what we took away from the more general question about what you'd like to see different about the Blog: More tactical posts and step-by-step walkthroughs. Posts that cut to the chase and offer a clear direction forward, as opposed to some of the types at the bottom of this list, which offer more opinions and cerebral explorations:
What happens next?
Now we go to work. =)
We'll spend some time fully digesting this info, and coming up with new goals for 2018 aimed at making improvements inspired by your feedback. We'll keep you all apprised as we start moving forward.
If you have any additional insight that strikes you in taking a look at these results, please do share it in the comments below -- we'd love to have those discussions.
For now, we've got some initial takeaways that we're already planning to take action on.
Primary takeaways
There are some relatively obvious things we can take away from these results that we're already working on:
- People in all businesses are finding it quite difficult to communicate the value of SEO to their clients, bosses, and colleagues. That's something we can help with, and we'll be developing materials in the near future to try and alleviate some of that particular frustration.
- There's a real desire for more succinct, actionable, step-by-step walkthroughs on the Blog. We can pretty easily explore formats for posts that are off our "beaten path," and will attempt to make things easier to consume through improvements to both the content itself and its delivery. I think there's some room for more "short and sweet" mixed in with our longer norm.
- The bulk of our audience does more than just SEO, despite a full 25% of them having it in their job titles, and the challenges you mentioned include a bunch of areas that are related to, but outside the traditional world of SEO. Since you all are clearly working on those sorts of things, we should work to highlight and facilitate the relationship between the SEO work and the non-SEO marketing work you do.
- In looking through some of the other sites you all visit for information on SEO, and knowing the kinds of posts they typically publish, it's clear we've got an opportunity to publish more news. We've always dreamed of being more of a one-stop shop for SEO content, and that's good validation that we may want to head down that path.
Again, thank you all so much for the time and effort you spent filling out this survey. Hopefully you'll notice some changes in the near (and not-so-near) future that make it clear we're really listening.
If you've got anything to add to these results -- insights, further explanations, questions for clarification, rebuttals of points, etc. -- please leave them in the comments below. We're looking forward to continuing the conversation. =)
Thank you for this post, although I didn't participate (I missed the survey) it's interesting to see people think the same way I do.
Personally I disagree with publishing shorter posts just because Search Engine Land do this for a few reasons:
1) I can't help but feel that one of the only reasons Search Engine Land is still a popular go to site is purely based on historical merit, as it can't be due to the quality of the content on there. Personally I find most of the posts on there are a waste of time as a LOT of the posts are just the same topic regurgitated a different way by a different person. I appreciate that sometimes a different take on the same topic is helpful, but who needs ANOTHER post about keyword analysis?
2) In this industry there are plenty of short posts out there to read through from lazy writers who just want to create a blog post for the sake of it to update their site. As Moz is a reputable company who many depend on for their SEO info, I feel long and detailed posts are expected now as these are usually much more interesting than a quick 1 minute post.
Perhaps a better way to tackle this would be to provide an easy to read TL;DR for each post which people can read through to decide whether the post is of interest to them or not?
Thanks for your thoughts, Adam!
I think you're absolutely right about publishing shorter posts just for shortness's sake, and I think you're likely on the nose about SEL, too -- I wondered if part of why they had so many responses because it's simply the site that comes to mind before others.
We got several responses cautioning us against the regurgitated content you mention, though, and that's something we take quite seriously. I don't ever want us to lower the bar for quality -- not one bit. I do think, though, that some stories that are worth telling don't require 2,000 words to do so. A quick news update as a heads-up before we have an in-depth analysis available, maybe. I worry that we sometimes feel like a post is required to go into a certain amount of depth in order to qualify as worthy of the Moz Blog, when some topics -- while important and valuable -- aren't complex enough to warrant that level of depth.
The TL;DR is a good idea, and something we're thinking about exploring. It's along the lines of something we've talked about around here a lot -- something we've dubbed "pre-read transparency." We can't stand click-bait titles, to the point that we'd love to be able to offer as much detail about what's behind the click as is practical. The point? We never want someone to click, spend the time reading, and then say "boy, that wasn't worth my time," or "wow, that took way too long."
In any case, thanks again for sharing your feedback. =)
Thanks for the response Trevor.
Perhaps it could have been worthwhile asking how long people have been visiting these sites for. We could have then identified any new comers that have only recently come to light for people, such as the Ahrefs blog which I'm sure has only recently become as popular as it has.
Perhaps if you are looking to create smaller blog posts then these should be posted into a different blog to avoid polluting the main blog with posts which lack quality. If first impressions count, I can't imagine many would be impressed to find small basic blog posts from their first visit to the blog.
Glad the TL;DR is something that may be considered for the future, will be interesting to see how you guys go about implementing something like that on the site.
I should clarify -- there'll be no pollution. I'd sooner eschew any thought of shorter posts than publish anything we didn't think was super high-quality. But I guess what I'm saying is, I think there's such thing as a really high-quality shorter post... and we shouldn't be afraid of those. =)
Thanks again for your thoughts!
Adam, You are right... @Trevor - you nailed it. The results of the survey are really surprising :)
Thanks.
@Adam - Most people I know that go to Search Engine Land, SERoundtable, etc. do so because of the shorter posts. They can spend 15-20 minutes each day just quickly browsing any main news/noteworthy topics and then decide to dive into it deeper later if need be. A lot of them look for those types of posts and then go to more "credible" sources like MoZ.
Great survey results, I am happy to see that the things I have asked for is going to be true soon.
Interesting post with all the statistics – gives a great overview!
When it comes to the challenges you face in your work today, for me it is also that most people do not understand the value of SEO. They think it is something not important/ worth it doing, since the results are kind of unsteady plus SEO is long-term oriented so it is difficult so see instant results (since Google is constantly testing things out or there a new competitors trying to rank for the same keyword and so on…)
I could not disagree more with people saying SEO is not important, as I experienced it as being really helpful – It is just difficult to explain it to other people that are not that convinced of all the benefits of SEO. Any tips on how you explain the usefulness of SEO best? (I know showing how SEO really helped but most of the time they still do no understand it / do not want to understand)
Thanks, Abel -- really appreciate your input. I completely agree (and clearly, so do the rest of our readers!) that convincing folks of the importance of SEO is a primary concern in the industry today. The answer will be anything but simple.
For one thing, I think it depends on who you're talking to. Some people respond well to numbers that prove performance (which brings its own set of challenges, as those numbers can be months away in SEO). Some people respond well to overarching concepts -- in other words, it's not that they don't believe it's effective, it's just that they don't understand how it would work. It seems like black magic. Either way, knowing a bit about who you're trying to pitch is definitely going to be helpful.
Beyond that, pointing to case studies is definitely helpful. "Hey, such-and-such company started paying attention to SEO about six months ago, and look at these traffic numbers they just released -- no way that's a coincidence..."
One thing I can tell you for sure: This is a problem we at Moz are going to dive into headlong in the weeks and months ahead. We hope to provide all the resources you might need to convince others that your work is incredibly important. Stay tuned. =)
Thanks for your response Trevor! Yes the point with the case studies is great - I actually also used it from time to time to explain SEO, sometimes it worked sometimes not. As you said for some it’s just black magic / they think the success leads back to a ton of other circumstances.
Great to hear that you are going to cover this topic more in-depth! Really looking forward to that!
This is phenomenal Trevor! Really appreciate you sharing all of these insights.
I can't stop thinking about this Q&A:
What's the biggest challenge you face?
#1 Answer: My clients / colleagues / bosses don't understand the value of SEO
And not far below it, "My clients / colleagues / bosses don't understand how SEO works."
We've go SO much opportunity in helping people make that pitch.
Thanks for the kind words, Brit -- onward! =)
Its little difficult to convince clients about the importance of SEO but it is more difficult and challenging to explain the value of SEO and how SEO works.
Although, sometimes I got success, but that sometimes are very hard to come.
Honestly I think a few blog posts on client management would be useful for many SEO's, as no matter how experienced they are in SEO there are always times when people are just not that easy to work with.
Perhaps a blog post which discusses an efficient way to provide monthly reports to a client? Or how to approach a manager about proposing some new changes to the website? Things that can help improve a persons confidence in communicating, as that seems to be an issue a lot of people struggle with.
[Nudging our blog manager, Felicia] ;)
Those are great ideas for posts, and right in line with things we're now planning!
Consider me nudged! Great ideas, Adam, I'm betting I can incorporate those topics into our editorial calendar quite soon-ish. :)
Great idea Adam, thanks.
Great survey outcome summarization! I've been following MOZ since it was SEOMOZ back in 2004, and it encouraged me to stop focusing on only designing websites which I did for 8 years, and only focus now on Marketing & SEO. I follow many of the other SEO related websites too, but hands-down, the Whiteboard Fridays had me hooked for 10+ years.
I am on here every day, and glad to read & see the outcome of a survey that I was a part of.
MOZ is still the first SEO based site that I check on daily.
That's as far back as the blog goes! Thank you so much for sticking with us through the years. It's heartwarming to know that some folks get enough value to keep coming back -- that's absolutely our goal!
Cheers. =)
RE: If anyone has any additional insight into why they read less often than they once did, please let us know in the comments below!
I think it has to do with experience-level and adult learning theory. I have to wear all the hats for a small business so time management and prioritization are pursued with religious fervor. As I dive into a new hat, I read everything and with great frequency until I have a good base knowledge. After that, any details are only relevant and therefore retained when they can be immediately applied.
I have seen a pattern where I read absolutely everything from a blog, learn quite a bit, cherry pick what I want and then eventually unsubscribe because I know and value the source and will come do a search for what I need, when I will actually be applying it.
That's a really interesting insight, Heather -- thanks for the note. I think you're probably right, and that makes me think of a way we conceptualize the difference between our Blog and our Learning Center. When folks dive into the early stages of SEO (their "new hat"), they need lots of resources to help them wrap their heads around the entirety of the subject, including some beginner-level stuff. That's how we envision the Learning Center helping. Once they've got that period under their belts, all they really need is occasional new tips/tricks, and to stay on top of changes in the industry -- that's more of what we imagine the Blog being for. Sort of similar to your observation.
I wonder, then, if we're just building a bigger and bigger base of people who've gotten "over the hump," and don't need to learn as much as they once did. That'd make good sense to me, and would explain the shifts in percentages...
Great analysis by Moz! Nicely penned Mr. Klein. It gives nice insights on how the world of SEO is changing. I would like to also see an analysis done by Moz which can show data country-wise. May be pick-up some major countries! Doing this can really help a lot as SEO folks around the world will be able to understand the trends of SEO worldwide.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Chirag Patel.
Great report and results!!!
Really congratulations for this great blog. Although English is not my native language I understand it more or less and I help the translator to keep following you. The truth that post to post I have been hunting ideas that have helped me to improve.
These results are really interesting most of us define our self as a medium level SEO specialist, not Guru... make sense....Most of us share the same problems clients/colleagues/bosses don't about SEO (value and how it works), Time and Budget constraints.
Jajajaja sounds like my diary
I took part in the survey and the results make interesting reading - I would like to add that I am always pressured for time to read long blog posts although the blog is always worth reading which is why I take the time. I would say more video posts would suit me - am a fan of Whiteboard Friday - I can take in the information in a more enjoyable and quicker way during a break at work. The transcript is useful to refer to as well.
You're certainly not alone in that desire, Rachel -- the survey responses showed quite a few folks in a similar boat, asking for more videos and quicker ways of consuming posts. We'll definitely work on that. Thanks so much for your thoughts!
Nice! I just discovered "Search Engine Roundtable" blog that I didn't know about!
Also, I know that it is not the favorite topic according to your study, but I would love to see more Local SEO and Google Map SEO blog posts!
Thanks for the input, Jean-Christophe! Local didn't get a whole lot of attention in the survey results, so I'm glad to see it mentioned here. =)
Thanks for the survey! Very insightful!
> If anyone has any additional insight into why they read less often than they once did, please let us know in the comments below!
Bring back YouMoz! :)
Thanks, Igor -- do you actually read the blog less often because we haven't published YouMoz posts? (I'm wondering if you can explain in a little more detail.)
For one, there is less content to read. Plus it was different, with Moz blog you pretty much move in one direction as a reader, but with Youmoz you get great articles from experts in other fields, cool cases, how-to's and etc.
Have to agree here, YouMoz is missed.
Maybe I'm not visiting the blog less often, but I do remember sharing a lot more articles with the rest of our company when YouMoz was alive.
I sent this specific post to our News editor as I think we should run a similar survey. But I remember a much wider range of topics on YouMoz, and I'd often send them to all levels of our SEO team, Social Media, GA, Product, Design, PPC, Tech, and even Sales.
On the other hand, I guess that it's also related to the decision to focus solely on SEO, which is great, but has some downsides too :)
Happy you guys are considering bringing YouMoz back, even if in a different form. And thanks for sharing the results, super interesting!
Thanks to you both for your thoughts -- these are some of the first requests we've seen to bring that back. It's been on our roadmap, but it hadn't been a priority, as we just hadn't seen the demand. Might have to change that. =)
1) I would guess the reason desktop view is much greater than mobile is because of how people are consuming the blog. I and I would bet many others read your blog at work where we're on a desktop computer.
2) I watch the Whiteboard Friday video every week as it gives me a break from having to read. I occasionally read other articles that come through from my email during the week but those articles have to be relevant to work or projects I'm currently working on. I mostly want to listen and consume rather than actively engage in reading which is what drives me to always consume the Whiteboard Friday videos and not always read the articles. There is a lack of quality videos related to SEO or well-promoted, quality videos, and I would love to see Moz develop more video content. Maybe it could be a way to tackle the short-form content and news/industry updates.
3) I noticed a change in the email newsletter format shortly after the survey came through and I do not like the new format. The layout perceives that it is a list of relevant or curated articles when you're simply sharing one article. The header is also very big now and hides the beginning of the article. I am even less inclined to read additional articles than I was before due to the new format. The old format was cleaner and easier to read to me.
Thanks for the additional thoughts, Heidi! I think you're likely right about why people prefer desktops; there probably aren't all that many of us reading blogs like the Moz Blog in their leisure time. =)
Sorry for the trouble with the new email format -- we've shifted our subscription services over to HubSpot, and are having trouble getting it to pick up any of the CSS, so the formatting has been messy lately. We're working with HubSpot's support team to iron it out, and hopefully it'll be back to normal soon!
On that note, when it asked how I prefer to read "blog posts" I interpreted it as "Moz Blog Posts," and based on the number of desktop answers, I presume so did most people. Is that how you meant it?
Interesting. No, I meant it as blog posts in general, but this discussion has me thinking that was a bit short-sighted. I think I should have clarified that I meant other blogs too, and also that we're interested in blogs you read for work purposes.
Well as long as you only meant blogs for work purposes, then you probably got the result you were looking for out of the people who interpreted it as just Moz.
The truth is that your blog is a reference for all those who are dedicated to digital marketing.
Thanks for your contributions.
Thanks!
This is my first Moz comment since 2011. I don't write comments regularly, and I certainly don't read them regularly either.
In support and expansion on your idea around improving commenting through UI changes, here is my take:
These comment threads are so 2005. They are linear. There are many voices covering many topics. There is no common narrative or question.
Many of us SEOs live in the world of spreadsheets and project management software. The current commenting system sounds a bit like cocktail party chatter compared to how we spend the rest of our days.
A superior commenting system would be structured around themes. It would have topics below it that if clicked on would open pointed discussions. Thus, this article would have had multiple topics based on the talk points- including one on commenting. I would've clicked on that option, and it would've opened sub-topics. I would've clicked on the UI sub-topic and would have put my comments there. (Think Reddit threads)
Taking this one step further, the Commenting > UI sub-topic for this blog would then be accessible in a knowledge base, so that when we are looking for UI suggestions for commenting we can see the discussions that have been had.
Thus comments are more pointed and they are building a valuable resource knowledge base.
Thanks for the ideas, Ken -- I'm now fascinated by the idea of completely re-thinking how we structure commenting, especially given that I've never seen it done before. Seems like most sites have a conversation along the line of "it's called Disqus? ...and it won't cost too much? Okay, yeah, just do that."
I do love the idea of tagging comments in order to make them accessible in a knowledge base. That's a very manual process at the moment -- we see a great comment thread that brings new ideas to light, and we then suggest those ideas as a new post to our authors.
I think applying an overarching structure, though, might end up detracting from the experience, as it'd be nearly impossible to categorize each comment. Take your example of a UI sub-topic. We'd have comments in there that ranged from "boy I hate the sticky social sharing buttons on your blog," to "the author's point about responsive interfaces was a great one," etc. We'd almost have to create custom sub-topics for each post in order to make it intelligible, since the threads in these comments are so unique to each post.
I'm definitely going to noodle over what changes we might be able to make to the commenting to make them more useful and easier to consume, though, and if you end up with any other ideas, I'd love to hear them!
Thanks Trevor! Some results are really interesting. I am surprised about the fact that people are not commenting because they are afraid of being judged or critisied... I think it will add a lot of value if more people starts commenting and asking their questions (no question is stupid).
I absolutely agree, Mario. I completely understand the feeling, but those kinds of questions and discussions are what these comments are for!
Excellent study
Pleased to have participated in this survey