May It Please the Mozzers,
Last week, many of you requested more posts on common contract clauses. Your wish is my command:
Today, I'm very briefly going to review "opportunity to cure" provisions. This provision is valuable for anyone providing SEO/M consulting services.
Last week, many of you requested more posts on common contract clauses. Your wish is my command:
Today, I'm very briefly going to review "opportunity to cure" provisions. This provision is valuable for anyone providing SEO/M consulting services.
Why do I need to include an "opportunity to cure" provision in my consulting contracts?
Unfortunately, many consultants will run into this problem at some point in their careers:
You meet a potential client and discuss working together. You are engaged to do the job. You perform the work and send an invoice to the client. The client does not send payment. Instead, the client sues you, requesting a refund for all monies paid to date, lost profits, money equal to the cost of hiring another SEO ,and attorneys' fees. You're completely shocked because you didn't even know there was a problem. Further, it becomes clear that if you had known about it, you could have done something about client satisfaction.
The above scenario is not uncommon.
It is even more common for the client to refuse payment because he or she is unsatisfied, but you don't find out about the dissatisfaction until they refuse to pay. Having an "opportunity to cure" clause can help resolve these issues by requiring the client to talk to you before withholding payment.
Please note, perfectly competent and talented consultants have client problems. They arise because (1) everyone is fallible and things fall through the cracks, and (2) miscommunication occurs in every professional relationship. Don't think that just because you are a talented SEO/M that you are immune to client problems and therefore don't need to think about limiting your risk. Having the right contract language can help reduce risk and increase customer satisfaction.
You meet a potential client and discuss working together. You are engaged to do the job. You perform the work and send an invoice to the client. The client does not send payment. Instead, the client sues you, requesting a refund for all monies paid to date, lost profits, money equal to the cost of hiring another SEO ,and attorneys' fees. You're completely shocked because you didn't even know there was a problem. Further, it becomes clear that if you had known about it, you could have done something about client satisfaction.
The above scenario is not uncommon.
It is even more common for the client to refuse payment because he or she is unsatisfied, but you don't find out about the dissatisfaction until they refuse to pay. Having an "opportunity to cure" clause can help resolve these issues by requiring the client to talk to you before withholding payment.
Please note, perfectly competent and talented consultants have client problems. They arise because (1) everyone is fallible and things fall through the cracks, and (2) miscommunication occurs in every professional relationship. Don't think that just because you are a talented SEO/M that you are immune to client problems and therefore don't need to think about limiting your risk. Having the right contract language can help reduce risk and increase customer satisfaction.
What does an "opportunity to cure" provision do?
An "opportunity to cure" contract provision requires the dissatisfied client to give you the chance to fix any problems before terminating the contract or suing you. By requiring the client to contact you about problems, you are given the opportunity to cure any oversights and to transform the unhappy client into a satisfied client.
You are also decreasing your risk of liability because the client is required (in most cases) to give you the opportunity to cure before going to court or withholding pay.
In short, it requires the client to do what you hope they would do anyway: talk to you about their dissatisfaction so that you can do something about it. By talking about the issues, you can resolve disputes and avoid lawsuits.
A few things you should know about "opportunity to cure" provisions
- Contract law varies state by state. Each state has its own rules about enforcing these kinds of provisions. These provisions are generally favored by courts because they help resolve disputes outside of court.
- HOWEVER, many states don't require a client to follow the notice and opportunity to cure provisions when there has been dishonesty, fraud, or when it is impossible to fix to the underlying problem. In other words, if you're dishonest or if you make a mistake that cannot be fixed, the Court will not require the client to give you an opportunity to fix the problem.
- They act as a shield against lawsuits. In most cases, the client must give you a chance to fix the problem before coming to court or refusing to pay.
- If you don't have language in your contract requiring an opportunity to cure defects, the client doesn't have to let you know there is a problem before bringing suit.
Opportunity to Cure. Prior to any claim for damages being made, you must provide SEOmoz with reasonable notice of any alleged deficiencies in performance and SEOmoz shall have a reasonable opportunity to cure any alleged defect in performance.
As you can see, it's pretty basic language. We use the "reasonable" opportunity standard, but it is also common to have a specific number of days to fix any problems. It depends on the industry, but anywhere from 10 to 30 days would be reasonable in most SEO/M consulting contracts.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about this important contract provision.
Best Regards,
Sarah
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about this important contract provision.
Best Regards,
Sarah
Excellent, but is there a reason why the clause is a bit vague? I know that you can get into trouble at times by being too specific (and thus opening unspecified loopholes) but wouldn't it be good to specify that notice be in writing and a minimum number of biz days to respond? If the door is left open for verbal comunication you can be exposed if your client turns out to be a psychopathic liar.
I've actually been through this exact scenario before and I'm probably a bit paranoid.
That's a great point David.
In our contract, we have a separate section on just "Notices." It requires all notices to be written and sent to very specific addresses.
More detail is better.
Thanks for pointing that out.
*** ... shall have a reasonable opportunity to cure any alleged defect in performance. ***
To me, this implies that you have to fix the defect once they point it out. What if what they point out is not a defect, or they are asking for something to be done which will harm their site?
What can of worms would this open up?
*** ... shall have a reasonable opportunity to cure, or refute, any alleged defect in performance. ***
That's the good news. You're not obligated to fix it. You're only entitled to the opportunity to fix it.
Obviously, sometimes you're not going to be able to please a client. Maybe what they want is impossible or unethical. This gives you the chance to make the customer happy, but not the obligation.
Thanks for your comment!
This is a fantastic idea! I’ll be adding this in my contracts immediately. It’s funny how little things like this slip your mind in the heat of battle. Thank you for the information.
I have seen this used before:
Warranties
Company will modify the client’s website and modify or create the client’s website’s online affiliations in a manner that Company believes will improve the client’s websites search engine listings.Due to the nature of internet search engine rankings, there is no performance guarantee written or implied in regards to the listing order of search engine results or standings. Search engines and internet search providers can, and do, change their search listings and/or ranking priority parameters at any time and without notice. Company has no direct authority or control over nor any agreement with search engines or internet search providers.
yes,i trust... a seo good imforation for everyone....
I like this one too!
Thanks Sarah for your words of wisdom, and thanks Rand for allowing us to all benefit from (non-SEO) business insights such as this by allowing Sarah to freely share.
It's often the little things, when implemented into a contract, that can make a large difference and it seems this clause is one of those elements.
great post.
usually communication from the contact point and the person writing the check varies, it's good to have these things.
I also recommend a clause like this:
In no event will YOUR COMPANY NAME be liable to Client, or any third party, for any damages, lost profits, lost savings or other incidental, consequential or special damages arising out of the operation, or inability to operate email, the web site, SEO campaign, or print projects. This includes any copyright, trademark, patent, tort, contract, or any other claim.
Thanks for the great post.
I'll look to incorporate it in agreements going forward.
All of my deals are done in a dark alley with cash only but there is usually a big green dumpster next to where we meet up. I suppose I can write out my right to cure on the side of the dumpster. Yup, That'll work. :)
Great post, Sarah. Thank you.
Cheers,
@Trontastic
great point on this site! I learn something about SEO and it's very informative one. Thanks Sarah.
lol when I first read this title I thought you meant giving the SEO an opportunity to "cure." That-is, it takes a while for the SEO value to really sink in - sometimes literally a year or longer of one tactic/link being in effect before the true value is felt.
Great point by the way and I am not arguing against this provision just against the concept of it being needed. If you use other language that covers the fact that it takes time for the "ham to cure," then doesn't that minimize the need as well for the cure provision as you describe it?
The other thing is I don't know why the full work was ever delivered without the full payment. 40% down, 40% on delivery of recommendations, 20% after X days is how we structure a lot of deals. The ongoing work is billed monthly...the most you can ever lose isn't much if you are not doing the work without getting paid. Of course it takes clout, references and trust to engage in contracts like that, but if you can back it up with 90%+ client retention numbers people are generally willing to sign.
Sarah hope to meet you again at SES San Jose?
Being new to contracts, this should come as no surprise, but I had never thought about this. Thanks Sarah!
Sarah, you're terrific - love this important information you're so willing to share.
A really useful post, Sarah. Thank you.
Your posts make SEOMoz different from other blogs. One always gets wonderful business insights in your posts.
Keep up the good work.
I'm no legal expert, but I'm guessing "defects," as in g1smd's question above, are defined by the deliverables of the contract.
This would go back to Sarah's last post on including a warranty in your contracts.
An excerpt:
"Including a solid warranty disclaimer limits your liability in the event that you can't get your client to the top of the rankings and/or can't sustain high rankings for your client."
In general, I follow the rule of "assume no understanding on the client's behalf" when writing a proposal/contract. It can make for lengthy contracts, but trying to save time now can cause a lot of pain later.
Sarah,
As always, great job. I thought my contract was "fool proof," but anytime you get people involved there is room for misunderstanding. This is a point I tended to overlook. Maybe my expectation that we would have open communication with clients. You do a great job of explaining this point and how important it could be. I know I'll be adding it to our future contracts.
Thanks
This is an excellent post. I really like your legal series.
Would this provide any protection against a loser client that just decides they won't pay you?
It offers some protection, but it's not full proof. Here's what I mean.
Let's assume you do the work according to the deliverables described in the contract. Then you invoice the client and he refuses to pay and accuses you of not delivering what she wanted.
You can tell her that she is required to give you notice and opportunity to fix it before she can withhold payment. Otherwise, you have the right to sue her and she cannot use the "defective services" as a counter-claim against you. She is required to give you the chance to fix it before withholding payment.
Here's the rub though: For true 'deadbeat' clients, these kinds of threats aren't going to inspire her to pay you. She would rather wait until you sue her or a collection agency starts in after her. Thus, if you're not willing to go to Court and collect the money through legal proceedings, this it may not be that useful for collection purposes. Most of the time, it's not worth going to court over collection issues. It has to be a pretty sizeable debt to make it worth it.
If you did bring this 'deadbeat' client to court, then having such a clause would definitely help you. It just so seldom worth the expense of court.
Having a provision for attorneys' fees in your contract will help make using the legal system for collections worth it.
Thanks for your question!
This is a great reason to craft your agreement so that you collect as much money as possible early and often in the relationship. The last payment is always the hardest one to get.
Thanks Sarah, another great post for us lowly web workers. :)
Its always good to know things like this. I'm not sure how it applies to Australian law but I have so many lawyers in my family, I'm sure one of them is bound to know. :)
Excellent post again Sarah :)
I was wondering if you know if this type of clause also holds weight in the UK - or if any other UK based mozzers know?
I was just going to ask the same question Hannah! Anyone know?
I'm no UK law expert, but I would be very surprised if such clauses were not favored in the UK, Canada and Australia. All three countries are based on the same common law system that tends to respect privately contracted rights, so long as they aren't manifestly unfair in a significant way.
The 'opportunity to cure clause' is generally favored by courts because it is such a common sense way to encourage the resolution of disputes outside of court.
Also, I have a vague memory of negotiating a contract with a UK party in which they included such a clause.
Hope this helps!
Perfect! Thanks for this Sarah :)
Excellent post again Sarah. Expecting more post on SEO contracts. I need more such inputs from experts as I'm reworking on the contract. Looking forward for more post.
Thanks for making this post brief, like the last one. I really enjoy reading your material, but I have to admit that I skipped some of the 'scroll forever' ones..
Wow Sarah ... great point. I will be adding this to our contracts immediately. Thanks for the great advice, and keep it coming!