Homepages were once the ultra-authoritative one-stop shops of online brands. As people and search engines have become better at understanding what users are looking for, though, the purpose of homepages has become more targeted. In today's Whiteboard Friday, Rand details several of the changes we've seen, and offers his advice for what to include on a truly effective homepage on the web today.
For reference, here's a still of this week's whiteboard!
Video transcription
Howdy Moz fans, and welcome to a new edition of Whiteboard Friday, the very first one of 2014. Hope you all had a wonderful happy New Year and a great holiday season, whatever you might celebrate.
This week, I think since January's the time when a lot of us revisit our core web marketing and a lot of the times what we're doing on our websites, we should talk about the starting point—the homepage. The homepage is a critically important page for a lot of reasons. Oftentimes it's one of, if not the most, trafficked web page that we have on our websites. It's also the starting point for where people try and understand our brand and our company and what we do.
Substantively, its role has changed over the last few years with big shifts like search engines being a little less focused around who gets links and how that influences the keywords that you rank for, a little less about the homepage being the only page that people land on, and whether they're coming just to the homepage, or whether they go into separate sections of the site. What people want and expect from homepages has changed over the years, what they expect to find there, and, thus, what we as marketers need to do to deliver on those expectations.
So I thought I'd start by talking about some of the old ways of doing things with homepages and the new ways of doing them.
In the old way, we'd promote all of the major sections of the site on the homepage. So you might have a homepage that's like, "Oh, check out our blog, and here's our product, and here's this other thing that we're doing. Oh and this new launch point." Each of these get featured, or they kind of scroll through them. It's really the homepage very much competing for attention. You can think of that Yahoo! homepage model being the discovery point for everything on the site. If you don't get homepage real estate, well, you're not important.
This is totally wrong in 2014, because really we can make all of those major sections easy to navigate to and find. We can focus very uniquely on just one section, on just the most important things that the most important customers and visitors are trying to get answers to and what they expect when they get to that homepage.
We don't need to say like, "Hey, I have this great feature and this other thing. Oh, we just launched this content. Let me promote everything, and I'll just try and capture a small bit of everyone's attention." This focus is not nearly as good as trying to be a little bit more of a, "Here's how to navigate to these sections. Let me just promote the most important thing and make that homepage more of a focused experience."
We've seen tons and tons of examples of folks A/B testing and testing different versions of their homepage, and that focus, really, really critical to driving people through.
Old way: focus on lots of keywords. A lot of homepages would focus on a lot different keywords. The reason being—it's not that hard to understand—the homepage, in the classic old, old Google, it would be your highest PageRank page and, therefore, could rank the most things. Then, as Google got more sophisticated and less about just PageRank, it was also the page that earned the most links. Often, the anchor text was fairly diversified that would link to that homepage, and so were all these other signals. So the homepage could rank for a lot of stuff that other pages couldn't. So, "You know what? Let's just smack all the keywords that we possibly can onto the homepage."
In the current model, we actually don't need to do that, because Google and Bing have both become much more sophisticated about understanding, "Hey, this site is about all of these things, not necessarily just this page. We're much more considerate as engines of the site's authority in different areas and around keyword terms and phrases. So, if that site has a page that specifically focuses on these topics, you know what? We're going push that up there, even if the page itself doesn't have all the signals that it needs to rank, because the site does."
You inherit your site's strength and authority into your internal pages. Because of that, I can now focus on a small subset of keywords on my homepage, possibly only one or two, possibly not even any keywords. I can just think about branded-centric keywords, not even unbranded keywords, and I can really have landing pages specific to those unbranded keywords deeper down in the sections.
This also means that you don't have to make the focus of the homepage so all over the place. You can get it much more refined and defined to focus on that specific set of people who are coming directly there.
Because of this, too, the old style was to put lots of text to help the homepage rank for all those pages. Now, we don't need that, but we really do need to communicate quickly, because web users have become more and more impatient. They're not going to read through paragraph and paragraph and paragraph of text. Therefore, many, many websites have found it valuable to use visual-centric homepages to help communicate and to quickly convey the primary value proposition to those visitors. Sometimes that's a video. Sometimes it's just an image or graphic that explains things really clearly. That can work out great.
We also used to have to serve many types of visitors. This was both for SEO reasons, but also because people would come for lots of different reasons and then expect the homepage to guide them to whatever is interesting. Now, people use search engines to find those different things around your brand and then navigate directly to them. Social media is really about referring to specific pieces of content, not just the homepage. Not like, "Hey, the Economist wrote a great article. Go to TheEconomist.com" No, they're going to send you a link right to the correct page. So you have a little bit more of that focus. You can just work on the most critical visitors and their needs and the messaging that you need to convey to them.
There also used to be this real concept of, "Keep it above the fold."
Thanks to things like tablets and phones, as well as wider screens and that sort of stuff, now we do a lot more scrolling. We're used to a lot more scrolling. So really people will scroll. I still urge folks to just make sure you keep some page content at the scroll line or near the traditional scroll lines, depending on your visitors' resolution. Keep that experience compelling to draw the eye down. The thing you don't want to do -- I'll show you in my sample homepage here—the thing I don't want to do is have the scroll line or the fold line, one of the big traditional fold lines for my primary visitors, be right here, so that it looks like I can get all the content I need above the fold, but in fact there's all this above the fold. If the scroll line instead is right here, and it bisects this secondary text section, perfect. Now I've drawn the eye down. Now people certainly will scroll, and that stuff will have visibility. You'll have that expectation.
So, speaking of this sample homepage, I'm going to talk about some things that I, personally, would nudge folks and generally nudge folks to do on their homepages. This is not to say that every single company should go with exactly this type of homepage, but I think that these nudges can help to order your thinking and to possibly give you some ideas about things you might be doing right or wrong on your site, might want to test, might want to talk about as you're kicking off 2014 with your homepage.
So first up, (A), right up top here, the logo and the nav. This is just standard 101 stuff. My general bias is to keep this the same logo and nav as other pages. However, the homepage is unique in that it's sometimes okay to be a little different from other pages on the site. I would urge you to have consistency across the rest of the site. If your homepage has to be a little bit varied because of some things you want to do, that's okay. But I like that nav staying consistent throughout the whole site. That's my general bias.
(B) Check out this image. I'm going to imagine that I'm Pocket, Pocket app, which I have on my phone and I use on my desktop and laptop computers. It's a great little app. The idea is that I've got an article that I want to read, maybe on a plane, and I want to read it on my phone. But, of course, I don't have a wi-fi signal on especially international flights, but even most of my US flights. Or I want to read it just anytime. I'm sitting in the car on a long drive down to Portland. Great. So I can click and save any article, any web page I see on the Internet, I can save that to Pocket and go fetch it for later, and it automatically caches. So I don't even need a web connection to be able to do that. I love Pocket app. It's great.
But explaining it with a bunch of heavy text and having like "read things later" and lots of different keywords stuff, that probably doesn't make sense. What does make sense is, "Let me quickly and easily explain it to you." So here's a guy, he's on his phone, and here's his thought bubble saying, "This is cool, but I wish I could read it later." Oh. "Go to Pocket, and now you can. Read anytime on any device without a web connection." Ah-ha! The value proposition of Pocket app is instantly conveyed in a visual format, which, as we all know, human beings are much better at taking visual cues and interpreting information from visuals rather than text alone.
So that's (B). Visually explain, make it visual, to easily explain what the product, company, service does. I want that visual. I would urge you to test a visual to easily explain what that does. Show it to a bunch of people who have no idea what you do. If they grasp it, great.
If you offer lots of products, make sure to convey the value proposition of what you do. If you're a clothing brand and you offer lots of different things, "Well, which picture should we use?" Well, quickly convey what your unique value proposition is. What it is about your clothing line that's so great, that's so much better? Is it where it's made and that it's hand crafted? Is it the quality of the material? Is it price? Is it something else? Make sure that you're delivering that unique value proposition. So I've got this (C) section. Does it work for XYZ? Like, "Well, can I use this on my Android? Can I use it on my iPhone? Will it also work on desktop?" Ah-ha! Excellent. I'm going to be empathetic and intuitive. Oftentimes this comes from experience. You know the things that, as soon as someone hears about your product, they instantly have these questions. So just answer them right there. I really like that section existing on the homepage. Then you can go into more detail in product pages as well.
(D) I like giving social proof. So lots of websites do this on their homepage—showing the logo of news outlets that have covered them or big brands that use them that are very trustworthy or testimonials. I personally have found a lot of value in testimonials. I like them quite a bit, especially when they're people who your audience knows who that person is. So you see an Avinash Kaushik or a Wil Reynolds or a Will Critchlow recommending Moz, you kind of go, "Well, I know who those guys are. They're very impressive, well-known web marketers from across the industry. Let me check that out. That must be good." So that's social proof credibility signals.
And the last thing that I really like having on your homepage is a call to action. Last, but certainly not least, a call to action. "How do I install this?" "Well, you do this, you do this, or you do this." So, for Pocket app, it might be, "If you have an Android, go to the Google Play Store. If you have Apple, go to the iPhone store. Want to use it on your desktop? Install the widget right here." Great. Cool, right? There's my call to action just sitting there, ready for me to go and do something. I think guiding someone to that next step is a key part of how successful a homepage operates. Then you can really test the success of your homepage as well, based on whether people engage and go there.
So I hope you've got some great ideas for your homepages in 2014. I look forward to hearing from you all. Thanks so much.
Rand, I think this is a wonderful first WBF for 2014! Just some thoughts and predictions on where this may all lead (though I admit that it's not based on any concrete data at the moment).
Because of that, I can now focus on a small subset of keywords on my homepage, possibly only one or two, possibly not even any keywords.
I perhaps foresee a time when home pages specifically are used not to target organic keywords but primarily as destinations for direct traffic, branded searches, and PR-based referral traffic. Say a person sees my brand mentioned in a newspaper or on Facebook and then he searches Google for my brand name's URL. He's now interested in what I offer. My meta title and meta description should, first and foremost, be written in a "sales" way to get him to click to my site. In this context, it's not about keywords. For more and more sites, I'm writing this meta information on the home page without bothering to include any keywords if the sales message is better without them.
many websites have found it valuable to use visual-centric homepages to help communicate and to quickly convey the primary value proposition to those visitors.
So, the home page should focus on converting people -- especially since those coming from branded searches and PR-based referral traffic are often already further down in the sales funnel. In contrast, internal pages -- all those pages with all the great content -- aim to rank highly for people searching for more general, informational topics that relate to the business and what it offers since those people are higher in the sales funnel and need great content to push them down the funnel.
To summarize:
1. Home page -- Targets brand searches, direct traffic, and referral traffic from general PR coverage. People arriving at the home page from these sources are already interested, so focus on direct conversion rather than keywords.
2. Internal sections and specific pages -- Targets informational queries (or commercial and transactional queries in other contexts) with content. Aims to get top-of-the-funnel traffic that is then pushed to convert -- sales, form submissions, e-mail sign-ups, and so on -- via calls to action and other means.
Just some random thoughts. Looking forward to more WBFs in 2014!
A suggestion from someone who did and does that same as you: when your comments start being more than 3 paragraphs... transform it in a post (a YouMoz would be even a better idea) :).
Great idea! Already published one YouMoz and have another in the queue.
However, didn't Rand himself once say that he likes in-depth comments that invite discussion rather than short, pithy ones? :)
By the way, did we meet at SMX Milan? I spoke on the "How to Build Links with PR" panel...
Indeed we did. I was in the "Hitchhiker's Guide to Google Changes" one.
Hey Rand, happy new year.
I have two remarks on your video, 1. can you give us examples of good home pages?
2. You speak about how a majority of visitors come through the home page, and from how I see it, this is not true, most websites that we see, have the majority of users landing on other subpages. Is this something we need to think about?
I would also like to see some example of good home pages. For number two, I think Rand was referring to how on most sites the home page receives more traffic than other pages.
Yes Ryan, I am agree with you. As per my experience we receive most visits for home page only as compare to other landing pages.
I'll let Rand speak to some of the good examples he's seen, but I think you may have misunderstood what he said about the ways in which users arrive on the homepage (he was talking about the way things used to be):
We also used to have to serve many types of visitors. This was both for SEO reasons, but also because people would come for lots of different reasons and then expect the homepage to guide them to whatever is interesting. Now, people use search engines to find those different things around your brand and then navigate directly to them. Social media is really about referring to specific pieces of content, not just the homepage.
You're absolutely right -- people are navigating directly to subpages within a site from all over the web, and that's definitely something we should think about!
I always wonder what makes for the best way to organize the home page and have stressed over it from the first time I began my website. I too would love to see your examples of what a good home page design would be.
Hey Rand Happy new year,
Its one of the best post of Whiteboard Friday. Its really very important to make website home page perfect. you right, focus so many keywords for home page, display all major segment on home page are looks terrible. New tips for home page which you described in this post is perfect. Every one have to follow this tips and change website home page.
Thank you rand for sharing this important stuff.
Moz really needs to work on its comment rankings if this is the first comment to show up, it's just nonsense.
Dear Seth... the only thing I saw a little weird in Sid comment was its grammar, but English is not his first language and he left a reasonable comment anyway... I wonder if you (or me) could do the same in his language (or mine) :).
Said that, the comment ranking is very simple, as it is based over the number of thumbs up discounted the thumbs down a comment receive.
Gianluca, I'd be very concerned if I started commenting on an Italian site and no one responded to how poorly I was doing at it.
That being said, grammar isn't my issue with the comment at all. Your grammar is not always on point, yet I value your contributions tremendously. I just don't think that the comment added anything to the conversation whatsoever, yet when I watched this post this morning, this was the top comment. Several comments below this one (including yours) contributed to the post in a meaningful way.
The ranking of comments on this site is TOO simple, IMO, and I think the comment section would be more useful if some effort was made to raise better commenters to the top of the pile. It's a very easily-gamed system, nothing stops someone from upvoting themselves with fake accounts for example. It normally takes reading through a lot of junk comments to get to anything meaningful.
This is an interesting concept that I've thought about in the recent past. The New York Times, for example, has editors that hand-pick the most valuable and discussion-driving comments, offering a separate (and default) view that prioritizes them.
Aside from the difficulty in implementing that sort of system, though, it's also something of an ethical dilemma, as the measure of comment quality is ideally up to the community, not just Mozzers. For that reason, the thumbs (while simplistic) are actually a decent indicator, so long as our community members are willing to use them. =)
Thumbs down are almost never used unless you make a negative comment about someone's comment. I'm all for a positive, supportive environment, but I really think it's making for a diluted comments section.
Thanks Seth, and I'm glad you replied to my comment. And I totally hear you... simply I found it not so TAGFEE toward Sid.
Said that, the system used by Moz is - as you say - too simplistic.
A good solution, and not so hard to implement maybe, is making that the "comment ranking factors" could be:
1) thumbs up (positive less negative);
2) answers to the comments;
3) the net thumbs up of comments generated by the first comment.
Said that, in order to give the correct visibility to new comments (which, if not, could get lost down in threads), an enhanced visibility of 30/60 minutes could be given to them in order to let them gain popularity and interest between the readers, if they deserve it. If they don't earn any of the three factors listed above, then the comment will slip down in the thread.
Those three factors, plus the visibility window for the new comments, could be enough for giving more visibility to the comments that deserve it, because adding value to the post.
Finally, remember that the Moz posts (in the main blog, as YouMoz works differently) are always published a 3am East Time, which is 9am for me, 8am in London and, if I'm not wrong, 1:30pm in Delhi and 4pm in Manila... that's why our Asian Mozzers are always the first commenting the Moz posts, followed by us Europeans and Africans... timezone is what makes that you see many comments you (and I) find not so useful.
On the other hand, being an Associate - hence knowing the backstage of the blog - I know how the editorial staff works hard in detecting thumbs spammers (and stalkers), advising and banning them.
Ciao
Since the aim of the comments is to incite discussions that expand upon the original post, adding in some weight for the number of nested comments (and their thumbs up) seems like a good idea, and is something that's likely easier to implement than a feature like the NYTimes uses.
That said, there are cases in which it could be detrimental, and you're reading one of them right now. The number of responses on this thread would move Sid's original comment back up toward the top. While we certainly appreciate Sid's kind words, it doesn't seem quite right to me to use our tangential conversation as a reason to move his comment back up the page.
In other words, there has to be some editorial review, whether by Mozzers or community members, as to whether a comment (and its resultant thread) are on- or off-topic, pushing only the on-topic comments higher up.
Yup, that's right... well, some sort of quality score should be added. An endorsement score by the Staff/Associate?
Gianluca, thanks so much for the info, very enlightening. I think Kinja has a pretty good model of staff endorsement mixed with quality scores of commenters (may be overkill for Moz, but a direction to shoot for). Also, they reward comments with lots of conversation happening on them, as well as how many 'recommendations' a post receives (there is no negative feedback mechanism). Unless a commenter has been preordained (they call it 'following') by the staff of the gawker blog the comment is left on, it won't even show unless the reader clicks "read all comments." If your post gets enough recommendations or a staff likes it, then it gets moved up to a visible spot on the post. I think you should have to earn, at least on some level, real estate on a post.
There are definitely some users on here that comment on every post even if they have nothing to say. And why wouldn't they if they have just as good a chance as any to show up on top, even if they are just saying something to the effect of "good article, I agree."? You give a marketer a vehicle to market themselves with, at least some of them are going to take you up on it.
I'm sorry this went so far off topic of the post (I should be demoted!), I'm not much of a commenter on this site, but i do get a lot of value in seeing people digest the information in a post. It helps me get started on an explanation of what's going on to my clients and staff. When I have to sift through mostly junk to get to the good parts, it's definitely not a good user experience for me. Seems like Moz of all sites would be concerned about that!:)
Again, thanks for the reply, Gianluca.
Wow, Gianluca, there's a general rule of thumb down the drain in no time at all! WAY more than three paragraphs! - LOL
(I hope you know I'm only kidding. Few people ramble on more than me!)
Hey Rand, great first post of year! I would like to hear a little more about the thought sequence as the foundation for building a conversation optimized homepage. Ultimately nowadays the homepage has the responsibility to keep users engaged. I often see the majority of users leaving the homepage in less than 10 seconds.
Personally,
I strongly suggest to focus on 1 keyword on the homepage.
Easy nav + best product or something.
Some contact possibilities & some social or biz proof (testimionals etc).
Like Rand said.
but...
If you're client isn't convinced,
try to convince them into taking an A/B test were you take away small items per step.
Less is more.
So they get a more clear look at their homepage.
Works like a charm to convince them to focus.
Seriously, Rand... with those hair and the longer beard we are looking frightfully (for you) similar.
Said that, great first WBF of 2014, and needed: it's incredible how many sites still have the "SEO content section" just above their footer, with their 200 words based on "keyword density rules". The saddest thing is that many still ask me to include those kind of things as my "on-page" tasks... and between those persons, not few are "SEOs".
"frightfully (for you) similar" - hmm may be in a few years - but nearby... this hairstyle makes him look a bit younger, I think you need a bit more styling :)
"incredible how many sites still have the "SEO content section" just above their footer" - the problem is that it still helps a lot as long as everybody is doing it. A little bit like never change a winning team.
Very good first WBF in 2014 - I think about some new Ideas for some new and some older of my homepages and will remember back to this WBF..
Great weekend to you folks!
LOL, I'm thankful I still have some hairs :) and... well, yes... sometimes Rand and I joke saying I'm him ten years in the future; and actually ten years separate us for real.
hmmm - I didn't say that you have less hair than Rand has. But it was in my mind :)
10 years was timespan difference I head in my mind between you two guys. I only have some connections to "Beiersdorf" but Nivea dosen't produce caffein shampoo :) When you need some other anti aging products we can speak again :)
Enaugh fun for today...
I'm just trying to keep up with your Italian+Valencian fashion forwardness, my friend :-) Happy New Year!
One question. We should also avoid affiliate/ads on home page, if it is a blog?
As always, the answer is: "it depends".
If those ads are not:
then you can use them.
Thanks Gianluca Fiorelli
:( I find I have much to learn. I'm in the process of redesigning our website, and realize I have way too much text on it. Time to go back to the drawing board: simpli-fi
Hey Rand Happy new year,
I always wonder what makes for the best way to organize the home page and have stressed over it from the first time I began my website. I too would love to see your examples of what a good home page design would be.
Its really very important to make website homepage perfect. you right, concentrate so many search phrases for home page.
Tejas Shah SEO
Nice one! Will definitely help me out.
One of the key benefits I've seen on a well thought out homepage, certainly for a website with a lot of traffic is it heavily reduces the bandwidth if you have a full comprehensive homepage.
Hi Rand great post. Happy New Year. Keep Simple the Home Page with Interesting Content.
It is interesting to see some pages rank even though they didn't have the standard SEO signals in place. I believe and actually agree with this change from Google if they truly are after a more organic result.
GREAT WBF Rand to kick off this New Year!!! Home page indeed is a brand page ad we don't need to be on keyword focusing. Instead going for too much of content, being more visual is what is preferred by users. Also the pocket concept cam from an app pocket which was also integrated by Apple into their browsers as "Read Later". All the valuables that one would like to offer in order to build a brand is what a home page ought to focused on to. Also well said about the credibility signals are very effective for people who are in the new visitor segments as that would foster a sense of trust as well. What would you say about the placement of social media icons on home page? What should ideally be done in this aspect?
Wow. This was one inspiring video! I have like four client sites in my mind right now and all need an update for the homepage. This is definitely something I have to fix fast. Thanks!
Although I am late on this video but still a very powerful content!
Rand, Happy New Year to you too and wishing all the best to Moz for 2014.
As far as the video is concern, I really like the idea that talks about explaining what you do visually and the best example is Neil Patel’s Tool Video!! I showed that video to my sister (nothing to do with IT) and she even understand a bit of what this video is all about and this is mainly because the content was easy and visuals were very powerful.
I fully agree with the point that if you can explain what you do in a video and if a person who has nothing to do with your industry can understand what that video is all about, you probably are a winner!
Thanks and Happy 2014 Rand! Indeed useful tips. But one question: With Google launched above the fold update last year, how should one manage to put content below the fold? I mean as you explained in the video about call to action, putting such thing beneath the fold will impress Google?
Great post as always Rand. People tend to forget about the power of the homepage.
Excellent post to start the new year, we would like add to it, and here it goes:
We feel that its the sole reason internet is filled with so much confusion, they have a product and they want to sell it, ask yourself do you really buy something just buy it or go with factors associated with it. if one actively thinks or not its part of or rather what psychiatrists describe as extensions of one's identity, the self the I. Everyone's favorite poster boy Apple, sole reason everyone is attraction is no other Brand feels like a leader, ground breaking enough or are sad Wanna Be's.
Interesting thing about almost all the Luxury brands are they have mastered how to position themselves, go through all these brands and spend some time on their homepages.
cartier | swarovski | bulgari | tiffany
Despite being in the same field, selling the same goods, they all have positioned themselves way apart, just few seconds on their home page validates that. Design is not superficiality, it is not the color the typography its the effective use of all the means, resulting in how well it fits into Customer's self extension.
I think we can write a detailed post on it, we do have a post on our design perception there in case you wish to have look.
Would like to finish on this quote (replace rifle with Brand), no points for guessing the film :)
"This is my rifle. There are many like it but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my rifle is useless. Without my rifle I am useless. I must fire my rifle true."
Cheers!
I strongly agree with Rand but I am surprised as it contradicts what is hot! I have conducted a research around new trends in web designs and I have seen lots and lots of 1 Page Templates either on Theme Forest or other sources. This is one hot trend! According to Rand, such websites are not going to help a lot. Please give your opinion!
Image, Whats about adding few slider banners to explain what the website is offering. Slider with multiple banners can explain few of the services or offers that website is offering.
Whats about big website that have blog, forum, elearning, services and some free apps, How can they actually display their homepage?
First of all I would like to appreciate the effort of Mr. Rand Fishkin he tried to present such information through a video tutorial. You have compared 4 old and new methods to bring traffic on your home page. Old ways were fill of unwanted key words, lot of text etc. Please explain these things on a real web page thanks.
Great info rand , Thanks a lot on explaining this homepage section . It really helps me lot on correcting these measures in 2014 .
Hi Rand:
Really great WBF. I'm new to this and have been building a home page and reading as much as I can about what to include, and that of course gets confusing. You answered a lot of my questions, particularly on how much text to include, as the standard I kept hearing was 300 words for SEO effectiveness. You really explain things well and tell a great story. Thanks for the help. -Wes
Although this information was good, I would have liked to see some example pages. Visual references are a much required descriptive element concerning websites. I own a San Antonio Roadside Assistance business and want my site to be informative and yet still cause the customer to follow my call to action.
[link removed]
get it, now i need to fix my web title and i remove the trademark symbol . any suggestion is welcome for my heart necklace: https://www.heartnecklace.us . thank you.
Always good to return to this whiteboard friday post, in order to remind yourself to review your home page, and remember to keep those target audience personas in mind.
Wow. This is great overview of the changing importance of the homepage in relationship to the rest of the site. Thanks for the great insights! I've been struggling with how my homepage fits in the SEO environment. After viewing this WBF session, I have a clearer picture in my mind about the site keyword structure. I do not have to worry so much about splitting keywords between the home page and other important pages on my site.
Hello and good new year!
i like a lot this video.
from Italy a kind arrivederci! bye bye ;-)
Really liking the old ways vs. new ways presentation in the last few Whiteboard Friday's. Great video!
This is a great Whiteboard Friday, Rand. Thanks for taking the time to put it together. I think it would be cool if there were more posts that talked about best practices for page types. For instance, what types of content (text, video, pics, etc.) should be used on an "About" page and what type of tone serves best if your a company vs. personal blog. Maybe based on some case studies if possible. I'm a big fan of these "best practices" posts. Keep 'em coming :)
This is a great wbf. Some food for thought for the New Year. Going to take some of your advice and implement this weekend :)
Homepage means everything. If your homepage is built with lack of optimization, it might be a big problem for the search engine to read it right. In addition, it may cause problems on the long-ranged term.
So essentially the home pages can be built for the user, not for SEO stuffing. Quite a concept, which makes it insane that we, collectively, bastardized that notion.
great video.... although it should now be called whitebeard friday! Love it!
Prior to panda and penguin, I was beyond nervous to make even the slightest change to my home page. Now that my site ranking has tanked further than I care to mention, I am willing to try anything. Changing around the main page is a good concept for starting off the new year. Currently, I have the following on the home page:
17 links to internal pages (anyone know if this is too many?)
2 small images (I would like to use larger ones but am concerned about page speed).
G+ and Facebook Buttons
I also have a link to my sites Google+ page and a link for Google Rel Author for G+.
Is it a mistake to have two links to Google (the G+ and Rel Author) on my home page?
This is perfect timing. I am re-designing one of my sites and totally revamping the content of the homepage. Thanks for another great vid!
Great first WBF for 2014! The homepage should focus on the MOST important elements the site focuses on. I like the 5 elements (A-E) with the focus being on a STRONG Call to action!! Thanks Rand
all about them call to actions!
Happy New Year, likewise! Regarding the "keep it above the fold" - a proper responsive design should be able to handle this problem (i.e. showing the most important stuff on top, even on small devices, e.g. through skipping the most graphical elements there are). So still important to me. Depends of course on the audience and their media usage, for B2B in a more "traditional" environment I do hardly see any changes in here.
Hmmm...I like the concepts of having the fold draw the eye and obviously love the call-to-action concept, but I still think that the textual aspect of describing the primary service offering/keyword target homepage section is important. Many of my clients, for example, are local service-oriented businesses. I find it is much easier to rank a home page for the primary keyword target if you have a textual description with an H1 etc.
Do you see the necessity of this type of home page decreasing? I have noticed some pages ranking well for targeted terms (ie. obgyn in xyz city) without any real on-page content. I assume it's likely a connecting (on Google's part) of data and category descriptions with Google plus pages for these types of local businesses.
Thoughts?
Happy new year Rand :)
Great summary of good trends in homepage making. Some really nice ideas. Maybe in next WBF you could tell us how we should create ideal landing pages/subpages ? :)
I agree that testimonials from people who site audience know are great.But testimonials from "nobody" can have opposite effect.Sounds fake.
Also,like visual explanations on sites.Easier to understand,and much faster for processing.If done right.
BTW,you spoke a little faster then usual but still,i have no problem to understand.Would be nice if you keep this speed as "max talking speed".I know there is video transcription,but i prefer to understand the video,if possible.
I really like single page scrolling homepage because it is great for storytelling. If you combine it with resource pages for gaining organic traffic you have a great combo!
Thank you for this, we are in the process of redoing our site, so this is very handy!
This was a great whiteboard. I guess the challenge I've always found is working in large organisations with multiple stakeholders that own different products or content they all want to be on the homepage. The only way around this I've found is to get the most senior stakeholder you can find to buy into a MVT or A/B test to remove content. Then measure overall business revenue (or other KPI) impact.
Has anyone else come across this and do they have strategies for dealing with it?
Here in Germany I don't see so many web sites that have little content on their homepage and that rank well at the same time. The most good ranking sites have more content. But I think you are right by saying that the whole sites (including sub sites) are taking into account. On the other hand I guess it is still important to have a larger homepage (main site / start site).
may be we write more. even if we just want to say something like - Thanks.
But we truly the the Pages with the "SEO Content Section" Gianluca Fiorelli wrote about. We sometimes see "SEO Content Section only" sites here in Berlin.
The backlinks of the most domains are horrible. Keyword only anchor phrases from 90% of all linking domains. Stuff like that is not that unnormal...
I think larger isn't the right word. The content has to be deeper. You can write a lot of nearly spammy SEO keyword rate based text, but that's not what our Job should be about. Point out the difference between me and my competitions. Answer the questions a google user may ask about my topic.
I stop here because I read this: "when your comments start being more than 3 paragraphs... transform it in a post (a YouMoz would be even a better idea)"
Right :D (re: last paragraph)
I didn't ment spammy when I said larger. I ment rather full of interesting content. In my opinion it doesn't have to spread on to many sub sites.
I knew what you thought - I just wanted to make it clear - I guess some MOZ readers could understand that point wrong :)
I also wanted to say, that many webmasters try a bit more content and a large site and it ends in a bit more repeating what is standing there allready.
I think you aggree - I see this specially in here on german sites.
Amazing first WBF of 2014! Rand can we add snippet of blog section on the homepage? I know its old but its very helpful strategy to attract visitors. BTW, nice hair style and shirt. :)
Interesting. After watching the vid I realize I've still got some "old school" tendencies in my blood, but also some "new school" ones as well. Interesting to see the evolution process here.
Back to basics it is in 2014, yet it's still so valuable. I'd encourage everyone go to the Pocket App website as Rand's walking through this video, really helps to see the visual aid and he explains it. The power of visuals! And of course now I'm looking at one of my client sites through this lens and realizing adjustments (major :/) need to be made.
Thanks, Rand! Happy New Year.
My biggest concern is that people will take the notion of eliminating or severely limiting text on a home page as gospel and will not approach the concept on a case by case basis.
Because the home page has the greatest chance of absorbing authority from other pages of the website, it's not unwise to use it to target a broad keyword phrase that you might otherwise have a difficult time ranking for. The accumulated authority from the related pages underneath that home page often help boost it higher in the rankings than it would be able to attain on its own.
If you ARE targeting keyword phrases with a page (in this case, the home page), it's extremely unlikely that the page will ever rank for those words if it does not have text on the page. If you are simply using the page for branding and as a navigation hub, I wholeheartedly agree that text on the page does not matter.
If I am trying to rank a home page for a keyword phrase, I'll put the text below the fold and the images, navigation, call to action above the fold so that the impatient people are tended to first.
Love the idea of targeting only brands on the index page and possibly not even any keywords, Rand. Great WBF topic!
Thinking of testing this with a current dev with several geo targeted pages for the service
Such a good info regarding homepage setup. everyone should follow
Rand, thanks for sharing first great helpful post in new year 2014.
Wishing you a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2014
Rand you've started 2014 with homepage, so we can expect next whiteboard on internal pages optimization. The Importance of homepage is much more than any other page as it drives more traffic and earn more links as you've discussed. I remember a whiteboard post on pogo sticking where you've explained few features to include on the webpage to make it more appealing, so if both post are followed to design the homepage, the final product would be definitely awesome. Anyhow it's time re-evaluate the homepage and make it short & snappy instead of increasing word count, specific to certain theme instead of making it a super store and a great professional look that suits your services, apps or products instead of just giving it a blog look i mean recent 10 posts with short summary as there is currently a misconceptioin that Google like blog based home pages. One more point adding call to action on homepage is not necessary like it is not essential to display the prices and packages on homepage.
i'm stopping at here thanks for the tips for main page. Happy Holiday!!!
Fantastic Starting with a great White Board Research !
Call To action always works - These are featured keys of a target business.
But I have a small doubt for this White board.
This strategy is not applicable ......for Health ? E-Commerce related websites ?
Call to action is really not applicable for all niches.
I hope I can get more clarification about it....
Thanks Rand Fishkin !
Warm Regards
Denish Verma (SEO Consultant) DnAWebSolution)
Presentation is everything and what you do chisel, weld, nail and bolt on to the home page considers first what visually hooks in image, color, media type, spacing and flow to keep them heading deeper into the buffet line. Sliding their empty tray down more and more, along the aluminum tubes with the sneeze guard. Be the guy or gal in the audience peering up at the stage... what works for you, entices, makes your eyes wide and ears perk? Great post, comments are the pot luck tasty, one by one, on this topic. The look, packaging, sadly, is even more important on the lead in then substance, helpful links on that home page these days.
Thanks for bringing up such a perfect first WBF on a very important subject for 2014 when we are once again given a great opportunity to start on re-evaluating how people are really using our websites to solve their problems. We can use these awesome insights as we do our best to step up some more notches this year as we proceed in putting our new plans into action doing everything we can to do things more effectively and more efficiently.
Great tips. I've always tried to keep my home page visual.
Lately I've taken the headline from above the picture and put it below.
Users on my site have no choice but to scroll down, unless they just want to look at the logo and page tabs.
The hint of pictures does draw their scrolling finger into action, however.
At least I like to think it does.
These are not new ideas, but I didn't really understand how to go about changing an old school page. Rand explains everything so succinctly, as soon as he starts talking, new ideas start to pop into my head. I have learnt a great deal from your videos, please keep them coming.
Wonderful thoughts here, Rand!
I definitely agree that having too much text on the homepage drives visitors away. It's a natural, human response to get turned off by reading too much text. It's not a pleasurable sensation -- consciously or subconsciously -- and with the new changes in SEO, there's really no need to continue this practice for rankings.
In fact, the best homepages have no more than 150-200 words on them. The old advertising adage of "Less is More" will work grand for redesigning a homepage.
I think a homepage should be like your living room cosy,warm,your want to stay in it and talk about it and share it with your family and friends;)
The concept of "tablets or smart phones make us to scroll more" is a great way to persuade clients to rethink their PC screen fold thing.
Great food for thought, Rand. I too would like to see examples of good home pages. I do take exception with your thoughts on information below the fold. There is always good uses of very long pages and people will scroll if they are following a thought or list of items that they are interested in. I do not feel that a call to action or the badges that help the reader complete the call to action be placed below the fold.
Sorry I'm (rather shamefully) late to the whole Whiteboard Friday party... but on the up side, i've got a ton of these videos to watch.
As for this video, very useful indeed, as everyone wants everything right at the top of the homepage, so it's good to have more ammo for my defence.
I look forward to next Friday already. Happy New Year!
Wow ... that is a shirt!
Do you have a stylist? Great episode!
Putting too much on homepage is like putting mom in a nursing home....